November Writing Month – November 2026 – “Lady Agatha Dies” – Day 1

Paranoia is my friend.

Take all the paper out of the file, throw it up in the air, wait until it all lands on the floor, and then take the first piece of paper nearest to you to start.

Perhaps fate is being kind to me because the sheet had the word paranoia on it.

To begin the story, we need to paint a picture of a successful woman running a charitable offshoot that manages the money her inheritance had bequeathed to be used for charitable purposes.

Why not just hand it over to a proper charity and let them do the dirty work?

She did once and found most of it went to administration and very little landed in the hands of those who needed it.

There’s no problem with that except …

Her father thinks there are better things to do, and she has spent considerable time and effort to dissuade her from doing so.

Perhaps his ultimate motive is to get a hold of her money because his own investments are not exactly faring well with the changes he made years before and he does have a wealthy lifestyle and image to keep up.

Then there’s the problem with the mysterious illness she had contracted, making it difficult to work, and necessitates the employment of a new head to administer the charity while she finds out why she’s ill and then recovering.

Her mistake is trusting her father to find the right man.

Then there’s her children, twins, and trouble with a capital T.

The real problem I’d of course that the illness manifests itself in unpredictable ways making her behaviour erratic, her moments of lucidly shorter and her stays in care longer, and her paranoia that someone is trying to kill her slowly taking over.

Who can she trust?

Her lawyer friend, or is he?

Her best friend, who seems above boats?

Her father, who is more interested in his own life than hers?

The new manager has his own agenda and a lot of money to play with.

Her children hate her because she abandoned them to boarding schools.

The doctors keep telling her they can’t find anything wrong.

Or the private detective she had hired to deep dive into all her so-called friends’ lives and find someone who could tell her what was wrong with her.

Oh, and lastly, find her ex-husband Michael, the only man she ever really loved, and whom she now realises she pushed away.

That first chapter of setting the scene has just become five or six.

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 289

Day 289 – Don’t clean up your writing space

…

Stop Cleaning Your Desk: Why Creative Chaos is the Secret to Better Writing

You sit down at your desk, coffee in hand, ready to tackle that chapter, blog post, or screenplay. You open the document, stare at the blank white screen, and take a deep breath.

Then, you notice it.

The empty mug from yesterday. The tower of reference books stacked precariously. The stray sticky notes, the receipt from the dry cleaner, and the tangled charging cables.

“I just can’t work in this mess,” you tell yourself. “I need a clean slate to get a clean mind.”

So, you stand up. You wipe down the surface. You file the papers, wash the mug, and organise your pens by colour. Forty-five minutes later, your desk looks like a minimalist furniture showroom. It’s pristine. It’s organized.

And your energy is completely gone. You’ve used up your daily quota of willpower on housekeeping, leaving you with nothing left for the actual writing.

Sound familiar? If so, it’s time for a hard truth: Cleaning your writing space isn’t productivity. It’s procrastination in disguise.

And even worse? By sanitising your environment, you might actually be scrubbing away your creativity.


The Comfort Trap of the “Clean Slate”

Let’s be honest about why we clean. Writing is terrifying. Staring down the barrel of a blank page requires vulnerability, brainpower, and emotional endurance. Our brains are hardwired to seek comfort and avoid discomfort.

Tidying up offers an irresistible dopamine hit. It’s a low-stakes task with an immediate reward. You move a stack of papers three inches to the left, and boom—instant gratification. You feel productive without having faced the agonizing friction of generating original thought.

Cleaning before writing is the ultimate safety blanket. It allows us to feel like we are “working on our project” without actually having to put a single difficult word on the page.

Why Chaos Breeds Creativity

We have been conditioned by modern minimalism, productivity influencers, and stock photos of white-desk setups to believe that an immaculate workspace equals an immaculate mind.

Psychological research, however, tells a different story.

In a famous study conducted by psychological scientist Kathleen Vohs at the University of Minnesota, participants placed in a messy room generated significantly more creative ideas and came up with more innovative uses for everyday objects than those in a clean room.

Vohs concluded that while a clean environment encourages rule-following and safe choices (great for accounting or compliance), disorder breaks free of tradition and inspires fresh insights.

When your desk is a bit messy, it reflects the messy nature of the creative process itself. Writing isn’t linear. It’s a chaotic journey of dead ends, sudden breakthroughs, half-baked ideas, and wild tangents. Trying to force that chaotic internal landscape into a hyper-sterile, hyper-organised external environment creates cognitive dissonance.

Out of the physical chaos on your desk often comes the very words you hoped you could write. Those scattered notes, dog-eared pages, and random reminders are visual cues of your intellectual momentum.

The Danger of the Pristine Workspace

Have you ever noticed how intimidating a brand-new, completely blank notebook is? The first stroke of a pen feels like a sacrilege. You don’t want to ruin the perfection of the empty page.

A spotless, minimalist desk does the exact same thing to your psyche. It demands perfection. It says, “You are sitting in a temple of productivity; your work had better be immaculate.” That kind of pressure is paralyzing.

A messy desk, on the other hand, is forgiving. It lowers the stakes. It whispers, “It’s okay to be messy here. Just start.”

When your environment is relaxed and slightly disordered, you give yourself permission to write badly—which is the absolute prerequisite for writing well. You can’t edit a blank page, and you certainly can’t write freely if you’re worried about keeping your workspace looking like an Architectural Digest.

How to Embrace the Creative Mess (Without Living in a Landfill)

Of course, there is a fine line between a productive, creative workspace and a biohazard. If you can’t find your keyboard under last week’s takeout boxes, it might be time for a reset.

The key is knowing when and why you are cleaning.

  • Clean after the session, not before: Make it a rule that you cannot tidy up until you have hit your daily word count. Use the mess as fuel while you write, and use the cleanup as a celebratory wind-down ritual after the work is safely saved on your hard drive.
  • Recognize the urge for what it is: The next time you find yourself aggressively reorganising your desktop folders or wiping down your monitor while the cursor blinks mockingly at you, stop. Acknowledge that you are running away from the writing. Take a deep breath, sit down in the chaos, and write just one sentence.
  • Give yourself permission to be messy: Let go of the societal pressure to have an aesthetically pleasing writing setup. Your readers don’t care if your desk looks like a hurricane hit a stationery store; they only care about the story, the insight, or the emotion you leave on the page.

Give Yourself Permission to Create

Writing is an act of courage. It requires diving headfirst into the unknown and wrestling your thoughts into existence. That process is inherently untidy.

