“One Last Look”: nothing is what it seems

A single event can have enormous consequences.

A single event driven by fate: after Ben told his wife, Charlotte, he would be home late one night, he left early and, by chance, discovered his wife having dinner in their favourite restaurant with another man.

A single event where it could be said Ben was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Who was this man? Why was she having dinner with him?

A simple truth to explain the single event was all Ben required. Instead, Charlotte told him a lie.

A single event that forces Ben to question everything he thought he knew about his wife and the people who are around her.

After a near-death experience and forced retirement into a world he is unfamiliar with, Ben finds himself once again drawn back into that life of lies, violence, and intrigue.

From London to a small village in Tuscany, little by little, Ben discovers who the woman he married is, and the real reason why fate had brought them together.

It is available on Amazon here:  http://amzn.to/2CqUBcz

The cinema of my dreams – Was it just another surveillance job – Episode 53

This story is now on the list to be finished so over the new few weeks, expect a new episode every few days.

The reason why new episodes have been sporadic, there are also other stories to write, and I’m not very good at prioritizing.

But, here we are, a few minutes opened up and it didn’t take long to get back into the groove.

Things are about to get complicated…


I thanked the CCTV operator and left with Joanne to go back to the third floor and Monica’s office.  Joanne had called her the moment we made the discovery, and she was there to make sure I made it.

It was a passing thought I leave, but I would not get past the soldier at the front door.

We waited for a few minutes in the outer office where an efficient personal assistant was typing faster than I could think.

A buzzing sound broke the steady keyboard sounds, and she said we could go in.

I could imagine another page and a half being entered in the time it took for us to get from the chairs to the door.

Inside, the office had wooden panelling, shelves lined with books, a minibar, benchtops covered in trinkets picked up in many travels, and strategically placed in a corner, four chairs and a coffee table.

Monica was sitting on one, and she motioned for us to sit in two others.

Was a fourth person expected?

If there was we were not waiting for them.  As soon as I was seated, she asked, “What did you find?”

She already knew, via Joanne, but perhaps this was a test.

“There were two people at the café, or perhaps one, the intermediary that O’Connell was looking for inside, and another nearby, like out the back of the café.

“I’d been too wrapped up in surviving the aftermath of the bomb to see O’Connell head for an alley near the café.  I thought it might be to check on the intermediary, but apparently, it was to meet someone else who obviously survived.”

“Anna Jacovich.”

Of course, Joanne had briefed her.  No secrets among friends.

“What do we know about her?”

Joanne answered that one, “She’s a fugitive, and Interpol is looking for her, as are the local police.”

“And she’s here?”

“If she hasn’t run.  A bomb nearby can do that.  She has to know people are out there actively trying to kill her like they did her husband.”

“He originally created the USB?”

“It looks like it.  And my guess, Dobbin was using O’Connell to act as a journalist and buy the information off her before it went to the highest bidder.  If we were to throw hypotheses out there, it’s not a stretch to believe Severin and Maury, as Westcott and Salvin, supposedly ex-department, were charged to get inside the lab and investigate the data breach, found out who it was, followed them here, and then set up an off-book surveillance group to watch the players culminating in the botched operation I was just on.  Severin wasn’t working for Dobbin but someone else, which means someone else in this department has an active interest in the breach, and who was running his or her own operation.  That wouldn’t be you would it?”

“That would be someone in a corner office.  I can barely see daylight here.  In other words, not high enough up in the food chain.  Like you, I’m staggering around in the dark.  Dobbin has a corner office.”

“Who’s in charge of matters concerning biological weapons?”

“The MOD.  Not us.”

“But you have experts.  You must come across credible threats from time to time, and I doubt you just hand it over.”

“We’re supposed to.  There is a chain of command you know.  It’s not like the movies.”

The way this operation had been running, that was exactly what I thought.

“That’s what I think I know.  Still no indication O’Connell is alive, but I suspect Dobbin does know, and just not telling.  Might also know where he is.  Perhaps while I’m trying to find him, you go over Dobbin’s head and find out.”

“Easier said than done.  You need help?”

“No.  Everyone I work with has their own axe to grind, so I’m better off alone.”

“That Jan woman?”

“Especially her.”

“OK.  Keep me, via Joanne, informed.  If you need anything, tell Joanne.”

Meeting over.

…

© Charles Heath 2020-2023

Harry Walthenson, Private Detective – the second case – A case of finding the “Flying Dutchman”

…

What starts as a search for a missing husband soon develops into an unbelievable story of treachery, lies, and incredible riches.

…

It was meant to remain buried long enough for the dust to settle on what was once an unpalatable truth, when enough time had passed, and those who had been willing to wait could reap the rewards.

The problem was, no one knew where that treasure was hidden or the location of the logbook that held the secret.

At stake, billions of dollars’ worth of stolen Nazi loot brought to the United States in an anonymous tramp steamer and hidden in a specially constructed vault under a specifically owned plot of land on the once docklands of New York.

It may have remained hidden and unknown to only a few, if it had not been for a mere obscure detail being overheard …

… by our intrepid, newly minted private detective, Harry Walthenson …

… and it would have remained buried.

Now, through a series of unrelated events, or are they, that well-kept secret is out there, and Harry will not stop until the whole truth is uncovered.

Even if it almost costs him his life.  Again.

The cinema of my dreams – I always wanted to see the planets – Episode 18

Can we say, full steam ahead?

…

The captain and the Chief Engineer were a team. I was on the outside, and I doubted being temporarily being promoted would change that.

And while it might not hamper the running of the ship, there might be pushback on some of my decisions, so it was going to be important to have his support.

But it was time to bring up the reason for my visit. “The Admiral said we have a faster ship than most of us were aware of.”

