365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 276/277

Day 276/277 – Writing exercise

A story based on three photographic elements

…

Then he checked behind him in case he was being followed. He was not. He ducked under an awning as another gust of wind shook it, avoiding a gush of water that fell like a waterfall, then moved on.

Was it Clara Higgins, an informant and a club singer?  He had interviewed her for a case, and they hit it off.  She worked at the ‘Blue Note’.  Her voice was pure velvet and smoke, a sultry husky drawl that had bought and sold a dozen cops and PI’s before him.

She was leaning against his car six weeks ago, smelling of gin and expensive perfume, whispering about a crime that desperate men were about to commit.

It could be her.  She lived in the shadows, but she usually called him Jackie.  The caller didn’t.

Was it Lydia Vance, now Rawlings, his sister, a woman variously in and out of trouble, with a no-good husband he had offered to sort out?

She had a voice that had grown raspy over time from a heavy bourbon habit she said was the only thing keeping her sane.

Their last conversation was a tense, midnight phone call eight months ago, her voice thick and gravelly as she begged for money to clear a gambling debt.

No, she didn’t have the stomach for whatever dangerous game this was.

He shook his head, and the water dripped from his hat brim.  Another glance up and down the road before turning the next corner.  Three suspects, but they were heading in a different direction.

He turned the corner, the lane narrowing, this time not stopping to look up at the rain.  It was falling harder, and he could hear the sound of the drops hitting the ground.

It was the sort of rain that made a familiar sound.

It bounced off the walls of the lane, as did other sounds, though he could not say where they came from. An arguing voice came from above, distorted by the rain and the surrounding walls.

The theatre alleyway was looming ahead, a dark chasm where anyone or anything could be waiting.  Jack slowed his pace as his heart rate increased, and he could feel the sweat from walking fast in anticipation.

Was it Sarah Kelly, the missing journalist?  She was the nosy type who pushed buttons and limits, but good at her job.  He had been quietly helping her.  Her voice was naturally husky, especially when tired and working a lead.

She was sitting on his office desk just three weeks before, her voice dropping to an intense, quiet rasp as she showed him some evidence and city hall shenanigans.  Two days later she vanished.

The cadence matched perfectly. Was she alive?  Was she trying to get a message to him, or was it a trap?

Could be, but…

Was it May Lin, the ex-detective he had just taken on?  She had a cold, raspy cough for the last week from a flu that she refused to take time off to get better.

Just yesterday, at their early morning meet-up at the diner, her voice was a rough, gravelly whisper, warning him that she heard on the grapevine that Internal Affairs was investigating his old cases when he was a cop.

If it was her, why the disguise?

He stopped just short of the turn into the alley. A sixth sense sent a shiver down his spine. The rain eased. His mind settled on two candidates: a desperate Sarah Kelly trying to surface from the dead, and a compromised May Lin playing a double game.

He turned into the narrow, dark alleyway, the neon lights from the main road reflecting in the pools of water that covered the cobblestones at the entrance.

He cursed, just remembering the cracks in the sole of the left shoe as the water seeped in, cold and uncompromising.

He pulled his hat down low, covering his face in case CCTV cameras had recently been installed. Then he looked up and saw a blinking red light mounted near the entrance.

He scurried past, close to the wall.

He travelled the full length of the alleyway, checking doorways and hiding spots for assailants, his hand on the gun in his pocket, just in case.

It was eerily silent, except for the occasional sound of running water. He saw the telephone booth, now disused and grimy, and walked past it, barely able to make out where any evidence might be, before continuing.

On one side, a single lamp cast a dim glow over the telephone itself, but it was not strong enough to reach the ground.

If he was being observed, it would not do to let them know the telephone booth was his destination.  Not yet.

He slowly returned as the rain eased, as if on cue. Above him, several high windows were lit, casting a pale yellowish light into the night. They did not illuminate the alley.

He was here.  Now.  As there was no evidence, he would wait.  Perhaps the husky-voiced woman would come, thrust an envelope into his hands and then disappear.  Dressed in black, she could easily fade into the gloom.

The only sounds now were his breathing and raindrops hitting metal.  Leaning against the telephone booth, he was right under a steady drip onto his hat, so regular, so mesmerising, he closed his eyes for a moment and tried to massage away the tiredness.

The steady drip onto his hat nearly caused him to miss the beam of light from above. It shone directly on a plain, stained and creased envelope sitting atop the pile of rubbish that had accumulated against the booth.

Just as he leaned down to pick it up, the light snapped off, plunging the area into darkness. The sudden change left him temporarily blind.

“Go to the diner and wait.”

The same husky voice.  He swivelled around, but all he could see was darkness, punctuated by a rim of light from the bulb above, and a sloshing sound.

The woman escaping?

It took two minutes for his sight to return.  He had the envelope, but no clue as to the identity of the woman.

He took his torch out of the other coat pocket and opened the envelope.  It contained a photograph.

It was a photograph of him and Jackson Pike, taken a year ago when Vance was a cop investigating a break-in at City Hall. Pike was alleged to have staged the break-in to obtain evidence of a rigged election. The photograph showed Pike handing Vance an envelope.

Evidence of what? Was Vance part of a cover-up?  There had been evidence, but it was not Vance who was the guilty party.  It had been his partner, Elroy Baggins.  Two weeks before, Elroy had been killed in a shootout.

Baggins had died and had taken the truth with him, leaving Vance to explain the unexplainable: that the dead officer was corrupt.  That maybe he was guilty by association or tarred with the same brush.  It was why he quit.  He had been very close to finding the proof, and then the boss called him into the office and gave him a choice: resign or be destroyed.

In the end, he had no choice.

Now, Vance figured, if they couldn’t get Baggins, they would come after him.

May Lin had tried to warn him, but his money was now on Sarah.  She had somehow got hold of the internal affairs evidence and had got the message to Jack via May.

Another look around the alley showed nothing.  She had gone.

There was nothing for it, except to go to the diner and wait.

…

©  Charles Heath  2026

365 Days of writing, 2026 – Beyond the second novel

The art of the series finale

…

The Art of the Series Finale (Without Actually Ending): How to Resolve Every Story on Its Own Terms

If you’re writing a book series, you’re playing a delicate psychological game with your readers. On one hand, you want to hook them so deeply that they immediately pre-order the next instalment. On the other hand, you have to deliver a satisfying reading experience for the book they just spent hours devouring.

Many aspiring series authors fall into a common trap: they treat an individual book as merely a glorified chapter in a massive, unending epic. They leave major storylines dangling, refuse to give the protagonist a definitive win, and roll the credits on a frustrating cliff-hanger.

The result? Disgruntled readers who feel cheated out of a complete narrative arc.

So, how do you keep the overarching plot of your series chugging along while still giving readers the satisfaction they crave? The secret lies in a golden rule of serialised storytelling: Make sure each story is resolved on its own terms.