So, stop apologising for the clutter. Stop weaponising organisation against your own productivity. Leave the dishes in the sink, let the papers stack up, and sit down in the glorious, messy reality of your creative life.

Out of that chaos, your best words are waiting to be written.

…

PI Walthenson’s second case – A case of finding the ‘Flying Dutchman’.

Known only to a few, there is a legend that a ship named the ‘Flying Dutchman’ left Nazi Germany in the last weeks of the war and set sail for America, escorted by U-boats, under a different name. Aboard was a trove of treasure and gold worth a ‘king’s ransom’.

It was said that it had been sent to a group of American Nazis to create the Fourth Reich at an appropriate time. Over the years, many expeditions off the coast had searched, but found no trace of the vessel or the treasure.

In other words, it was just a legend created to boost tourism.

…

Fast forward to 2024. Our intrepid private detective, Harry Walthenson, overhears a conversation at Grand Central Station. It was the oddness of the message that caught his attention. An investigation turned up nothing out of the ordinary, and he thinks no more about it.

Then Harry is kidnapped, interrogated, and asked questions over and over about a date and a place, why he went there, and when he could not give satisfactory answers, he was beaten half to death and left for dead on a rubbish heap. He was lucky that it was a living space for homeless men; otherwise, he would have died.

In the aftermath, he once again gives it no more thought.

…

After resolving his first case successfully, there’s no rest. Harry’s angry mother comes to his office and demands that he find out where his father has gone. She believes he has run off with a mistress, not for the first time.

Perhaps it was not the wisest decision she has made, because Harry promises to investigate, and adds that she might not like what he finds.

He soon discovered he does not like what he finds, that his father’s friends, a cabal formed at University, have two who are his mother’s current lovers, and another, a criminal blackmailing his father.

Felicity, now his partner, working on a different case, and trying to get answers, uncovers a crime family involved in guarding a disused warehouse on the docks, where she believes Harry had been taken for interrogation, and subsequently dumped nearby to die.

Why are they up to? What is so important that the empty warehouse needs guarding? Who is employing them?

Harry, following up on the death of the blackmailer, traces his death back to an enforcer employed by his grandfather. His mother’s grandfather was a pre-war industrialist who made his fortune in war munitions and shipbuilding.

He was also a member of the American Nazi party.

When Harry also discovers a logbook belonging to a so-called wartime Liberty ship the “Paul Revere” in brackets ‘Freiheitskämpfer’, hidden by his father, and written in a code that is not readily identifiable.

It is no longer a matter of a father who has run off with his mistress; it is a very frightened man in fear of his life, running from a group who will stop at nothing to get the logbook back. And when Harry discovers a family connection to the group, it becomes a race against time to decode the log and find his father before his grandfather does.

…

Coming soon: Harry Walthenson’s new adventure – A case of finding the ‘Flying Dutchman’

An excerpt from “Mistaken Identity” – a work in progress

The odds of any one of us having a doppelganger are quite high. Whether or not you got to meet them or be confronted by them was significantly lower. Except, of course, unless you are a celebrity.

It was a phenomenon remarkable only for the fact that, at times, certain high-profile people, notorious or not, had doubles if only to put off enemies or the general public. Sometimes we see people in the street who look like someone we knew and make the mistake of approaching them like a long-lost friend, only to discover an embarrassed individual desperately trying to get away from what they perceive as a stalker, or worse.

And then sometimes it is a picture that looms up on a TV screen, an almost exact likeness of you. At first, you are fascinated, and then, according to the circumstances and narrative that is attached to that picture, either flattered or horrified.

For me, one turned to the other when I saw an almost likeness of me flash up on the screen when I turned the TV on in my room. What looked to be my photo, with only minor differences, was in the corner of the screen, the newsreader speaking in rapid Italian, so fast I could only translate every second or third word.

But the one word I did recognise was murder. The photo of the man on the screen was the subject of an extensive manhunt. The crime, the murder of a woman in the very same hotel I was staying, and it was being played out live several floors above me. The gist of the story, the woman had been seen with and staying with the man who was my double, and, less than an hour ago, the body had been discovered by a chambermaid.

The killer, the announcer said, was believed to be still in the hotel because the woman had died shortly before she had been discovered.

I watched, at first fascinated by what I was seeing. I guess I should have been horrified, but at that moment it didn’t register that I might be mistaken for that man.

Not until another five minutes had passed, and I was watching the police in full riot gear, with a camera crew following behind, coming up a passage towards a room. Live action of the arrest of the suspected killer, the breathless commentator said.

Then, suddenly, there was a pounding on the door. On the TV screen, plain to see, was the number of my room. I looked through the peephole and saw an army of police officers. It didn’t take much to realise what had happened. The hotel staff identified me as the man in the photograph on the TV and called the police.

Horrified wasn’t what I was feeling right then.

It was fear.

My last memory was the door crashing open, the wood splintering, and men rushing into the room, screaming at me, waving guns, and when I put my hands up to defend myself, I heard a gunshot.

And in one very confused and probably near-death experience, I thought I saw my mother and thought what was she doing in Rome?

…

I was the archetypal nobody.

I lived in a small flat, I drove a nondescript car, had an average job in a low-profile travel agency, was single, and currently not involved in a relationship, had no children, and, according to my workmates, no life.

They were wrong. I was one of those people who preferred their own company; I had a cat, and travelled whenever I could. And I did have a ‘thing’ for Rosalie, one of the reasons why I stayed at the travel agency. I didn’t expect anything to come of it, but one could always hope.

I was both pleased and excited to be going to the conference. It was my first, and the glimpse I had seen of it had whetted my appetite for more information about the nuances of my profession.

Some would say that a travel agent wasn’t much of a job, but to me, it was every bit as demanding as being an accountant or a lawyer. You were providing a customer with a service, and arguably, more people needed a travel agent than a lawyer. At least that was what I told myself as I watched more and more people start using the internet, and our relevance slowly dissipating.

This conference was about countering that trend.

The trip over had been uneventful. I was met at the airport and taken to the hotel where the conference was being held with several other delegates who had arrived on the same plane. I had mingled with several other delegates at the pre-conference get-together, including one whose name was Maryanne.

She was an unusual young woman, not the sort that I usually met, because she was the one who was usually surrounded by all the boys, the life of the party. In normal circumstances, I would not have introduced myself to her, but she had approached me. Why did I think that may have been significant? All of this ran through my mind, culminating in the last event on the highlight reel, the door bursting open, men rushing into my room, and then one of the policemen opened fire.

I replayed that last scene again, trying to see the face of my assailant, but it was just a sea of men in battle dress, bulletproof vests and helmets, accompanied by screaming and yelling, some of which I identified as “Get on the floor”.

