More about my second novel

…

It’s time to delve into the past that Zoe tries so hard not to remember because the memories are painful.

It was a time before she became the emotionless killer she was now, and the people who had turned her into one.

Friends, lovers, teachers, mentors, but, in the end, all people who wanted her for one thing or another because they were selfish.

Alistair’s mother, Olga, was one, the woman who first had the job of training her, the first to recognise that while gifted, she would be trouble.

She had been recommended to her by a man called Yuri, the first of many to take advantage of an innocent girl who didn’t know any better.

Once trained, she was placed with Alistair, and he, too, wanted her for himself, until he found her replacement, a man who wrongly thought she was so emotionless she would be happy to share him with others.

It was a mistake he wouldn’t be making again.

It was Yuri she discovered who had been in contact with the kidnappers in Marsailles, and perhaps inadvertently inserting himself into her quest for those seeking to kill her. He would know who it was seeking her, and who the name Romanov referred to.

After ensuring John was safe, she contacted him.

There’s a conversation, and he agrees to meet her, reluctantly, as being seen with a fugitive might harm his reputation.

It’s going to be an interesting conversation and reunion.

Day 100 – Write like a spy

…

The Art of the Dossier: What Writers Can Learn from the CIA’s Style Guide

In the world of espionage, information is the ultimate currency. But information is useless if it’s buried under a mountain of fluff, jargon, and muddy thinking.

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is arguably the world’s most demanding editor. When an intelligence officer files a report, they aren’t writing for leisure; they are writing for a busy policymaker who needs to make life-or-death decisions in seconds. To ensure clarity, the CIA famously published Psychology of Intelligence Analysis and various internal style guides.

For the fiction writer or the essayist, these rules are more than just bureaucratic mandates—they are a masterclass in narrative tension and reader engagement. Here is how you can write like a spy to make your prose lethal.

---

1. The Principle of “Bottom-Line Up Front” (BLUF)

In intelligence, the most important information must come first. The CIA mandates that reports lead with the “BLUF”—the core conclusion or the most vital intelligence finding.

The Writer’s Takeaway: Stop burying the lede. If you’re writing a thriller, don’t spend three pages describing the weather before the murder happens. If you’re writing a blog post, don’t make the reader hunt for your thesis. If your reader has to guess what your point is, you’ve already lost them. Lead with the punch, and use the rest of the text to provide the evidence.

2. Radical Brevity

The CIA’s style guide is obsessed with brevity. Intelligence officers are taught to cut every word that doesn’t contribute to the meaning. Adjectives are suspicious; adverbs are practically treasonous.

The Writer’s Takeaway: Your readers aren’t sitting in a bunker waiting for your next sentence—they’re scrolling through a world of distractions. Every word you write that fails to advance the plot or the argument is a “dead drop” of wasted space. Use the “CIA Filter”: If you can delete a word without changing the meaning, delete it. Your prose will become muscular, cold, and confident.

3. Precision Over Poetry

“The night was dark and menacing.” To a spy, this is a useless sentence. It’s subjective. It tells us nothing.

The CIA demands objective, verifiable language. Instead of “menacing,” they want “the suspect was observed checking his watch every thirty seconds.”

The Writer’s Takeaway: Show, don’t tell—but do it through the lens of a forensic investigator. Instead of using purple prose to describe an emotion, focus on the physical tells. A character who is nervous doesn’t need to be described as “anxious”; have them obsessively clean their glasses or avoid eye contact. Precision creates a psychological atmosphere that “poetic” writing often ruins.

4. Know Your Audience’s “Knowledge Gap”

Spy reports are calibrated specifically to the knowledge base of the recipient. If you’re writing for a President, you don’t explain the history of a region; you explain how a regional event threatens national interests.

The Writer’s Takeaway: Who are you writing for? If you’re writing a technical guide for experts, use the jargon. If you’re writing for a general audience, simplify. The biggest mistake writers make is “The Curse of Knowledge”—assuming the reader knows what you know. A spy anticipates the reader’s ignorance and bridges the gap quickly, without condescension.

