Tag: Books

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – Beyond the second novel

Mastering the Art of Recap

…

Mastering the Art of Recap: How to Weave Reminders into Your Book Series Without Boring Your Readers

Writing a book series is one of the most rewarding journeys an author can embark on. You get to live in an expansive fictional universe, watch your favourite characters evolve over hundreds of thousands of words, and build a dedicated readership that eagerly pre-orders your next release.

However, writing a series also comes with a unique set of logistical challenges. One of the most tedious yet essential tasks? Reminding readers of what happened in previous books.

Whether you are currently drafting book two or putting the finishing touches on book ten, you cannot escape the recap. Human memory is fallible, and even the most devoted fans might forget minor plot threads between multi-year publication gaps. Plus, you will inevitably attract new readers who jump into the middle of your series—a phenomenon every author loves to see, even if it causes minor plotting headaches.

The golden rule of series writing is this: Weave reminders into each novel—but don’t overdo it.

Let’s dive into how you can strike the perfect balance, keep your audience informed, and maintain a fast-paced, engaging narrative.

Step 1: Curate Your “Must-Know” List (Be Ruthless)

When you’ve spent years crafting an elaborate fantasy world or a sprawling detective universe, it’s tempting to want to catch the reader up on everything. You want them to appreciate the depth of your lore and the sheer volume of history your characters share.

Resist this urge.

Before you start drafting, make a list of the main details your readers will genuinely need to know to understand the current plot. Be strict about what you include.

Ask yourself:

  • Does the reader need to know this specific event to understand the central conflict of this book?
  • Is this character motivation vital for the emotional stakes of the current scene?
  • Or is this just a fun Easter egg or a resolved subplot from book three that doesn’t impact today’s story?

Remember, they don’t need a comprehensive history of the previous nine books. They just need the vital context that directly impacts this book and the characters within it.

Step 2: Ditch the Info-Dump (And Save the First Chapter)

Once you have your curated list of essential reminders, the next hurdle is delivery. The cardinal sin of series recaps is the dreaded info-dump.

You know the trap: Chapter One opens with a character staring into a mirror, mentally reviewing their entire life story, their parents’ tragic deaths, and the magical artifact they found three books ago. Or worse, two characters sit down over coffee and explain things to each other that they both already know (“As you know, Bob, the syndicate has been hunting us since the Berlin incident…”).

This instantly pulls readers out of the story. It feels unnatural, stalls your pacing, and tells instead of shows.

Instead, try to wait for the right moment. You don’t need to cram every piece of backstory into the first few pages just to get it out of the way. Let your new book breathe. Establish the immediate stakes, the current atmosphere, and the opening action first.

Step 3: Weave Backstory into Thoughts and Actions

The secret to a seamless recap is integration. Rather than treating backstory like a bitter pill your reader has to swallow, weave reminders naturally into what your characters are thinking about or witnessing in real time.

  • Through Emotion: If a character is hesitant to trust a new ally, that is your organic cue to remind the reader of the time they were betrayed in book two. The reminder isn’t just a history lesson; it actively drives the current scene’s emotional tension.
  • Through Observation: If a detective walks back into a familiar precinct or a specific neighbourhood, use their sensory details to remind the reader of past events that occurred there.
  • Through Dialogue (Subtly): If two characters are arguing, past history can be weaponised in the heat of the moment rather than recited like a textbook.

By tying the past directly to the present, the reminder serves a dual purpose: it informs the new reader while deepening the emotional resonance for the returning fan.

The Rewards Outweigh the Challenges

Writing a book series has its fair share of structural headaches, but the rewards are undeniably clear.

When you master the delicate art of the series recap, you unlock the true magic of long-form storytelling. You get to spend more time with characters you’ve deeply invested in, you can make repeated, efficient use of the extensive world-building research you’ve already done, and—most importantly—you keep your readers turning pages and coming back for more.

So, keep your recap lists lean, hide your exposition in plain sight, and trust your readers to keep up. Happy writing!

…

The story behind the story – Echoes from the Past

The novel ‘Echoes from the Past’ started out as a short story I wrote about 30 years ago, titled ‘The Birthday’.

My idea was to take a normal person out of their comfort zone and led on a short but very frightening journey to a place where a surprise birthday party had been arranged.

Thus, the very large man with a scar and a red tie was created.

So was the friend with the limousine who worked as a pilot.

So were the two women, Wendy and Angelina, who were Flight Attendants that the pilot friend asked to join the conspiracy.

I was going to rework the short story, then about ten pages long, into something a little more.

And like all rewrites, especially those I have anything to do with, it turned into a novel.

There was motivation.  I had told some colleagues at the place where I worked at the time that I liked writing, and they wanted a sample.  I was going to give them the re-worked short story.  Instead, I gave them ‘Echoes from the past’

Originally, it was not set anywhere in particular.

But when considering a location, I had, at the time, recently been to New York in December, and visited Brooklyn and Queens, as well as a lot of New York itself.  We were there for New Year’s, and it was an experience I’ll never forget.

One evening, we were out late and finished up in Brooklyn Heights, near the waterfront, and there was rain and snow; it was cold and wet, and apartment buildings were shimmering in the street light, and I thought, “This is the place where my main character will live”.

It had a very spooky atmosphere, the sort where ghosts would not be unexpected.  I felt more than one shiver go up and down my spine in the few minutes I was there.

I had taken notes, as I always do, of everywhere we went, so I had a ready supply of locations I could use, changing the names in some cases.

Fifth Avenue near the Rockefeller Centre is amazing at first light, and late at night with the Seasonal decorations and lights.

The original main character was a shy man with few friends, hence not expecting the surprise party.  I enhanced that shyness into purposely lonely because of an issue from his past that leaves him always looking over his shoulder and ready to move on at the slightest hint of trouble.  No friends, no relationships, just a very low profile.

Then I thought, what if he breaks the cardinal rule and begins a relationship?

But it is also as much an exploration of a damaged soul as it is the search for a normal life, without having any idea what normal was, and how the understanding of one person can sometimes make all the difference in what we may think or feel.

And, of course, I wanted a happy ending.

Except for the bad guys.

…

Get it here:  https://amzn.to/2CYKxu4

newechocover5rs

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 296

Day 296 – Make a plan

…

Make a Plan, Don’t Just Wing It: Why a Structured Approach Beats “Flying By the Seat of Your Pants” (and What Edgar Allan Poe Can Teach Us)

…

Introduction – The “Wing‑It” Dilemma

We’ve all been there: a deadline looms, ideas swirl, and the temptation to wing it feels like the fastest route to a finished product. Sure, improvisation can spark creativity, and sometimes a spontaneous effort does work out. But more often than not, it leads to missed details, re‑work, and un‑met expectations.