Then came the shot.

Why ask me to get on the floor if all they were going to do was shoot me? I was putting my hands up at the time, in surrender, not reaching for a weapon.

Then I saw the face again, hovering in the background like a ghost. My mother. Only the hair was different, and her clothes, and then the image was going, perhaps a figment of my imagination brought on by pain-killing drugs. I tried to imagine the scene again, but this time it played out without the image of my mother.

I opened my eyes and took stock of my surroundings. What I felt in that exact moment couldn’t be described. I should most likely be dead, the result of a gunshot wound. I guess I should be thankful the shooter hadn’t aimed at anything vital, but that was the only item on the plus side.

I was in a hospital room with a policeman by the door. He was reading a newspaper and sitting uncomfortably on a small chair. He gave me a quick glance when he heard me move slightly, but didn’t acknowledge me with either a nod or a greeting, just went back to the paper.

If I still had a police guard, then I would still be considered a suspect. What was interesting was that I was not handcuffed to the bed. Perhaps that only happened in TV shows. Or maybe they knew I couldn’t run because my injuries were too serious. Or the guard would shoot me long before my feet hit the floor. I knew the police well enough now to know they would shoot first and ask questions later.

On the physical side, I had a large bandage over the top left corner of my chest, extending over my shoulder. A little poking and prodding determined the bullet had hit somewhere between the top of my rib cage and my shoulder. Nothing vital there, but my arm might be somewhat useless for a while, depending on what the bullet hit on the way in or through.

It didn’t feel like there were any broken or damaged bones.

That was the good news.

On the other side of the ledger, my mental state, there was only one word that could describe it. Terrified. I was looking at a murder charge and jail time, a lot of it. Murder usually had a long time in jail attached to it.

Whatever had happened, I didn’t do it. I know I didn’t do it, but I had to try to explain this to people who had already made up their minds. I searched my mind for evidence. It was there, but in the confused state brought on by the medication, all I could think about was jail, and the sort of company I was going to have.

I think death would have been preferable.

…

Half an hour later, maybe longer, I was drifting in and out of consciousness. A nurse, or what I thought was a nurse, came into the room. The guard stood, checked her ID card, and then stood by the door.

She came over and stood beside the bed. “How are you?” she asked, first in Italian, and when I pretended I didn’t understand, she asked the same question in accented English.

“Alive, I guess,” I said. “No one has come and told me what my condition is yet. You are my first visitor. Can you tell me?”

“Of course. You are very lucky to be alive. You will be fine and make a full recovery. The doctors here are excellent at their work.”

“What happens now?”

“I check you, and then you have another visitor. He is from the British Embassy, I think. But he will have to wait until I have finished my examination.”

I realised then she was a doctor, not a nurse.

…

My second visitor was a man, dressed in a suit, the sort of which I associated with the British Civil Service.  He was not very old, which told me he was probably a recent graduate on his first posting, the junior officer who drew the short straw.

The guard checked his ID but again did not leave the room, sitting back down and going back to his newspaper.

My visitor introduced himself as Alex Jordan from the British Embassy in Rome, and he had been asked by the Ambassador to sort out what he labelled a tricky mess.

For starters, it was good to see that someone cared about what happened to me.  But, equally, I knew the mantra, get into trouble overseas, and there is not much we can do to help you.  So, after that lengthy introduction, I had to wonder why he was here.

I said, “They think I am an international criminal by the name of Jacob Westerbury, whose picture looks just like me, and apparently, for them, it is an open and shut case.”  I could still hear the fragments of the yelling as the police burst through the door, at the same time telling me to get on the floor with my hands over my head.

“It’s not.  They know they’ve got the wrong man, which is why I’m here.  There is the issue of what had been described as excessive force, and the fact that you were shot had made it an all-around embarrassment for them.”

“Then why are you here?  Shouldn’t they be here apologising?”

“That is why you have another visitor.  I only took precedence because I insisted on speaking with you first.  I have come, basically, to ask you for a favour.  This situation has afforded us an opportunity.  We would like you to sign the official document, which basically indemnifies them against any legal proceedings.”

Curious.  What sort of opportunity was he talking about?  Was this a matter that could get difficult and I could be charged by the Italian Government, even if I wasn’t guilty, or was it one of those hush-hush type deals, you do this for us, we’ll help you out with that?  “What sort of opportunity?”

“We want to get our hands on Jacob Westerbury as much as they do.  They’ve made a mistake, and we’d like to use that to get custody of him if or when he is arrested in this country.  I’m sure you would also like this man brought into custody as soon as possible, so you will stop being confused with him.  I can only imagine what it was like to be arrested in the manner you were.  And I would not blame you if you wanted to get some compensation for what they’ve done.  But.  There are bigger issues in play here, and you would be doing this for your country.”

I wondered what would happen if I didn’t agree to his proposal.  I had to ask, “What if I don’t?”

His expression didn’t change.  “I’m sure you are a sensible man, Mr Pargeter, who is more than willing to help his country whenever he can.  They have agreed to take care of all your hospital expenses, refund the cost of the Conference, and travel.  I’m sure I could also get them to pay for a few days at Capri or Sorrento, if you like, before you go home.  What do you say?”

There was only one thing I could say.  Wasn’t it treason if you went against your country’s wishes?

“I’m not an unreasonable man, Alex.  Go do your deal, and I’ll sign the papers.”

“Good man.”

…

After Alex left, the doctor came back to announce the arrival of a woman, who had announced herself as the publicity officer from the Italian police. When she came into the room, she was not dressed in a uniform.

The doctor left after giving a brief report to the civilian at the door. I understood the gist of it: “The patient has recovered excellently, and the wounds are healing as expected. There is no cause for concern.”

That was a relief.

While the doctor was speaking to the civilian, I speculated on who she might be. She was young, not more than thirty, conservatively dressed, so an official of some kind, but not necessarily with the police. Did they have prosecutors? I was unfamiliar with the Italian legal system.

She had long, wavy black hair and the sort of sultry looks of an Italian movie star, and her presence made me more curious than fearful, though I couldn’t say why.

The woman then spoke to the guard, and he reluctantly got up and left the room, closing the door behind him. She checked the door and then came back towards me, standing at the end of the bed. Now alone, she said, “A few questions before we begin.” Her English was only slightly accented. “Your name is Jack Pargeter?”

I nodded. “Yes.”

“You are in Rome to attend the Travel Agents Conference at the Hilton Hotel?”

“Yes.”

“You attended a preconference introduction on the evening of the 25th, after arriving from London at approximately 4:25 pm.”

