NaNoWriMo – April – 2026 – Day 13

Now, over the cat and his wake-up tactics, food issues, and then walking off with a snooty expression, it might not be, but I’m going with that, it’s time to get to work.

But before that, I’m going to take the time to go over the plan, and taking into account the few sidebars that I made a few notes on to come back to, I realise there was a little loss of continuity.

Unfortunately, I’m going to have to rechart the plan in Excel, so later, when the same thing happens, I can quickly move the ’tiles’ around, and this takes a few hours.

Chester drops by to give me a surly look and wanders off.

Now having sorted the ’tiles’ into order, and added side notes, I’m ready to start again.

Of course, then there’s a problem. I’m writing away, and instead of sticking to the plan, I’m going off on a tangent. That’s the way the story is leading me, pantser style, but it’s only one possibility, so I put that writing aside and go back to the plan.

Done.

Not happy, but it’s written.

A to Z – April – 2026 – K

K is for Katerina

Sunday lunch could be the best of times or the worst of times.  Any family gathering at my parents’ house was a trial, one that eventually drove me away.

I had stopped turning up at the family residence for the weekly gatherings simply because the ritual cross-examination of why I was not like my brothers and sisters, married with three point two children, got too exhausting.

It meant that I rarely, if ever, got to see my nieces and nephews or my brothers, sisters, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, and well-meaning but over-the-top parents.

Moving to the other side of the country had a lot to do with it.  The rest of my family had stayed put, making their lives in the one place they all professed they could never leave.

Only one other sibling had attempted an escape, my younger sister Eileen, but two months after she left, she came home.  I knew something bad had happened, but she never said anything and never left again, except for the odd trip to the state capital for work.

But like all good things that came to an end, it was approaching that time when I would have to go back, if only once, because it was time.

I might have returned home earlier had it not been for an entirely unforeseen event.

I never had any intention of looking for, or becoming involved with, any other person, not to the extent that it would require explanation of my rather odd, to me anyway, circumstances.

Yes, I harboured the same hopes and dreams of meeting ‘the one’ as everyone else had, but the idea of subjecting them to the rigours of the family third degree was the single limiting factor.  I could not say I was an orphan, but then I didn’t think it would be a selling point that I was the second youngest of fourteen children, with twelve of the thirteen others married, with a collective thirty-six nephews and nieces.

What was probably the worst aspect, this group turned up every Sunday for lunch, all sixty-four of them, unless a major calamity prevented their attendance.  As you can see, with odds of sixty-four to one, the Spanish Inquisition would have been a kindergarten outing by comparison.

But to say I missed them may have been the case, but that they missed me more was becoming very hard to ignore or put off.

Perhaps they had missed making my life hell, because over the past three years, there had been many phone calls and messages and one visit by my eldest brother, the self-elected spokesman, he said, the peacemaker, who had come to take me home.

It was the last time we spoke. Civilly, anyway.

That was a year ago.

Things had changed during that year, though I was not sure whether for the better.  I had met someone, yes, a woman named Catherine, Katerina if I wanted to call her by her Russian name, which I didn’t, one who was perhaps as skittish as I was at the whole dating and sharing your life thing.

Our first meeting was fascinating because her Russian accent was intoxicating, and I told her at the end of the night that she could read me War and Peace, and I would listen to it all night.  I think that I realised she used her Russian heritage to put off potential suitors.  I told her it wouldn’t work with me.

We both started out playing the orphan card, and as the dates piled up and the little pieces of our sad lives leaked out, it became apparent we both had suffered the small-town, large family, endless expectations things.  She had been expected to marry her high school sweetheart until she found out he was secretly cheating on her.

When she told her parents, and they confronted him, he denied it and made her look like she was just spiteful because she didn’t want to marry him.  The other girl could have him, and she left on the next bus out.  It was no surprise to learn the other girl hadn’t married him, nor had any other.

From there, with cards on the table, we just clicked.

But like all good things, it, too, should have ended because I was one of those people who never finished what they started.

A Saturday morning, not generally a workday and the day we set aside for everything that couldn’t get done on a weekday, came after an extended evening in the pub.

We rarely stayed beyond a drink or two, but others we knew, just back from a long holiday, dropped in on the off chance we would be there, and it turned into dinner and more drinks.

It never affected Katerina. I was guessing it was something to do with her Russian heritage and vodka, and the explanation I missed when I had to go to the bathroom. I was not so lucky.

She was up and about, and I heard the buzzer, usually someone trying to get in after they forgot to take their key, and I thought no more about it.

