Day 252 – Overcoming failure
…
The Aesthetics of Inadequacy: Why Samuel Beckett Made Failure His Masterpiece
Most writers spend their lives trying to transcend, outrun, or at least strategically overcome their failures. They polish the rough edges, suppress the dud manuscripts, and curate a trajectory of upward momentum.
Then there is Samuel Beckett.
Where others saw an obstacle to be conquered, the Irish modernist saw a fundamental truth of the human condition. Beckett didn’t just tolerate failure; he elevated it into a formal aesthetic, a philosophical inquiry, and ultimately, a triumphant theme.
If most literature is built on the pursuit of success, resolution, and meaning, Beckett’s work is the magnificent monument built on the ruins of their impossibility. Let’s explore how the master of the absurd turned artistic and existential failure into high art—and what modern creators can learn from his glorious embrace of getting it wrong.
The Paradigm Shift: From Mastery to Incompetence
To understand Beckett’s relationship with failure, you have to look at the tradition of Western letters. For centuries, the implicit contract between writer and reader was one of authority. The author was an architect constructing a tidy, coherent world.
Beckett, deeply scarred by the horrors of the 20th century and disillusioned by grand narratives, realized this contract was a lie. How could an artist pretend to offer neat resolutions in a world shattered by world wars and defined by existential dread?
Instead of faking mastery, Beckett chose incompetence.
In his landmark essay on the painter Bram van Velde, Beckett dropped a meta-commentary on his own artistic ethos, writing: “The expression that there is nothing to express, nothing with which to express, nothing from which to express, no power to express, no desire to express, together with the obligation to express.”
This is the quintessential Beckettian bind: you must speak, even though you have nothing to say; you must try, even though you are bound to fail.
Waiting for Godot: The Art of Getting Nowhere
No work captures this ethos better than Beckett’s 1953 masterpiece, Waiting for Godot. The play’s premise is an act of structural failure: two tramps, Vladimir and Estragon, wait on a desolate road for a man named Godot who never arrives.
- Act I: Nothing happens.
- Act II: Exactly the same nothing happens, repeated.
Traditional drama relies on plot progression, character arcs, and a climax. Godot actively resists all three. It is a play about a failed appointment, a failed communication, and a failed attempt to pass the time.
Yet, by stripping away plot, Beckett achieves something profound. By making failure the very architecture of the play, he frees the audience from the tyranny of expectation. We stop asking, “What happens next?” and instead confront the deeper, heavier question: “What do we do with the time we have left?”
In Godot, failure is not a bug; it’s the operating system.
“Fail Better”: The Ultimate Creative Mantra
Perhaps Beckett’s most famous contribution to the lexicon of failure comes from his 1983 prose piece, Worstward Ho, which contains the oft-quoted, fiercely paradoxically encouraging line:
“Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.”
This is not cynical resignation; it is radical liberation. “Fail better” is a direct challenge to the paralysing perfectionism that plagues modern writers, entrepreneurs, and artists.
Most people view failure as a binary: you either succeed or you fail. Beckett introduces a gradient. He suggests that failure is an infinite regress, but within that regress, there is a craft to be honed. You can learn to articulate your ignorance more precisely. You can learn to map your dead ends with greater eloquence.
When you accept that failure is guaranteed, the stakes lower, and the true creative work can finally begin.
Why Beckett’s Failure Matters Today
In our current cultural moment—obsessed as it is with highlight reels, algorithmic success, and relentless personal branding—Beckett feels more subversive than ever. We live in a world terrified of looking foolish, of being cancelled, or of producing sub-optimal outputs.
Beckett reminds us that:
- Uncertainty is honest: Pretending to have all the answers is a form of artistic dishonesty.
- Incoherence has emotional resonance: Sometimes, the only way to express grief, confusion, or absurdity is through stuttering, repetition, and silence.
- The struggle is the art: The value is not in the finished product that solves all problems, but in the noble, doomed attempt to articulate the inarticulate.
Conclusion: Embracing Your Inner Beckett
You don’t need to write a play about two guys standing by a leafless tree to incorporate Beckett’s philosophy into your life.
Next time you face a blank page, a botched project, or an ambition that has completely derailed, take a page out of Beckett’s playbook. Stop trying to transcend the mess. Lean into it.
Acknowledge that the words won’t be entirely right, the project won’t be a neat masterpiece, and the grand plan might completely dissolve. Then, smile, take a deep breath, and heed the master’s advice:
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
…
