What I learned about writing – To plan or not to plan.

Well, it depends.

Most of the time, I fly by the seat of my pants because I like the idea of the story unfolding in the same way it does for the reader.

Until…

Yes, it’s that little thing called painting yourself into a corner.

It happens.

Luckily for me, when I run aground, I just have to walk away from it for a few days, a week, perhaps a month, and suddenly, an idea pops into my head, and we’re off again.

It’s why I write most of my stories in episodic form, and I work on three or four, not just the one.

However, there are pros and cons, and yes, I do actually plan.

When a story gets a good start, the ideas start drying up.

Or…

I find myself having to create a biography for the characters, family trees, and getting the dates correct.  Flying high is great, but there comes a time when the timeline gets confused.

Usually, about halfway through, we’re getting down to the serious side of the story.  So, on balance, nearly all of my states are a blend of the two methodologies.

Which of the two is best?.

I’d say planning.

My only problem with that is that it’s not always apparent what is going to happen at the end, though if I sat down and thought about the process I used for the 20 or so books that I have written, the end was not a surprise, so perhaps it was always there in the back of my mind.

For the two sequels I’m working on, they were more planned than pantsed.  With one, I knew the end before it started.  With the second, nearly done, I didn’t to a certain extent.  I know how I want it to end, but writing it is taking it in a different direction.

Perhaps a third book is needed for them to finally realise they should be together.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 72

Day 72  – Focus, concentration – and the cat!

Focus and Concentration in a Distracted World

(And Why Your Cat Might Be the Secret Weapon – or the Worst Saboteur)


1. Why Focus Matters More Than Ever

In 2024‑2025 the average knowledge‑worker juggles seven digital tools, nine instant‑messaging channels, and a relentless stream of notifications. The result? A mental‑energy drain that feels like trying to read a novel while the TV is playing the soundtrack of a busy airport.

When you can focus—that state of deep, uninterrupted attention—your brain operates in its most efficient mode:

BenefitWhat It Looks Like
Higher quality outputFewer errors, richer ideas
Speedier completionTasks that once took 2 h now finish in 1 h
Reduced stressLess “I’m behind” anxiety
Better memory retentionInformation sticks after a single deep‑work session

But achieving that sweet spot isn’t a given. It’s a skill that must be deliberately cultivated, and like any skill it runs into obstacles.


2. The Biggest Obstacles to Deep Focus

#ObstacleHow It Sabotages YouQuick Fix
1Digital OverloadPop‑ups, email pings, Slack threads, and endless scrolling hijack the prefrontal cortex, forcing it into task‑switching mode.Turn off non‑essential notifications, batch‑check email 2‑3× per day, use “focus‑mode” extensions (e.g., Freedom, LeechBlock).
2Multitasking MythSwitching costs ~23 seconds per switch and erodes memory. The brain never truly “does” two things at once.Adopt single‑tasking: block 90‑minute “focus windows” and commit to one deliverable per block.
3Physical EnvironmentClutter, poor lighting, uncomfortable seating, and temperature fluctuations raise cortisol, making it hard to settle into concentration.Declutter the desk, invest in ergonomic furniture, use a 6000 K “focus” light, and keep the room at 20‑22 °C.
4Internal NoiseStress, rumination, and low‑grade anxiety flood the mind with “background chatter.”Practice a 2‑minute mindful breathing reset before each work block; keep a “worry journal” to offload intrusive thoughts.
5Biological RhythmsWorking against your circadian peaks (e.g., tackling analytical work at 3 a.m.) lowers cognitive bandwidth.Map your personal “chronotype” and schedule high‑cognition tasks during your natural peak (usually mid‑morning for most).
6The “Cat Effect”A sudden, adorable interruption that pulls you away from the screen.(See the next section – it can be both a curse and a cure.)

While many of these obstacles can be mitigated with tools and habits, the Cat Effect is a special case because it blends the emotional with the environmental in a way few other distractions do.


3. The “Cat Effect”: Remedy or Curse?

3.1 What Exactly Is the Cat Effect?

In productivity circles, the Cat Effect describes the phenomenon where a feline (or any beloved pet) jumps onto your keyboard, sits on your paperwork, or simply meows for attention at the moment you’re deep in concentration. It’s a classic meme: a cat perched on a laptop with the caption “I’m working, don’t disturb.”

But beyond the humour, the Cat Effect raises a genuine question: Can an unpredictable, affectionate animal actually improve focus, or does it merely sabotage it?

3.2 The Science Behind “Cute Interruption”

Research InsightTakeaway
Oxytocin boost – Petting a cat releases oxytocin, a hormone linked to reduced stress and heightened focus. (Study: Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2023)A brief cuddle can reset the nervous system, making it easier to return to work refreshed.
Micro‑break theory – Short, intentional breaks improve cognitive performance. The Pomodoro Technique (25 min work + 5 min break) is backed by neuroscience.A cat’s “interruption” can act as a natural micro‑break, provided it’s timed right.
Attention residue – Switching tasks leaves “residue” that can linger up to 20 minutes, impairing subsequent performance. (Lleras et al., 2022)If the cat’s demand leads to an unplanned, longer break, you incur the cost of attention residue.
Positive affect – Positive emotions broaden thinking and foster creativity (Fredrickson, 2021).The joy a cat brings can expand your creative bandwidth after the interaction.

Bottom line: The Cat Effect can be both a remedy and a curse—it hinges on how and when the interruption happens.

3.3 When It Becomes a Remedy

  1. Scheduled “Pet Pomodoros” – Set a timer for 45 minutes of deep work, then allocate a 5‑minute “cat cuddle” break. The cat learns the pattern, and you get a stress‑busting oxytocin hit.
  2. Pre‑work Warm‑up – Spend 2‑3 minutes playing with your cat before you begin a focus block. This releases built‑up tension and signals to your brain that you’re entering a calm state.
  3. Mindful Observation – Instead of shooing the cat away, observe its behaviour for a breath‑count (inhale 4, hold 4, exhale 4). You turn the distraction into a mini‑meditation.

3.4 When It Turns Into a Curse

  • Unplanned, Prolonged Attention – If your cat decides to nap on your keyboard for 10 minutes, you lose momentum and may need to restart a task.
  • Emotional Over‑Attachment – Guilt or anxiety about leaving the cat alone can cause you to pre‑emptively check on it, fracturing the focus block.
  • Multiple Pets – Two or more cats (or a cat + dog) amplify the probability of chaotic interruptions, making the environment too volatile for deep work.

3.5 A Practical Decision Tree

               Is the cat demanding attention?
                       /          
                 Yes (short)   Yes (long)
                  /                
   Is it < 2 min & 5‑min break?  Is it >5 min?
          |                         |
    Allow micro‑break    Gently redirect cat
          |                         |
   Resume work (oxytocin)   Use “cat‑free” zone


If the cat’s request is brief (under 2 minutes) and you’re already scheduled for a short break, embrace it. Anything longer? Redirect—a separate cat‑play area, a treat puzzle, or a scheduled “cat time” later in the day.