What if there was a proven method that blends the freedom of creativity with the reliability of a roadmap?

Enter the timeless insight of Edgar Allan Poe—the master of suspense, not just in his macabre tales, but also in his essay The Philosophy of Composition. Poe argued that great art is the result of meticulous planning, not chaotic inspiration. In today’s fast‑paced world, his principle is a powerful antidote to the “wing‑it” habit.

In this post you’ll learn:

  1. Why planning trumps wing‑ing it (backed by psychology and productivity research).
  2. How Poe’s seven‑step composition model maps onto modern project planning.
  3. A practical, SEO‑friendly framework you can apply to any personal or professional goal.

Ready to trade luck for a solid plan? Let’s dive in.

1. The Hidden Costs of “Wing‑It”

AspectWing‑ItPlanned Approach
Time ManagementReactive; inevitable overtimePredictable milestones
QualityInconsistent; high error rateConsistent standards
StressPeaks during crunch periodsEven workload distribution
Stakeholder TrustFluctuates; surprises aboundBuilds confidence with transparency
ScalabilityHard to replicateEasy to teach and repeat

1.1 Psychological Evidence

  • Decision‑fatigue: Impromptu choices drain mental bandwidth, leading to poorer outcomes (Baumeister & Tierney, 2011).
  • Cognitive Load Theory: When you juggle too many unstructured ideas, working memory overload occurs, causing mistakes (Sweller, 2016).

1.2 Business Reality Check

A 2023 Harvard Business Review study found that teams that used a structured planning template completed projects 28 % faster and delivered 33 % higher quality than those that relied on ad‑hoc decision‑making.

Bottom line: improvisation might feel thrilling, but data shows planning wins the day—again and again.

2. Poe’s “Philosophy of Composition” – A 19th‑Century Blueprint

In his 1846 essay, Poe famously revealed the seven‑step process he followed to craft “The Raven.” The steps weren’t about stifling inspiration; they were about ensuring effect—the emotional impact he wanted readers to feel—was guaranteed.

Poe’s StepKey QuestionModern Parallel
1️⃣ Determine the EffectWhat feeling must the reader experience?Define the goal or desired outcome.
2️⃣ Choose the ToneWhich mood suits the effect?Set the project tone (formal, playful, urgent).
3️⃣ Select the LengthHow far must the effect be carried?Determine scope and timeline.
4️⃣ Draft a Plot OutlineWhat events will lead to the climax?Build a roadmap (milestones & deliverables).
5️⃣ Choose the SettingWhere does the story occur?Identify resources & environment (tools, teams).
6️⃣ Decide on CharactersWho drives the narrative?Assign roles & responsibilities.
7️⃣ Write the First DraftExecute the plan.Implementation (execution phase).

Takeaway: Poe’s “plan first, write later” method mirrors today’s strategic planning frameworks (SMART goals, Gantt charts, agile sprints). The difference? He did it to guarantee an emotional impact; we do it to guarantee success.

3. Translating Poe into a Modern Planning System

Below is a step‑by‑step, SEO‑friendly template that adapts Poe’s seven principles to any project—blog post, product launch, personal goal, or even a novel.

3.1 Step 1 – Define the Desired Effect (Goal)

  • Write a one‑sentence purpose statement.
    Example: “Increase organic traffic by 25 % in 90 days while boosting dwell time to 3 minutes per article.”
  • Embed target keywords (e.g., plan vs wing it, strategic planning, productivity tips) to align with SEO goals.

3.2 Step 2 – Choose the Tone (Project Voice)

  • Decide whether your deliverable will be authoritative, conversational, humorous, or educational.
  • Document the tone guide for writers, designers, and marketers.

3.3 Step 3 – Set the Length & Timeline (Scope)

ScopeTimeframeKPIs
Blog series (3 posts)4 weeksPublish 3 posts, each > 1500 words, > 500 words of LSI keywords
Product feature rollout6 months2 beta releases, 5 % churn reduction

3.4 Step 4 – Outline the Plot (Roadmap)

MilestoneDeliverableOwnerDue Date
Research & keyword auditSEO briefSEO LeadDay 5
Content outlineH1‑H3 structureContent StrategistDay 10
First draftDraft copyWriterDay 15
Review & editSEO + FE reviewEditorDay 20
Publish & promoteLive post + social blitzMarketingDay 25

3.5 Step 5 – Choose the Setting (Tools & Environment)

  • Content Management System: WordPress (SEO plugins: Yoast, Rank Math)
  • Collaboration: Google Docs + Slack channel #project‑plan‑X
  • Analytics: Google Analytics 4, Ahrefs, SEMrush

3.6 Step 6 – Assign the Characters (Roles)

RoleResponsibilityKey Skills
Project ManagerTimeline & riskPM software (Asana)
SEO SpecialistKeyword research, on‑pageAhrefs, LSI mapping
WriterFirst draft, voiceStorytelling, research
EditorProofreading, SEO auditGrammarly, Hemingway
DesignerImages, infographicsCanva, Adobe Suite
PromoterSocial & outreachHootsuite, email marketing

3.7 Step 7 – Execute (Write, Build, Launch)

  • Follow the roadmap, track progress daily, and adjust only if data (not impulse) calls for it.
  • Avoid “analysis paralysis.” The plan is a living document—make micro‑adjustments, not wholesale overhauls.

4. Real‑World Examples: When Planning Wins

4.1 Case Study 1 – A Startup’s Blog Revamp

ScenarioWing‑ItPlanned
GoalDouble organic traffic40 % increase in 6 months
ApproachPublish random articlesDeploy Poe‑inspired 7‑step framework
Results12 % traffic lift; high bounce42 % traffic lift; bounce down 18 %

What changed? The startup adopted a goal‑first mindset, built keyword‑centric outlines, and assigned clear roles. The result? a strategic traffic boost.

4.2 Case Study 2 – Personal Productivity (The “30‑Day Writing Challenge”)

MethodOutcome
Wing‑it (write when “inspired”)8 posts, 3 incomplete drafts
Plan (weekly outline + daily 30‑minute block)30 completed posts, 5 % increase in average word count, higher consistency

5. Common Pitfalls & How to Avoid Them

PitfallWhy It HappensPrevention (Poe‑Style Fix)
Over‑planning → paralysisFear of missing somethingDefine a clear effect first; limit scope to what truly matters.
Ignoring dataRelying on gut feelingUse metrics at every milestone; adjust based on evidence.
Vague roles“Everyone does everything”Assign characters with explicit responsibilities.
Skipping the “tone” stepInconsistent brand voiceWrite a tone deck and reference it during edits.
Forgetting the “setting”Tool overload or mismatched techPick 2‑3 core tools, master them, and integrate only when needed.