“Project Alpha. It was need to know, as you can understand.”

“Who exactly is aware of the fact?”

“Three engineers. The captain, the navigator, helmsman, and six engine specialists. Van was going to tell you before the general announcement in a day or so once we’ve gone through the preparations before a short test.”

“It didn’t happen in the trials before the handover?”

“It did, but it was not the resounding success we were expecting. It’s the reason for the delay in departure.”

And the reason I was on the ship at all. Had the ship left when it was.intended, I would have still been on the moon base waiting for transport. The fact I made it at all was all down to fate. Which, for once, was on my side.

“You were on board for the trials?”

“As was Van. You would gave been,too, if you hadn’t got stuck at the moon base.”

“The problem, if it was it was problem, I assume has been fixed?”

“Let’s hope so. We’re going to need it, if what I hear is true.”

“Last question, when?”

“By the time you get back to the bridge. We’ll need to have another talk later.”

“Of course.”

There were so many questions the chief engineer, and obviously the captains best friend certainly on-board the ship, didn’t ask, starting with information on the alien.

I suspect he already knew as much about the alien ship as he needed.

Back on the bridge it was hard to tell whether anything was happening. Unlike a freighter where there was no more than three present any one time, out of a crew of about twenty. Here, there was about twenty or so, each quietly monitoring systems.

The second now first officer .jumped out of the captains chair the moment he heard the elevator doors open.

“No change, still on course for Uranus.thw two shipyard still there, effectively in our path, no sign of the other ship, but we believed it is cloaked, or at the very least, obscured from our scanners.”

“Very good.”

I took the.few.steps.to the navigation console.where.i could see our trajectory, and.the planet Uranus which intersected.our path.

“Mr Saville.”

He preferred being called by name, not rank.

“Sir?”

“I assume you’re across Project Alpha?”

“Yes.” He had a quizzical expression, that said, how do you know about it?

“Stand by, were about to see if it works this time.”

Quizzical expression to total concentration. I saw him enter code, and the console change to a different screen.

As I turned to return to the captains seat, not that I felt like sitting in it, I saw a message flashing at the top of his screen, “System awaiting command”.

Umpteen billions worth of research, technology, and man power was sitting on the end of a green button that had the word “go” on it.

We were according to my console, sitting on an SSPD of 3.25. It was close to the tip speed I knew we were capable of, and just under cruise.

I sat. A short announcement. I was not sure what to expect when we moved to a higher speed, but I was guessing it would be similar to what it was like now, a gradual increase in speed, to the maximum.

We’d soon find out.

“Attention all personnel. We are about to run a test on our propulsion unit.”

“Mr Saville.”

“Sir.” He turned to look at me.

“It’s the moment of truth. Let’s go.”

…

© Charles Heath 2021

What I learned about writing – Not to use Figures of Speech

I found this explanation on the internet for what figures of speech are: ‘a word or phrase used in a non-literal sense for rhetorical or vivid effect.’

We as writers should not use these in our writing because most people might not understand their use.  I think it sometimes adds a degree of whimsy to the story.

I remember some years ago when I was working with a Russian chap who’d not been in the country very long, and though he had a reasonable use of English, he was not quite up with our figures of speech.

And made me realise when he kept asking me what they meant, just how many I used in everyday use.

Most of these figures of speech use descriptions that do not necessarily match the word being described, such as ‘I dance like I have two left feet’.

And that pretty much sums up how good I can dance.  But …

‘Like a bat out of hell’, not sure how this got into the vernacular

‘Like a bull in a China shop’, describes a toddler let loose

‘More front than Myers’, as my mother used to say, but in context, Myers is the Australian version of the English Selfridges or Harrods or Paris Galleries Lafayette.  It refers to the width of the street frontage of the stores

‘As mad as a hatter’, though not necessarily of the millinery kind, but, well, you can guess

‘As nutty as a fruitcake’, provided your fruitcake has nuts in it

You can see, if you get the references, they are somewhat apt, and, yes, they sometimes creep into my stories.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 264

Day 264 – Writers have two choices

…

The Writer’s Crossroads: Embrace Reality & Complexity or Escape to Simplicity?


“The writer is often faced with two choices: turn away from reality and complexity, or conquer its mystery by battling with it.” – Chinua Achebe
— Your next breakthrough begins at this fork in the road.


Table of Contents

  1. Understanding the Dilemma
  2. Why Some Writers Choose Escape
  3. The Power of Grappling with Reality
  4. Real‑World Examples: From Hemingway to Margaret Atwood
  5. Practical Ways to Face Complexity Head‑On
  6. When Escapism Becomes a Tool, Not a Trap
  7. Balancing Both Worlds: A Hybrid Approach
  8. FAQ
  9. Take the Next Step

1. Understanding the Dilemma

Every writer—whether a novelist, journalist, poet, or copywriter—confronts the same universal crossroads:

ChoiceWhat It Looks LikeTypical ProsTypical Cons
Turn AwayWrite in a bubble of fantasy, avoid controversial topics, keep narratives “comfort‑zone” safe.Faster drafts, less self‑scrutiny, immediate emotional relief.Shallow worlds, missed audience connection, risk of stagnation.
Conquer MysteryDive into messy reality—politics, mental health, cultural nuance, technical detail.Depth, authenticity, lasting impact, critical acclaim.Exhaustion, writer’s block, fear of misrepresentation.

The decision isn’t binary; it’s a dynamic tension that fuels the creative engine. Recognizing when you’re leaning toward one pole helps you consciously choose the path that best serves your story and career.


2. Why Some Writers Choose Escape

2.1 Emotional Safety Net

Complex reality often surfaces uncomfortable truths—trauma, systemic injustice, personal failure. Escapism offers a safe distance, allowing the writer to stay emotionally intact while still creating.