4. Building a Focus‑Friendly Ecosystem (Cat‑Friendly Edition)

  1. Create a Dedicated “Focus Zone”
    • Use a separate room or a visual barrier (e.g., a bookshelf) that signals “do not disturb.”
    • Add a cat perch just outside the zone so your feline can still be near you without hijacking your keyboard.
  2. Leverage Technology
    • Noise‑cancelling headphones with a “focus playlist” (Binaural beats, 60 bpm).
    • Smart lighting that mimics daylight during peak hours and dims after your scheduled break.
  3. Set Boundaries with Your Pet
    • Training cue: Teach your cat a “go to bed” command for when you need uninterrupted time.
    • Timed play sessions: 10 minutes of interactive toys (laser pointer, feather wand) right before you start a focus block.
  4. Optimise Physical Health
    • Hydration: Keep a water bottle at your desk; dehydration reduces concentration by up to 30 %.
    • Movement: A 30‑second stretch every 30 minutes combats the “couch‑potato” effect of sitting too long.
  5. Mind‑Body Reset Ritual
    • 2‑minute breathing: Inhale for 4, hold for 4, exhale for 4.
    • Gratitude snap: Look at something you’re grateful for (often, that’s your cat) for 5 seconds—instant positive affect.

5. A Sample Day That Harnesses the Cat Effect

TimeActivityCat Strategy
07:30‑08:00Morning routine (coffee, stretch)Play with cat for 5 min, then give a treat in a separate corner.
08:00‑09:45Deep work block (project planning)Focus cue: “Do not disturb” sign + headphones. If cat jumps, count to 5, gently guide it to the perch.
09:45‑10:00Micro‑breakCat cuddle – 5 min of petting, oxytocin boost.
10:00‑11:30Focus block (writing)Same focus cue. If cat stays on the desk, redirect with a puzzle feeder.
11:30‑12:00Lunch + PlaytimeDedicated 30‑min interactive session with cat; burn energy for the rest of the day.
13:00‑14:30Focus block (analysis)Headphones on, “focus zone.” Cat on perch, watching you.
14:30‑14:35Quick stretch + breathingNo cat interaction; keep the rhythm of work.
14:35‑15:45Wrap‑up & reviewGive cat a final cuddle before shutting down the computer.

Result: You experience two intentional cat‑driven micro‑breaks that enhance focus, while preventing unscheduled, disruptive interruptions.


6. The Takeaway

  • Focus is a muscle that needs regular, deliberate training.
  • Digital, physical, and internal distractions are the primary obstacles; each can be managed with clear habits, environment tweaks, and self‑care.
  • The Cat Effect is a double‑edged sword:
    • Remedy when it serves as a short, pleasurable micro‑break that releases oxytocin and resets stress.
    • Curse when it leads to prolonged, unplanned interruptions that create attention residue.
  • The secret lies in predictability: schedule pet time, train boundaries, and design a workspace that welcomes the cat—but only on its terms.

Ready to Test the Cat Effect?

  1. Pick one focus block today (e.g., 90 minutes).
  2. Set a clear cat‑break rule (≤2 minutes, then back to work).
  3. Track the outcome – Did you feel more refreshed? Did productivity improve?

Share your results in the comments! Whether you’re a solo freelancer, a remote team leader, or a cat‑loving student, mastering the balance between focus and feline affection can be the game‑changer you didn’t know you needed.

Happy focusing—and happy cat‑cuddling! 🐾✨

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 71

Day 71 – Luck

Writing Is a Blend of Drafts, Practice, Patience… and (Yes) Luck
How much does luck really matter, and can you manufacture your own?


1. The Four Pillars of the Writing Process

PillarWhat It Looks Like in PracticeWhy It Matters
DraftA messy, imperfect first version that never sees the light of day.Gets ideas out of your head and onto paper before they evaporate.
PracticeWriting daily, experimenting with genre, studying the craft.Turns raw talent into reliable skill; the more you write, the better you become at spotting what works.
PatienceAllowing stories to simmer, waiting for feedback, revising until the narrative sings.Prevents rushed, half‑baked work and gives you the space to notice subtle improvements.
LuckThe right eyes on the right piece at the right time.Bridges the gap between “good enough” and “published, celebrated, paid.”

Most writers feel comfortable dissecting the first three. They’re concrete, measurable, and—most importantly—controllable. Luck, on the other hand, feels ethereal, like a gust of wind you can’t predict or direct. Yet, it’s a factor that many successful authors (and their agents, editors, and readers) cite as a turning point in their careers.


2. Luck: Myth, Mystery, or Measurable Influence?

a. The “Right Person” Phenomenon

The story you’ll hear a thousand times: “I sent my manuscript to 50 agents, and the 51st said yes.”

  • Statistical reality: If an agent receives 200 submissions a week and picks one, the odds are 0.5 % per submission. That’s a very real, quantifiable element of luck.
  • Why it matters: Even a superb manuscript can sit in the abyss of an overburdened inbox forever without that serendipitous glance.

b. Timing is Everything

A dystopian novel released in 2024 lands in a saturated market; a similar story in 2008 rides the wave of post‑9/11 anxiety and becomes a bestseller.

  • External factors: Cultural mood, current events, emerging trends, even algorithm changes on platforms like Amazon or TikTok.
  • The luck factor: Being in sync with the zeitgeist often feels like luck, but it’s also a product of awareness and timing.

c. Network Effects

A friend shares your article on LinkedIn, it goes viral, and a publishing house reaches out.

  • The roulette wheel: Who you know, where you post, which forum you frequent—these are chance encounters that can catapult a piece from obscurity to spotlight.

Bottom line: Luck isn’t a mystical force; it’s the intersection of your work with unpredictable external variables. And that intersection is not completely out of your control.


3. Engineering Your Own Luck

If luck is a probability, you can raise the odds. Below are proven tactics that writers use to manufacture their own good fortune.

1️⃣ Show Up Consistently (The Visibility Engine)

  • Why it works: The more you publish—whether it’s blog posts, flash fiction, or LinkedIn threads—the higher the chance one piece lands in the right feed at the right moment.
  • Action step: Commit to a minimum output (e.g., 500 words a day or one medium‑length article per week). Use a content calendar to keep yourself accountable.

2️⃣ Target the Right Gatekeepers

  • Research before you pitch: Identify agents, editors, or influencers whose recent purchases align with your genre or theme.
  • Personalise: Mention a specific piece they’ve championed and explain why your manuscript complements it.
  • Result: You’re no longer sending a blind shot in the dark; you’re aiming at a moving target you’ve studied.

3️⃣ Leverage “Micro‑Virality” Platforms

  • Twitter, TikTok, Substack, Medium: These ecosystems reward shareable, bite‑sized content. A well‑crafted hook can earn thousands of impressions overnight.
  • Tip: Repurpose a chapter excerpt into a 280‑character “teaser” or a 30‑second video reading. Cross‑post to maximise reach.

4️⃣ Build a Community First

  • Why it matters: A loyal readership will champion your work, give honest feedback, and amplify your voice.
  • How: Host virtual writing circles, participate in genre‑specific Discord servers, or run a monthly newsletter with exclusive drafts.
  • Outcome: When you finally release a book, you already have a built‑in launch squad.

5️⃣ Collect Data, Iterate, and Scale

  • Track metrics: Open rates, click‑throughs, submission response rates.
  • A/B test subject lines, cover designs, query letters.
  • Refine: Treat each launch as an experiment; the data reveals which “luck‑generating” tactics actually work for you.