5. Differentiate Fact from Inference

This is the cardinal rule of intelligence: never confuse what you saw with what you think.

The Writer’s Takeaway: This is perhaps the best lesson for fiction writers. Writers often conflate a character’s internal thoughts with the objective reality of the scene. By maintaining a sharp line between “The gun went off” (fact) and “He felt like a coward” (inference), you create a much stronger narrative layer. It forces you to rely on external evidence to show internal truth.

---

The Verdict: Is it useful?

If you want your writing to be flowery, whimsical, or deeply introspective, the CIA’s style guide will feel like a straitjacket. But if you want your writing to be gripping, clear, and impossible to put down, it is the best advice you will ever receive.

Writing like a spy means respecting the reader’s time and intelligence. It means stripping away the ego of the author to focus entirely on the delivery of the mission—the story.

Next time you open a blank document, imagine the stakes are highest. Cut the fluff. Lead with the punch. Identify your objective.

Go dark, write sharp, and don’t get caught in the weeds.

Day 100 – Write like a spy

…

The Art of the Dossier: What Writers Can Learn from the CIA’s Style Guide

In the world of espionage, information is the ultimate currency. But information is useless if it’s buried under a mountain of fluff, jargon, and muddy thinking.

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is arguably the world’s most demanding editor. When an intelligence officer files a report, they aren’t writing for leisure; they are writing for a busy policymaker who needs to make life-or-death decisions in seconds. To ensure clarity, the CIA famously published Psychology of Intelligence Analysis and various internal style guides.

For the fiction writer or the essayist, these rules are more than just bureaucratic mandates—they are a masterclass in narrative tension and reader engagement. Here is how you can write like a spy to make your prose lethal.

---

1. The Principle of “Bottom-Line Up Front” (BLUF)

In intelligence, the most important information must come first. The CIA mandates that reports lead with the “BLUF”—the core conclusion or the most vital intelligence finding.

The Writer’s Takeaway: Stop burying the lede. If you’re writing a thriller, don’t spend three pages describing the weather before the murder happens. If you’re writing a blog post, don’t make the reader hunt for your thesis. If your reader has to guess what your point is, you’ve already lost them. Lead with the punch, and use the rest of the text to provide the evidence.

2. Radical Brevity

The CIA’s style guide is obsessed with brevity. Intelligence officers are taught to cut every word that doesn’t contribute to the meaning. Adjectives are suspicious; adverbs are practically treasonous.

The Writer’s Takeaway: Your readers aren’t sitting in a bunker waiting for your next sentence—they’re scrolling through a world of distractions. Every word you write that fails to advance the plot or the argument is a “dead drop” of wasted space. Use the “CIA Filter”: If you can delete a word without changing the meaning, delete it. Your prose will become muscular, cold, and confident.

3. Precision Over Poetry

“The night was dark and menacing.” To a spy, this is a useless sentence. It’s subjective. It tells us nothing.

The CIA demands objective, verifiable language. Instead of “menacing,” they want “the suspect was observed checking his watch every thirty seconds.”

The Writer’s Takeaway: Show, don’t tell—but do it through the lens of a forensic investigator. Instead of using purple prose to describe an emotion, focus on the physical tells. A character who is nervous doesn’t need to be described as “anxious”; have them obsessively clean their glasses or avoid eye contact. Precision creates a psychological atmosphere that “poetic” writing often ruins.

4. Know Your Audience’s “Knowledge Gap”

Spy reports are calibrated specifically to the knowledge base of the recipient. If you’re writing for a President, you don’t explain the history of a region; you explain how a regional event threatens national interests.

The Writer’s Takeaway: Who are you writing for? If you’re writing a technical guide for experts, use the jargon. If you’re writing for a general audience, simplify. The biggest mistake writers make is “The Curse of Knowledge”—assuming the reader knows what you know. A spy anticipates the reader’s ignorance and bridges the gap quickly, without condescension.