2.2 Market Pressures

Publishers and platforms sometimes favor “feel‑good” content that sells quickly. The promise of a high conversion rate can tempt writers to produce formulaic pieces rather than nuanced explorations.

2.3 Cognitive Overload

The modern information age inundates us with data. Decision fatigue can make the simple, familiar narrative feel like a mental oasis.

SEO Tip: Use keywords like “writer’s block,” “creative burnout,” and “escapist writing” within this section to capture search traffic from writers seeking relief solutions.


3. The Power of Grappling with Reality

When you confront complexity, you unlock three core benefits:

  1. Authentic Voice – Readers sense sincerity. Authenticity drives dwell time and social shares.
  2. Narrative Authority – Grounding your story in researched reality builds credibility, which Google’s E‑E‑A‑T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) loves.
  3. Long‑Term Impact – Works that challenge norms (think 1984 or The Handmaid’s Tale) endure for decades, generating evergreen traffic and royalties.

3.1 The “Mystery‑Battle” Framework

  1. Identify the Core Mystery – What’s the unknown element that keeps you up at night? (e.g., “Why do people self‑sabotage?”)
  2. Gather Raw Data – Interviews, statistics, first‑hand observations.
  3. Map the Complexity – Use mind maps, storyboards, or spreadsheets to visualize relationships.
  4. Create a Narrative Mini‑Goal – Solve a piece of the puzzle each chapter/section.
  5. Iterate & Refine – Treat each draft as a battlefield report, not a final victory.

Keyword Spotlight: “how to write complex characters,” “research-driven storytelling,” “creative writing process.”


4. Real‑World Examples: From Hemingway to Margaret Atwood

AuthorEscape Route?Reality‑Based TriumphWhat Writers Can Learn
Ernest HemingwayMinimalist prose, “Iceberg Theory” → appears simple but hides depth.A Farewell to Arms – War’s brutal reality under a spare style.Use minimalism to mask complexity, not avoid it.
Margaret AtwoodFuturistic dystopia → escapist veneer.The Handmaid’s Tale – Direct commentary on gender politics.Blend speculative settings with current social issues.
Neil GaimanMythic fantasy worlds.American Gods – Contemporary America’s cultural melting pot.Anchor fantastical elements in real‑world research.
Ta-Nehisi CoatesNon‑fiction memoirs.Between the World and Me – Raw, unfiltered confession on race.Honesty about personal pain creates universal resonance.

SEO Insight: Including the names of popular authors boosts search relevance for writers researching literary strategies.


5. Practical Ways to Face Complexity Head‑On

5.1 Start With a “Reality Check” Prompt

Prompt: “If this story were a news article tomorrow, what facts would have to be accurate?”

Write a short paragraph that answers the prompt. It forces you to root the narrative in verifiable detail before you drift into abstraction.

5.2 Micro‑Research Sprints

  • Timebox: 30 minutes of focused research (no email, no social).
  • Tool: Use Google Scholar, JSTOR, or reputable podcasts.
  • Output: A bullet‑list of 5 concrete facts you can weave into your draft.

5.3 The “Complexity Calendar”

DayTask
MonIdentify one confusing aspect of your story’s world.
TueDraft a scene where a character confronts it.
WedPeer‑review for clarity (ask a non‑expert friend).
ThuRevise using feedback.
FriReflect: Did the scene deepen the story’s truth?

5.4 Dialogue as Investigation

Treat every conversation as an interview. Let your characters ask probing questions that mirror the writer’s own curiosity.

5.5 Use Data Visualization

If your story involves statistics (e.g., climate change), create an infographic for yourself. Seeing numbers visually helps you internalize the data and embed it fluidly.


6. When Escapism Becomes a Tool, Not a Trap

Escapism isn’t inherently lazy—it can be a strategic way to:

  • Recharge mental batteries (take a creative “vacation”).
  • Explore alternative perspectives through genre (e.g., magical realism to discuss migration).
  • Simplify a tangled concept for a broader audience (think children’s picture books).

Guideline: Escapism must be intentional. Set a timer. If a week passes without integrating any real‑world insight, revisit your outline.

Keyword Cluster: “benefits of creative writing,” “using fiction for social commentary,” “how to write fantasy with purpose.”


7. Balancing Both Worlds: A Hybrid Approach

7.1 The “Layered Narrative” Model

LayerGoalExample
Surface (Escapist)Hook the reader with compelling plot & vivid setting.A space‑opera chase scene.
Mid‑Layer (Analytical)Introduce data, history, or philosophical debate.A politician’s speech referencing real‑world policy.
Core (Mystery‑Battle)Resolve the central philosophical question.The protagonist confronting their own moral ambiguity.

7.2 The “Two‑Draft Rule”

  1. First Draft (Escape Mode): Write fluidly, ignore facts.
  2. Second Draft (Conquer Mode): Fact‑check, tighten, embed research.

7.3 The “Reader Test”

  • Ask: “If I read this tomorrow, would I feel enlightened, entertained, or both?”
  • Metric: Aim for ≥70% of readers reporting both in post‑launch surveys (use tools like Google Forms or Typeform).

8. Frequently Asked Questions

QuestionShort Answer
Is it okay to write purely escapist fiction?Absolutely—if it’s your artistic intent. However, give it some grounding (e.g., emotional truth) to avoid feeling hollow.
How much research is “enough” for a novel?There’s no one-size‑fits‑all, but a research‑to‑writing ratio of 1:3 (1 hour research per 3 hours writing) works for many authors.
Can I use my own life’s complexity without over‑exposing?Yes. Use fictionalization techniques—change names, amalgamate characters, shift timelines—to protect privacy while preserving truth.
What if I feel overwhelmed by the “mystery” of reality?Break it down into bite‑size questions. Tackle one per writing session; celebrate each micro‑victory.
Do search engines reward complexity?Google favors depth and authoritativeness. Well‑researched, detailed content ranks higher than shallow filler.