6️⃣ Stay Informed About Industry Shifts

  • Subscribe to trade newsletters (Publishers Weekly, The Bookseller, etc.).
  • Attend virtual conferences and note emerging trends (e.g., the rise of interactive fiction or AI‑assisted storytelling).
  • Result: You can anticipate the next wave and position your manuscript to ride it—turning what looks like luck into strategic timing.

4. A Real‑World Example: From “Luck” to “Preparedness + Opportunity”

Case Study – Maya Patel, debut sci‑fi author

  1. Draft & Practice: Wrote three full manuscripts over four years, revising each based on beta‑reader feedback.
  2. Patience: Held back on publishing, waiting for the right moment to submit to agents specialized in climate‑fiction.
  3. Manufactured Luck:
  • Joined a niche Discord for “eco‑thrillers.”
  • Shared a 1,000‑word excerpt, which was retweeted by a popular environmental activist.
  • The tweet caught the eye of an agent who listed “eco‑drama” as a current interest.
  • Within two weeks, Maya’s manuscript was under contract.

Maya’s story illustrates that the “lucky” agent discovery was the result of deliberate community building and strategic exposure.


5. The Mindset Shift: From “I’m Unlucky” to “I’m Luck-Optimising.”

Fixed‑Luck ThoughtLuck‑Optimizing Reframe
“I never get noticed; it’s just bad luck.”“I need more visibility points where luck can happen.”
“If I’m not published by 30, it’s fate.”“I’ll create multiple launch pathways—self‑publish, serialized web‑novel, audiobooks.”
“Publishers are gatekeepers I can’t influence.”“I can build relationships with them through consistent, high‑quality content.”

By treating luck as a resource you can attract rather than a random wind you must endure, you shift from passive resignation to active agency.


6. Quick‑Start Checklist: Crafting Your Own Luck

✅Action
1Set a daily word‑count goal and log it for 30 days.
2Compile a list of 10 agents/editors who have sold books similar to yours.
3Publish a 500‑word excerpt on two social platforms this week.
4Join one writing community (Discord/Reddit/Slack) and contribute weekly.
5Track the performance of each post (views, shares, comments).
6Review data every two weeks; tweak headlines, posting times, or formats.
7Pitch one query letter per week, using the personalized research you did.
8Celebrate every small win—an extra comment, a retweet, a beta‑reader endorsement.

Consistently checking off these items builds “luck capital” that compounds over time.


7. The Bottom Line

Writing success is rarely a straight line from draft → practice → patience → publication. Luck—those unpredictable moments when the right person sees the right piece—plays a genuine role. But luck is not a cosmic lottery ticket you either draw or don’t. It’s a probability that you can raise dramatically by:

  1. Increasing the number of opportunities (more drafts, more posts, more pitches).
  2. Targeting the right people (research, personalisation).
  3. Timing your releases (stay current, watch industry trends).
  4. Cultivating a community that will champion your work.

When you combine solid craft with a systematic “luck‑building” strategy, you turn the nebulous element of fortune into a replicable part of your writing business.

Remember: “Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.”—Seneca (or at least a modern writer’s version of it).
So keep drafting, keep practicing, keep being patient, and then engineer the circumstances where luck can finally knock on your door.


Ready to boost your luck? Drop a comment below with the first step you’ll take today, and let’s hold each other accountable. Happy writing! ✍️🚀

What I learned about writing – Writing is the supreme solace.

Perhaps it can be.

I remember when my mother died. It was the closest I had ever been in the presence of death.

I got a phone call to tell me I should come to the hospital; she was not going to last much longer.  I was on the way out the door when the call said she had passed.

That was followed by going to the hospital, where I stayed for an hour, trying to assemble my thoughts.

In that moment when I first saw her, I felt numb.  And much as I hate to say it, she was not much of a mother to me or any of us, for that matter, and I never really understood why.

Our grandmother, her mother, had been more caring and considerate.

For a few days after, I guess I went through a period where I tried to think of all the good things about her, but the bad still intruded.  Those thoughts included my father, who was still alive, and had we been on speaking terms, perhaps it might have helped.

Instead, I was left with mixed emotions.

A few days later, I started putting words on paper, deciding that I would try to put together a eulogy of sorts, in case it was called for.

Writing about it was a form of solace, a period where I could address what it was that I felt, and at the end of it, I felt better.

Only later, much later, when I started digging into the family genealogy, did a lot of stuff start making sense.

Like most people, she was as complicated as the day was long. 

She had an older sister whom I believe she was very jealous of; she had a boyfriend who was a local boy, since she was sixteen, writing continually during the war after he signed up, and writing about the life they would have together.

She had an explosive temper and managed at one time or another to alienate or get on the wrong side of everybody she cared about, and girlfriends in particular.  That tempered extended, eventually to her boyfriend, now home from the war, and I believe they were looking forward to getting married.

A row put an end to it.  He didn’t answer her letters of apology and ignored a telegram she sent, an indication of how badly she had fractured their relationship.

It’s 1946, and she’s working in Melbourne. 

My father had gone overseas, why, we’ll never know, and ended up with his own matrimonial disaster, and having a wedding planned called off, he returned home disappointed and alone, going back to his old job of projectionist that he had before he enlisted.

It’s 1947, and he’s in the Snowy Mountain district as a roving projectionist.

I could only imagine how she and her family managed her disappointment situation, and her sister, who herself had married and had her own life, might account for my mother’s feelings towards her.

With that failed relationship in the past, her matrimonial prospects are now in the hands of a woman who is charged with finding a suitable husband.

That man was my father.

He gets the introduction, goes to see her, and she has gone home for the weekend to her parents’ house.  It’s not surprising she had had another row with her girlfriends, and she faces time alone in her room.

He writes, not in the same romantic flowery prose of her last boyfriend, but of how domestic his life is, and how much he needs a wife to do those chores.

The thing is, he is a returned serviceman and used to fending for himself.  This is not going to be a match made in heaven.  He has his own anger management issues and battles with his own family, and it’s no surprise to learn there were ultimatums and threats to call off the wedding.

And yet, in 1950, it finally went ahead.  There may have been compelling reasons, but one thing that was assured, neither of them advertised the fact that they had families, and we, as children, rarely, if ever, saw our aunts and uncles, only on rare occasions our grandparents.

Does snake me feel any better writing this down?

No.  It does, however, provide a deeper understanding of the two people who were my parents and sadness at the loss of never knowing my aunts, uncles and grandparents, and goes a long way towards explaining why I am the way I am.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 71

Day 71 – Luck

Writing Is a Blend of Drafts, Practice, Patience… and (Yes) Luck
How much does luck really matter, and can you manufacture your own?


1. The Four Pillars of the Writing Process

PillarWhat It Looks Like in PracticeWhy It Matters
DraftA messy, imperfect first version that never sees the light of day.Gets ideas out of your head and onto paper before they evaporate.
PracticeWriting daily, experimenting with genre, studying the craft.Turns raw talent into reliable skill; the more you write, the better you become at spotting what works.
PatienceAllowing stories to simmer, waiting for feedback, revising until the narrative sings.Prevents rushed, half‑baked work and gives you the space to notice subtle improvements.
LuckThe right eyes on the right piece at the right time.Bridges the gap between “good enough” and “published, celebrated, paid.”

Most writers feel comfortable dissecting the first three. They’re concrete, measurable, and—most importantly—controllable. Luck, on the other hand, feels ethereal, like a gust of wind you can’t predict or direct. Yet, it’s a factor that many successful authors (and their agents, editors, and readers) cite as a turning point in their careers.