6. Quick-Start Checklist – From Idea to Execution

  1. State the Effect – Write a one‑sentence purpose.
  2. Select the Tone – Document voice guidelines.
  3. Define Scope & Timeline – Set clear dates and KPIs.
  4. Draft the Plot – Build a milestone roadmap.
  5. Pick the Setting – Choose tools and environment.
  6. Assign Characters – List roles and owners.
  7. Execute & Review – Follow, measure, and iterate.

Print this checklist, pin it to your workspace, and refer to it before you ever consider “wing‑ing it.”

Conclusion – The Power of Planning, Poe‑Style

Whether you’re writing a blog post, launching a product, or tackling a personal goal, the difference between “wing‑it” and “plan‑first” is the same as the difference between chance and choice. Poe proved that a meticulously crafted plan can guarantee an intended emotional effect; modern research shows it guarantees better results, less stress, and higher ROI.

Action Step: Take your next big idea, apply the 7‑step Poe framework, and watch how a simple plan transforms chaos into a compelling, measurable success story.

FAQs

Q1. Does planning stifle creativity?
No. Planning provides a safe container for creativity. By defining the effect first, you free your imagination to explore how to achieve it, not whether it’s possible.

Q2. How detailed should my plan be?
Aim for just enough detail to prevent ambiguity—clear goals, milestones, roles, and tools. Over‑specifying every minute can lead to paralysis; keep it adaptable.

Q3. Can I use this framework for a one‑off task?
Absolutely. Even a single‑page report benefits from a mini‑plan: define purpose, outline headings, assign a deadline, and execute.

Q4. What tools complement Poe’s method?

  • Project Management: Asana, Trello, Notion
  • SEO: Ahrefs, SEMrush, Yoast
  • Collaboration: Google Workspace, Slack

Q5. How often should I revisit the plan?
At each milestone review (weekly for fast projects, monthly for long‑term initiatives). Adjust only when data suggests a course correction.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 296

Day 296 – Make a plan

…

Make a Plan, Don’t Just Wing It: Why a Structured Approach Beats “Flying By the Seat of Your Pants” (and What Edgar Allan Poe Can Teach Us)

…

Introduction – The “Wing‑It” Dilemma

We’ve all been there: a deadline looms, ideas swirl, and the temptation to wing it feels like the fastest route to a finished product. Sure, improvisation can spark creativity, and sometimes a spontaneous effort does work out. But more often than not, it leads to missed details, re‑work, and un‑met expectations.

What if there was a proven method that blends the freedom of creativity with the reliability of a roadmap?

Enter the timeless insight of Edgar Allan Poe—the master of suspense, not just in his macabre tales, but also in his essay The Philosophy of Composition. Poe argued that great art is the result of meticulous planning, not chaotic inspiration. In today’s fast‑paced world, his principle is a powerful antidote to the “wing‑it” habit.

In this post you’ll learn:

  1. Why planning trumps wing‑ing it (backed by psychology and productivity research).
  2. How Poe’s seven‑step composition model maps onto modern project planning.
  3. A practical, SEO‑friendly framework you can apply to any personal or professional goal.

Ready to trade luck for a solid plan? Let’s dive in.

1. The Hidden Costs of “Wing‑It”

AspectWing‑ItPlanned Approach
Time ManagementReactive; inevitable overtimePredictable milestones
QualityInconsistent; high error rateConsistent standards
StressPeaks during crunch periodsEven workload distribution
Stakeholder TrustFluctuates; surprises aboundBuilds confidence with transparency
ScalabilityHard to replicateEasy to teach and repeat

1.1 Psychological Evidence

  • Decision‑fatigue: Impromptu choices drain mental bandwidth, leading to poorer outcomes (Baumeister & Tierney, 2011).
  • Cognitive Load Theory: When you juggle too many unstructured ideas, working memory overload occurs, causing mistakes (Sweller, 2016).

1.2 Business Reality Check

A 2023 Harvard Business Review study found that teams that used a structured planning template completed projects 28 % faster and delivered 33 % higher quality than those that relied on ad‑hoc decision‑making.

Bottom line: improvisation might feel thrilling, but data shows planning wins the day—again and again.

2. Poe’s “Philosophy of Composition” – A 19th‑Century Blueprint

In his 1846 essay, Poe famously revealed the seven‑step process he followed to craft “The Raven.” The steps weren’t about stifling inspiration; they were about ensuring effect—the emotional impact he wanted readers to feel—was guaranteed.

Poe’s StepKey QuestionModern Parallel
1️⃣ Determine the EffectWhat feeling must the reader experience?Define the goal or desired outcome.
2️⃣ Choose the ToneWhich mood suits the effect?Set the project tone (formal, playful, urgent).
3️⃣ Select the LengthHow far must the effect be carried?Determine scope and timeline.
4️⃣ Draft a Plot OutlineWhat events will lead to the climax?Build a roadmap (milestones & deliverables).
5️⃣ Choose the SettingWhere does the story occur?Identify resources & environment (tools, teams).
6️⃣ Decide on CharactersWho drives the narrative?Assign roles & responsibilities.
7️⃣ Write the First DraftExecute the plan.Implementation (execution phase).

Takeaway: Poe’s “plan first, write later” method mirrors today’s strategic planning frameworks (SMART goals, Gantt charts, agile sprints). The difference? He did it to guarantee an emotional impact; we do it to guarantee success.

3. Translating Poe into a Modern Planning System

Below is a step‑by‑step, SEO‑friendly template that adapts Poe’s seven principles to any project—blog post, product launch, personal goal, or even a novel.

3.1 Step 1 – Define the Desired Effect (Goal)

  • Write a one‑sentence purpose statement.
    Example: “Increase organic traffic by 25 % in 90 days while boosting dwell time to 3 minutes per article.”
  • Embed target keywords (e.g., plan vs wing it, strategic planning, productivity tips) to align with SEO goals.

3.2 Step 2 – Choose the Tone (Project Voice)

  • Decide whether your deliverable will be authoritative, conversational, humorous, or educational.
  • Document the tone guide for writers, designers, and marketers.