Five minutes passed, and then Katerina was standing in the doorway, her half-hostile, annoyed expression glaring at me. It was one of those expressions you could feel.

“Some silly girl at the door says she is your sister.”

“I don’t have a sister.”

“I say this, and she says, ‘Go tell that annoying bastard Eileen is here’.  So, annoying bastard, who is this Eileen?”

“One of the thirteen other siblings I try very hard not to admit I have.  They’re like debt collectors. You can never really escape them.”

I climbed out of bed and went out.  She stayed back at the door but was still visible from the front.

I opened the door, and there was Eileen, my youngest sister, the last born and the most spoiled.  Given the age differences between my other siblings and me, she was the only one I could relate to.

“What the hell, Robert?”

“What the hell, yourself?  Didn’t I make it clear to Prince Walter that I had disappeared through a portal to another dimension?”

It was an attempt at a joke that he couldn’t and wouldn’t understand.  He had no sense of humour at all.

“That dumb shit doesn’t work on me.  Are you going to leave me standing in the passage?”

“I’m thinking about it.”

“Oh, for fucks sake, Robert,” then brushed past inside.

Katerina was watching with a bemused expression.  Perhaps this was her family, too.

I could see Eileen giving her the traditional family female death stare.  “Who is she?”

“She is standing right here, and I can hear and see you.  A warning word, my other job is a bouncer at a nightclub, and you may, depending on what you say next, find out how I treat recalcitrant customers.”

That notion of not wanting to meet her in a dark alley was right.  Katarina was a gym freak.

It was amusing to see Eileen think before she spoke next.

Then, with a glance over my shoulder at Katarina, she said, “As I said at the door, I’m his sister, Eileen.  I’m surprised he didn’t mention me.”

Katerina looked her up and down.  “He mentioned all of you, but I think his description may have been a little harsh.  You only seem a little bit bitch from hell.  I am Katarina.  Bigger bitch from Siberia.”

I smiled.  She could be a fascinating companion, more so after a bottle of vodka, and especially when she related tales of being in the Russian army.  I could never tell if they were true and never dared to ask.

Eileen didn’t know what to do or say at that point. She was a hugger, and for the first time, I saw her hesitate.

Instead, she said, “Wow.  The others are going to shit their pants when they meet Katarina.”

“And you know that’s never going to happen.  That unappreciative, condescending collection of hypocrites doesn’t deserve anything from me and nothing from Katerina.”

She switched her death stare back to me.

“Dad’s dying.  Earlier in the week, the final diagnosis gave him four to six months, if he’s lucky.  We don’t believe he’s lucky.  He must go to the hospital next week, and I honestly believe he won’t be coming out, Robert.  We gave him a wish, the one thing he wanted most of all, no matter what it was, and we would grant it.  He wants to see you one more time before he dies.”

That was saying something. When I left, he told me I could die in purgatory, after hell froze over, before he wanted to see me again.

“You were there when I left?  He was the one who drove me away.  Along with everyone else, including mother, who, I might add, spent every last breath making you the spoilt brat you are.”

“You need to get over it and yourself.  I was not spoiled.  When I left, I made a fool of myself and was raped.  It was the worst experience of my life, and my mother nearly fought a losing battle when I tried to kill myself.  I thought I knew everything, but I knew nothing.  Perhaps I should have told you, and you wouldn’t have left.”

Well, if nothing else, it was typical of how my family handled trouble.  My brother could have explained everything when he came, but he chose not to.  He was the same man as my father, uncompromising and a hard task master.  I was sure that if my father, and in turn my eldest brother, could whip us for our sins, he would have.

I shook my head and looked at Katerina.  She went up to Eileen and hugged her. 

“It is a terrible thing, what men can do to women.  We go find this lowlife and teach lesson, no?”

“Too late.  God has a way of sorting out these problems. He was killed in a crash, chased by the cops while kidnapping an underage girl he had got pregnant.  Leopards and spots, my father says.”

That would be him.  A saying for everything, not a solution.

“There is no God, just karma.  But the story doesn’t change people, as you say, like leopards and spots.  Nor does death. They are still the same people as in life.  You need more compelling reasons.  I have the same family, which is why I left Russia.”

Eileen glared at me.  “Who is this woman?”

Katerina put her angry face on again. “When you live my life, you can dare ask.  You have delivered a message.”  She went to the door and opened it.  “We will discuss; let you know.”

“Robert?”

“Where are you staying?”

“The hotel up the road, not far from here.”

“Good.  I’ll call you.  I assume your cell number hasn’t changed?”

Her annoyance changed to surprise. I was not sure what she was expecting, but it certainly wasn’t the open door.