Let’s dive into why this matters, the common pitfalls to avoid, and how you can master the balancing act of episodic resolution within a grand series arc.


The Myth of the Endless Middle

Some writers balk at the idea of providing a resolution at the end of each story in their series. “Surely,” they think, “the whole point is to keep the plot going, right?”

Well, yes… and no.

It is true that series fiction relies on momentum. You want readers to turn the final page of Book 1 and immediately race to buy Book 2. However, stretching a single plotline across multiple books without providing intermediate victories is a recipe for reader fatigue.

If you don’t provide some kind of resolution at the end of each novel, your reader will be left feeling frustrated that the story didn’t go anywhere. Without a self-contained narrative victory, the ending will probably come off as abrupt, meandering, and—worst of all—incomplete.

Readers are willing to invest their time in a multi-book journey, but they want milestones along the way. They want to feel like the protagonist’s struggles in this specific book mattered.


The Balancing Act: Resolution vs. Continuation

Of course, you don’t want to resolve everything, either. If you tie up every single loose end, answer every lingering mystery, and defeat the ultimate evil once and for all, you’ve just written a standalone novel—not a series.

You still need to keep elements of your overarching plot going for the next installment. So, what is an author to do?

The key is to resolve a key element of that individual story, without resolving the plot of the whole series.

Think of it like a single season of a great television drama. By the end of the season finale, the immediate threat of that season is dealt with, and the characters catch their breath. But the larger, series-spanning mystery deepens, or a new threat emerges just as the credits roll.

In novel terms, this might look like:

  • The Villain: The antagonist’s specific, localised evil plan for this book is foiled, but the villain manages to escape and live to fight another day.
  • The Protagonist: Your hero achieves a crucial, hard-fought goal—like rescuing a specific mentor or finding a magical artifact—but realises this artifact only points the way to a much larger war.
  • The Romance: The two main characters finally admit their feelings and get together, but now they must face an external kingdom-wide crisis side-by-side.

By wrapping up the micro-plot while keeping the macro-plot alive, you give the reader the best of both worlds: the dopamine hit of a satisfying conclusion, and the irresistible itch of anticipation for what comes next.


The Setup: Why Timing is Everything

You can’t just slap a random resolution onto the end of your book and call it a day. For a resolution to feel earned, it has to be integrated into the DNA of the story from the very beginning.

To pull this off successfully, follow these rules:

  1. Establish the stakes early: Set up the specific element that you’re going to resolve towards the beginning of your story.
  2. Keep it central: Ensure this objective remains a central issue throughout the narrative.
  3. Avoid last-minute reveals: It won’t feel like a true resolution if the thing you’re resolving only comes into focus in the final three chapters, or if it never really seemed all that important to begin with.

When a reader looks back at the journey, they should see a clear trajectory: Problem introduced, obstacles faced, struggle ensued, problem solved (with new complications on the horizon).


Final Thoughts: Satisfy Today, Hook Tomorrow

Writing a series is an exercise in pacing and promises. Your primary promise to the reader is that if they invest their time in your book, they will get a complete, emotionally resonant experience.

By making sure each story is resolved on its own terms, you honor that promise. You leave your readers feeling triumphant, deeply connected to your characters, and emotionally satisfied—which makes them more than eager to follow you into the very next adventure.

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – Beyond the second novel

The art of the series finale

…

The Art of the Series Finale (Without Actually Ending): How to Resolve Every Story on Its Own Terms

If you’re writing a book series, you’re playing a delicate psychological game with your readers. On one hand, you want to hook them so deeply that they immediately pre-order the next instalment. On the other hand, you have to deliver a satisfying reading experience for the book they just spent hours devouring.

Many aspiring series authors fall into a common trap: they treat an individual book as merely a glorified chapter in a massive, unending epic. They leave major storylines dangling, refuse to give the protagonist a definitive win, and roll the credits on a frustrating cliff-hanger.

The result? Disgruntled readers who feel cheated out of a complete narrative arc.

So, how do you keep the overarching plot of your series chugging along while still giving readers the satisfaction they crave? The secret lies in a golden rule of serialised storytelling: Make sure each story is resolved on its own terms.

Let’s dive into why this matters, the common pitfalls to avoid, and how you can master the balancing act of episodic resolution within a grand series arc.


The Myth of the Endless Middle

Some writers balk at the idea of providing a resolution at the end of each story in their series. “Surely,” they think, “the whole point is to keep the plot going, right?”

Well, yes… and no.

It is true that series fiction relies on momentum. You want readers to turn the final page of Book 1 and immediately race to buy Book 2. However, stretching a single plotline across multiple books without providing intermediate victories is a recipe for reader fatigue.

If you don’t provide some kind of resolution at the end of each novel, your reader will be left feeling frustrated that the story didn’t go anywhere. Without a self-contained narrative victory, the ending will probably come off as abrupt, meandering, and—worst of all—incomplete.

Readers are willing to invest their time in a multi-book journey, but they want milestones along the way. They want to feel like the protagonist’s struggles in this specific book mattered.


The Balancing Act: Resolution vs. Continuation

Of course, you don’t want to resolve everything, either. If you tie up every single loose end, answer every lingering mystery, and defeat the ultimate evil once and for all, you’ve just written a standalone novel—not a series.

You still need to keep elements of your overarching plot going for the next installment. So, what is an author to do?

The key is to resolve a key element of that individual story, without resolving the plot of the whole series.

Think of it like a single season of a great television drama. By the end of the season finale, the immediate threat of that season is dealt with, and the characters catch their breath. But the larger, series-spanning mystery deepens, or a new threat emerges just as the credits roll.

In novel terms, this might look like:

  • The Villain: The antagonist’s specific, localised evil plan for this book is foiled, but the villain manages to escape and live to fight another day.
  • The Protagonist: Your hero achieves a crucial, hard-fought goal—like rescuing a specific mentor or finding a magical artifact—but realises this artifact only points the way to a much larger war.
  • The Romance: The two main characters finally admit their feelings and get together, but now they must face an external kingdom-wide crisis side-by-side.

By wrapping up the micro-plot while keeping the macro-plot alive, you give the reader the best of both worlds: the dopamine hit of a satisfying conclusion, and the irresistible itch of anticipation for what comes next.


The Setup: Why Timing is Everything

You can’t just slap a random resolution onto the end of your book and call it a day. For a resolution to feel earned, it has to be integrated into the DNA of the story from the very beginning.

To pull this off successfully, follow these rules:

  1. Establish the stakes early: Set up the specific element that you’re going to resolve towards the beginning of your story.
  2. Keep it central: Ensure this objective remains a central issue throughout the narrative.
  3. Avoid last-minute reveals: It won’t feel like a true resolution if the thing you’re resolving only comes into focus in the final three chapters, or if it never really seemed all that important to begin with.

When a reader looks back at the journey, they should see a clear trajectory: Problem introduced, obstacles faced, struggle ensued, problem solved (with new complications on the horizon).