2. Luck: Myth, Mystery, or Measurable Influence?

a. The “Right Person” Phenomenon

The story you’ll hear a thousand times: “I sent my manuscript to 50 agents, and the 51st said yes.”

  • Statistical reality: If an agent receives 200 submissions a week and picks one, the odds are 0.5 % per submission. That’s a very real, quantifiable element of luck.
  • Why it matters: Even a superb manuscript can sit in the abyss of an overburdened inbox forever without that serendipitous glance.

b. Timing is Everything

A dystopian novel released in 2024 lands in a saturated market; a similar story in 2008 rides the wave of post‑9/11 anxiety and becomes a bestseller.

  • External factors: Cultural mood, current events, emerging trends, even algorithm changes on platforms like Amazon or TikTok.
  • The luck factor: Being in sync with the zeitgeist often feels like luck, but it’s also a product of awareness and timing.

c. Network Effects

A friend shares your article on LinkedIn, it goes viral, and a publishing house reaches out.

  • The roulette wheel: Who you know, where you post, which forum you frequent—these are chance encounters that can catapult a piece from obscurity to spotlight.

Bottom line: Luck isn’t a mystical force; it’s the intersection of your work with unpredictable external variables. And that intersection is not completely out of your control.


3. Engineering Your Own Luck

If luck is a probability, you can raise the odds. Below are proven tactics that writers use to manufacture their own good fortune.

1️⃣ Show Up Consistently (The Visibility Engine)

  • Why it works: The more you publish—whether it’s blog posts, flash fiction, or LinkedIn threads—the higher the chance one piece lands in the right feed at the right moment.
  • Action step: Commit to a minimum output (e.g., 500 words a day or one medium‑length article per week). Use a content calendar to keep yourself accountable.

2️⃣ Target the Right Gatekeepers

  • Research before you pitch: Identify agents, editors, or influencers whose recent purchases align with your genre or theme.
  • Personalise: Mention a specific piece they’ve championed and explain why your manuscript complements it.
  • Result: You’re no longer sending a blind shot in the dark; you’re aiming at a moving target you’ve studied.

3️⃣ Leverage “Micro‑Virality” Platforms

  • Twitter, TikTok, Substack, Medium: These ecosystems reward shareable, bite‑sized content. A well‑crafted hook can earn thousands of impressions overnight.
  • Tip: Repurpose a chapter excerpt into a 280‑character “teaser” or a 30‑second video reading. Cross‑post to maximise reach.

4️⃣ Build a Community First

  • Why it matters: A loyal readership will champion your work, give honest feedback, and amplify your voice.
  • How: Host virtual writing circles, participate in genre‑specific Discord servers, or run a monthly newsletter with exclusive drafts.
  • Outcome: When you finally release a book, you already have a built‑in launch squad.

5️⃣ Collect Data, Iterate, and Scale

  • Track metrics: Open rates, click‑throughs, submission response rates.
  • A/B test subject lines, cover designs, query letters.
  • Refine: Treat each launch as an experiment; the data reveals which “luck‑generating” tactics actually work for you.

6️⃣ Stay Informed About Industry Shifts

  • Subscribe to trade newsletters (Publishers Weekly, The Bookseller, etc.).
  • Attend virtual conferences and note emerging trends (e.g., the rise of interactive fiction or AI‑assisted storytelling).
  • Result: You can anticipate the next wave and position your manuscript to ride it—turning what looks like luck into strategic timing.

4. A Real‑World Example: From “Luck” to “Preparedness + Opportunity”

Case Study – Maya Patel, debut sci‑fi author

  1. Draft & Practice: Wrote three full manuscripts over four years, revising each based on beta‑reader feedback.
  2. Patience: Held back on publishing, waiting for the right moment to submit to agents specialized in climate‑fiction.
  3. Manufactured Luck:
  • Joined a niche Discord for “eco‑thrillers.”
  • Shared a 1,000‑word excerpt, which was retweeted by a popular environmental activist.
  • The tweet caught the eye of an agent who listed “eco‑drama” as a current interest.
  • Within two weeks, Maya’s manuscript was under contract.

Maya’s story illustrates that the “lucky” agent discovery was the result of deliberate community building and strategic exposure.


5. The Mindset Shift: From “I’m Unlucky” to “I’m Luck-Optimising.”

Fixed‑Luck ThoughtLuck‑Optimizing Reframe
“I never get noticed; it’s just bad luck.”“I need more visibility points where luck can happen.”
“If I’m not published by 30, it’s fate.”“I’ll create multiple launch pathways—self‑publish, serialized web‑novel, audiobooks.”
“Publishers are gatekeepers I can’t influence.”“I can build relationships with them through consistent, high‑quality content.”

By treating luck as a resource you can attract rather than a random wind you must endure, you shift from passive resignation to active agency.


6. Quick‑Start Checklist: Crafting Your Own Luck

✅Action
1Set a daily word‑count goal and log it for 30 days.
2Compile a list of 10 agents/editors who have sold books similar to yours.
3Publish a 500‑word excerpt on two social platforms this week.
4Join one writing community (Discord/Reddit/Slack) and contribute weekly.
5Track the performance of each post (views, shares, comments).
6Review data every two weeks; tweak headlines, posting times, or formats.
7Pitch one query letter per week, using the personalized research you did.
8Celebrate every small win—an extra comment, a retweet, a beta‑reader endorsement.

Consistently checking off these items builds “luck capital” that compounds over time.


7. The Bottom Line

Writing success is rarely a straight line from draft → practice → patience → publication. Luck—those unpredictable moments when the right person sees the right piece—plays a genuine role. But luck is not a cosmic lottery ticket you either draw or don’t. It’s a probability that you can raise dramatically by:

  1. Increasing the number of opportunities (more drafts, more posts, more pitches).
  2. Targeting the right people (research, personalisation).
  3. Timing your releases (stay current, watch industry trends).
  4. Cultivating a community that will champion your work.

When you combine solid craft with a systematic “luck‑building” strategy, you turn the nebulous element of fortune into a replicable part of your writing business.

Remember: “Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.”—Seneca (or at least a modern writer’s version of it).
So keep drafting, keep practicing, keep being patient, and then engineer the circumstances where luck can finally knock on your door.


Ready to boost your luck? Drop a comment below with the first step you’ll take today, and let’s hold each other accountable. Happy writing! ✍️🚀

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 70

Day 70 – The nine-to-five effect

The 9‑to‑5 Grind: How a “Soul‑Destroying” Day Job Can Become the Secret Sauce Behind Award‑Winning Fiction

“The work we do for a living is the very material our imagination chews on while we’re trying to stay awake at the office.” – Anon.

If you’re a writer who spends eight-plus hours a day staring at a spreadsheet, fielding angry customers, or shuffling paperwork, you’ve probably wondered whether that soul‑sucking routine is killing your creative spark. The short answer? It’s not.

In fact, for many of the world’s most celebrated authors—including the master of psychological suspense, Patricia Highsmith—the very same grind that felt like a dead‑end at the time became the fueldiscipline, and grounding that later powered their best work. Below, we’ll unpack why the daily grind can be a surprisingly potent catalyst for literary greatness, and we’ll look at real‑life writers who turned their “day‑job drudgery” into literary gold.