“About that time, yes. I know it was about five when the bus came to collect me, and several others, to take us to the hotel.”

She smiled. It was then that I noticed she was reading from a small notepad.

“It was ten past five to be precise. The driver had been held up in traffic. We have several witnesses who saw you on the plane, on the bus, at the hotel, and with the aid of closed-circuit TV, we have established you are not the criminal Jacob Westerbury.”

She put her notebook back in her bag and then said, “My name is Vicenza Andretti, and I am with the prosecutor’s office. I am here to formally apologise for the situation that can only be described as a case of mistaken identity. I assure you, it is not the habit of our police officers to shoot people unless they have a very strong reason for doing so. I understand that in the confusion of the arrest, one of our officers accidentally discharged his weapon. We are undergoing a very thorough investigation into the circumstances of this event.”

I was not sure why, but between the time I had spoken to the embassy official and now, something about letting them off so easily was bugging me. I could see why they had sent her. It would be difficult to be angry or annoyed with her.

But I was annoyed.

“Do you often send a whole squad of trigger-happy riot police to arrest a single man?” It came out harsher than I intended.

“My men believed they were dealing with a dangerous criminal.”

“Do I look like a dangerous criminal?” And then I realised if it was mistaken identity, the answer would be yes.

She saw the look on my face and said quietly, “I think you know the answer to that question, Mr Pargeter.”

“Well, it was overkill.”

“As I said, we are very sorry for the circumstances you now find yourself in. You must understand that we honestly believed we were dealing with an armed and dangerous murderer, and we were acting within our mandate. My department will cover your medical expenses and any other amounts for the inconvenience this has caused you. I believe you were attending a conference at your hotel. I am very sorry, but given the medical circumstances you have, you will have to remain here for a few more days.”

“I guess, then, I should thank you for not killing me.”

Her expression told me that was not the best thing I could have said in the circumstances.

“I mean, I should thank you for the hospital and the care. But a question or two of my own. May I?”

She nodded.

“Did you catch this Jacob Westerbury character?”

“No. In the confusion created by your arrest, he escaped. Once we realised we had made a mistake and reviewed the closed-circuit TV, we tracked him leaving by a rear exit.”

“Are you sure it was one of your men who shot me?”

I watched as her expression changed to one of surprise.

“You don’t think it was one of my men?”

“Oddly enough, no. But don’t ask me why.”

“It is very interesting that you should say that, because in our initial investigation, it appeared none of our officers’ weapons had been discharged. A forensic investigation into the bullet tells us it was one that is used in our weapons, but…”

I could see their dilemma.

“Have you any enemies that would want to shoot you, Mr Pargeter?”

That was absurd because I had no enemies, at least none that I knew of, much less anyone who would want me dead.

“Not that I’m aware of.”

“Then it is strange, and will perhaps remain a mystery. I will let you know if anything more is revealed in our investigation.”

She took an envelope out of her briefcase and opened it, pulling out several sheets of paper.

I knew what it was. A verbal apology was one thing, but a signed waiver would cover them legally. They had sent a pretty girl to charm me. Perhaps using anyone else would not have worked. There was potential for a huge litigation payout here, and someone more ruthless would jump at the chance of making a few million out of the Italian Government.

“We need a signature on this document,” she said.

“Absolving you of any wrongdoing?”

“I have apologised. We will take whatever measures are required for your comfort after this event. We are accepting responsibility for our actions and are being reasonable.”

They were. I took the pen from her and signed the documents.

“You couldn’t add dinner with you on that list of benefits?” No harm in asking.

“I am unfortunately unavailable.”

I smiled. “It wasn’t a request for a date, just dinner. You can tell me about Rome, as only a resident can. Please.”

She looked me up and down, searching for the ulterior motive. When she couldn’t find one, she said, “We shall see once the hospital discharges you in a few days.”

“Then I’ll pencil you in?”

She looked at me quizzically. “What is this pencil me in?”

“It’s an English colloquialism. It means maybe. As when you write something in pencil, it is easy to erase it.”

A momentary frown, then recognition and a smile. “I shall remember that. Thank you for your time and cooperation, Mr Pargeter. Good morning.”

…

© Charles Heath 2015-2021

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 289

Day 289 – Don’t clean up your writing space

…

Stop Cleaning Your Desk: Why Creative Chaos is the Secret to Better Writing

You sit down at your desk, coffee in hand, ready to tackle that chapter, blog post, or screenplay. You open the document, stare at the blank white screen, and take a deep breath.

Then, you notice it.

The empty mug from yesterday. The tower of reference books stacked precariously. The stray sticky notes, the receipt from the dry cleaner, and the tangled charging cables.

“I just can’t work in this mess,” you tell yourself. “I need a clean slate to get a clean mind.”

So, you stand up. You wipe down the surface. You file the papers, wash the mug, and organise your pens by colour. Forty-five minutes later, your desk looks like a minimalist furniture showroom. It’s pristine. It’s organized.

And your energy is completely gone. You’ve used up your daily quota of willpower on housekeeping, leaving you with nothing left for the actual writing.

Sound familiar? If so, it’s time for a hard truth: Cleaning your writing space isn’t productivity. It’s procrastination in disguise.

And even worse? By sanitising your environment, you might actually be scrubbing away your creativity.


The Comfort Trap of the “Clean Slate”

Let’s be honest about why we clean. Writing is terrifying. Staring down the barrel of a blank page requires vulnerability, brainpower, and emotional endurance. Our brains are hardwired to seek comfort and avoid discomfort.

Tidying up offers an irresistible dopamine hit. It’s a low-stakes task with an immediate reward. You move a stack of papers three inches to the left, and boom—instant gratification. You feel productive without having faced the agonizing friction of generating original thought.

Cleaning before writing is the ultimate safety blanket. It allows us to feel like we are “working on our project” without actually having to put a single difficult word on the page.

Why Chaos Breeds Creativity

We have been conditioned by modern minimalism, productivity influencers, and stock photos of white-desk setups to believe that an immaculate workspace equals an immaculate mind.

Psychological research, however, tells a different story.

In a famous study conducted by psychological scientist Kathleen Vohs at the University of Minnesota, participants placed in a messy room generated significantly more creative ideas and came up with more innovative uses for everyday objects than those in a clean room.

Vohs concluded that while a clean environment encourages rule-following and safe choices (great for accounting or compliance), disorder breaks free of tradition and inspires fresh insights.