Final Thoughts: Satisfy Today, Hook Tomorrow

Writing a series is an exercise in pacing and promises. Your primary promise to the reader is that if they invest their time in your book, they will get a complete, emotionally resonant experience.

By making sure each story is resolved on its own terms, you honor that promise. You leave your readers feeling triumphant, deeply connected to your characters, and emotionally satisfied—which makes them more than eager to follow you into the very next adventure.

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 275

Day 275 – To win or not to win literary contests

…

Get to the Point, Make ‘Em Laugh, and Ignore Fay Weldon (A Little Bit)

Let’s rip the bandage off right away: The most boring book wins literary contests.

That gem of a quote comes from the fiercely witty British novelist Fay Weldon. And honestly? She wasn’t wrong. Think about the last time you read a critically acclaimed, prize-winning heavyweight novel. Did it feel like a brisk jog through a comedy club, or did it feel like trudging through an intellectual swamp of heavy metaphors, agonizing grief, and sentences that stretch across three paragraphs?

Exactly.

We live in a culture obsessed with efficiency. Get to the point! Cut the fluff! Give me the TL;DR! But writing—especially the kind of writing you actually want to read and write—often rebels against this sterile efficiency.

So, what is the ultimate writing philosophy? Should we cut straight to the chase and inject a healthy dose of humor, or should we embrace the sprawling, solemn boredom that wins awards? Let’s dive in.


The Cult of “Get to the Point” (And Why Humor is Our Savior)

In the digital age, attention spans are shorter than a TikTok loop. If your opening paragraph doesn’t hook the reader, introduce a conflict, and promise emotional payoff, they’re gone. Click. Back to Instagram.

Because of this, modern copywriters, bloggers, and even fiction writers are told to get to the point. Brevity is king.

  • The Problem: Being purely concise is dangerously close to being boring. A user manual is concise. A tax form gets straight to the point. Nobody stays up until 3:00 AM crying over the IRS instructions.
  • The Solution: Humour.

Humour is the spoonful of sugar that helps the conciseness go down. It’s the human element. When you get to the point while making the reader snort coffee out of their nose, you’ve won. You’ve respected their time (by not rambling) while entertaining their soul (by being funny).

If Fay Weldon says boring books win prizes, humour is the rebellion against the prize committee. It says: I want people to actually enjoy this.


Why Fay Weldon Was Right About “Boring” Books

Let’s not throw Fay under the bus just yet. She knew the literary establishment’s inner workings better than most.

Literary prizes—think of the Booker, the Pulitzer, or heavy-hitting academic nods—often reward gravitas. A book about a happy couple who communicate well, pay their mortgage on time, and occasionally go to brunch does not win awards. Why? Because it lacks suffering and significance.

To win a literary contest, a book usually needs:

  1. Misery: Preferably historical, existential, or deeply psychological.
  2. Slow pacing: Often disguised as “rich atmospheric development.”
  3. Sentences that require a semicolon and a master’s degree to decode.

Weldon’s warning is a liberation for everyday writers. She is essentially telling us: Stop writing for the judges in ivory towers. Write for the human beings on the subway.

If your book is so thrilling, funny, and fast-paced that it disqualifies you from winning a dusty trophy in a wood-paneled room in London or New York… take it as a compliment.


Can You Have It All? (Point + Humor + Depth)

Is it a zero-sum game? Must we choose between being a humor-filled, punchy writer who people actually read, and a solemn literary genius who wins medals that nobody checks out at the library?

Not necessarily. The sweet spot of modern writing lies in the intersection of clarity, wit, and depth.

You can get to the point quickly, keep the reader laughing, and still deliver a profound emotional punch. Think of authors like David Sedaris, Nora Ephron, or Kurt Vonnegut. They didn’t write boring, prize-winning snoozefests. They wrote punchy, hilarious, deeply moving works that outlived the prize committees anyway.

How to Apply This to Your Writing:

  1. Respect the reader’s time: Get to the point. Don’t spend three pages describing a tree unless that tree is plotting a murder.
  2. Disarm with wit: Use humour as a vehicle for truth. If you have a heavy point to make, a joke is the best shock absorber.
  3. Ignore the gatekeepers: If you write something genuinely entertaining, fast-paced, and funny, the literary establishment might sniff at it. Let them. You’ll be too busy having an audience to notice.

The Verdict

So, what is the best thing to do?

Fay Weldon gave us great advice: don’t write the boring book just to impress the critics. But we also don’t need to live in a world of purely rushed, hyper-efficient bullet points, either.

The best thing to do is write the book you would want to read. Get to the point, make ’em laugh, and leave the boring, prize-winning misery to the people who enjoy sitting in silence.


What’s your take? Do you prefer a laugh-out-loud page-turner, or do you secretly love a 600-page historical epic about melancholy? Let us know in the comments below!

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 275

Day 275 – To win or not to win literary contests

…

Get to the Point, Make ‘Em Laugh, and Ignore Fay Weldon (A Little Bit)

Let’s rip the bandage off right away: The most boring book wins literary contests.

That gem of a quote comes from the fiercely witty British novelist Fay Weldon. And honestly? She wasn’t wrong. Think about the last time you read a critically acclaimed, prize-winning heavyweight novel. Did it feel like a brisk jog through a comedy club, or did it feel like trudging through an intellectual swamp of heavy metaphors, agonizing grief, and sentences that stretch across three paragraphs?

Exactly.

We live in a culture obsessed with efficiency. Get to the point! Cut the fluff! Give me the TL;DR! But writing—especially the kind of writing you actually want to read and write—often rebels against this sterile efficiency.

So, what is the ultimate writing philosophy? Should we cut straight to the chase and inject a healthy dose of humor, or should we embrace the sprawling, solemn boredom that wins awards? Let’s dive in.


The Cult of “Get to the Point” (And Why Humor is Our Savior)

In the digital age, attention spans are shorter than a TikTok loop. If your opening paragraph doesn’t hook the reader, introduce a conflict, and promise emotional payoff, they’re gone. Click. Back to Instagram.

Because of this, modern copywriters, bloggers, and even fiction writers are told to get to the point. Brevity is king.

  • The Problem: Being purely concise is dangerously close to being boring. A user manual is concise. A tax form gets straight to the point. Nobody stays up until 3:00 AM crying over the IRS instructions.
  • The Solution: Humour.

Humour is the spoonful of sugar that helps the conciseness go down. It’s the human element. When you get to the point while making the reader snort coffee out of their nose, you’ve won. You’ve respected their time (by not rambling) while entertaining their soul (by being funny).

If Fay Weldon says boring books win prizes, humour is the rebellion against the prize committee. It says: I want people to actually enjoy this.


Why Fay Weldon Was Right About “Boring” Books

Let’s not throw Fay under the bus just yet. She knew the literary establishment’s inner workings better than most.