“Is that it?”

“Like the rest, your expectation is that I would just fall into line. You could have called me.”

“You wouldn’t answer.”

“Perhaps, perhaps not.   But I will call you.”

“We can talk now.”

“No.  You can’t just turn up on my doorstep and expect me to drop everything.  I now have a life, one I like, free of all that obligation and expectation.  I don’t have to meet anyone’s standards other than my own and of Katarina, as it should be.”

“He’ll be very disappointed if you don’t.  Everyone will be.”

“And there’s the emotional blackmail.  Go now before I simply refuse, and you will have wasted your time and money.”

She looked at me with anger and just a little of what my brother had in his eyes the last time I saw him.  Hatred.

“I don’t understand why you hate us so much.”

“You should be asking them, not me.”

A final shake of the head, and she left.  It was not what I wanted, but it was the right thing to do.  Something I had learned while away from home was that decisions were not mine alone when there were others involved, something my father never practised.  It had always been his way or no way.

I leaned against the door and sighed.

“You think her story is true?  She is quite manipulative, as you said.”

“Maybe.  My father taught them well, her especially.”

“What do you want to do?”

“Go back to bed and pretend it didn’t happen.”

“Shopping or bed, I know which I prefer, but it doesn’t resolve the problem.”

“Then I make a call to a friend who will know what’s really going on.  Then bed, then we talk, then we take her to dinner and send her back with the good or bad news.  It’s up to you, too.”

“It is, after all, your family.”

“And yours for better or worse, if or when we decide to make this permanent.”

“Does that mean we have to go to Siberia to see mine? It is not something I would ask of you.”

“I’d love to see Siberia.”

She laughed.  “You are funny, boy Robert.  No one loves to go to Siberia, especially Siberians.  Make the call, and then I will make you forget Siberia exists.”

©  Charles Heath  2025-2026

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 86

Day 86 – Writing fast or slow

Speed vs. Patience in Novel Writing: Why “Fast” Doesn’t Have to Mean “Shallow”

  • Writing fast can be a strength when it’s backed by a solid plan, disciplined habits, and a system for keeping track of details.
  • Rushing without preparation usually ends in thin characters, plot holes, and endless rewrites.
  • Earl Stanley Gardner’s 3 × 5‑card system shows how a writer can sprint the first draft while still maintaining “detail‑level” control.

In the world of fiction, the “fast‑track” versus “slow‑burn” debate is as old as the first typewriter. Some of the most beloved classics were laboured over for years; others erupted onto the scene in a burst of creative momentum. So, is finishing a novel quickly a badge of honour or a recipe for mediocrity? Let’s unpack the myth, look at the data, and see what a master of the craft—Earl Stanley Gardner—can teach us about marrying speed with substance.


1. The Myth of the “Quick‑Write” Novel

Common Pro‑Speed BeliefReality Check
“If I write fast, the story stays fresh.”Freshness can be preserved if you capture the core idea quickly, but the nuance (voice, subtext, world‑building) still requires time.
“The first draft should be a sprint.”A sprint works when you have a map; otherwise you risk getting lost and having to backtrack.
“Fast writers are more productive, period.”Productivity = output ÷ time. A fast first draft can be productive, but quality revisions are the true productivity multiplier.

The romantic image of the author hunched over a typewriter, words spilling out like a torrent, is compelling. Yet the industry’s “publish‑or‑perish” pressure has turned speed into a badge of professionalism—sometimes at the cost of depth.

Why the Fear of “Too‑Slow” Persists

  1. Market pressure – Publishers want marketable manuscripts, and a lengthy gestation can look risky.
  2. Personal doubt – Writers equate time spent with laziness, ignoring the fact that thoughtful revision is work, not procrastination.
  3. Social media – Flash‑fiction challenges and “write‑a‑novel‑in‑30‑days” hashtags glorify speed.

But speed alone is not a metric of quality. It’s the process behind that speed that makes the difference.


2. The Counter‑Argument: “Take Your Time, Get the Detail Right”

Many celebrated authors have taken years—sometimes decades—to perfect a single novel:

AuthorTime to First DraftNotable Detail
Marcel Proust13 years ( À la recherche du temps perdu )Intricate memory structures, sensory detail
J.K. Rowling5 years ( Harry Potter series)World‑building, magical system rules
Haruki Murakami4–6 years per novelAtmosphere, recurring motifs

These writers demonstrate that deliberate, layered craftsmanship often requires a slower pace. Yet notice the pattern: they didn’t just sit and think; they produced drafts, rewrote, and refined—a disciplined cadence, not a languid drift.