1. The “Soul‑Destroying” Job: Why It’s Not All Bad

Common ComplaintHidden Benefit
Monotony – “It feels like I’m watching paint dry.”Rhythmic structure. Repetitive tasks teach you timing, pacing, and the power of restraint—key ingredients in tight prose.
Lack of creative freedom – “I’m stuck following a script.”Constraint breeds invention. When you can’t control your environment, you learn to make the most of the tiny windows you do control (a notebook on a lunch break, a restless mind on the commute).
Emotional exhaustion – “I’m drained by the time I get home.”Emotional reservoir. The frustrations, absurdities, and small triumphs of office life provide a deep well of authentic human experience to mine later.
Time scarcity – “There’s never enough time to write.”Time‑management mastery. Juggling deadlines forces you to carve out micro‑moments of focus, sharpening the skill of writing with brevity.
Identity dilution – “I feel like a cog, not a creator.”Grounded perspective. A day job anchors you in the “real world,” preventing the echo chamber that can make fictional worlds feel detached from lived experience.

Think of the nine‑to‑five as a training ground rather than a trough. It may feel soul‑crushing in the moment, but the resilience you build, the people you observe, and the grit you develop often become the scaffolding for your most resonant stories.


2. How the Day Job Turns Into Narrative Gold

  1. Observation Lab – An office is a micro‑society. You see power dynamics, office politics, and the hidden rituals people perform to survive. Highsmith famously used the mundanity of a clerk’s life to study the banality of evil, later channelling it into the chilling psyche of Tom Ripley.
  2. Character Templates – The “friend who never stops complaining,” the “manager who micromanages,” the “quiet intern who overhears everything.” Real people become ready‑made character sketches that feel instantly believable.
  3. Dialogue Bank – The snappy exchange at the water cooler, the forced politeness of customer service calls, the frantic email threads—each is a masterclass in subtext, pacing, and voice.
  4. Structural Discipline – Meeting deadlines and delivering consistent output teaches you to treat your manuscript like a project with milestones, not an amorphous dream.
  5. Financial Safety Net – Money isn’t the only resource a steady job provides; it buys the psychological freedom to take creative risks later, without the pressure to “sell” immediately.

3. Real‑World Proof: Writers Who Turned the Grind Into Glory

WriterDay‑Job DragHow It Informed Their WorkNotable Works/Accolades
Patricia HighsmithCopy‑editor, office clerk, and later a full‑time mother with no literary income.The repetitive, almost mechanical nature of clerical work sharpened her ability to depict the “quiet horror” of everyday life. Her protagonists often feel trapped in dead‑end jobs, mirroring her own experience.The Talented Mr. Ripley (adapted into multiple films), Strangers on a Train (Oscar‑winning screenplay).
Raymond CarverWarehouse loader, janitor, saw‑mill worker.The stark, economical prose of minimalism mirrors the physical labor and scarcity of his jobs—every word had to earn its place, just as every broken piece of wood earned his paycheck.What We Talk About When We Talk About Love (National Book Award finalist).
J.K. RowlingUnpaid research assistant, later a single mother on welfare.Living on the edge of financial collapse fueled the poverty‑and‑hope themes in the Harry Potter series; the bureaucracy she faced informed the Ministry of Magic’s absurdities.Harry Potter series (multiple Booker‑type honors, 7‑time Hugo nominee).
Stephen King – The TeacherHigh school English teacher (full‑time).The daily rhythm of lesson planning and grading taught King the mechanics of suspense: pacing a lesson parallels pacing a chapter; the “classroom” is a micro‑stage for human drama.Carrie (1974), The Shining (1977), The Dark Tower series (Hugo, World Fantasy).
Franz KafkaInsurance clerk at the Workers’ Accident Insurance Institute.Kafka’s legal‑bureaucratic prose directly mirrors the labyrinthine paperwork of his day job—The Trial is practically a love letter to (and indictment of) bureaucratic absurdity.The MetamorphosisThe Castle (posthumous critical acclaim).
Toni MorrisonEditor at Random House (while writing).Editing other authors’ manuscripts sharpened her ear for rhythm and voice; the corporate environment gave her a front‑row seat to the politics of representation.Beloved (Pulitzer, Nobel).

Takeaway: None of these writers quit the day job because they loved it. They leveraged it—using the grind as a crucible for observation, discipline, and raw material.


4. Turning Your Own 9‑to‑5 Into a Writing Engine (Practical Steps)

  1. Carry a Pocket Notebook
    A two‑minute break? Jot down a striking phrase you overheard, a facial expression that tells a story, or a sudden burst of emotion.
  2. Set “Micro‑Writing” Goals
    • 5‑minute flash fiction during lunch.
    • One paragraph before you log off.
    • A single line of dialogue while waiting for the elevator.
  3. Create a “Work‑to‑Write” Ratio
    Example: 90 % work, 10 % writing. When you see the 10 % slice, treat it like a sacrament—no scrolling, no emails, just writing.
  4. Use the Commute as a Lab
    Audio‑record your thoughts (or a voice‑memo of a character’s monologue). Transcribe later; you’ll have a ready‑made scene while still stuck in traffic.
  5. Harvest Office Archetypes
    Make a cheat‑sheet of “the boss,” “the gossip,” “the silent observer.” When you need a character, pull from your list and tweak a few details.
  6. Schedule a “Reflection Day”
    Once a month, take a half‑day off (or use a vacation day) to sit with your notebook, reorganise ideas, and see what patterns emerge from your daily observations.
  7. Remember the Paycheck’s Purpose
    The salary isn’t just a means to survive; it’s a portfolio that lets you fund research trips, attend workshops, and ultimately leave the day job when you’re ready.

5. The Psychological Flip: From “Soul‑Destroyer” to “Soul‑Maker”

Many writers describe a pivotal moment when they stop hating their day job and start using it. Here’s a quick mental reframing exercise:

  1. Identify the Pain Point – “I hate the endless emails.”
  2. Find the Narrative Parallel – “Characters stuck in a flood of unwanted information.”
  3. Translate to Plot – “A protagonist receives a mysterious series of emails that slowly reveal a conspiracy.”
  4. Create a Symbol – The email inbox becomes a metaphor for the subconscious, a place where buried secrets surface.

When you consciously map a nuisance onto a story element, the job stops being an opponent and becomes a collaborator.


6. The Endgame: When the Lights Go Out

Your day job may eventually fade—whether you quit, get promoted, or transition to freelance—but the lessons you learned never do:

  • Structure – You now know how to break a massive manuscript into manageable sections.
  • Observation – You can paint vivid settings with a single, well‑placed detail.
  • Resilience – You’ve already survived the “soul‑destroying” grind; rejections and revisions will feel less brutal.

Patricia Highsmith herself once said, “The ordinary is an endless source of the extraordinary if you just look at it.” She didn’t escape the office to find inspiration; she stayed and listened—and the result was a body of work that still haunts readers decades later.


Bottom Line

The nine‑to‑five isn’t a curse; it’s a crucible. It strips away the illusion that writing lives in some ethereal realm and forces you to mine the real world for raw, unfiltered material. That material—filtered through discipline, observation, and a dash of rebellion—can become the backbone of award‑winning fiction.

So the next time you stare at your computer screen and feel the weight of a “soul‑destroying” task, remember:

Your desk is a front‑row seat to humanity.
Your inbox is a repository of dialogue.
Your paycheck is a safety net that lets you risk the stories that truly matter.