Literary prizes—think of the Booker, the Pulitzer, or heavy-hitting academic nods—often reward gravitas. A book about a happy couple who communicate well, pay their mortgage on time, and occasionally go to brunch does not win awards. Why? Because it lacks suffering and significance.

To win a literary contest, a book usually needs:

  1. Misery: Preferably historical, existential, or deeply psychological.
  2. Slow pacing: Often disguised as “rich atmospheric development.”
  3. Sentences that require a semicolon and a master’s degree to decode.

Weldon’s warning is a liberation for everyday writers. She is essentially telling us: Stop writing for the judges in ivory towers. Write for the human beings on the subway.

If your book is so thrilling, funny, and fast-paced that it disqualifies you from winning a dusty trophy in a wood-paneled room in London or New York… take it as a compliment.


Can You Have It All? (Point + Humor + Depth)

Is it a zero-sum game? Must we choose between being a humor-filled, punchy writer who people actually read, and a solemn literary genius who wins medals that nobody checks out at the library?

Not necessarily. The sweet spot of modern writing lies in the intersection of clarity, wit, and depth.

You can get to the point quickly, keep the reader laughing, and still deliver a profound emotional punch. Think of authors like David Sedaris, Nora Ephron, or Kurt Vonnegut. They didn’t write boring, prize-winning snoozefests. They wrote punchy, hilarious, deeply moving works that outlived the prize committees anyway.

How to Apply This to Your Writing:

  1. Respect the reader’s time: Get to the point. Don’t spend three pages describing a tree unless that tree is plotting a murder.
  2. Disarm with wit: Use humour as a vehicle for truth. If you have a heavy point to make, a joke is the best shock absorber.
  3. Ignore the gatekeepers: If you write something genuinely entertaining, fast-paced, and funny, the literary establishment might sniff at it. Let them. You’ll be too busy having an audience to notice.

The Verdict

So, what is the best thing to do?

Fay Weldon gave us great advice: don’t write the boring book just to impress the critics. But we also don’t need to live in a world of purely rushed, hyper-efficient bullet points, either.

The best thing to do is write the book you would want to read. Get to the point, make ’em laugh, and leave the boring, prize-winning misery to the people who enjoy sitting in silence.


What’s your take? Do you prefer a laugh-out-loud page-turner, or do you secretly love a 600-page historical epic about melancholy? Let us know in the comments below!

…

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 274

Day 274 – A story will evolve

…

“Nothing Turns Out Quite in the Way You First Thought It Would”: Unraveling Agatha Christie’s Masterclass in Misdirection

“Nothing turns out quite in the way you first thought it would.”

If there is a single sentence that encapsulates the entire literary legacy of Agatha Christie, the Queen of Mystery, this is it. While not penned as a plot synopsis, this sentiment serves as the heartbeat of every locked-room murder, every gathering of wealthy suspects in a snowbound mansion, and every ticking-clock international conspiracy she ever crafted.

Christie didn’t just write whodunits; she wrote masterclasses in human expectation. She understood that the human brain loves patterns, leaps to conclusions, and is easily blinded by its own biases.

In this post, we’re going to explore why this philosophy defines Christie’s enduring genius, how she used it to trick generations of readers, and what this truth about life and storytelling can teach us beyond the final chapter.


The Anatomy of a Christie Twist: Playing with Perceptions

Why do we fall for Agatha Christie’s tricks time and time again? Because she understood the difference between seeing and observing—a distinction famously highlighted by her most brilliant creation, Hercule Poirot.

When we pick up a mystery novel, we enter a silent contract with the author. We want to solve the puzzle. We gather the clues, analyse the alibis, and try to outsmart the detective. But Christie’s brilliance lies in subverting the very tools we use to solve her puzzles.

1. The Obvious Suspect vs. The Unseen Observer

In classics like The Murder of Roger Ackroyd or And Then There Were None, Christie sets up an expectation. She presents a clear suspect or a traditional formula, luring us into a false sense of security. We think we know the rules of the game.

Then, she pulls the rug out from under us. The narrator is the killer. The person we thought was dead is actually running the show. The least likely person—often the unassuming governess, the quiet doctor, or the bumbling sidekick—turns out to be the mastermind.

2. Psychological Misdirection

Christie rarely relied on cheap tricks or hidden clues revealed only on the final page. Instead, she used psychological misdirection. She played on our societal prejudices and assumptions:

  • We assume the butler didn’t do it because that’s a cliché. (Until Christie makes the butler do it—or makes us suspect him so thoroughly that we miss the real culprit).
  • We dismiss the elderly spinster or the eccentric foreign detective as harmless.
  • We assume people act out of rational, linear motives (greed, jealousy), when in reality, human emotion is messy, contradictory, and entirely unpredictable.

By the time the truth is revealed in the drawing-room denouement, we are left staring at the page, muttering, “Of course! It was right there the whole time!”


Life Imitates Art: Why Nothing Ever Goes to Plan

Beyond the realm of fiction, Christie’s words—“Nothing turns out quite in the way you first thought it would”—resonate deeply with the human experience.

How often do we map out our lives with the precision of a Poirot timeline, only for reality to hand us a completely different script?

  • Career paths twist and turn into unexpected industries.
  • Relationships evolve in ways we never anticipated during the first flush of romance.
  • Challenges we dread turn out to be catalysts for our greatest growth, while moments we expected to bring pure joy sometimes carry unforeseen complexities.

We live in a constant state of plotting. We form hypotheses about our careers, our friends, and our futures. And yet, life is the ultimate mystery writer. It loves a good plot twist.

Rather than viewing this unpredictability with fear, Christie’s work invites us to embrace it. The thrill of a mystery isn’t knowing the ending from page one; it’s the journey of discovering that the truth is far more intricate, surprising, and fascinating than we ever could have imagined.


Lessons from the Queen of Crime

What can we take away from Agatha Christie’s philosophy of unexpected outcomes? Here are three ways to apply the Queen of Crime’s wisdom to daily life:

  1. Question Your Assumptions: When faced with a problem, pause. Are you reacting to the facts, or are you reacting to your preconceived notions about how things should be?
  2. Expect the Unexpected: Rigidity leads to frustration. When life deviates from your master plan, treat it not as a disaster, but as an intriguing plot twist.
  3. Look for the Unseen Clues: Sometimes, the most important details in our lives are the ones we dismiss as insignificant. Pay attention to the quiet moments, the subtle shifts, and the perspectives you usually overlook.

The Enduring Magic of the Unexpected

Agatha Christie remains the best-selling fiction writer of all time for a reason. She tapped into a universal truth: we are endlessly fascinated by the gap between what we expect and what actually happens.

Whether she was writing about cyanide in a teacup or the winding, unpredictable nature of human fate, Christie reminded us that certainty is an illusion. The real magic happens in the twists, the turns, and the stunning realisations that change everything we thought we knew.