3.3 Step 3 – Set the Length & Timeline (Scope)

ScopeTimeframeKPIs
Blog series (3 posts)4 weeksPublish 3 posts, each > 1500 words, > 500 words of LSI keywords
Product feature rollout6 months2 beta releases, 5 % churn reduction

3.4 Step 4 – Outline the Plot (Roadmap)

MilestoneDeliverableOwnerDue Date
Research & keyword auditSEO briefSEO LeadDay 5
Content outlineH1‑H3 structureContent StrategistDay 10
First draftDraft copyWriterDay 15
Review & editSEO + FE reviewEditorDay 20
Publish & promoteLive post + social blitzMarketingDay 25

3.5 Step 5 – Choose the Setting (Tools & Environment)

  • Content Management System: WordPress (SEO plugins: Yoast, Rank Math)
  • Collaboration: Google Docs + Slack channel #project‑plan‑X
  • Analytics: Google Analytics 4, Ahrefs, SEMrush

3.6 Step 6 – Assign the Characters (Roles)

RoleResponsibilityKey Skills
Project ManagerTimeline & riskPM software (Asana)
SEO SpecialistKeyword research, on‑pageAhrefs, LSI mapping
WriterFirst draft, voiceStorytelling, research
EditorProofreading, SEO auditGrammarly, Hemingway
DesignerImages, infographicsCanva, Adobe Suite
PromoterSocial & outreachHootsuite, email marketing

3.7 Step 7 – Execute (Write, Build, Launch)

  • Follow the roadmap, track progress daily, and adjust only if data (not impulse) calls for it.
  • Avoid “analysis paralysis.” The plan is a living document—make micro‑adjustments, not wholesale overhauls.

4. Real‑World Examples: When Planning Wins

4.1 Case Study 1 – A Startup’s Blog Revamp

ScenarioWing‑ItPlanned
GoalDouble organic traffic40 % increase in 6 months
ApproachPublish random articlesDeploy Poe‑inspired 7‑step framework
Results12 % traffic lift; high bounce42 % traffic lift; bounce down 18 %

What changed? The startup adopted a goal‑first mindset, built keyword‑centric outlines, and assigned clear roles. The result? a strategic traffic boost.

4.2 Case Study 2 – Personal Productivity (The “30‑Day Writing Challenge”)

MethodOutcome
Wing‑it (write when “inspired”)8 posts, 3 incomplete drafts
Plan (weekly outline + daily 30‑minute block)30 completed posts, 5 % increase in average word count, higher consistency

5. Common Pitfalls & How to Avoid Them

PitfallWhy It HappensPrevention (Poe‑Style Fix)
Over‑planning → paralysisFear of missing somethingDefine a clear effect first; limit scope to what truly matters.
Ignoring dataRelying on gut feelingUse metrics at every milestone; adjust based on evidence.
Vague roles“Everyone does everything”Assign characters with explicit responsibilities.
Skipping the “tone” stepInconsistent brand voiceWrite a tone deck and reference it during edits.
Forgetting the “setting”Tool overload or mismatched techPick 2‑3 core tools, master them, and integrate only when needed.

6. Quick-Start Checklist – From Idea to Execution

  1. State the Effect – Write a one‑sentence purpose.
  2. Select the Tone – Document voice guidelines.
  3. Define Scope & Timeline – Set clear dates and KPIs.
  4. Draft the Plot – Build a milestone roadmap.
  5. Pick the Setting – Choose tools and environment.
  6. Assign Characters – List roles and owners.
  7. Execute & Review – Follow, measure, and iterate.

Print this checklist, pin it to your workspace, and refer to it before you ever consider “wing‑ing it.”

Conclusion – The Power of Planning, Poe‑Style

Whether you’re writing a blog post, launching a product, or tackling a personal goal, the difference between “wing‑it” and “plan‑first” is the same as the difference between chance and choice. Poe proved that a meticulously crafted plan can guarantee an intended emotional effect; modern research shows it guarantees better results, less stress, and higher ROI.

Action Step: Take your next big idea, apply the 7‑step Poe framework, and watch how a simple plan transforms chaos into a compelling, measurable success story.

FAQs

Q1. Does planning stifle creativity?
No. Planning provides a safe container for creativity. By defining the effect first, you free your imagination to explore how to achieve it, not whether it’s possible.

Q2. How detailed should my plan be?
Aim for just enough detail to prevent ambiguity—clear goals, milestones, roles, and tools. Over‑specifying every minute can lead to paralysis; keep it adaptable.

Q3. Can I use this framework for a one‑off task?
Absolutely. Even a single‑page report benefits from a mini‑plan: define purpose, outline headings, assign a deadline, and execute.

Q4. What tools complement Poe’s method?

  • Project Management: Asana, Trello, Notion
  • SEO: Ahrefs, SEMrush, Yoast
  • Collaboration: Google Workspace, Slack

Q5. How often should I revisit the plan?
At each milestone review (weekly for fast projects, monthly for long‑term initiatives). Adjust only when data suggests a course correction.

First Dig Two Graves

A sequel to “The Devil You Don’t”

…

Revenge is a dish best served cold – or preferably so when everything goes right

Of course, it rarely does, as Alistair, Zoe’s handler, discovers to his peril. Enter a wildcard, John, and whatever Alistair’s plan for dealing with Zoe was dies with him.

It leaves Zoe in completely unfamiliar territory.

…

John’s idyllic romance with a woman who is utterly out of his comfort zone is on borrowed time. She is still trying to reconcile her ambivalence after being so indifferent for so long.

They agree to take a break, during which she disappears. John, thinking she has left without saying goodbye, refuses to accept the inevitable and calls on an old friend for help in finding her.

After the mayhem and being briefly reunited, she recognises an inevitable truth: there is a price to pay for taking out Alistair; she must leave and find them first, and he would be wise to keep a low profile.

But keeping a low profile just isn’t possible, and enlisting another friend, a private detective and his sister, a deft computer hacker, they track her to the border between Austria and Hungary.

What John doesn’t realise is that another enemy is tracking him to find her too. It could have been a grand tour of Europe. Instead, it becomes a race against time before enemies old and new converge for what will be an inevitable showdown.

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 295

Day 295 – Don’t tell the readers what they already know about life

…

Why Charles Simic’s Advice to “Not Tell Readers What They Already Know” Can Transform Your Writing

…

Introduction

“Don’t tell the readers what they already know about life.” — Charles Simic

Charles Simic, the Serbian‑American poet and former U.S. Poet Laureate, was famous for his razor‑sharp wit. This single line may sound almost like a tautology, but it holds a secret weapon for every writer: trust your audience.

When you assume readers have the same life experiences you do, you risk preaching, over‑explaining, and, ultimately, boring them. The modern reader craves connection, not instruction. In this post we’ll unpack Simic’s advice, see why it matters in today’s content‑driven world, and give you concrete steps to keep your prose fresh, resonant, and—most importantly—show rather than tell.

1. What Simic Really Meant

1.1 A reminder of the “show, don’t tell” principle

Simic’s statement is a riff on the classic show‑don’t‑tell mantra taught in every creative‑writing class. While “show” urges you to let actions, dialogue, and sensory details illustrate a point, Simic sharpens it: don’t waste precious words on truths the reader already carries.

1.2 Why it matters today

  • Attention economy: Online readers skim. A sentence that restates the obvious is a fast track to bounce‑rate.
  • Reader empowerment: Audiences enjoy the pleasure of discovering meaning themselves. It feels like a partnership, not a lecture.
  • Depth over surface: By discarding the obvious, you free up space for nuance, subtext, and emotional resonance.