When your desk is a bit messy, it reflects the messy nature of the creative process itself. Writing isn’t linear. It’s a chaotic journey of dead ends, sudden breakthroughs, half-baked ideas, and wild tangents. Trying to force that chaotic internal landscape into a hyper-sterile, hyper-organised external environment creates cognitive dissonance.

Out of the physical chaos on your desk often comes the very words you hoped you could write. Those scattered notes, dog-eared pages, and random reminders are visual cues of your intellectual momentum.

The Danger of the Pristine Workspace

Have you ever noticed how intimidating a brand-new, completely blank notebook is? The first stroke of a pen feels like a sacrilege. You don’t want to ruin the perfection of the empty page.

A spotless, minimalist desk does the exact same thing to your psyche. It demands perfection. It says, “You are sitting in a temple of productivity; your work had better be immaculate.” That kind of pressure is paralyzing.

A messy desk, on the other hand, is forgiving. It lowers the stakes. It whispers, “It’s okay to be messy here. Just start.”

When your environment is relaxed and slightly disordered, you give yourself permission to write badly—which is the absolute prerequisite for writing well. You can’t edit a blank page, and you certainly can’t write freely if you’re worried about keeping your workspace looking like an Architectural Digest.

How to Embrace the Creative Mess (Without Living in a Landfill)

Of course, there is a fine line between a productive, creative workspace and a biohazard. If you can’t find your keyboard under last week’s takeout boxes, it might be time for a reset.

The key is knowing when and why you are cleaning.

  • Clean after the session, not before: Make it a rule that you cannot tidy up until you have hit your daily word count. Use the mess as fuel while you write, and use the cleanup as a celebratory wind-down ritual after the work is safely saved on your hard drive.
  • Recognize the urge for what it is: The next time you find yourself aggressively reorganising your desktop folders or wiping down your monitor while the cursor blinks mockingly at you, stop. Acknowledge that you are running away from the writing. Take a deep breath, sit down in the chaos, and write just one sentence.
  • Give yourself permission to be messy: Let go of the societal pressure to have an aesthetically pleasing writing setup. Your readers don’t care if your desk looks like a hurricane hit a stationery store; they only care about the story, the insight, or the emotion you leave on the page.

Give Yourself Permission to Create

Writing is an act of courage. It requires diving headfirst into the unknown and wrestling your thoughts into existence. That process is inherently untidy.

So, stop apologising for the clutter. Stop weaponising organisation against your own productivity. Leave the dishes in the sink, let the papers stack up, and sit down in the glorious, messy reality of your creative life.

Out of that chaos, your best words are waiting to be written.

…

The story behind the story – Echoes from the Past

The novel ‘Echoes from the Past’ started out as a short story I wrote about 30 years ago, titled ‘The Birthday’.

My idea was to take a normal person out of their comfort zone and led on a short but very frightening journey to a place where a surprise birthday party had been arranged.

Thus, the very large man with a scar and a red tie was created.

So was the friend with the limousine who worked as a pilot.

So were the two women, Wendy and Angelina, who were Flight Attendants that the pilot friend asked to join the conspiracy.

I was going to rework the short story, then about ten pages long, into something a little more.

And like all rewrites, especially those I have anything to do with, it turned into a novel.

There was motivation.  I had told some colleagues at the place where I worked at the time that I liked writing, and they wanted a sample.  I was going to give them the re-worked short story.  Instead, I gave them ‘Echoes from the past’

Originally, it was not set anywhere in particular.

But when considering a location, I had, at the time, recently been to New York in December, and visited Brooklyn and Queens, as well as a lot of New York itself.  We were there for New Year’s, and it was an experience I’ll never forget.

One evening, we were out late and finished up in Brooklyn Heights, near the waterfront, and there was rain and snow; it was cold and wet, and apartment buildings were shimmering in the street light, and I thought, “This is the place where my main character will live”.

It had a very spooky atmosphere, the sort where ghosts would not be unexpected.  I felt more than one shiver go up and down my spine in the few minutes I was there.

I had taken notes, as I always do, of everywhere we went, so I had a ready supply of locations I could use, changing the names in some cases.

Fifth Avenue near the Rockefeller Centre is amazing at first light, and late at night with the Seasonal decorations and lights.

The original main character was a shy man with few friends, hence not expecting the surprise party.  I enhanced that shyness into purposely lonely because of an issue from his past that leaves him always looking over his shoulder and ready to move on at the slightest hint of trouble.  No friends, no relationships, just a very low profile.

Then I thought, what if he breaks the cardinal rule and begins a relationship?

But it is also as much an exploration of a damaged soul as it is the search for a normal life, without having any idea what normal was, and how the understanding of one person can sometimes make all the difference in what we may think or feel.

And, of course, I wanted a happy ending.

Except for the bad guys.

…

Get it here:  https://amzn.to/2CYKxu4

newechocover5rs

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 288

Day 288 – Writing exercise – the prologue

…

The fluorescent lights of the cardiology suite buzzed with the sterile hum of a greenhouse kept at absolute zero. Agatha sat on the examination table, her posture straight, wrapped in a pale blue paper gown that felt entirely too thin for the weight settling into her chest.

Across from her, Dr Harrison—a man whose salt-and-pepper hair and rimless glasses screamed “academic tenure”—swivelled a heavy monitor toward her. The screen was a chaotic scribble of green neon peaks and valleys, looking less like human biology and more like the visualizer from an illegal warehouse rave in 1996.

“Well, Agatha,” Dr Harrison said, tapping a stylus against the desk. “The mystery of your palpitations is solved. Though I suspect you aren’t going to like the answer.”

Agatha offered a practised, reassuring smile—the same one she used when she had to deal with her more recalcitrant charities seeking more funds. “Try me. I have to deal with very difficult people daily. I’ve survived worse than medical jargon.”

“You have Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy, or HOCM,” Dr Harrison said, his tone shifting into clinical precision. “It’s a genetic condition. The muscular wall—the septum—between your left and right ventricles has grown abnormally thick. On top of that structural bottleneck, your telemetry shows intermittent Atrial Fibrillation. Your upper heart chambers are essentially quivering instead of beating effectively, and your thickened muscle is blocking the outflow of blood to the rest of your body.”

Agatha blinked. “Thickened. Like… a muscle getting stronger at the gym?”

“Not quite,” Dr Harrison said gently. “Think of it like a highway where the lanes have suddenly narrowed, and the engine is misfiring. Your heart is working overtime just to maintain basic output. That pressure, that fatigue you’ve been feeling—it’s your heart screaming for backup.”