So, the next time life doesn’t turn out quite the way you thought it would, channel your inner Hercule Poirot. Adjust your lapel, embrace the complexity of the puzzle, and get ready for a brilliant twist.


What is the biggest plot twist life has handed you so far? Did it turn out better—or stranger—than you first thought? Let’s discuss in the comments below!

…

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 274

Day 274 – A story will evolve

…

“Nothing Turns Out Quite in the Way You First Thought It Would”: Unraveling Agatha Christie’s Masterclass in Misdirection

“Nothing turns out quite in the way you first thought it would.”

If there is a single sentence that encapsulates the entire literary legacy of Agatha Christie, the Queen of Mystery, this is it. While not penned as a plot synopsis, this sentiment serves as the heartbeat of every locked-room murder, every gathering of wealthy suspects in a snowbound mansion, and every ticking-clock international conspiracy she ever crafted.

Christie didn’t just write whodunits; she wrote masterclasses in human expectation. She understood that the human brain loves patterns, leaps to conclusions, and is easily blinded by its own biases.

In this post, we’re going to explore why this philosophy defines Christie’s enduring genius, how she used it to trick generations of readers, and what this truth about life and storytelling can teach us beyond the final chapter.


The Anatomy of a Christie Twist: Playing with Perceptions

Why do we fall for Agatha Christie’s tricks time and time again? Because she understood the difference between seeing and observing—a distinction famously highlighted by her most brilliant creation, Hercule Poirot.

When we pick up a mystery novel, we enter a silent contract with the author. We want to solve the puzzle. We gather the clues, analyse the alibis, and try to outsmart the detective. But Christie’s brilliance lies in subverting the very tools we use to solve her puzzles.

1. The Obvious Suspect vs. The Unseen Observer

In classics like The Murder of Roger Ackroyd or And Then There Were None, Christie sets up an expectation. She presents a clear suspect or a traditional formula, luring us into a false sense of security. We think we know the rules of the game.

Then, she pulls the rug out from under us. The narrator is the killer. The person we thought was dead is actually running the show. The least likely person—often the unassuming governess, the quiet doctor, or the bumbling sidekick—turns out to be the mastermind.

2. Psychological Misdirection

Christie rarely relied on cheap tricks or hidden clues revealed only on the final page. Instead, she used psychological misdirection. She played on our societal prejudices and assumptions:

  • We assume the butler didn’t do it because that’s a cliché. (Until Christie makes the butler do it—or makes us suspect him so thoroughly that we miss the real culprit).
  • We dismiss the elderly spinster or the eccentric foreign detective as harmless.
  • We assume people act out of rational, linear motives (greed, jealousy), when in reality, human emotion is messy, contradictory, and entirely unpredictable.

By the time the truth is revealed in the drawing-room denouement, we are left staring at the page, muttering, “Of course! It was right there the whole time!”


Life Imitates Art: Why Nothing Ever Goes to Plan

Beyond the realm of fiction, Christie’s words—“Nothing turns out quite in the way you first thought it would”—resonate deeply with the human experience.

How often do we map out our lives with the precision of a Poirot timeline, only for reality to hand us a completely different script?

  • Career paths twist and turn into unexpected industries.
  • Relationships evolve in ways we never anticipated during the first flush of romance.
  • Challenges we dread turn out to be catalysts for our greatest growth, while moments we expected to bring pure joy sometimes carry unforeseen complexities.

We live in a constant state of plotting. We form hypotheses about our careers, our friends, and our futures. And yet, life is the ultimate mystery writer. It loves a good plot twist.

Rather than viewing this unpredictability with fear, Christie’s work invites us to embrace it. The thrill of a mystery isn’t knowing the ending from page one; it’s the journey of discovering that the truth is far more intricate, surprising, and fascinating than we ever could have imagined.


Lessons from the Queen of Crime

What can we take away from Agatha Christie’s philosophy of unexpected outcomes? Here are three ways to apply the Queen of Crime’s wisdom to daily life:

  1. Question Your Assumptions: When faced with a problem, pause. Are you reacting to the facts, or are you reacting to your preconceived notions about how things should be?
  2. Expect the Unexpected: Rigidity leads to frustration. When life deviates from your master plan, treat it not as a disaster, but as an intriguing plot twist.
  3. Look for the Unseen Clues: Sometimes, the most important details in our lives are the ones we dismiss as insignificant. Pay attention to the quiet moments, the subtle shifts, and the perspectives you usually overlook.

The Enduring Magic of the Unexpected

Agatha Christie remains the best-selling fiction writer of all time for a reason. She tapped into a universal truth: we are endlessly fascinated by the gap between what we expect and what actually happens.

Whether she was writing about cyanide in a teacup or the winding, unpredictable nature of human fate, Christie reminded us that certainty is an illusion. The real magic happens in the twists, the turns, and the stunning realisations that change everything we thought we knew.

So, the next time life doesn’t turn out quite the way you thought it would, channel your inner Hercule Poirot. Adjust your lapel, embrace the complexity of the puzzle, and get ready for a brilliant twist.


What is the biggest plot twist life has handed you so far? Did it turn out better—or stranger—than you first thought? Let’s discuss in the comments below!

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 273

Day 273 – Empathetic writing

…

The Empathy Engine: How Writers Make You Fall in Love with People Who Don’t Exist

Have you ever sobbed uncontrollably over the death of a fictional character? Or felt your heart race as a made-up detective navigated a dark alley? Or closed a book and felt a lingering, hollow ache, as if you’d just said goodbye to a real, lifelong friend?

It’s a peculiar magic, when you think about it. You are sitting on a couch, staring at dead trees covered in squiggly black ink, yet your nervous system responds as though you are experiencing a real-world event. You are feeling profound grief, joy, terror, and love for people who have never drawn a breath.

How do writers pull off this psychological sleight of hand? How do they make us see, hear, and—most importantly—feel for strangers who live only on the page?

Let’s pull back the curtain on the writer’s craft and explore the anatomy of literary empathy.


1. The Visual Illusion: Painting with Specificity, Not Adjectives

A common misconception among beginner writers is that to make readers see a character, they need to describe every physical detail: eye colour, height, clothing brand, hair texture. But human brains don’t process people by cataloguing inventory. We process people through impression, movement, and telling details.

Master writers know that specificity breeds reality.

Instead of writing: “She was an old, tired woman who wore a faded blue coat,” a skilled writer might write: “Aunt Mae wore her winter coat into June, the hem frayed where she’d stepped on it a hundred times, smelling faintly of mothballs and spearmint.”

Suddenly, you don’t just see the coat; you feel the weight of it, you smell it, you understand Aunt Mae’s stubbornness and her isolation.

Writers also master the art of visceral action. They show characters interacting with their environment in ways that reveal personality. A nervous character doesn’t just “feel anxious”—they pick at the cuticle of their thumb until it bleeds, or they repeatedly check the lock on the door. By anchoring the character in physical space through sensory details (sight, sound, texture, smell), the writer tricks our brains into treating the character as a physical presence in the room with us.