Embrace the grind, write in the margins, and let the ordinary become the extraordinary foundation of your next masterpiece.

Happy writing, and may your coffee be strong and your ideas stronger.


References & Further Reading

  1. The Talented Mr. Ripley – Patricia Highsmith (1955) – analysis of occupational ennui in character development.
  2. Reading Like a Writer – Francine Prose – chapters on “Writing from Experience.”
  3. On Writing – Stephen King – King’s reflections on his teaching career and its influence on his narrative pacing.
  4. The Art of Fiction – John Gardner – on using everyday life as a seed for fiction.

Want more stories of day‑job‑turned‑novelists? Subscribe to the newsletter for monthly case studies and actionable writing hacks!

What I learned about writing – What do you believe is your forte as a writer?

I have always liked English as a subject at school, starting at primary school and getting books for Christmas.

My favourite shop was a newsagent’s and bookstore up the road, and while my mother shopped in the grocery store, I would go looking at the books.

It wasn’t until secondary school and the introduction to English literature that my love of books took a new turn. The school had a library, and there I could discover all of the schoolboy heroes like Biggles and the adventures of the Famous Five and Secret Seven.

It also afforded me the chance to work as a librarian and learn the ropes, as it were, and for a while, the idea of going to university to become a proper librarian was firmly planted in my mind.

Of course, circumstances got in the way of that plan, and I finished up leaving school early and never quite making it to university.

But I did go to correspondence school and picked up English literature again, but this time, it was a study of various aspects of literature, such as poetry, fiction, plays, and nonfiction.

I didn’t like poetry. In fact, I did not understand it at all.

I liked the idea of writing a play and creating a screenplay, but I never got around to it.

No, my first foray into writing came when I started doing an off-campus degree that majored in literature and had units called narrative.

Yes, the expectation was to write stories. Short stories, and so I began. Those I wrote as assignments scored well. Those I wrote and submitted did not.

Yes, it was the beginner’s story, the pile of rejections that started crushing that desire to succeed.

There was, around this time, a novel competition run by the Australian newspaper, and, like all naive beginners, I told myself my first entry would blow them away, and the prize was mine.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

But I wrote a novel every year until I was too old to participate. Unfortunately, I can’t find the manuscripts I wrote back then; perhaps disgusted, I threw them away. Pity, I would like to see them now, just to see how bad they were.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 70

Day 70 – The nine-to-five effect

The 9‑to‑5 Grind: How a “Soul‑Destroying” Day Job Can Become the Secret Sauce Behind Award‑Winning Fiction

“The work we do for a living is the very material our imagination chews on while we’re trying to stay awake at the office.” – Anon.

If you’re a writer who spends eight-plus hours a day staring at a spreadsheet, fielding angry customers, or shuffling paperwork, you’ve probably wondered whether that soul‑sucking routine is killing your creative spark. The short answer? It’s not.

In fact, for many of the world’s most celebrated authors—including the master of psychological suspense, Patricia Highsmith—the very same grind that felt like a dead‑end at the time became the fueldiscipline, and grounding that later powered their best work. Below, we’ll unpack why the daily grind can be a surprisingly potent catalyst for literary greatness, and we’ll look at real‑life writers who turned their “day‑job drudgery” into literary gold.


1. The “Soul‑Destroying” Job: Why It’s Not All Bad

Common ComplaintHidden Benefit
Monotony – “It feels like I’m watching paint dry.”Rhythmic structure. Repetitive tasks teach you timing, pacing, and the power of restraint—key ingredients in tight prose.
Lack of creative freedom – “I’m stuck following a script.”Constraint breeds invention. When you can’t control your environment, you learn to make the most of the tiny windows you do control (a notebook on a lunch break, a restless mind on the commute).
Emotional exhaustion – “I’m drained by the time I get home.”Emotional reservoir. The frustrations, absurdities, and small triumphs of office life provide a deep well of authentic human experience to mine later.
Time scarcity – “There’s never enough time to write.”Time‑management mastery. Juggling deadlines forces you to carve out micro‑moments of focus, sharpening the skill of writing with brevity.
Identity dilution – “I feel like a cog, not a creator.”Grounded perspective. A day job anchors you in the “real world,” preventing the echo chamber that can make fictional worlds feel detached from lived experience.

Think of the nine‑to‑five as a training ground rather than a trough. It may feel soul‑crushing in the moment, but the resilience you build, the people you observe, and the grit you develop often become the scaffolding for your most resonant stories.


2. How the Day Job Turns Into Narrative Gold

  1. Observation Lab – An office is a micro‑society. You see power dynamics, office politics, and the hidden rituals people perform to survive. Highsmith famously used the mundanity of a clerk’s life to study the banality of evil, later channelling it into the chilling psyche of Tom Ripley.
  2. Character Templates – The “friend who never stops complaining,” the “manager who micromanages,” the “quiet intern who overhears everything.” Real people become ready‑made character sketches that feel instantly believable.
  3. Dialogue Bank – The snappy exchange at the water cooler, the forced politeness of customer service calls, the frantic email threads—each is a masterclass in subtext, pacing, and voice.
  4. Structural Discipline – Meeting deadlines and delivering consistent output teaches you to treat your manuscript like a project with milestones, not an amorphous dream.
  5. Financial Safety Net – Money isn’t the only resource a steady job provides; it buys the psychological freedom to take creative risks later, without the pressure to “sell” immediately.

3. Real‑World Proof: Writers Who Turned the Grind Into Glory

WriterDay‑Job DragHow It Informed Their WorkNotable Works/Accolades
Patricia HighsmithCopy‑editor, office clerk, and later a full‑time mother with no literary income.The repetitive, almost mechanical nature of clerical work sharpened her ability to depict the “quiet horror” of everyday life. Her protagonists often feel trapped in dead‑end jobs, mirroring her own experience.The Talented Mr. Ripley (adapted into multiple films), Strangers on a Train (Oscar‑winning screenplay).
Raymond CarverWarehouse loader, janitor, saw‑mill worker.The stark, economical prose of minimalism mirrors the physical labor and scarcity of his jobs—every word had to earn its place, just as every broken piece of wood earned his paycheck.What We Talk About When We Talk About Love (National Book Award finalist).
J.K. RowlingUnpaid research assistant, later a single mother on welfare.Living on the edge of financial collapse fueled the poverty‑and‑hope themes in the Harry Potter series; the bureaucracy she faced informed the Ministry of Magic’s absurdities.Harry Potter series (multiple Booker‑type honors, 7‑time Hugo nominee).
Stephen King – The TeacherHigh school English teacher (full‑time).The daily rhythm of lesson planning and grading taught King the mechanics of suspense: pacing a lesson parallels pacing a chapter; the “classroom” is a micro‑stage for human drama.Carrie (1974), The Shining (1977), The Dark Tower series (Hugo, World Fantasy).
Franz KafkaInsurance clerk at the Workers’ Accident Insurance Institute.Kafka’s legal‑bureaucratic prose directly mirrors the labyrinthine paperwork of his day job—The Trial is practically a love letter to (and indictment of) bureaucratic absurdity.The MetamorphosisThe Castle (posthumous critical acclaim).
Toni MorrisonEditor at Random House (while writing).Editing other authors’ manuscripts sharpened her ear for rhythm and voice; the corporate environment gave her a front‑row seat to the politics of representation.Beloved (Pulitzer, Nobel).