Agatha looked down at her hands, resting in her lap. For nineteen years, she had traded neon mesh and strobe lights for cashmere cardigans and beige throw pillows. She had raised twins on her own in a hostile environment, earned a corner office, and mastered the art of quiet, predictable suburban grace. She had buried the girl who danced on speaker stacks until dawn so deep she almost forgot she ever existed.

And now, her own biology was staging a rebellion.

“Okay,” Agatha said, her voice remarkably steady. “What does the fix look like?”

Dr Harrison leaned forward, folding his hands. “First, we adjust your lifestyle. High-intensity cardio is out. Dehydration is your enemy. But pharmacologically, we need to slow your heart rate, allow those stiff ventricles time to fill properly, and strengthen the actual force of the contraction so you don’t pass out walking to your car.”

He tapped a few keys on his keyboard and printed out a prescription sheet, sliding it across the desk.

“We’re going to start you on Digoxin, commonly known as Digitalis,” Dr Harrison instructed, his eyes locking onto hers. “Your maintenance dose will be 0.25 mg taken orally, once daily.”

Agatha committed the numbers to memory. “Digitalis. Isn’t that derived from foxglove?”

“It is,” Dr Harrison nodded, looking mildly impressed. “A potent botanical turned pharmaceutical marvel. It works by inhibiting the sodium-potassium ATPase pump in your myocardial cells, which increases intracellular calcium. The result? Your heart beats slower, but with significantly more authority. It calms the erratic electrical chaos of the AFib and forces your thick heart muscle to coordinate its rhythm.”

“Sounds delicate,” Agatha murmured.

“It is a narrow-therapeutic-index drug, Agatha. Which means the line between helpful and toxic is razor thin. You cannot afford to be casual with this.” Dr Harrison’s voice dropped an octave, turning severe. “You need to understand the stakes. If you miss doses, your AFib will return with a vengeance, your heart rate will skyrocket, and your risk of a thromboembolic stroke climbs exponentially. But if you take too much, or if it accumulates dangerously in your bloodstream, Digoxin toxicity will set in.”

Agatha met his gaze, the old adrenaline junkie in her waking up, not with panic, but with a sudden, sharp clarity. “Define toxicity.”

“Nausea, profound vomiting, visual disturbances—specifically seeing a yellow-green halo around objects, or snowy vision,” Dr Harrison recited grimly. “And worse: severe, fatal arrhythmias. Complete heart block. If your serum potassium drops, the toxicity escalates rapidly. We will be doing routine blood draws to monitor your plasma levels.”

Dr Harrison tore the script off the printer and handed it to her. “Same time every day, Agatha. No doubling up if you miss a dose. No guessing. Treat this pill with absolute respect.”

Agatha took the paper. The white slip felt heavy, a tiny anchor tethering her erratic, wild heart to the rigid demands of survival.

She stood up, untied the paper gown, and began changing back into her sensible wool trousers and silk blouse. As she zipped her boots, she caught her reflection in the small vanity mirror by the sink. Her hair was pulled back in a neat, professional chignon; her expression was calm, composed, entirely suburban.

Nobody looking at her would ever guess the truth. Not the doctors, not her client, not even her children away at boarding school. But beneath her ribs, a fierce little engine was beating out a complex, dangerous rhythm—and Agatha was ready to take the wheel.

After she left, Dr Harrison wrote up his clinical notes and then slipped a piece of paper out from under the keyboard.  Earlier in the day, the head of the practice called him in for a meeting.  It was about the patient who was listed at 10 am, Agatha Montgomery.

He slid a piece of notepaper torn from a pharmaceutical company’s notepad with a telephone number.  “After you have seen her, call this number.”

“Why?”

“That will be between you and the person on the end of the phone.”

“What about doctor-patient confidentiality?”

“Report, as requested, and then we shall speak of it no more.”  That was all he said.  The meeting was over.

…

©  Charles Heath  2026

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 288

Day 288 – Writing exercise – the prologue

…

The fluorescent lights of the cardiology suite buzzed with the sterile hum of a greenhouse kept at absolute zero. Agatha sat on the examination table, her posture straight, wrapped in a pale blue paper gown that felt entirely too thin for the weight settling into her chest.

Across from her, Dr Harrison—a man whose salt-and-pepper hair and rimless glasses screamed “academic tenure”—swivelled a heavy monitor toward her. The screen was a chaotic scribble of green neon peaks and valleys, looking less like human biology and more like the visualizer from an illegal warehouse rave in 1996.

“Well, Agatha,” Dr Harrison said, tapping a stylus against the desk. “The mystery of your palpitations is solved. Though I suspect you aren’t going to like the answer.”

Agatha offered a practised, reassuring smile—the same one she used when she had to deal with her more recalcitrant charities seeking more funds. “Try me. I have to deal with very difficult people daily. I’ve survived worse than medical jargon.”

“You have Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy, or HOCM,” Dr Harrison said, his tone shifting into clinical precision. “It’s a genetic condition. The muscular wall—the septum—between your left and right ventricles has grown abnormally thick. On top of that structural bottleneck, your telemetry shows intermittent Atrial Fibrillation. Your upper heart chambers are essentially quivering instead of beating effectively, and your thickened muscle is blocking the outflow of blood to the rest of your body.”

Agatha blinked. “Thickened. Like… a muscle getting stronger at the gym?”

“Not quite,” Dr Harrison said gently. “Think of it like a highway where the lanes have suddenly narrowed, and the engine is misfiring. Your heart is working overtime just to maintain basic output. That pressure, that fatigue you’ve been feeling—it’s your heart screaming for backup.”

Agatha looked down at her hands, resting in her lap. For nineteen years, she had traded neon mesh and strobe lights for cashmere cardigans and beige throw pillows. She had raised twins on her own in a hostile environment, earned a corner office, and mastered the art of quiet, predictable suburban grace. She had buried the girl who danced on speaker stacks until dawn so deep she almost forgot she ever existed.

And now, her own biology was staging a rebellion.

“Okay,” Agatha said, her voice remarkably steady. “What does the fix look like?”

Dr Harrison leaned forward, folding his hands. “First, we adjust your lifestyle. High-intensity cardio is out. Dehydration is your enemy. But pharmacologically, we need to slow your heart rate, allow those stiff ventricles time to fill properly, and strengthen the actual force of the contraction so you don’t pass out walking to your car.”

He tapped a few keys on his keyboard and printed out a prescription sheet, sliding it across the desk.

“We’re going to start you on Digoxin, commonly known as Digitalis,” Dr Harrison instructed, his eyes locking onto hers. “Your maintenance dose will be 0.25 mg taken orally, once daily.”

Agatha committed the numbers to memory. “Digitalis. Isn’t that derived from foxglove?”