9. Take the Next Step: Turn Complexity into Your Creative Superpower

Ready to stop choosing between flight and fight? Use the “Mystery‑Battle Checklist” below and download our free Writer’s Reality‑Toolkit (PDF) to keep your research, outlines, and drafts organised.

📋 Mystery‑Battle Checklist

  •  Identify the central mystery of my story.
  •  Collect at least 3 credible sources for each major fact.
  •  Write a “reality‑check” paragraph for every chapter.
  •  Schedule a research sprint weekly (30‑45 minutes).
  •  Conduct a peer‑review focused on clarity & authenticity.

🔗 Download the Writer’s Reality‑Toolkit (PDF)

Join our community of 12,000+ writers who’ve turned complexity into bestseller material. Subscribe for weekly tips, prompts, and SEO‑friendly writing hacks.


Final Thought

Every writer stands on the same precipice—turn away into comforting simplicity, or conquer the complex mystery that reality offers. The choice isn’t a sacrifice; it’s a strategic decision that defines your voice, your impact, and ultimately, your legacy. Embrace the battle, wield your research like a sword, and watch your stories resonate far beyond the page.

Happy writing—may your pen never shy away from the beautiful, messy truth.

…

In a word: Key

So, as we all know, a key is used to lock or unlock a door, gate, or something else.  It’s either made of shiny metal, brass, or rusty iron, it can be small, or very, very big, as is the key to a dungeon.

We can have one key or we can have many or even a master key that unlocks everything, very handy if you have a house full of locked rooms.

People always seem to want to steal them, especially in crime shows.

There is also an item called a key card.  Not the metal thing, but a plastic thing, that opens doors.  Odd that it’s called keyless entry!

Then there’s what is known as the key to something, i.e. you might have the key to his or her heart, metaphorically speaking.

And in that metaphorical sense, it opens up pandora’s box with a plethora of different meanings.

He had the key to the puzzle.

I wish sometimes I had the key to be able to write better, that that one particular key eludes me.

There are keys on a keyboard, the ones you use on computers and calculators.  They were originally on typewriters.  You can also find keys on a piano, or an accordion, and some other musical instruments.

A key can also be a master index field, or unique identifier, in a database, particularly those kept on computers.

And,

there’s a host of other uses for the word key, such as

roughening a surface

describing the shooting area on a basketball court

a group, or one, of small coral islets

matching words to pictures

or, you’re just too keyed up to sleep.

 

 

 

An excerpt from “Mistaken Identity” – a work in progress

The odds of any one of us having a doppelganger are quite high. Whether or not you got to meet them or be confronted by them was significantly lower. Except, of course, unless you are a celebrity.

It was a phenomenon remarkable only for the fact that, at times, certain high-profile people, notorious or not, had doubles if only to put off enemies or the general public. Sometimes we see people in the street who look like someone we knew and make the mistake of approaching them like a long-lost friend, only to discover an embarrassed individual desperately trying to get away from what they perceive as a stalker, or worse.

And then sometimes it is a picture that looms up on a TV screen, an almost exact likeness of you. At first, you are fascinated, and then, according to the circumstances and narrative that is attached to that picture, either flattered or horrified.

For me, one turned to the other when I saw an almost likeness of me flash up on the screen when I turned the TV on in my room. What looked to be my photo, with only minor differences, was in the corner of the screen, the newsreader speaking in rapid Italian, so fast I could only translate every second or third word.

But the one word I did recognise was murder. The photo of the man on the screen was the subject of an extensive manhunt. The crime, the murder of a woman in the very same hotel I was staying, and it was being played out live several floors above me. The gist of the story, the woman had been seen with and staying with the man who was my double, and, less than an hour ago, the body had been discovered by a chambermaid.

The killer, the announcer said, was believed to be still in the hotel because the woman had died shortly before she had been discovered.

I watched, at first fascinated by what I was seeing. I guess I should have been horrified, but at that moment it didn’t register that I might be mistaken for that man.

Not until another five minutes had passed, and I was watching the police in full riot gear, with a camera crew following behind, coming up a passage towards a room. Live action of the arrest of the suspected killer, the breathless commentator said.

Then, suddenly, there was a pounding on the door. On the TV screen, plain to see, was the number of my room. I looked through the peephole and saw an army of police officers. It didn’t take much to realise what had happened. The hotel staff identified me as the man in the photograph on the TV and called the police.

Horrified wasn’t what I was feeling right then.

It was fear.

My last memory was the door crashing open, the wood splintering, and men rushing into the room, screaming at me, waving guns, and when I put my hands up to defend myself, I heard a gunshot.

And in one very confused and probably near-death experience, I thought I saw my mother and thought what was she doing in Rome?

…

I was the archetypal nobody.

I lived in a small flat, I drove a nondescript car, had an average job in a low-profile travel agency, was single, and currently not involved in a relationship, had no children, and, according to my workmates, no life.

They were wrong. I was one of those people who preferred their own company; I had a cat, and travelled whenever I could. And I did have a ‘thing’ for Rosalie, one of the reasons why I stayed at the travel agency. I didn’t expect anything to come of it, but one could always hope.

I was both pleased and excited to be going to the conference. It was my first, and the glimpse I had seen of it had whetted my appetite for more information about the nuances of my profession.

Some would say that a travel agent wasn’t much of a job, but to me, it was every bit as demanding as being an accountant or a lawyer. You were providing a customer with a service, and arguably, more people needed a travel agent than a lawyer. At least that was what I told myself as I watched more and more people start using the internet, and our relevance slowly dissipating.