2. The Pitfalls of Over‑Explaining

Common Over‑ExplainersWhy They FailBetter Alternative
Heavy “moral of the story” statementsFeels preachy; removes reader agencyLet the narrative’s arc imply the lesson
Repeating universal truths (“love is painful”)Redundant; cheapens impactUse a specific anecdote that embodies the truth
Expository dumps under the guise of “background”Slows pacing; creates info‑overloadWeave backstory into dialogue, setting, and action
Overly literal metaphors (“the storm raged like a lion” )Cluttered, clichéChoose fresh, concrete images that spark imagination

3. Trusting Your Reader’s Intuition

3.1 Readers bring their own life experience

Even if you think a concept is obvious, each reader’s cultural background, age, and personal history shape how they receive it. By offering breadcrumbs rather than a full meal, you respect their intelligence.

3.2 The “Goldilocks Zone” of information

  • Too little: Readers feel confused or alienated.
  • Just right: Readers fill gaps, feel involved, and remember the story.
  • Too much: The narrative becomes a lecture.

Finding the sweet spot is a skill—one we’ll develop in the next sections.

4. Techniques to “Show, Not Tell” the Known

4.1 Use specific, concrete details

Instead of saying “She was sad,” describe “She traced the rim of her coffee cup with a trembling finger, the steam fogging the window as her eyes refused to meet his.” The emotion is inferred, not stated.

4.2 Leverage dialogue

Let characters voice their worldview. A line like “I guess we’re all just trying to stay afloat” hints at life’s struggle without the author’s narration.

4.3 Play with sensory language

Touch, taste, sound, and smell evoke feeling. The scent of rain on pavement can conjure renewal without commenting on it.

4.4 Deploy subtext and implication

A character’s silence, a lingering glance, or an unfinished sentence can say more than an explicit explanation.

4.5 Trim expository filler

Ask yourself: Is this sentence necessary for plot, character, or theme? If the answer is “no,” cut it.

5. Embracing Ambiguity & Subtlety

Simic didn’t recommend vague writing for its own sake; he championed purposeful ambiguity. When you leave room for interpretation, you invite deeper engagement.

  • Open‑ended endings let readers project their own experiences onto the story.
  • Symbolic objects (a cracked mirror, a broken watch) can hold layered meaning.
  • Contradictory actions (a smile in grief) provoke curiosity and empathy.

6. Applying Simic’s Advice Across Genres

GenreWhat “don’t tell” looks likeExample
Literary fictionFocus on inner nuance, avoid moralizingInstead of “He realized love was fleeting,” show the wilted roses he places on the table.
ThrillerKeep suspense by revealing only what the protagonist knowsDon’t tell the reader the killer’s motive before the reveal.
Non‑fictionTrust readers to connect facts themselvesIn a business article, present data and let readers draw the conclusion.
Blog contentProvide actionable insights, not “obvious” adviceSkip “Write regularly” and share a unique workflow that helped you meet deadlines.
PoetryUse metaphor rather than declarative statementsRather than “Life is painful,” write “The night bleeds into the dawn.”

7. Common Mistakes & How to Fix Them

  1. Narrative “hand‑holding” – Fix: Cut adverbs that explain feelings; replace them with visual cues.
  2. Cliché overload – Fix: Replace generic phrases with fresh, sensory images.
  3. Over‑reliance on exposition – Fix: Convert exposition into scenes or dialogue.
  4. Assuming universality – Fix: Research diverse perspectives; test your piece with beta readers from varied backgrounds.

8. Practical Exercises

ExerciseGoalHow to Execute
The 30‑Word SceneStrip to essentialsDraft a scene in 30 words that conveys a full emotional beat.
Show‑Only RewriteReplace “telling” sentencesFind five “telling” lines in a recent draft and rewrite them using only actions, senses, or dialogue.
Reader Gap TestIdentify unnecessary explanationsShare a paragraph with a friend and ask them to “fill in the blanks” where they think you’ve over‑explained.
Metaphor HuntReplace generic statementsLocate any sentences that begin with “It was …” and replace them with a concrete metaphor.
Silence ExerciseUse subtextWrite a dialogue where the main conflict is never spoken outright.

9. Key Takeaways

  • Trust your audience. Readers bring their own life experience—don’t waste words reiterating the obvious.
  • Show, don’t tell with concrete details, dialogue, and sensory language.
  • Embrace ambiguity to create richer, more memorable writing.
  • Tailor the approach to your genre, but the core principle remains universal.
  • Practice relentlessly. Use the exercises above to train your instinct for what to leave unsaid.

10. Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Isn’t some exposition necessary for clarity?
A: Absolutely. The key is balance. Give readers only the information they need to stay oriented, and let the rest unfold organically.

Q: How do I know if I’m over‑explaining?
A: If a sentence could be replaced with a sensory detail or an action without losing meaning, you’re likely over‑explaining.

Q: What if my audience is younger or less experienced?
A: Adjust the depth of implied knowledge, but still avoid stating the obvious. Use relatable analogies instead of explicit explanation.

Q: Does this mean I should avoid “life lessons” altogether?
A: Not at all. Life lessons shine when they emerge from the narrative’s events, not from the author’s direct commentary.

Q: How can I apply this advice to SEO‑focused blog posts?
A: Write for humans first—use engaging storytelling, vivid examples, and data-driven insights. Then sprinkle SEO keywords naturally; avoid keyword‑stuffed “obvious” statements that sound like filler.

11. Closing Thought

Charles Simic’s advice isn’t a command to become cryptic—it’s an invitation to collaborate with your readers. By withholding the obvious, you give them space to connect the dots, feel the emotions, and remember the story. The next time you reach for a line that tells rather than shows, ask yourself: Does my reader already know this? If the answer is yes, let the scene breathe, and watch your writing become more alive, more authentic, and ultimately, more unforgettable.

Ready to rewrite? Grab your latest draft, highlight every sentence that says what instead of how, and start swapping the tell for the show. Your readers (and your Google rankings) will thank you.

Another excerpt from ‘Betrayal’; a work in progress

…

My next destination in the quest was the hotel we believed Anne Merriweather had stayed at.

I was, in a sense, flying blind because we had no concrete evidence she had been there, and the message she had left behind didn’t quite name the hotel or where Vladimir was going to take her.

Mindful of the fact that someone might have been following me, I checked to see if the person I’d assumed had followed me to Elizabeth’s apartment was still in place, but I couldn’t see him. Next, I made a mental note of seven different candidates and committed them to memory.

Then I set off to the hotel, hailing a taxi. There was the possibility that the cab driver was one of them, but perhaps I was slightly more paranoid than I should be. I’d been watching the queue, and there were two others before me.