“It is,” Dr Harrison nodded, looking mildly impressed. “A potent botanical turned pharmaceutical marvel. It works by inhibiting the sodium-potassium ATPase pump in your myocardial cells, which increases intracellular calcium. The result? Your heart beats slower, but with significantly more authority. It calms the erratic electrical chaos of the AFib and forces your thick heart muscle to coordinate its rhythm.”

“Sounds delicate,” Agatha murmured.

“It is a narrow-therapeutic-index drug, Agatha. Which means the line between helpful and toxic is razor thin. You cannot afford to be casual with this.” Dr Harrison’s voice dropped an octave, turning severe. “You need to understand the stakes. If you miss doses, your AFib will return with a vengeance, your heart rate will skyrocket, and your risk of a thromboembolic stroke climbs exponentially. But if you take too much, or if it accumulates dangerously in your bloodstream, Digoxin toxicity will set in.”

Agatha met his gaze, the old adrenaline junkie in her waking up, not with panic, but with a sudden, sharp clarity. “Define toxicity.”

“Nausea, profound vomiting, visual disturbances—specifically seeing a yellow-green halo around objects, or snowy vision,” Dr Harrison recited grimly. “And worse: severe, fatal arrhythmias. Complete heart block. If your serum potassium drops, the toxicity escalates rapidly. We will be doing routine blood draws to monitor your plasma levels.”

Dr Harrison tore the script off the printer and handed it to her. “Same time every day, Agatha. No doubling up if you miss a dose. No guessing. Treat this pill with absolute respect.”

Agatha took the paper. The white slip felt heavy, a tiny anchor tethering her erratic, wild heart to the rigid demands of survival.

She stood up, untied the paper gown, and began changing back into her sensible wool trousers and silk blouse. As she zipped her boots, she caught her reflection in the small vanity mirror by the sink. Her hair was pulled back in a neat, professional chignon; her expression was calm, composed, entirely suburban.

Nobody looking at her would ever guess the truth. Not the doctors, not her client, not even her children away at boarding school. But beneath her ribs, a fierce little engine was beating out a complex, dangerous rhythm—and Agatha was ready to take the wheel.

After she left, Dr Harrison wrote up his clinical notes and then slipped a piece of paper out from under the keyboard.  Earlier in the day, the head of the practice called him in for a meeting.  It was about the patient who was listed at 10 am, Agatha Montgomery.

He slid a piece of notepaper torn from a pharmaceutical company’s notepad with a telephone number.  “After you have seen her, call this number.”

“Why?”

“That will be between you and the person on the end of the phone.”

“What about doctor-patient confidentiality?”

“Report, as requested, and then we shall speak of it no more.”  That was all he said.  The meeting was over.

…

©  Charles Heath  2026

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 287

Day 287 – Packing an entire world into one sentence

…

Packing an Entire World into One Sentence: The Literary Economy of Charles Portis and True Grit

Charles Portis and True Grit: How One Sentence Built a World Meta Description: Explore the brilliant literary economy of Charles Portis through his masterpiece True Grit. Discover how just six novels proved that less is more.


There is a rare breed of writer who cares very little for literary fanfare, yet commands the absolute, obsessive devotion of fellow authors and devoted readers alike. Charles Portis was the patron saint of this elusive club.

Publishing a mere six novels over the course of his career, Portis never chased blockbuster status or critical preening. Instead, he crafted a body of work defined by precision, deadpan wit, and an astonishingly balanced economy of plot, character, and description.

Nowhere is this mastery more evident than in the opening sentence of his 1968 masterpiece, True Grit. With a single breath, Portis does something extraordinary: he packs an entire world, a distinct voice, and a complete worldview onto the page.

Let’s take a journey into the brilliant literary mind of Charles Portis and examine how a famously brief bibliography achieved timeless greatness through the art of economy.


The Immortal Opening: Setting the Stage in One Sentence

To understand what makes Charles Portis a master of narrative efficiency, you need only look at how True Grit begins:

“People do not often give due credence to the sorrows of young people, but those of us who have been young ourselves know differently and can remember what it was like in those sad and lonely days.”

In just thirty-one words, Portis accomplishes what other writers take whole chapters to establish.

First, he establishes voice. Through the narrator, a 14-year-old Mattie Ross looking back from old age, we immediately recognise a tone that is formal, unyielding, slightly archaic, and utterly lacking in self-pity or sentimentality.

Second, he establishes perspective. This is not a standard, bloodless Western. It is a deeply personal reckoning. By acknowledging the gravity of youth, Mattie preemptively pushes back against anyone who might dismiss her quest for vengeance as childish folly.

Without describing a horse, a dusty street, a revolver, or a badge, Portis sets the psychological and emotional stakes of the American frontier. He packs a whole world—a universe of stubborn grief and nineteenth-century grit—into a single sentence.


The Magic of Six: Quality Over Quantity in the Portis Canon

It is staggering to think that a writer of Portis’s calibre produced only six novels:

  1. Norwood (1966)
  2. True Grit (1968)
  3. The Dog of the South (1979)
  4. Masters of Atlantis (1985)
  5. Gringos (1991)
  6. Starlight (1999)

In an era of bloated manuscripts and multi-book fantasy series, Portis’s bibliography looks positively monastic. Yet, every single one of these books is a polished gem.

Portis had no time for literary fat. His books are famously difficult to categorise—are they comedies? Westerns? Picaresque road trips? They are all of these things, bound together by an economically balanced plot that never drags, characters who are eccentric yet undeniably human, and descriptions that are razor-sharp without ever lapsing into purple prose.


The Three Pillars of Portis’s Economy

How did Portis pull off this rare literary magic trick across his six novels? By maintaining a strict equilibrium between three essential elements:

1. The Balanced Plot: Movement Without Rush

Portis’s plots are generally simple in design—often structured as a quest or a journey. In True Grit, it’s a girl hunting her father’s killer. In The Dog of the South, it’s a man chasing his runaway wife and his stolen Ford Torino.

Because the overarching premise is usually straightforward, Portis doesn’t need to waste time on convoluted twists. The plot simply acts as a vehicle to move his wonderfully bizarre characters from one strange encounter to the next. The pacing is steady, rhythmic, and perfectly proportioned.

2. The Unforgettable Character: Eccentricity Grounded in Truth

If you ask readers to name their favourite Charles Portis characters—whether it’s Mattie Ross, the hard-drinking Rooster Cogburn, or the grandiose Lamar Jimmerson from Masters of Atlantis—you are talking about people who march to the beat of an entirely different drum.