This conference was about countering that trend.

The trip over had been uneventful. I was met at the airport and taken to the hotel where the conference was being held with several other delegates who had arrived on the same plane. I had mingled with several other delegates at the pre-conference get-together, including one whose name was Maryanne.

She was an unusual young woman, not the sort that I usually met, because she was the one who was usually surrounded by all the boys, the life of the party. In normal circumstances, I would not have introduced myself to her, but she had approached me. Why did I think that may have been significant? All of this ran through my mind, culminating in the last event on the highlight reel, the door bursting open, men rushing into my room, and then one of the policemen opened fire.

I replayed that last scene again, trying to see the face of my assailant, but it was just a sea of men in battle dress, bulletproof vests and helmets, accompanied by screaming and yelling, some of which I identified as “Get on the floor”.

Then came the shot.

Why ask me to get on the floor if all they were going to do was shoot me? I was putting my hands up at the time, in surrender, not reaching for a weapon.

Then I saw the face again, hovering in the background like a ghost. My mother. Only the hair was different, and her clothes, and then the image was going, perhaps a figment of my imagination brought on by pain-killing drugs. I tried to imagine the scene again, but this time it played out without the image of my mother.

I opened my eyes and took stock of my surroundings. What I felt in that exact moment couldn’t be described. I should most likely be dead, the result of a gunshot wound. I guess I should be thankful the shooter hadn’t aimed at anything vital, but that was the only item on the plus side.

I was in a hospital room with a policeman by the door. He was reading a newspaper and sitting uncomfortably on a small chair. He gave me a quick glance when he heard me move slightly, but didn’t acknowledge me with either a nod or a greeting, just went back to the paper.

If I still had a police guard, then I would still be considered a suspect. What was interesting was that I was not handcuffed to the bed. Perhaps that only happened in TV shows. Or maybe they knew I couldn’t run because my injuries were too serious. Or the guard would shoot me long before my feet hit the floor. I knew the police well enough now to know they would shoot first and ask questions later.

On the physical side, I had a large bandage over the top left corner of my chest, extending over my shoulder. A little poking and prodding determined the bullet had hit somewhere between the top of my rib cage and my shoulder. Nothing vital there, but my arm might be somewhat useless for a while, depending on what the bullet hit on the way in or through.

It didn’t feel like there were any broken or damaged bones.

That was the good news.

On the other side of the ledger, my mental state, there was only one word that could describe it. Terrified. I was looking at a murder charge and jail time, a lot of it. Murder usually had a long time in jail attached to it.

Whatever had happened, I didn’t do it. I know I didn’t do it, but I had to try to explain this to people who had already made up their minds. I searched my mind for evidence. It was there, but in the confused state brought on by the medication, all I could think about was jail, and the sort of company I was going to have.

I think death would have been preferable.

…

Half an hour later, maybe longer, I was drifting in and out of consciousness. A nurse, or what I thought was a nurse, came into the room. The guard stood, checked her ID card, and then stood by the door.

She came over and stood beside the bed. “How are you?” she asked, first in Italian, and when I pretended I didn’t understand, she asked the same question in accented English.

“Alive, I guess,” I said. “No one has come and told me what my condition is yet. You are my first visitor. Can you tell me?”

“Of course. You are very lucky to be alive. You will be fine and make a full recovery. The doctors here are excellent at their work.”

“What happens now?”

“I check you, and then you have another visitor. He is from the British Embassy, I think. But he will have to wait until I have finished my examination.”

I realised then she was a doctor, not a nurse.

…

My second visitor was a man, dressed in a suit, the sort of which I associated with the British Civil Service.  He was not very old, which told me he was probably a recent graduate on his first posting, the junior officer who drew the short straw.

The guard checked his ID but again did not leave the room, sitting back down and going back to his newspaper.

My visitor introduced himself as Alex Jordan from the British Embassy in Rome, and he had been asked by the Ambassador to sort out what he labelled a tricky mess.

For starters, it was good to see that someone cared about what happened to me.  But, equally, I knew the mantra, get into trouble overseas, and there is not much we can do to help you.  So, after that lengthy introduction, I had to wonder why he was here.

I said, “They think I am an international criminal by the name of Jacob Westerbury, whose picture looks just like me, and apparently, for them, it is an open and shut case.”  I could still hear the fragments of the yelling as the police burst through the door, at the same time telling me to get on the floor with my hands over my head.

“It’s not.  They know they’ve got the wrong man, which is why I’m here.  There is the issue of what had been described as excessive force, and the fact that you were shot had made it an all-around embarrassment for them.”

“Then why are you here?  Shouldn’t they be here apologising?”

“That is why you have another visitor.  I only took precedence because I insisted on speaking with you first.  I have come, basically, to ask you for a favour.  This situation has afforded us an opportunity.  We would like you to sign the official document, which basically indemnifies them against any legal proceedings.”

Curious.  What sort of opportunity was he talking about?  Was this a matter that could get difficult and I could be charged by the Italian Government, even if I wasn’t guilty, or was it one of those hush-hush type deals, you do this for us, we’ll help you out with that?  “What sort of opportunity?”

“We want to get our hands on Jacob Westerbury as much as they do.  They’ve made a mistake, and we’d like to use that to get custody of him if or when he is arrested in this country.  I’m sure you would also like this man brought into custody as soon as possible, so you will stop being confused with him.  I can only imagine what it was like to be arrested in the manner you were.  And I would not blame you if you wanted to get some compensation for what they’ve done.  But.  There are bigger issues in play here, and you would be doing this for your country.”

I wondered what would happen if I didn’t agree to his proposal.  I had to ask, “What if I don’t?”