5. Differentiate Fact from Inference

This is the cardinal rule of intelligence: never confuse what you saw with what you think.

The Writer’s Takeaway: This is perhaps the best lesson for fiction writers. Writers often conflate a character’s internal thoughts with the objective reality of the scene. By maintaining a sharp line between “The gun went off” (fact) and “He felt like a coward” (inference), you create a much stronger narrative layer. It forces you to rely on external evidence to show internal truth.

---

The Verdict: Is it useful?

If you want your writing to be flowery, whimsical, or deeply introspective, the CIA’s style guide will feel like a straitjacket. But if you want your writing to be gripping, clear, and impossible to put down, it is the best advice you will ever receive.

Writing like a spy means respecting the reader’s time and intelligence. It means stripping away the ego of the author to focus entirely on the delivery of the mission—the story.

Next time you open a blank document, imagine the stakes are highest. Cut the fluff. Lead with the punch. Identify your objective.

Go dark, write sharp, and don’t get caught in the weeds.

Day 99 – The Forster Effect

…

The Unspoken Truth: Why Writing is the Ultimate Act of Discovery

“How can I tell what I think until I see what I say?”

E.M. Forster, the celebrated author of A Passage to India, penned this deceptively simple line, and it has echoed through the halls of literature and psychology ever since. At first glance, it sounds like a paradox. We usually think of thought as the precursor to action—we process, we formulate, and then we speak or write.

But Forster flips the script. He suggests that thought is not a static state waiting to be expressed; it is a fluid process that is crystallised through the act of expression.

If you’ve ever sat down to write an email, a journal entry, or a creative piece, you’ve likely experienced the “Forster Effect.” You start with a vague, amorphous cloud of feelings or ideas. You type a sentence. You look at it, frown, delete it, and try again. Suddenly, as the words hit the page, the fog lifts. You realise, “Oh, that’s actually what I believe.”

Here is why Forster’s wisdom is the key to unlocking your own clarity.

1. Thought is Abstract; Language is Structural

Our internal lives are messy. They are collections of half-formed impulses, sensory memories, and emotional echoes. When we keep these inside, they remain formless.

Language, however, is structural. It requires a subject, a verb, and an object. It demands logic. When you force your subconscious thoughts into the rigid architecture of a sentence, you are forced to choose. You must discard the surplus and define the core. Writing acts as a refining fire, burning away the noise and leaving behind the essence of your position.

2. The “Mirroring” Effect of the Page

When you “see what you say,” you are essentially externalising your consciousness. By putting your thoughts on paper, you turn them into an object you can observe.

You stop being the person having the thought and become an editor viewing the thought. This shift in perspective is transformative. You can spot the gaps in your logic, the inconsistencies in your values, or the hidden fears driving your opinions. You can’t argue with your own brain when it’s spinning in circles, but you can argue with a paragraph on a screen.

3. Writing as a Discovery Tool (Not a Recording Tool)

Most people make the mistake of using writing only to “record” thoughts that were already fully formed. They treat the pen (or keyboard) like a stenographer.

But true creativity and clarity come when you use writing as a discovery tool. Don’t write to tell people what you know; write to find out what you know. If you start a sentence without knowing how it ends, you are giving your subconscious permission to take the wheel. You will often find yourself surprised by your own insights. That surprise is the feeling of growth.

How to Practice the “Forster Method”

If you want to clear the mental clutter, try these three strategies:

• The Morning Pages Technique: Commit to writing three pages of stream-of-consciousness thoughts first thing in the morning. Don’t edit, don’t worry about grammar, and don’t stop. Just let the pen move. You will be shocked by the realisations that emerge when you bypass your inner critic.
• The “Why” Chain: When you have a strong opinion, write it down. Then, write “Because…” and finish the sentence. Then write “Because…” again for that sentence. You will eventually hit the bottom of your own belief system.
• Talk to the Page: If you’re struggling with a difficult decision, treat your journal like a trusted friend. Write, “I’m not sure how I feel about X, but here is what I’m worried about…” and let the dialogue unfold.