2. The Sound of Truth: Capturing the Inner and Outer Voice

To make a reader hear a character, a writer must master dialogue and internal monologue.

Human speech is messy. We interrupt each other, trail off, use subtext, and lie. If a writer makes dialogue too grammatically correct and polished, it sounds like a robot reading a script. But when a writer captures the rhythm, cadence, and vernacular of a real voice—complete with hesitations, regional slang, and unspoken tensions—the character springs to life.

Consider the difference between:

  • “I am very angry that you forgot our anniversary,” said John.
  • “Right. Well. The restaurant takes reservations until eight, I suppose,” John said, staring intently at his thumbnail.

Which one do you hear? Which one makes you lean in?

Furthermore, writers invite us into the inner sanctum of the character’s mind. Through interiority—the thoughts, doubts, and rationalisations that bounce around inside a person’s head—we hear their private voice. When a character admits a shameful secret to the reader that they would never dare tell anyone in the story, an intimate bond of trust is formed. You are now accomplices.


3. The Empathy Engine: Universal Vulnerability

Seeing and hearing a character are just the entry points. The real magic trick is making the reader feel for them. How does a writer cross the chasm from “this is an interesting person” to “I care about what happens to them as if they were my own child”?

The secret is vulnerability and flaws.

Perfection is repellent. If a character is impossibly brave, flawlessly beautiful, remarkably intelligent, and always does the right thing, we might admire them, but we won’t feel for them. We admire statues; we empathise with humans.

Writers make us care by giving their characters:

  • Contradictory desires: They want to be loved, but they push people away.
  • A secret shame: A memory or a fear they try desperately to hide from the world.
  • Unmet needs: A deep, aching void—whether it’s a missing parent, a lost love, or a lack of self-worth—that drives their every action.

When we see a character trying desperately to maintain their dignity while the universe relentlessly kicks them down, our mirror neurons fire. We recognize our own insecurities, our own heartbreaks, and our own frailties in that fictional creation. We don’t feel pity for them; we feel camaraderie.


4. The Power of Empathy Engineering (The Writer’s Toolkit)

Underneath the artistry, writers use specific psychological levers to guide our emotions:

  • The “Save the Cat” Moment: Popularised by screenwriter Blake Snyder, this is a moment early in a story where a character does something inherently kind or endearing (like saving a stray cat), instantly earning the reader’s affection.
  • Stakes and Consequences: We care about characters in proportion to what they stand to lose. A character losing a dollar bill doesn’t move us; a character losing custody of their child, or losing their last chance at redemption, grips our soul.
  • Empathy by Association: How other characters treat someone influences how we feel about them. If a universally despised tyrant is kind to a stray dog, our perception of the tyrant shifts. We look for the humanity underneath.

Why We Need the Illusion

Why do we willingly subject ourselves to the emotional rollercoaster of reading about fictional pain and triumph?

Because in our daily lives, we are trapped behind the glass wall of our own skull. We can never truly know what it feels like to be someone else. We are limited to one perspective, one life, one set of experiences.

Great writers are the bridge builders across that isolation. They take us by the hand and lead us into the minds of murderers, saints, monarchs, paupers, heroes, and cowards. They stretch our capacity for compassion until it breaks open.

When a writer makes you weep for a person who has never existed, they aren’t just telling a story—they are expanding your humanity. They are proving that empathy knows no boundaries, and that even in the quietest, loneliest corners of your imagination, you are never truly alone.

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 273

Day 273 – Empathetic writing

…

The Empathy Engine: How Writers Make You Fall in Love with People Who Don’t Exist

Have you ever sobbed uncontrollably over the death of a fictional character? Or felt your heart race as a made-up detective navigated a dark alley? Or closed a book and felt a lingering, hollow ache, as if you’d just said goodbye to a real, lifelong friend?

It’s a peculiar magic, when you think about it. You are sitting on a couch, staring at dead trees covered in squiggly black ink, yet your nervous system responds as though you are experiencing a real-world event. You are feeling profound grief, joy, terror, and love for people who have never drawn a breath.

How do writers pull off this psychological sleight of hand? How do they make us see, hear, and—most importantly—feel for strangers who live only on the page?

Let’s pull back the curtain on the writer’s craft and explore the anatomy of literary empathy.


1. The Visual Illusion: Painting with Specificity, Not Adjectives

A common misconception among beginner writers is that to make readers see a character, they need to describe every physical detail: eye colour, height, clothing brand, hair texture. But human brains don’t process people by cataloguing inventory. We process people through impression, movement, and telling details.

Master writers know that specificity breeds reality.

Instead of writing: “She was an old, tired woman who wore a faded blue coat,” a skilled writer might write: “Aunt Mae wore her winter coat into June, the hem frayed where she’d stepped on it a hundred times, smelling faintly of mothballs and spearmint.”

Suddenly, you don’t just see the coat; you feel the weight of it, you smell it, you understand Aunt Mae’s stubbornness and her isolation.

Writers also master the art of visceral action. They show characters interacting with their environment in ways that reveal personality. A nervous character doesn’t just “feel anxious”—they pick at the cuticle of their thumb until it bleeds, or they repeatedly check the lock on the door. By anchoring the character in physical space through sensory details (sight, sound, texture, smell), the writer tricks our brains into treating the character as a physical presence in the room with us.


2. The Sound of Truth: Capturing the Inner and Outer Voice

To make a reader hear a character, a writer must master dialogue and internal monologue.

Human speech is messy. We interrupt each other, trail off, use subtext, and lie. If a writer makes dialogue too grammatically correct and polished, it sounds like a robot reading a script. But when a writer captures the rhythm, cadence, and vernacular of a real voice—complete with hesitations, regional slang, and unspoken tensions—the character springs to life.

Consider the difference between:

  • “I am very angry that you forgot our anniversary,” said John.
  • “Right. Well. The restaurant takes reservations until eight, I suppose,” John said, staring intently at his thumbnail.

Which one do you hear? Which one makes you lean in?

Furthermore, writers invite us into the inner sanctum of the character’s mind. Through interiority—the thoughts, doubts, and rationalisations that bounce around inside a person’s head—we hear their private voice. When a character admits a shameful secret to the reader that they would never dare tell anyone in the story, an intimate bond of trust is formed. You are now accomplices.


3. The Empathy Engine: Universal Vulnerability

Seeing and hearing a character are just the entry points. The real magic trick is making the reader feel for them. How does a writer cross the chasm from “this is an interesting person” to “I care about what happens to them as if they were my own child”?

The secret is vulnerability and flaws.

Perfection is repellent. If a character is impossibly brave, flawlessly beautiful, remarkably intelligent, and always does the right thing, we might admire them, but we won’t feel for them. We admire statues; we empathise with humans.