The journey took about an hour, during which time I kept an eye out the back to see if anyone had been following us. If anyone was, I couldn’t see them.

I had the cab drop me off a block from the hotel and then spent the next hour doing a complete circuit of the block the hotel was on, checking the front and rear entrances, the cameras in place, and the siting of the driveway into the underground carpark. There was a camera over the entrance, and one we hadn’t checked for footage. I sent a text message to Fritz to look into it.

The hotel lobby was large and busy, which was exactly what you’d want if you wanted to come and go without standing out. It would be different later at night, but I could see her arriving about mid-afternoon, and anonymous among the clientele the hotel attracted.

I spent an hour sitting in various positions in the lobby simply observing. I had already ascertained where the elevator lobby for the rooms was, and the elevator down to the car park. Fortunately, it was not ‘guarded’, but there was a steady stream of concierge staff coming and going to the lower levels, and, just from time to time, guests.

Then, when there was a commotion at the front door, what seemed to be a collision of guests and free-wheeling bags, I saw one of the seven potential taggers sitting by the front door. Waiting for me to leave? Or were they wondering why I was spending so much time there?

Taking advantage of that confusion, I picked my moment to head for the elevators that went down to the car park, pressed the down button, and waited.

There was no car on the ground level, so I had to wait, watching, like several others, the guests untangling themselves at the entrance, and keeping an eye on my potential surveillance, still absorbed in the confusion.

The doors to the left car opened, and a concierge stepped out, gave me a quick look, then headed back to his desk. I stepped into the car, pressed the first level down, the level I expected cars to arrive on, and waited what seemed like a long time for the doors to close.

As they did, I was expecting to see a hand poke through the gap, a latecomer. Nothing happened, and I put it down to a television moment.

There were three basement levels, and for a moment, I let my imagination run wild and considered the possibility that there were more levels. Of course, there was no indication on the control panel that there were any other floors, and I’d yet to see anything like it in reality.

With a shake of my head to return to reality, the car arrived, the doors opened, and I stepped out.

A car pulled up, and the driver stepped out, went around to the rear of his car, and pulled out a case. I half expected him to throw me the keys, but the instant glance he gave me told him he was not the concierge, and instead he brushed past me like I wasn’t there.

He bashed the up button several times impatiently and cursed when the doors didn’t open immediately. Not a happy man.

Another car drove past on its way down to a lower level.

I looked up and saw the CCTV camera, pointing towards the entrance, visible in the distance. A gate that lifted up was just about back in position, then clunked when it finally closed. The footage from the camera would not prove much, even if it had been working, because it didn’t cover the lift lobby, only what was in the direction of the car entrance.

The doors to the other elevator car opened, and a man in a suit stepped out.

“Can I help you, sir? You seem lost.”

Security, or something else. “It seems that way. I went to the elevator lobby, got in, and it went down rather than up. I must have been in the wrong place.”

“Lost it is, then, sir.” I could hear the contempt for Americans in his tone. “If you will accompany me, please.”

He put out a hand ready to guide me back into the elevator. I was only too happy to oblige him. There had been a sign near the button panel that said the basement levels were only to be accessed by the guests.

Once inside, he turned a key and pressed the lobby button. The doors closed, and we went up. He stood, facing the door, not speaking. A few seconds later, he was ushering me out to the lobby.

“Now, sir, if you are a guest…”

“Actually, I’m looking for one. She called me and said she would be staying in this hotel and to come down and visit her. I was trying to get to the sixth floor.”

“Good. Let’s go over to the desk and see what we can do for you.”

I followed him over to the reception desk, where he signalled one of the clerks, a young woman who looked and acted very efficiently, and told her of my request, but then remained to oversee the proceeding.

“Name of guest, sir?”

“Merriweather, Anne. I’m her brother, Alexander.” I reached into my coat pocket and pulled out my passport to prove that I was who I said I was. She glanced cursorily at it.

She typed the name into the computer, and then we waited a few seconds while it considered what to output. Then, she said, “That lady is not in the hotel, sir.”

Time to put on my best-confused look. “But she said she would be staying here for the week. I made a special trip to come here to see her.”

Another puzzled look from the clerk, then, “When did she call you?”

An interesting question to ask, and it set off a warning bell in my head. I couldn’t say today, it would have to be the day she was supposedly taken.

“Last Saturday, about four in the afternoon.”

Another look at the screen, then, “It appears she checked out Sunday morning. I’m afraid you have made a trip in vain.”

Indeed, I had. “Was she staying with anyone?”

I just managed to see the warning pass from the suited man to the clerk. I thought he had shown an interest when I mentioned the name, and now I had confirmation. He knew something about her disappearance. The trouble was, he wasn’t going to volunteer any information because he was more than just hotel security.

“No.”

“Odd,” I muttered. “I thought she told me she was staying with a man named Vladimir something or other. I’m not too good at pronouncing those Russian names. Are you sure?”

She didn’t look back at the screen. “Yes.”

“OK, now one thing I do know about staying in hotels is that you are required to ask guests with foreign passports their next destination, just in case they need to be found. Did she say where she was going next?” It was a long shot, but I thought I’d ask.

“Moscow. As I understand it, she lives in Moscow. That was the only address she gave us.”

I smiled. “Thank you. I know where that is. I probably should have gone there first.”

She didn’t answer; she didn’t have to, her expression did that perfectly.

The suited man spoke again, looking at the clerk. “Thank you.” He swivelled back to me. “I’m sorry we can’t help you.”

“No. You have more than you can know.”

“What was your name again, sir, just in case you still cannot find her?”

“Alexander Merriweather. Her brother. And if she is still missing, I will be posting a very large reward. At the moment, you can best contact me via the American Embassy.”

Money is always a great motivator, and that thoughtful expression on his face suggested he gave a moment’s thought to it.

I left him with that offer and left. If anything, the people who were holding her would know she had a brother, that her brother was looking for her, and equally that brother had money.

…

© Charles Heath – 2018-2025

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 295

Day 295 – Don’t tell the readers what they already know about life

…

Why Charles Simic’s Advice to “Not Tell Readers What They Already Know” Can Transform Your Writing

…

Introduction

“Don’t tell the readers what they already know about life.” — Charles Simic

Charles Simic, the Serbian‑American poet and former U.S. Poet Laureate, was famous for his razor‑sharp wit. This single line may sound almost like a tautology, but it holds a secret weapon for every writer: trust your audience.

When you assume readers have the same life experiences you do, you risk preaching, over‑explaining, and, ultimately, boring them. The modern reader craves connection, not instruction. In this post we’ll unpack Simic’s advice, see why it matters in today’s content‑driven world, and give you concrete steps to keep your prose fresh, resonant, and—most importantly—show rather than tell.