His expression didn’t change.  “I’m sure you are a sensible man, Mr Pargeter, who is more than willing to help his country whenever he can.  They have agreed to take care of all your hospital expenses, refund the cost of the Conference, and travel.  I’m sure I could also get them to pay for a few days at Capri or Sorrento, if you like, before you go home.  What do you say?”

There was only one thing I could say.  Wasn’t it treason if you went against your country’s wishes?

“I’m not an unreasonable man, Alex.  Go do your deal, and I’ll sign the papers.”

“Good man.”

…

After Alex left, the doctor came back to announce the arrival of a woman, who had announced herself as the publicity officer from the Italian police. When she came into the room, she was not dressed in a uniform.

The doctor left after giving a brief report to the civilian at the door. I understood the gist of it: “The patient has recovered excellently, and the wounds are healing as expected. There is no cause for concern.”

That was a relief.

While the doctor was speaking to the civilian, I speculated on who she might be. She was young, not more than thirty, conservatively dressed, so an official of some kind, but not necessarily with the police. Did they have prosecutors? I was unfamiliar with the Italian legal system.

She had long, wavy black hair and the sort of sultry looks of an Italian movie star, and her presence made me more curious than fearful, though I couldn’t say why.

The woman then spoke to the guard, and he reluctantly got up and left the room, closing the door behind him. She checked the door and then came back towards me, standing at the end of the bed. Now alone, she said, “A few questions before we begin.” Her English was only slightly accented. “Your name is Jack Pargeter?”

I nodded. “Yes.”

“You are in Rome to attend the Travel Agents Conference at the Hilton Hotel?”

“Yes.”

“You attended a preconference introduction on the evening of the 25th, after arriving from London at approximately 4:25 pm.”

“About that time, yes. I know it was about five when the bus came to collect me, and several others, to take us to the hotel.”

She smiled. It was then that I noticed she was reading from a small notepad.

“It was ten past five to be precise. The driver had been held up in traffic. We have several witnesses who saw you on the plane, on the bus, at the hotel, and with the aid of closed-circuit TV, we have established you are not the criminal Jacob Westerbury.”

She put her notebook back in her bag and then said, “My name is Vicenza Andretti, and I am with the prosecutor’s office. I am here to formally apologise for the situation that can only be described as a case of mistaken identity. I assure you, it is not the habit of our police officers to shoot people unless they have a very strong reason for doing so. I understand that in the confusion of the arrest, one of our officers accidentally discharged his weapon. We are undergoing a very thorough investigation into the circumstances of this event.”

I was not sure why, but between the time I had spoken to the embassy official and now, something about letting them off so easily was bugging me. I could see why they had sent her. It would be difficult to be angry or annoyed with her.

But I was annoyed.

“Do you often send a whole squad of trigger-happy riot police to arrest a single man?” It came out harsher than I intended.

“My men believed they were dealing with a dangerous criminal.”

“Do I look like a dangerous criminal?” And then I realised if it was mistaken identity, the answer would be yes.

She saw the look on my face and said quietly, “I think you know the answer to that question, Mr Pargeter.”

“Well, it was overkill.”

“As I said, we are very sorry for the circumstances you now find yourself in. You must understand that we honestly believed we were dealing with an armed and dangerous murderer, and we were acting within our mandate. My department will cover your medical expenses and any other amounts for the inconvenience this has caused you. I believe you were attending a conference at your hotel. I am very sorry, but given the medical circumstances you have, you will have to remain here for a few more days.”

“I guess, then, I should thank you for not killing me.”

Her expression told me that was not the best thing I could have said in the circumstances.

“I mean, I should thank you for the hospital and the care. But a question or two of my own. May I?”

She nodded.

“Did you catch this Jacob Westerbury character?”

“No. In the confusion created by your arrest, he escaped. Once we realised we had made a mistake and reviewed the closed-circuit TV, we tracked him leaving by a rear exit.”

“Are you sure it was one of your men who shot me?”

I watched as her expression changed to one of surprise.

“You don’t think it was one of my men?”

“Oddly enough, no. But don’t ask me why.”

“It is very interesting that you should say that, because in our initial investigation, it appeared none of our officers’ weapons had been discharged. A forensic investigation into the bullet tells us it was one that is used in our weapons, but…”

I could see their dilemma.

“Have you any enemies that would want to shoot you, Mr Pargeter?”

That was absurd because I had no enemies, at least none that I knew of, much less anyone who would want me dead.

“Not that I’m aware of.”

“Then it is strange, and will perhaps remain a mystery. I will let you know if anything more is revealed in our investigation.”

She took an envelope out of her briefcase and opened it, pulling out several sheets of paper.

I knew what it was. A verbal apology was one thing, but a signed waiver would cover them legally. They had sent a pretty girl to charm me. Perhaps using anyone else would not have worked. There was potential for a huge litigation payout here, and someone more ruthless would jump at the chance of making a few million out of the Italian Government.

“We need a signature on this document,” she said.

“Absolving you of any wrongdoing?”

“I have apologised. We will take whatever measures are required for your comfort after this event. We are accepting responsibility for our actions and are being reasonable.”

They were. I took the pen from her and signed the documents.

“You couldn’t add dinner with you on that list of benefits?” No harm in asking.

“I am unfortunately unavailable.”

I smiled. “It wasn’t a request for a date, just dinner. You can tell me about Rome, as only a resident can. Please.”

She looked me up and down, searching for the ulterior motive. When she couldn’t find one, she said, “We shall see once the hospital discharges you in a few days.”

“Then I’ll pencil you in?”

She looked at me quizzically. “What is this pencil me in?”