Takeaway: None of these writers quit the day job because they loved it. They leveraged it—using the grind as a crucible for observation, discipline, and raw material.


4. Turning Your Own 9‑to‑5 Into a Writing Engine (Practical Steps)

  1. Carry a Pocket Notebook
    A two‑minute break? Jot down a striking phrase you overheard, a facial expression that tells a story, or a sudden burst of emotion.
  2. Set “Micro‑Writing” Goals
    • 5‑minute flash fiction during lunch.
    • One paragraph before you log off.
    • A single line of dialogue while waiting for the elevator.
  3. Create a “Work‑to‑Write” Ratio
    Example: 90 % work, 10 % writing. When you see the 10 % slice, treat it like a sacrament—no scrolling, no emails, just writing.
  4. Use the Commute as a Lab
    Audio‑record your thoughts (or a voice‑memo of a character’s monologue). Transcribe later; you’ll have a ready‑made scene while still stuck in traffic.
  5. Harvest Office Archetypes
    Make a cheat‑sheet of “the boss,” “the gossip,” “the silent observer.” When you need a character, pull from your list and tweak a few details.
  6. Schedule a “Reflection Day”
    Once a month, take a half‑day off (or use a vacation day) to sit with your notebook, reorganise ideas, and see what patterns emerge from your daily observations.
  7. Remember the Paycheck’s Purpose
    The salary isn’t just a means to survive; it’s a portfolio that lets you fund research trips, attend workshops, and ultimately leave the day job when you’re ready.

5. The Psychological Flip: From “Soul‑Destroyer” to “Soul‑Maker”

Many writers describe a pivotal moment when they stop hating their day job and start using it. Here’s a quick mental reframing exercise:

  1. Identify the Pain Point – “I hate the endless emails.”
  2. Find the Narrative Parallel – “Characters stuck in a flood of unwanted information.”
  3. Translate to Plot – “A protagonist receives a mysterious series of emails that slowly reveal a conspiracy.”
  4. Create a Symbol – The email inbox becomes a metaphor for the subconscious, a place where buried secrets surface.

When you consciously map a nuisance onto a story element, the job stops being an opponent and becomes a collaborator.


6. The Endgame: When the Lights Go Out

Your day job may eventually fade—whether you quit, get promoted, or transition to freelance—but the lessons you learned never do:

  • Structure – You now know how to break a massive manuscript into manageable sections.
  • Observation – You can paint vivid settings with a single, well‑placed detail.
  • Resilience – You’ve already survived the “soul‑destroying” grind; rejections and revisions will feel less brutal.

Patricia Highsmith herself once said, “The ordinary is an endless source of the extraordinary if you just look at it.” She didn’t escape the office to find inspiration; she stayed and listened—and the result was a body of work that still haunts readers decades later.


Bottom Line

The nine‑to‑five isn’t a curse; it’s a crucible. It strips away the illusion that writing lives in some ethereal realm and forces you to mine the real world for raw, unfiltered material. That material—filtered through discipline, observation, and a dash of rebellion—can become the backbone of award‑winning fiction.

So the next time you stare at your computer screen and feel the weight of a “soul‑destroying” task, remember:

Your desk is a front‑row seat to humanity.
Your inbox is a repository of dialogue.
Your paycheck is a safety net that lets you risk the stories that truly matter.

Embrace the grind, write in the margins, and let the ordinary become the extraordinary foundation of your next masterpiece.

Happy writing, and may your coffee be strong and your ideas stronger.


References & Further Reading

  1. The Talented Mr. Ripley – Patricia Highsmith (1955) – analysis of occupational ennui in character development.
  2. Reading Like a Writer – Francine Prose – chapters on “Writing from Experience.”
  3. On Writing – Stephen King – King’s reflections on his teaching career and its influence on his narrative pacing.
  4. The Art of Fiction – John Gardner – on using everyday life as a seed for fiction.

Want more stories of day‑job‑turned‑novelists? Subscribe to the newsletter for monthly case studies and actionable writing hacks!

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 69

Day 69 – Writing exercise

We don’t have a lot of time

This was the thing about end-of-world stuff.

You honestly believe that people could not be that stupid, and how simple it was to create the conditions where the only answer is nuclear Armageddon.

We go to the movies, we watch television shows that portray what it’s like before the war, during the war and then after the war, what we are calling World War 3.

If there’s a war, because some shows are about people building bunkers in anticipation of a war, and then when there wasn’t, they blew everything up anyway.

And sadly, that just about sums up what is happening to us now.

Let’s go back.  It wasn’t all that long ago.  We had a particular country in the Middle East deciding that it was sick of missiles randomly raining down on it.

Maybe that’s a bit of an exaggeration, but the intent was the same.  Certain Arab states didn’t like Israel, that certain country, so Israel started bombing the Palestinians. 

Meanwhile, elements in Yemen sent missiles, elements in Lebanon sent missiles, and a larger oil-rich country, Iran, financed all these splinter Arab groups.

Then there’s the Russians and the Ukrainians.  There’s the Chinese posturing over Taiwan.  The United States posturing over oil and terrorism, and the rest of the world, basically horrified, are nervously watching on.

We are in Australia, as far away from all this stuff as you could get, but we do have a problem.  Oil.  We import it all, so if the Middle East explodes, we will be in trouble.

We could live with posturing.  We could live with the superpowers flexing their muscles.  What we don’t want or need is a full-scale war that would become a black hole and suck everyone in.

We even said so, multiple times. Preceful negotiations, not bombs.

Did anyone listen….

I was reading a book, a work of fiction, written a few years ago now.

The premise ..

If someone blows up the oil pipelines in the Middle East, and a country on the borders of the Hormuz Strait decided to sink a few ships and block it, how long would it take for society to break down?

This book should be mandatory reading for every politician in the world because what happens when the scenario plays out is Armageddon.

No oil, no petrol, no cars or trucks, no deliveries.  No oil for the power station generators, no industry, no food moving.  People don’t store food.  They buy it daily.  When the food runs out…

Rationing?  Tell that to the guy with the gun, pointing it at you.  He’s desperate and will pull the trigger.  All semblance of sanity is finished.

You get the picture. Two weeks, anarchy, four goodbye to sanity and everything else.

I’m reading this book, and a newsflash comes on the screen.
.
Israel and America have bombed Iran.

Why?  They think the Iranians are about to launch a nuclear warhead. 

Where?  Israel, America?

Do they not know that if the Iranians exploded a nuclear bomb anywhere, there’s going to be retaliation?

I’m sitting staring at the TV screen in utter disbelief.

Of course, Iran is going to fire back, and because America is involved, they will retaliate against all the US bases in the other Arab States.

What was the reason for this seemingly unprovoked attack, other than the alleged nuclear weapon?

Pick one out of 157 random reasons, none quite a making up a coherent sentence.  We are told it will last two days, the war will be won, Iran will lose everything, the country will be taken back by the people, and everything will be fine.

That’s right, after the alleged nuclear bomb, the next reason was to kill the radical leadership and have the people revolt.

Two days at the most.  Bomb their nuclear facilities and some infrastructure, one of which was apparently next to a girl’s school, and it was hit instead with horrifying results.   But they did kill the leader.