Portis loved obsessives, grifters, pedants, and drifters. Yet, his genius lies in his restraint. He lets his characters reveal their absurdities through their own dialogue and deadpan narration. He doesn’t need to tell us they are funny; he just lets them speak, trusting the reader to appreciate the dry humour.

3. The Minimalist Description: Showing the World in Flashbacks and Brief Strokes

Portis was a former journalist (having worked as a reporter for the New York Herald Tribune), and it shows in his prose. He understood the power of the selected detail.

Instead of devoting pages to describing a sunset or a saloon, Portis gives you the one detail that matters—a slouching hat, a particular brand of canned peach, the precise legal terminology of a land dispute. His descriptions are economical because they serve a dual purpose: they anchor the scene visually while simultaneously revealing character.


Why Charles Portis Matters Today

In contemporary fiction, we often equate length and complexity with depth. We celebrate door-stopper novels that take hundreds of pages to warm up.

Charles Portis stands as a glorious antidote to this trend. He proved that a novel doesn’t need to be massive to be profound. By respecting the reader’s intelligence, stripping away every unnecessary word, and anchoring his stories in unforgettable, singular voices, Portis created a body of work that will be read and admired as long as people care about great writing.

It all started with a thirty-one-word sentence.

If you haven’t yet stepped into the wonderfully eccentric, economically crafted world of Charles Portis, open True Grit, read that first sentence, and prepare to be carried away by a master….

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 287

Day 287 – Packing an entire world into one sentence

…

Packing an Entire World into One Sentence: The Literary Economy of Charles Portis and True Grit

Charles Portis and True Grit: How One Sentence Built a World Meta Description: Explore the brilliant literary economy of Charles Portis through his masterpiece True Grit. Discover how just six novels proved that less is more.


There is a rare breed of writer who cares very little for literary fanfare, yet commands the absolute, obsessive devotion of fellow authors and devoted readers alike. Charles Portis was the patron saint of this elusive club.

Publishing a mere six novels over the course of his career, Portis never chased blockbuster status or critical preening. Instead, he crafted a body of work defined by precision, deadpan wit, and an astonishingly balanced economy of plot, character, and description.

Nowhere is this mastery more evident than in the opening sentence of his 1968 masterpiece, True Grit. With a single breath, Portis does something extraordinary: he packs an entire world, a distinct voice, and a complete worldview onto the page.

Let’s take a journey into the brilliant literary mind of Charles Portis and examine how a famously brief bibliography achieved timeless greatness through the art of economy.


The Immortal Opening: Setting the Stage in One Sentence

To understand what makes Charles Portis a master of narrative efficiency, you need only look at how True Grit begins:

“People do not often give due credence to the sorrows of young people, but those of us who have been young ourselves know differently and can remember what it was like in those sad and lonely days.”

In just thirty-one words, Portis accomplishes what other writers take whole chapters to establish.

First, he establishes voice. Through the narrator, a 14-year-old Mattie Ross looking back from old age, we immediately recognise a tone that is formal, unyielding, slightly archaic, and utterly lacking in self-pity or sentimentality.

Second, he establishes perspective. This is not a standard, bloodless Western. It is a deeply personal reckoning. By acknowledging the gravity of youth, Mattie preemptively pushes back against anyone who might dismiss her quest for vengeance as childish folly.

Without describing a horse, a dusty street, a revolver, or a badge, Portis sets the psychological and emotional stakes of the American frontier. He packs a whole world—a universe of stubborn grief and nineteenth-century grit—into a single sentence.


The Magic of Six: Quality Over Quantity in the Portis Canon

It is staggering to think that a writer of Portis’s calibre produced only six novels:

  1. Norwood (1966)
  2. True Grit (1968)
  3. The Dog of the South (1979)
  4. Masters of Atlantis (1985)
  5. Gringos (1991)
  6. Starlight (1999)

In an era of bloated manuscripts and multi-book fantasy series, Portis’s bibliography looks positively monastic. Yet, every single one of these books is a polished gem.

Portis had no time for literary fat. His books are famously difficult to categorise—are they comedies? Westerns? Picaresque road trips? They are all of these things, bound together by an economically balanced plot that never drags, characters who are eccentric yet undeniably human, and descriptions that are razor-sharp without ever lapsing into purple prose.


The Three Pillars of Portis’s Economy

How did Portis pull off this rare literary magic trick across his six novels? By maintaining a strict equilibrium between three essential elements:

1. The Balanced Plot: Movement Without Rush

Portis’s plots are generally simple in design—often structured as a quest or a journey. In True Grit, it’s a girl hunting her father’s killer. In The Dog of the South, it’s a man chasing his runaway wife and his stolen Ford Torino.

Because the overarching premise is usually straightforward, Portis doesn’t need to waste time on convoluted twists. The plot simply acts as a vehicle to move his wonderfully bizarre characters from one strange encounter to the next. The pacing is steady, rhythmic, and perfectly proportioned.

2. The Unforgettable Character: Eccentricity Grounded in Truth

If you ask readers to name their favourite Charles Portis characters—whether it’s Mattie Ross, the hard-drinking Rooster Cogburn, or the grandiose Lamar Jimmerson from Masters of Atlantis—you are talking about people who march to the beat of an entirely different drum.

Portis loved obsessives, grifters, pedants, and drifters. Yet, his genius lies in his restraint. He lets his characters reveal their absurdities through their own dialogue and deadpan narration. He doesn’t need to tell us they are funny; he just lets them speak, trusting the reader to appreciate the dry humour.

3. The Minimalist Description: Showing the World in Flashbacks and Brief Strokes

Portis was a former journalist (having worked as a reporter for the New York Herald Tribune), and it shows in his prose. He understood the power of the selected detail.

Instead of devoting pages to describing a sunset or a saloon, Portis gives you the one detail that matters—a slouching hat, a particular brand of canned peach, the precise legal terminology of a land dispute. His descriptions are economical because they serve a dual purpose: they anchor the scene visually while simultaneously revealing character.


Why Charles Portis Matters Today

In contemporary fiction, we often equate length and complexity with depth. We celebrate door-stopper novels that take hundreds of pages to warm up.

Charles Portis stands as a glorious antidote to this trend. He proved that a novel doesn’t need to be massive to be profound. By respecting the reader’s intelligence, stripping away every unnecessary word, and anchoring his stories in unforgettable, singular voices, Portis created a body of work that will be read and admired as long as people care about great writing.

It all started with a thirty-one-word sentence.

If you haven’t yet stepped into the wonderfully eccentric, economically crafted world of Charles Portis, open True Grit, read that first sentence, and prepare to be carried away by a master….