“It’s an English colloquialism. It means maybe. As when you write something in pencil, it is easy to erase it.”

A momentary frown, then recognition and a smile. “I shall remember that. Thank you for your time and cooperation, Mr Pargeter. Good morning.”

…

© Charles Heath 2015-2021

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 264

Day 264 – Writers have two choices

…

The Writer’s Crossroads: Embrace Reality & Complexity or Escape to Simplicity?


“The writer is often faced with two choices: turn away from reality and complexity, or conquer its mystery by battling with it.” – Chinua Achebe
— Your next breakthrough begins at this fork in the road.


Table of Contents

  1. Understanding the Dilemma
  2. Why Some Writers Choose Escape
  3. The Power of Grappling with Reality
  4. Real‑World Examples: From Hemingway to Margaret Atwood
  5. Practical Ways to Face Complexity Head‑On
  6. When Escapism Becomes a Tool, Not a Trap
  7. Balancing Both Worlds: A Hybrid Approach
  8. FAQ
  9. Take the Next Step

1. Understanding the Dilemma

Every writer—whether a novelist, journalist, poet, or copywriter—confronts the same universal crossroads:

ChoiceWhat It Looks LikeTypical ProsTypical Cons
Turn AwayWrite in a bubble of fantasy, avoid controversial topics, keep narratives “comfort‑zone” safe.Faster drafts, less self‑scrutiny, immediate emotional relief.Shallow worlds, missed audience connection, risk of stagnation.
Conquer MysteryDive into messy reality—politics, mental health, cultural nuance, technical detail.Depth, authenticity, lasting impact, critical acclaim.Exhaustion, writer’s block, fear of misrepresentation.

The decision isn’t binary; it’s a dynamic tension that fuels the creative engine. Recognizing when you’re leaning toward one pole helps you consciously choose the path that best serves your story and career.


2. Why Some Writers Choose Escape

2.1 Emotional Safety Net

Complex reality often surfaces uncomfortable truths—trauma, systemic injustice, personal failure. Escapism offers a safe distance, allowing the writer to stay emotionally intact while still creating.

2.2 Market Pressures

Publishers and platforms sometimes favor “feel‑good” content that sells quickly. The promise of a high conversion rate can tempt writers to produce formulaic pieces rather than nuanced explorations.

2.3 Cognitive Overload

The modern information age inundates us with data. Decision fatigue can make the simple, familiar narrative feel like a mental oasis.

SEO Tip: Use keywords like “writer’s block,” “creative burnout,” and “escapist writing” within this section to capture search traffic from writers seeking relief solutions.


3. The Power of Grappling with Reality

When you confront complexity, you unlock three core benefits:

  1. Authentic Voice – Readers sense sincerity. Authenticity drives dwell time and social shares.
  2. Narrative Authority – Grounding your story in researched reality builds credibility, which Google’s E‑E‑A‑T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) loves.
  3. Long‑Term Impact – Works that challenge norms (think 1984 or The Handmaid’s Tale) endure for decades, generating evergreen traffic and royalties.

3.1 The “Mystery‑Battle” Framework

  1. Identify the Core Mystery – What’s the unknown element that keeps you up at night? (e.g., “Why do people self‑sabotage?”)
  2. Gather Raw Data – Interviews, statistics, first‑hand observations.
  3. Map the Complexity – Use mind maps, storyboards, or spreadsheets to visualize relationships.
  4. Create a Narrative Mini‑Goal – Solve a piece of the puzzle each chapter/section.
  5. Iterate & Refine – Treat each draft as a battlefield report, not a final victory.

Keyword Spotlight: “how to write complex characters,” “research-driven storytelling,” “creative writing process.”


4. Real‑World Examples: From Hemingway to Margaret Atwood

AuthorEscape Route?Reality‑Based TriumphWhat Writers Can Learn
Ernest HemingwayMinimalist prose, “Iceberg Theory” → appears simple but hides depth.A Farewell to Arms – War’s brutal reality under a spare style.Use minimalism to mask complexity, not avoid it.
Margaret AtwoodFuturistic dystopia → escapist veneer.The Handmaid’s Tale – Direct commentary on gender politics.Blend speculative settings with current social issues.
Neil GaimanMythic fantasy worlds.American Gods – Contemporary America’s cultural melting pot.Anchor fantastical elements in real‑world research.
Ta-Nehisi CoatesNon‑fiction memoirs.Between the World and Me – Raw, unfiltered confession on race.Honesty about personal pain creates universal resonance.

SEO Insight: Including the names of popular authors boosts search relevance for writers researching literary strategies.


5. Practical Ways to Face Complexity Head‑On

5.1 Start With a “Reality Check” Prompt

Prompt: “If this story were a news article tomorrow, what facts would have to be accurate?”

Write a short paragraph that answers the prompt. It forces you to root the narrative in verifiable detail before you drift into abstraction.

5.2 Micro‑Research Sprints

  • Timebox: 30 minutes of focused research (no email, no social).
  • Tool: Use Google Scholar, JSTOR, or reputable podcasts.
  • Output: A bullet‑list of 5 concrete facts you can weave into your draft.

5.3 The “Complexity Calendar”

DayTask
MonIdentify one confusing aspect of your story’s world.
TueDraft a scene where a character confronts it.
WedPeer‑review for clarity (ask a non‑expert friend).
ThuRevise using feedback.
FriReflect: Did the scene deepen the story’s truth?

5.4 Dialogue as Investigation

Treat every conversation as an interview. Let your characters ask probing questions that mirror the writer’s own curiosity.

5.5 Use Data Visualization

If your story involves statistics (e.g., climate change), create an infographic for yourself. Seeing numbers visually helps you internalize the data and embed it fluidly.