Writers make us care by giving their characters:

  • Contradictory desires: They want to be loved, but they push people away.
  • A secret shame: A memory or a fear they try desperately to hide from the world.
  • Unmet needs: A deep, aching void—whether it’s a missing parent, a lost love, or a lack of self-worth—that drives their every action.

When we see a character trying desperately to maintain their dignity while the universe relentlessly kicks them down, our mirror neurons fire. We recognize our own insecurities, our own heartbreaks, and our own frailties in that fictional creation. We don’t feel pity for them; we feel camaraderie.


4. The Power of Empathy Engineering (The Writer’s Toolkit)

Underneath the artistry, writers use specific psychological levers to guide our emotions:

  • The “Save the Cat” Moment: Popularised by screenwriter Blake Snyder, this is a moment early in a story where a character does something inherently kind or endearing (like saving a stray cat), instantly earning the reader’s affection.
  • Stakes and Consequences: We care about characters in proportion to what they stand to lose. A character losing a dollar bill doesn’t move us; a character losing custody of their child, or losing their last chance at redemption, grips our soul.
  • Empathy by Association: How other characters treat someone influences how we feel about them. If a universally despised tyrant is kind to a stray dog, our perception of the tyrant shifts. We look for the humanity underneath.

Why We Need the Illusion

Why do we willingly subject ourselves to the emotional rollercoaster of reading about fictional pain and triumph?

Because in our daily lives, we are trapped behind the glass wall of our own skull. We can never truly know what it feels like to be someone else. We are limited to one perspective, one life, one set of experiences.

Great writers are the bridge builders across that isolation. They take us by the hand and lead us into the minds of murderers, saints, monarchs, paupers, heroes, and cowards. They stretch our capacity for compassion until it breaks open.

When a writer makes you weep for a person who has never existed, they aren’t just telling a story—they are expanding your humanity. They are proving that empathy knows no boundaries, and that even in the quietest, loneliest corners of your imagination, you are never truly alone.

…

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 272

Day 272 – Writing Exercise

…

The one thing they tell you about writing is to not be put off by criticism.

In fact the one basic tenet I try to get across as the most important, if you want to be a writer, is to take criticism as the best form of encouragement.

The second, you are writing for yourself, not for the masses out there, because there are writers who churn out pulp fiction.  You may do that one day, but first be the best writer you can.

Then once you’ve finished that first draft, you can send it out to a respected and qualified group of beta readers, but be prepared to get constructive criticism.

It was a pity I didn’t take my own advice.

I always wanted to be a writer. I spent most of my spare time scribbling on notepads, buying a typewriter and turning scribbles into typed pages.

I was always going to finish it.

Then I met a girl, Samantha Biggins, and I took a sojourn.  With marriage and work and juggling everything else, writing took a step back.

Until we decided to get a bigger house.

While getting ready for the move, I found all of my work packed into a half dozen boxes.  Marked “Toss” in Samantha’s scrawl.

I’d told her once that I wanted to be a writer, and she told me to be practical.  Unless I became a best-selling author, there was no money in it.

She was right, but I was not tossing it.

When she asked why I was keeping it, I asked her to read what I’d written; she did, and then simply told me not to give up my day job.

Five more years of being abjectly unhappy, I found out she was having an affair with my best friend.  He is no longer my best friend; she is no longer my wife; there were no children; she refused to become a mother, and it all ended on a sour note.

I quit my job, moved, changed my name, and became an associate professor teaching students to write. 

It was the best of both worlds, teaching writing, and writing that first novel.

…

It was a new intake for my class, twenty-three souls who thought they wanted to become writers.  On average, only fifteen would survive, and perhaps one or two would continue after the classes ended.

Day one, they were full of enthusiasm, or at least most of them were.

When I told them their first assignment was to write a ten-thousand-word story over the next four weeks, applying what they learned, that enthusiasm waned.

This was not the class to use as a break between the hard stuff.  The next class dropped to twenty.

After two weeks, the student with the mt enthusiasm, Charlene, stopped on her way out the door and asked, “Are you a writer?”

Of all of them, she was the most promising, but that might be because she was a mature-age student, finally doing the university degree she would have if she had not got pregnant before graduating high school.

She was a little too forthcoming in her introduction of herself.

I wondered where this was leading.  “Yes.”

“Published?”

“No.  Still working on that first blockbuster.”

“When did you start writing?”

“About 13 or 14 years old.”

“In all that time…”

This was not going to be a time when I defended myself.

“Sometimes life gets in the way, and your priorities change.  I took a ten-year sabbatical, if you could call it that.  It happens.  Sometimes the idea of becoming a published author has to be put aside because food and rent don’t appear out of thin air.”

“Wouldn’t you just find a job that allows you to do both?”

“That’s the final lesson.  It took me ten years to figure that one out.”

“So you didn’t go to university and have to survive while studying?”

“My university studies were paid for.  The struggle came afterwards.”

She shrugged.  “We all get there, I guess, in our own time.  You want anyone to beta read your stuff, I’m available.”

I was not sure how to take that, so it was best avoided.  “If I do, I’ll let you know “

She left with an expression I couldn’t fathom.

…

Charlene’s story, exactly 10,000 words, was a story of struggle.  It had me from the first page.

And it made me think she was a faculty spy, sent to see if I knew what I was doing.  To be truthful, it was my second year at it, and it was a learning process.  My first wasn’t so great.

Teaching wasn’t the same as doing.

The other nineteen varied in length, from a thousand to five thousand words.  Stories started and petered out, some with a strong start and then hitting that invisible brick wall.  Several were in the realm of fantasy, but none could go down the superhero with humility path.

It gave me a lot of scope.

Most were glad they would not be revisiting that story until towards the end of the year.

During the previous year, I thought about restarting my book, even starting to unpack the writing boxes, but it went into recess again when I told myself I had to write class lessons and prompt papers 

In other words, I found any excuse not to write.

But during the summer break, when I finally stopped prevaricating, I dragged everything out of the boxes, arranged my writing nook, and put a piece of paper in the typewriter.

Nothing came.

I pulled out the notepads and decided I would write longhand.  That went from writing to planning to maybe I’ll do it tomorrow.

I was still prevaricating at the start of the year, and perhaps it was going to go into a recess like the year before.

Then I woke in the middle of the night, halfway through the first semester, thinking I should retype and edit the story I gave Samantha to read, and see what Charlene’s thought.

Perhaps I was looking for compliments.  If I was, then maybe I should just burn it and move on.

That morning’s lesson, we were going to visit non-fiction, and we were all going to embark on a genealogical expedition. 

I found the previous year the notion of having relatives that go back in time, and where they came from, was as much of a writing adventure for me as it was for them.  It also honed another important writing skill; research.

I was shocked to discover I came from England and Germany.  There were Irish, Welsh, Scots, but no Americans.  There was even a little Scandinavian.  They were mostly agricultural labourers, though there was the odd publican and shop owner.

I often wondered how I could be related to any of those given my school results.