I guess what happens next would be the same if the Iranians killed the President of the USA, and I hpe they weren’t thinking there would be no retaliation.

Admittedly, we all think that Iran is run a little too religiously, and that the regime is harsh in meting out punishment to dissenters and women, but it is a sovereign country, and no other country has the right to bomb them simply because we don’t like their religion or customs.

Of course, we in Australia denounced the attack as illegal, along with just about every sane country in the world.  But again, we are reminded that this is allegedly about killing the leadership and hoping for an uprising.

Yep.  Good luck with that.  Day two, the expert commentators, yes, like sport, we have commentators for wars, the experts are saying that in killing heads of state, they will be replaced, quite possibly with more radical heads of state, with the warning they will never forget what the enemy did.  And yes, there might be protesters in the streets, hoping for a change in government, but we’ll shoot them.

Day four, no to the regime change and no to surrender.  This war is just getting started. Reading between the lines, the Iranians saw this coming, have seen it coming for years, and have made appropriate arrangements.

And a little daunting on the side, the message sent to Israel and America, bring it on.

Day five, we are told Iran is a spent force, with no munitions, destroyed launching sites, and no leadership. 

Until a barrage of missiles lands in places where no missiles were expected, leaving a few dead soldiers for someone to explain how this had happened when their infrastructure had been, so-called, blasted to bits.

And no, just because it’s war and there are always casualties, it just doesn’t cut it when you tell a mother who has lost her son that they have to expect casualties in war, when they had been told no more wars, ending existing wars, and their President is the President of Peace.

This isn’t going to win anyone a Nobel Peace Prize any time soon.

The two-day, worst-case-scenario war is now a week along, and there is no end in sight.  Iran seems to have an inexhaustible supply of missiles.

That one week suddenly turns into two weeks, and the world is now panicking over the loss of oil getting through. Oil prices per barrel are rocketing, ships are not moving, insurance is withdrawn, and stock markets are tanking.

Here’s a thought. Let’s let Russia sell oil to ease the shortages. They won’t use the funds to fuel the war with Ukraine. Will they? Or supply intelligence to the Iranians. Or is China selling arms and missile defence systems?

And not forgetting their own little skirmish, it seems the initial efforts are not working, so let’s start bombing infrastructure.  Not outhouses and portable toilets, let’s start taking out gas and oil fields and make it hard for them to produce anything. Like their major gas field.

Haven’t they heard of retaliation?  You know when the other side goes for your stuff?

Obviously not.  But who didn’t expect Iran to target the other Arab countries’ infrastructure, and now it’s getting serious.

You can see a pattern forming here. Drop bombs on us, we sent missiles and drones back, you target our gas and oil fields, we will target yours. They even stand up and tell us in plain language what they’re going to do.

Week three, we don’t want to know.  Israel has bombarded and damaged a large Iranian facility.  And no, I didn’t hear them surrendering, I hear them going for American and Arab states’ gas and oil fields with the same intensity.

This is a war.  There are no good guys when it comes to running wars.  It’s about destroying the enemy, plain and simple.

OMG.

By this time, we are beginning to realise they’re using missiles which we apparently didn’t or can’t find or destroy because they’re, well, hidden, 500 meters below ground level, and therefore can launch barrages with impunity on friendly Arab states, and it seems longer range targets.

And if they can hit long-range targets, nothing is safe, no one is safe, and you have to think that this war is becoming the mother of all disasters.

So, here we are, each side bombing and destroying part of the other’s oil and gas-producing facilities, and now the world is suffering because of it. Where will it end?

Two world wars, and we apparently haven’t learned anything.

Three weeks, and we’re on a knife-edge. It’s that time when, turning on the TV to get the latest news, we are barraged with destruction and posturing.

And, this morning, an ultimatum. We are telling them they have 48 hours to surrender or they will be totally destroyed.

What?

An ultimatum that says, basically, you’re in a no-win situation. I can literally see the Iranian leadership behind closed doors, discussing the latest threat.

Imagining that they do not have nuclear weapons at their disposal would be a mistake. We want to believe they don;t but I suspect, as so a lot of others, they do.

The question is whether they would use them.

Is anyone, on either side, asking the question?

If you shoot, they shoot, and there will be nothing left.  There will be no world left for either side to claim any sort of victory. And all those who didn’t want to be involved will suffer the same fate.

Nuclear annihilation.

So, here’s the thing.

In many different TV shows where someone is backed into a corner, and there’s no way out, the only way outcome is the worst possible eventuality.

You see the people who finally realise that it’s a no-win situation, and try to calm things down, but it’s usually one person or a group in an isolated situation.  The damage, as catastrophic as it is, is confined.

When you corner someone into believing the only way out is annihilation, well, hold onto your hats because this is one in, all in.

And as is the nature of our society and its thirst for instant news, we’re going to see the end of the world in real time.

We may not die instantly like the lucky ones, no, we’ll get to die a lingering death, a day, or two, or a week.  Maybe a month, but the thought of that is too horrific to contemplate.

You just have to wonder who the madman is who will authorise the first strike.

The Iranians, the Israelis or the Americans?

In the end, it doesn’t matter.  They will condemn this planet to extinction. 

Somewhere out there, the aliens who put us here as an experiment will be saying, yep. What a bunch of nihilistic dumbasses.  Money will change hands as the bets are paid, and the universe will go about its business, happy that Elon Musk isn’t going to live on Mars, and the Chinese aren’t going to take over the moon.

And the self-immolation tendencies of the human race will not spread its disease through the universe.

Except…

Flip-flop has just flipped the 48-hour deadline to five days, and then it will be the infamous two weeks that never end.

The stock market was cratering. It needed to hear positive news, that peace is within reach.

Even if it isn’t. Maybe money with trump annihilation.

We all collectively hold our breath, knowing that inevitably the end of this world is coming, and we can blame the person who invented the atomic bomb.  I was going to say that it’s the aliens’ fault because they could have come and stopped all this nonsense before it started. 

I guess they tried when they landed at Area 51, but our ‘shoot first and ask questions later; basically basically sealed our fate.

So?

We have a four-day breather before everything starts over again.

Is it any wonder I do not like roller coasters?

  .

What I learned about writing – The use and abuse of obscenities.

I’ll say it straight up: I don’t believe it’s necessary to use obscenities in most of my stories, and I don’t. They do appear in the odd story, but you can count on the fingers of one hand how many times I use these words.

Sometimes, the odd ‘f’ word or the ‘s’ word is used for dramatic effect, but there are others that I would never use. The point is that I rarely use those words in general speech myself. I don’t see the point.

But..

All around me, wherever I go, the language is terrible, and by people so young they should not, and probably don’t know the meaning of the words they are using. My grandchildren use that language as a matter of speaking and forget sometimes that we don’t like to hear it, but they are getting better. i know for a fact that my two children use it all the time, so it’s a case of what you hear all the time in the home is what you consider normal.

I’m told all the kids at school swear, so I’m guessing there’s no discipline to stamp it out. These days, teachers have no authority to do anything, so it’s only going to get worse.

So, while I don’t appreciate it and try not to go to any movies that have obscene language, which means we don’t see very many, or watch TV shows with it, I don’t use it as an excuse not to read something that I’ve been asked to critique. I have to get on board with the way the wind is blowing.

But I don’t have to like it.

And yes, as you’ve probably guessed, I’m one of those really old fuddy-duddies.