1. What Simic Really Meant

1.1 A reminder of the “show, don’t tell” principle

Simic’s statement is a riff on the classic show‑don’t‑tell mantra taught in every creative‑writing class. While “show” urges you to let actions, dialogue, and sensory details illustrate a point, Simic sharpens it: don’t waste precious words on truths the reader already carries.

1.2 Why it matters today

  • Attention economy: Online readers skim. A sentence that restates the obvious is a fast track to bounce‑rate.
  • Reader empowerment: Audiences enjoy the pleasure of discovering meaning themselves. It feels like a partnership, not a lecture.
  • Depth over surface: By discarding the obvious, you free up space for nuance, subtext, and emotional resonance.

2. The Pitfalls of Over‑Explaining

Common Over‑ExplainersWhy They FailBetter Alternative
Heavy “moral of the story” statementsFeels preachy; removes reader agencyLet the narrative’s arc imply the lesson
Repeating universal truths (“love is painful”)Redundant; cheapens impactUse a specific anecdote that embodies the truth
Expository dumps under the guise of “background”Slows pacing; creates info‑overloadWeave backstory into dialogue, setting, and action
Overly literal metaphors (“the storm raged like a lion” )Cluttered, clichéChoose fresh, concrete images that spark imagination

3. Trusting Your Reader’s Intuition

3.1 Readers bring their own life experience

Even if you think a concept is obvious, each reader’s cultural background, age, and personal history shape how they receive it. By offering breadcrumbs rather than a full meal, you respect their intelligence.

3.2 The “Goldilocks Zone” of information

  • Too little: Readers feel confused or alienated.
  • Just right: Readers fill gaps, feel involved, and remember the story.
  • Too much: The narrative becomes a lecture.

Finding the sweet spot is a skill—one we’ll develop in the next sections.

4. Techniques to “Show, Not Tell” the Known

4.1 Use specific, concrete details

Instead of saying “She was sad,” describe “She traced the rim of her coffee cup with a trembling finger, the steam fogging the window as her eyes refused to meet his.” The emotion is inferred, not stated.

4.2 Leverage dialogue

Let characters voice their worldview. A line like “I guess we’re all just trying to stay afloat” hints at life’s struggle without the author’s narration.

4.3 Play with sensory language

Touch, taste, sound, and smell evoke feeling. The scent of rain on pavement can conjure renewal without commenting on it.

4.4 Deploy subtext and implication

A character’s silence, a lingering glance, or an unfinished sentence can say more than an explicit explanation.

4.5 Trim expository filler

Ask yourself: Is this sentence necessary for plot, character, or theme? If the answer is “no,” cut it.

5. Embracing Ambiguity & Subtlety

Simic didn’t recommend vague writing for its own sake; he championed purposeful ambiguity. When you leave room for interpretation, you invite deeper engagement.

  • Open‑ended endings let readers project their own experiences onto the story.
  • Symbolic objects (a cracked mirror, a broken watch) can hold layered meaning.
  • Contradictory actions (a smile in grief) provoke curiosity and empathy.

6. Applying Simic’s Advice Across Genres

GenreWhat “don’t tell” looks likeExample
Literary fictionFocus on inner nuance, avoid moralizingInstead of “He realized love was fleeting,” show the wilted roses he places on the table.
ThrillerKeep suspense by revealing only what the protagonist knowsDon’t tell the reader the killer’s motive before the reveal.
Non‑fictionTrust readers to connect facts themselvesIn a business article, present data and let readers draw the conclusion.
Blog contentProvide actionable insights, not “obvious” adviceSkip “Write regularly” and share a unique workflow that helped you meet deadlines.
PoetryUse metaphor rather than declarative statementsRather than “Life is painful,” write “The night bleeds into the dawn.”

7. Common Mistakes & How to Fix Them

  1. Narrative “hand‑holding” – Fix: Cut adverbs that explain feelings; replace them with visual cues.
  2. Cliché overload – Fix: Replace generic phrases with fresh, sensory images.
  3. Over‑reliance on exposition – Fix: Convert exposition into scenes or dialogue.
  4. Assuming universality – Fix: Research diverse perspectives; test your piece with beta readers from varied backgrounds.

8. Practical Exercises

ExerciseGoalHow to Execute
The 30‑Word SceneStrip to essentialsDraft a scene in 30 words that conveys a full emotional beat.
Show‑Only RewriteReplace “telling” sentencesFind five “telling” lines in a recent draft and rewrite them using only actions, senses, or dialogue.
Reader Gap TestIdentify unnecessary explanationsShare a paragraph with a friend and ask them to “fill in the blanks” where they think you’ve over‑explained.
Metaphor HuntReplace generic statementsLocate any sentences that begin with “It was …” and replace them with a concrete metaphor.
Silence ExerciseUse subtextWrite a dialogue where the main conflict is never spoken outright.

9. Key Takeaways

  • Trust your audience. Readers bring their own life experience—don’t waste words reiterating the obvious.
  • Show, don’t tell with concrete details, dialogue, and sensory language.
  • Embrace ambiguity to create richer, more memorable writing.
  • Tailor the approach to your genre, but the core principle remains universal.
  • Practice relentlessly. Use the exercises above to train your instinct for what to leave unsaid.

10. Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Isn’t some exposition necessary for clarity?
A: Absolutely. The key is balance. Give readers only the information they need to stay oriented, and let the rest unfold organically.

Q: How do I know if I’m over‑explaining?
A: If a sentence could be replaced with a sensory detail or an action without losing meaning, you’re likely over‑explaining.

Q: What if my audience is younger or less experienced?
A: Adjust the depth of implied knowledge, but still avoid stating the obvious. Use relatable analogies instead of explicit explanation.

Q: Does this mean I should avoid “life lessons” altogether?
A: Not at all. Life lessons shine when they emerge from the narrative’s events, not from the author’s direct commentary.

Q: How can I apply this advice to SEO‑focused blog posts?
A: Write for humans first—use engaging storytelling, vivid examples, and data-driven insights. Then sprinkle SEO keywords naturally; avoid keyword‑stuffed “obvious” statements that sound like filler.

11. Closing Thought

Charles Simic’s advice isn’t a command to become cryptic—it’s an invitation to collaborate with your readers. By withholding the obvious, you give them space to connect the dots, feel the emotions, and remember the story. The next time you reach for a line that tells rather than shows, ask yourself: Does my reader already know this? If the answer is yes, let the scene breathe, and watch your writing become more alive, more authentic, and ultimately, more unforgettable.

Ready to rewrite? Grab your latest draft, highlight every sentence that says what instead of how, and start swapping the tell for the show. Your readers (and your Google rankings) will thank you.

NANOWRIMO – April 2024 – “The One That Got Away” – Day 6

The General

…

We are now going to look at the individuals who are national heroes, looking to do some good in the twilight of their lives.