Charlene’s relatives, going back, were famous, or maybe they would have been if she hadn’t noticed that a cousin had been previously down that path, and picked the most interesting rather than the actual people who were her forebears.

Who wouldn’t do that if they were looking for a more interesting story?  After all, they had been dead for a long time and were not going to argue the point.

…

By the end of the first semester I had rewritten the first three chapters, the magic amount I thought would set up the story, and would be what I would send to a publisher for appraisal.

It had been a lot of long nights and ruthlessness I hadn’t thought was in me.    Sometimes it was not so much about what was on the page as having the backbone to throw out what was simply padding.

It was my own advice echoing in my head: 200 tightly written pages trumped 500 pages of mostly fluff.

Last day of semester, after setting an assignment to be delivered the first day back, I called Charlene over and handed her the brown, anonymous envelope.

“My marching orders,” she asked.

“The first three chapters.  If you want to read it.  I don’t usually give anyone anything, not after the last time.”

She looked at me with a quizzical expression.

“A long story that involves an ex, and it would be in poor taste to air what most people would call petty grievances.”

“We all have them.”

“Petty differences or exes?”

“Both.  But let me guess, you finally gave in to showing your work to your spouse and you got everything but what you wanted.”

“I was told not to give up my day job.”

She smiled, or perhaps it was something else.  “I was told to stick to what women like me did best: cooking, cleaning, and babies.  After that comment, I did none of the above.”

“I stopped writing.”

“So did I.  And you were right.  Life gets in the way.  I have coffee some mornings at the Three Moon cafe.  If you pick the right day, I’ll give you my honest opinion.”

She left before I could think of a suitable reply.

…

Perception is everything.

Rather than working on my novel, I spent the time fretting over the implications of Charlene’s invitation.

And, yes, it was an invitation.

That I had all sorts of feelings about the matter, right down to reading and rereading the rule book five times, the answer was always going to be the same.

It was verboten.

If it wasn’t my imagination running wild.  If it was not what I thought it was.

Normally it was not something I would think about.  And, like I said, it might be just my overactive imagination.  It had happened to a colleague the previous year.  He had ignored it, and when push came to shove, the university sacked him, even when her had done nothing to encourage the relationship.

It was for him either the devil or the deep blue sea.  Even when the girl in question told the Dean, eventually, that he had never been interested, and she did it out of spite.

It was an ugly world we lived in sometimes.

So, armed with the rule book, I reluctantly went to the Three Moon café.  She was not there, but I felt like a coffee and stayed, pretending to be one of my characters, on surveillance while waiting for the contact with the top secret information.

It wasn’t hard to pick out the university types, or the students. After all, I had heard of it from class members, a place where good food was reasonably priced, better than living on fast food and coffee

Other than the business types.

I tried not to look like a university associate professor, but as some of my students said, it was an acquired look.  Not even changing the style of my clothes worked.

One of my latest group of budding writers had said that a professor in a five-thousand-dollar suit and expensive shoes, even a Rolex watch, was still a professor.

I knew it was me she was talking about.

My coffee arrived, but it was not the waitress who took the order; it was Charlene.  She slid into the booth’s opposite seat.

“You have waitressing skills?”

“Among many others.  Navy SEAL.  Cabinet minister.  Short order chef.  A girl has to be multi-talented.  I work here, off and on.”

It was hard to tell if she was telling me off for categorising her, and if I thought about it, I probably did, and without thinking.

“Perhaps I should apologise.  Sometimes I say stuff without thinking, but it doesn’t excuse what I said.  I’m sorry.”

I was going to have to categorise these expressions of hers.  It was fascinating to watch it change.  This one: perhaps disdain.

“Apology accepted.  Better than most of those tinder dates, but what can you expect?”

“Never used a dating app.  I just think it’s too much effort, and knowing my luck, she would secretly be an axe murderer.”

“Ah, about that…”

I could see, after a moment of apprehension, that she was joking.  Or at least I hope she was.

She pulled the envelope, now creased and crumpled, and put it on the table between us.

I looked at it, but said nothing.

I had left the university rule book on the table, and she had noticed it.  It was a quick glance, one that I wasn’t supposed to see.

“Impressive daytime reading,” a glance, then back.

“Still trying to grapple with being an associate professor, which alternately makes me feel like an aging know-it-all, or just simply a weirdo.”

“What have you learned?”

“The hundred and twenty-two ways of getting into deep water and drowning.”

“Metaphorically speaking.  I still haven’t been able to find the campus pool.”

It was the subject of students’ quests, and an exercise for writing a piece on executing a question, taking something ordinary and turning it into treasure.  It was the imagination test.

She was watching me, over the top of her coffee cup, contemplating or planning my demise.  Talking to her was going to be a slow dance.

“You’re writing, in your mind, a scene, you and I.  There was a flicker of a smile.  Hopes dashed or triumph.”

“No.”  I would go with something a little more topical.  “What’s a girl like you doing the writing course?”

Expressing change, nose wrinkle, eyebrows lift fractionally.  Surprise?

“I want to be a better writer.”

“I don’t think so.  You’re almost there, from what I’m reading of your work.”

“Maybe I just want a break from work.  Working afternoons at the café and nights cleaning up after the grubs that pretend they’re human has taken its toll.”

There was paid in-house eyes, along with a self-realisation that may or may not be what I thought it was.  It was the sort of pain I’d never had to endure.

She ordered another coffee.  Mine was going cold.

Then she came out with it.  “We’re not supposed to be here together, or anywhere.  If you’re checking the rules, it could mean one of two things.  You’re wondering about my motives, or you’re wondering about yours.”

“Or I’m looking for ways to cure my insomnia.”  I picked the book up.  “Reading this, or trying to, is better than any sleeping pill.”  I put it down again.  ” We can meet like this; there just can’t be any other reason than to discuss the coursework.”

“And you thought…”

“I don’t think.  I’m just telling you what I read, just before it put me to sleep.  I’m not going to bore you with details.  Perhaps we could talk about my train wreck book.”

Another smile, less warmth.  Perhaps I was unconsciously trying to be unworthy of her attention. 

“It’s anything but a train wreck, but it does tell me a lot about you.  No, its good.  Can’t wait to see more.”  She watched my reaction before adding, “Do you dance?”

I made a mental note to curse the person that gave me an imagination, because it was working overtime.

“Ballroom, or that uncoordinated wriggling?”

She laughed, perhaps imagining what I meant by uncoordinated wriggling.  I’d seen it once when I agreed to go out with a girl a friend had recommended.  She had been trying to be something she was not.

“I’ll let you ponder that, until the next batch of pages.”

With that she made an exit, which was so much more than just leaving.

And sitting there, after ordering another coffee, a realisation came over me.  I needed a museum.  Not in the sense that I would pursue romantically, but someone who could stoke the fires of inspiration, because I could see the next part of the story.

And I hadn’t felt like this in a decade.

…

©  Charles Heath  2026