The Bottom Line

We spend so much of our lives waiting for “the right time” to speak or “the perfect thought” to arrive. But silence is rarely as clarifying as we hope it will be.

If you want to understand your own mind, stop waiting for the epiphany. Pick up a pen. Start a sentence. You might be surprised at who you find on the other side of that first period. As Forster knew, we aren’t just expressing ourselves—we are inventing ourselves with every word we choose.

Day 99 – The Forster Effect

…

The Unspoken Truth: Why Writing is the Ultimate Act of Discovery

“How can I tell what I think until I see what I say?”

E.M. Forster, the celebrated author of A Passage to India, penned this deceptively simple line, and it has echoed through the halls of literature and psychology ever since. At first glance, it sounds like a paradox. We usually think of thought as the precursor to action—we process, we formulate, and then we speak or write.

But Forster flips the script. He suggests that thought is not a static state waiting to be expressed; it is a fluid process that is crystallised through the act of expression.

If you’ve ever sat down to write an email, a journal entry, or a creative piece, you’ve likely experienced the “Forster Effect.” You start with a vague, amorphous cloud of feelings or ideas. You type a sentence. You look at it, frown, delete it, and try again. Suddenly, as the words hit the page, the fog lifts. You realise, “Oh, that’s actually what I believe.”

Here is why Forster’s wisdom is the key to unlocking your own clarity.

1. Thought is Abstract; Language is Structural

Our internal lives are messy. They are collections of half-formed impulses, sensory memories, and emotional echoes. When we keep these inside, they remain formless.

Language, however, is structural. It requires a subject, a verb, and an object. It demands logic. When you force your subconscious thoughts into the rigid architecture of a sentence, you are forced to choose. You must discard the surplus and define the core. Writing acts as a refining fire, burning away the noise and leaving behind the essence of your position.

2. The “Mirroring” Effect of the Page

When you “see what you say,” you are essentially externalising your consciousness. By putting your thoughts on paper, you turn them into an object you can observe.

You stop being the person having the thought and become an editor viewing the thought. This shift in perspective is transformative. You can spot the gaps in your logic, the inconsistencies in your values, or the hidden fears driving your opinions. You can’t argue with your own brain when it’s spinning in circles, but you can argue with a paragraph on a screen.

3. Writing as a Discovery Tool (Not a Recording Tool)

Most people make the mistake of using writing only to “record” thoughts that were already fully formed. They treat the pen (or keyboard) like a stenographer.

But true creativity and clarity come when you use writing as a discovery tool. Don’t write to tell people what you know; write to find out what you know. If you start a sentence without knowing how it ends, you are giving your subconscious permission to take the wheel. You will often find yourself surprised by your own insights. That surprise is the feeling of growth.

How to Practice the “Forster Method”

If you want to clear the mental clutter, try these three strategies:

• The Morning Pages Technique: Commit to writing three pages of stream-of-consciousness thoughts first thing in the morning. Don’t edit, don’t worry about grammar, and don’t stop. Just let the pen move. You will be shocked by the realisations that emerge when you bypass your inner critic.
• The “Why” Chain: When you have a strong opinion, write it down. Then, write “Because…” and finish the sentence. Then write “Because…” again for that sentence. You will eventually hit the bottom of your own belief system.
• Talk to the Page: If you’re struggling with a difficult decision, treat your journal like a trusted friend. Write, “I’m not sure how I feel about X, but here is what I’m worried about…” and let the dialogue unfold.

The Bottom Line

We spend so much of our lives waiting for “the right time” to speak or “the perfect thought” to arrive. But silence is rarely as clarifying as we hope it will be.

If you want to understand your own mind, stop waiting for the epiphany. Pick up a pen. Start a sentence. You might be surprised at who you find on the other side of that first period. As Forster knew, we aren’t just expressing ourselves—we are inventing ourselves with every word we choose.