They have a name, they have a reputation, and it’s a recognisable commodity.

Selling range rovers or enticing young adults to join the armed services isn’t quite the post-service career move he was looking for.

The trouble is, he never got the opportunity to get rich like some of his contemporaries, and what there was went on a gambling addiction that just about took everything when he retired.

But the question is, is the General the person he portrays himself as?

Truth is, he needs to find a very well-paying gig.

And just lurking in the background, fuelling the rising trust issues between father and daughter, why is Agatha’s father promoting this particular celebrity?

…

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 294

Day 294 – Observation

…

The Art of Extreme Observation: What Georges Perec’s 60-Page Parisian Stakeout Can Teach Every Writer

Imagine sitting at a cafe table in the heart of Paris for three consecutive days. You aren’t writing a sweeping historical fiction novel, inventing dramatic plot twists, or even checking your phone. Instead, you are simply acting as a human security camera—writing down the make of every passing car, the colour of a pigeon’s feathers, the exact time a woman in a green coat walks by, and the hum of conversation drifting from the bar.

This isn’t a mindfulness exercise; it was a radical literary experiment.

Over a full October weekend in 1974, French avant-garde writer and filmmaker Georges Perec posted up in Paris’s Place Saint-Sulpice. Armed with notebooks, he attempted to exhaust his subject completely. The result? An Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris, a fascinating 60-page essay that redefines how we look at the world around us.

So, is this something every writer should do? And more importantly, why should you waste an entire weekend staring at ordinary life when you could be drafting your next masterpiece?

Let’s dive into the radical genius of Perec’s experiment and explore why hyper-observation is the secret weapon every writer needs.

What Did Georges Perec Actually Do?

Georges Perec was a member of Oulipo (Ouvroir de littérature potentielle), a loose gathering of French-speaking writers and mathematicians who enjoyed creating works using constrained writing techniques.

For his Place Saint-Sulpice experiment, Perec’s constraint was simple: record the infratrivial—the ordinary, the trivial, the background noise that people usually ignore.

Over Thursday, October 18, Friday, October 19, and Saturday, October 20, 1974, Perec sat at various cafes (Café de la Mairie, Tabac Saint-Sulpice) and noted:

  • The weather shifting.
  • Buses arriving and departing (Route 86, Route 63).
  • Dogs being walked.
  • The changing shadows of the Saint-Sulpice church.
  • Fragments of overheard dialogue.

He wasn’t looking for a murder mystery to unfold. He wasn’t waiting for a celebrity sighting. He was deliberately focusing on what happens when nothing special happens.

As Perec wrote in the introduction:

“What happens every day and recurs every day: the banal, the quotidian, the obvious, the common, the ordinary, the infra-ordinary, the background noise, the habitual? How to account for it, how to question it, how to describe it?”

Is This Something Every Writer Should Do?

Let’s be honest: you probably shouldn’t spend 60 pages detailing the license plates of cars in your local strip mall today. Most writers are already strapped for time, balancing day jobs, families, and actual writing deadlines.

However, every writer should adopt the mindset of Perec’s experiment.

Whether you write literary fiction, sci-fi world-building, high-octane thrillers, or creative nonfiction, doing a localised “exhaustion” exercise completely transforms your relationship with reality and your craft. Here is why you need to try it at least once.

1. It Cures “Writer’s Blindness”

Writers are professional daydreamers. We live inside our heads, plotting, planning, and worrying about character arcs. Because of this, we suffer from what psychologists call inattentional blindness—we stop seeing the actual physical world around us.

When you force yourself to sit still and record mundane details for an hour (let alone a whole weekend), the world snaps back into high definition. You notice how sunlight hits a cracked pavement, the precise way an elderly man adjusts his scarf, or the nervous tic of a barista dropping a ceramic cup. These are the sensory details that turn flat, generic writing into immersive, breathing fiction.

2. It Teaches You the Power of Constraint

In a world of infinite possibilities (blank Google Docs, endless plot directions), writers often freeze. Perec’s experiment proves that limitations breed creativity.

By restricting yourself to a single street corner, park bench, or coffee shop for a defined period, you remove the paralysis of choice. You stop worrying about what to write and focus entirely on how to capture what is right in front of you.

3. It Deepens Your Understanding of Pacing and Rhythm

Read An Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris, and you’ll notice the text has a rhythmic, hypnotic quality. It mimics the natural ebb and flow of daily life—slow lulls in the afternoon, rushes of commuter traffic, quiet evenings.

By practising extreme observation, you learn the natural cadences of the real world. When you translate this into storytelling, your narrative pacing improves. You learn when to speed up a scene (like morning rush hour) and when to let the atmosphere linger (like a quiet Sunday afternoon).

4. It Retrains Your Brain to Value the “Infratrivial”

The best stories aren’t always about explosions, dramatic breakups, or epic fantasy quests. Often, the most resonant moments in literature happen in the spaces in between: a conversation over lukewarm soup, the silence in a car after an argument, the way someone stirs their coffee.

Perec teaches us to pay attention to the background noise. As writers, our job is to make readers care about the ordinary. If you can make a 60-page essay about a mundane Parisian square engaging, you can make any scene in your novel compelling.

How to Do Your Own “Perec Weekend” (Or Afternoon)

You don’t need to fly to Paris to channel Georges Perec. You can run your own micro-version of this experiment this very weekend. Here is how:

  1. Pick a Mundane Location: Choose somewhere unremarkable—a local diner, a subway platform, a hotel lobby, or a bench in a suburban park. Avoid hyper-stimulating tourist hotspots.
  2. Bring a Notebook (Not a Phone): Put your phone on Do Not Disturb. Use a physical notebook and pen. Digital devices invite distraction; paper demands presence.
  3. Commit to a Timeframe: Start small. Give yourself one uninterrupted hour. If you’re feeling ambitious, try three hours.
  4. Record Without Filtering: Write down everything. Do not judge whether it’s “interesting” enough. Write the mundane details: “12:15 PM. A pigeon with a missing toe lands near a discarded crisp packet. A woman in a yellow jacket walks past, looking at her watch. The hum of an idling delivery van.”
  5. Review and Mine: Later, read back through your notes. Highlight the phrases, sensory triggers, and micro-moments that jump out at you. Drop these observations into your current work-in-progress to anchor your characters in a vivid, tangible reality.

Final Thoughts

Georges Perec didn’t write An Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris to give us a plot blueprint; he wrote it to wake us up.

As writers, we are chroniclers of the human experience. But we cannot write about humanity if we aren’t willing to watch it—truly watch it—in its most unpolished, unscripted, and ordinary moments.

So, pack a notebook, find a bench, and start noticing. You might just surprise yourself with what you find when you stop looking for a story and let the world come to you.

…