6. When Escapism Becomes a Tool, Not a Trap

Escapism isn’t inherently lazy—it can be a strategic way to:

  • Recharge mental batteries (take a creative “vacation”).
  • Explore alternative perspectives through genre (e.g., magical realism to discuss migration).
  • Simplify a tangled concept for a broader audience (think children’s picture books).

Guideline: Escapism must be intentional. Set a timer. If a week passes without integrating any real‑world insight, revisit your outline.

Keyword Cluster: “benefits of creative writing,” “using fiction for social commentary,” “how to write fantasy with purpose.”


7. Balancing Both Worlds: A Hybrid Approach

7.1 The “Layered Narrative” Model

LayerGoalExample
Surface (Escapist)Hook the reader with compelling plot & vivid setting.A space‑opera chase scene.
Mid‑Layer (Analytical)Introduce data, history, or philosophical debate.A politician’s speech referencing real‑world policy.
Core (Mystery‑Battle)Resolve the central philosophical question.The protagonist confronting their own moral ambiguity.

7.2 The “Two‑Draft Rule”

  1. First Draft (Escape Mode): Write fluidly, ignore facts.
  2. Second Draft (Conquer Mode): Fact‑check, tighten, embed research.

7.3 The “Reader Test”

  • Ask: “If I read this tomorrow, would I feel enlightened, entertained, or both?”
  • Metric: Aim for ≥70% of readers reporting both in post‑launch surveys (use tools like Google Forms or Typeform).

8. Frequently Asked Questions

QuestionShort Answer
Is it okay to write purely escapist fiction?Absolutely—if it’s your artistic intent. However, give it some grounding (e.g., emotional truth) to avoid feeling hollow.
How much research is “enough” for a novel?There’s no one-size‑fits‑all, but a research‑to‑writing ratio of 1:3 (1 hour research per 3 hours writing) works for many authors.
Can I use my own life’s complexity without over‑exposing?Yes. Use fictionalization techniques—change names, amalgamate characters, shift timelines—to protect privacy while preserving truth.
What if I feel overwhelmed by the “mystery” of reality?Break it down into bite‑size questions. Tackle one per writing session; celebrate each micro‑victory.
Do search engines reward complexity?Google favors depth and authoritativeness. Well‑researched, detailed content ranks higher than shallow filler.

9. Take the Next Step: Turn Complexity into Your Creative Superpower

Ready to stop choosing between flight and fight? Use the “Mystery‑Battle Checklist” below and download our free Writer’s Reality‑Toolkit (PDF) to keep your research, outlines, and drafts organised.

📋 Mystery‑Battle Checklist

  •  Identify the central mystery of my story.
  •  Collect at least 3 credible sources for each major fact.
  •  Write a “reality‑check” paragraph for every chapter.
  •  Schedule a research sprint weekly (30‑45 minutes).
  •  Conduct a peer‑review focused on clarity & authenticity.

🔗 Download the Writer’s Reality‑Toolkit (PDF)

Join our community of 12,000+ writers who’ve turned complexity into bestseller material. Subscribe for weekly tips, prompts, and SEO‑friendly writing hacks.


Final Thought

Every writer stands on the same precipice—turn away into comforting simplicity, or conquer the complex mystery that reality offers. The choice isn’t a sacrifice; it’s a strategic decision that defines your voice, your impact, and ultimately, your legacy. Embrace the battle, wield your research like a sword, and watch your stories resonate far beyond the page.

Happy writing—may your pen never shy away from the beautiful, messy truth.

…

The story behind the story – Echoes from the Past

The novel ‘Echoes from the Past’ started out as a short story I wrote about 30 years ago, titled ‘The Birthday’.

My idea was to take a normal person out of their comfort zone and led on a short but very frightening journey to a place where a surprise birthday party had been arranged.

Thus, the very large man with a scar and a red tie was created.

So was the friend with the limousine who worked as a pilot.

So were the two women, Wendy and Angelina, who were Flight Attendants that the pilot friend asked to join the conspiracy.

I was going to rework the short story, then about ten pages long, into something a little more.

And like all rewrites, especially those I have anything to do with, it turned into a novel.

There was motivation.  I had told some colleagues at the place where I worked at the time that I liked writing, and they wanted a sample.  I was going to give them the re-worked short story.  Instead, I gave them ‘Echoes from the past’

Originally, it was not set anywhere in particular.

But when considering a location, I had, at the time, recently been to New York in December, and visited Brooklyn and Queens, as well as a lot of New York itself.  We were there for New Year’s, and it was an experience I’ll never forget.

One evening, we were out late and finished up in Brooklyn Heights, near the waterfront, and there was rain and snow; it was cold and wet, and apartment buildings were shimmering in the street light, and I thought, “This is the place where my main character will live”.

It had a very spooky atmosphere, the sort where ghosts would not be unexpected.  I felt more than one shiver go up and down my spine in the few minutes I was there.

I had taken notes, as I always do, of everywhere we went, so I had a ready supply of locations I could use, changing the names in some cases.

Fifth Avenue near the Rockefeller Centre is amazing at first light, and late at night with the Seasonal decorations and lights.

The original main character was a shy man with few friends, hence not expecting the surprise party.  I enhanced that shyness into purposely lonely because of an issue from his past that leaves him always looking over his shoulder and ready to move on at the slightest hint of trouble.  No friends, no relationships, just a very low profile.

Then I thought, what if he breaks the cardinal rule and begins a relationship?

But it is also as much an exploration of a damaged soul as it is the search for a normal life, without having any idea what normal was, and how the understanding of one person can sometimes make all the difference in what we may think or feel.

And, of course, I wanted a happy ending.

Except for the bad guys.

…

Get it here:  https://amzn.to/2CYKxu4

newechocover5rs