What “Taking Your Time” Looks Like in Practice

  • Daily word‑count goals (e.g., 500–1,000 words) that respect a realistic schedule.
  • Research blocks are scheduled before or during the draft, not after.
  • Iterative outline revisions as the story evolves.
  • Scheduled “detail‑days” where you focus solely on specific aspects: dialogue, setting, character back‑story.

In other words, time is a resource—you can spend it wisely or waste it. The key is structure.


3. Planning: The Bridge Between Speed and Substance

Speed without a plan is like driving a sports car without a road map: you’ll get somewhere, but likely not where you intended. A robust plan lets you:

  • Locate narrative landmarks (major plot twists, climax, resolution).
  • Flag high‑stakes details (character motivations, world rules) for later refinement.
  • Allocate “sprint” vs. “sprint‑pause” phases, ensuring stamina.

Types of Planning Systems

SystemCore IdeaIdeal For
Full‑blown outline (e.g., Snowflake Method)Start with a single sentence, expand to chapters.Writers who love a macro view before micro work.
Scene‑by‑scene index cardsCards for each scene, shuffled as needed.Visual thinkers, flexible plots.
Mind‑mapNon‑linear, branching ideas.Complex worlds, multiple POVs.
3 × 5‑card system (Earl Stanley Gardner)Details captured on index cards, organized into “files.”Plot‑driven writers, mystery/suspense authors.

All of these share a common thread: externalise the story. When you move ideas off the page (or screen) you free mental bandwidth for creative flow.


4. Case Study: Earl Stanley Gardner and the 3 × 5‑Card System

Who Was Earl Stanley Gardner?

  • Creator of the Perry Mason series (1933–1973) – over 80 novels, many adapted for TV.
  • Prodigious output: Averaged a novel every two months, some weeks.
  • Master of plot precision: Known for intricate puzzles that never left loose ends.

The Card System Explained

StepWhat You DoWhy It Helps
1. Capture every ideaWrite each plot point, character trait, clue, or setting on a 3 × 5 index card.Prevents “aha!” moments from evaporating.
2. Categorize into “files.”Group cards into logical bins: CharactersMotivesCluesRed HerringsScenes.Gives you a searchable “database” of story elements.
3. Sequence the narrativeLay out the scene cards in order, shuffle, test alternate orders.Enables rapid restructuring without rewriting.
4. Draft from the cardsUse the sequence as a road map for a fast, first‑draft sprint.Keeps you moving forward; you already have the details.
5. Review & tightenAfter the draft, return to the cards to spot missing connections or over‑complicated twists.Guarantees that the detail‑level (the “fair‑play” of mystery) stays intact.

Why It Works

  • External Memory: The cards become a “second brain,” freeing the author to write rather than juggle facts.
  • Modular Flexibility: If a scene feels flat, you pull a different card, replace it, and keep writing.
  • Speed with Safety Net: Gardener could sprint the first draft because the “detail police” lived on his card table.

Takeaways for Any Writer

  1. Adopt a capture tool – physical index cards, a digital Kanban board (Trello, Notion), or even a simple spreadsheet.
  2. Commit to a “card‑first” mindset – no idea is too small to be carded.
  3. Use the cards as a reversible outline – rearrange, add, delete, then write.

5. Practical Blueprint: Write a Novel Fast Without Losing Depth

Below is a step‑by‑step workflow that blends Gardner’s method with modern tools.

Phase 1 – Ideation (1–2 weeks)

ActionToolOutput
Brain‑dump plot seedsScrivener, Google Docs, or a stack of 3 × 5 cards20–30 raw ideas
Turn each seed into a cardPhysical cards or Trello card“Idea Cards”
Assign tags (Character, Setting, Twist)Card color/labelOrganized library

Phase 2 – Structure (2–3 weeks)

ActionToolOutput
Draft a one‑sentence loglineNotepadCore hook
Expand to a paragraph synopsisWord processorStory arc
Break synopsis into scene cardsTrello board columns (Act I, II, III)30–50 scene cards
Verify each scene supports one major plot goal and one character arc beatChecklistCohesive structure

Phase 3 – Sprint Draft (4–6 weeks)

Daily RoutineGoal
Morning (30 min): Review the next 2‑3 scene cards, add any missing details.Keep the mental map fresh.
Writing block (2 hr): Write the scenes in order without editing.Capture raw narrative.
Afternoon (15 min): Update card status (Done, Needs Revision).Track progress.
Evening (10 min): Quick “detail‑audit” – do any clues or character motives feel incomplete? Add new cards if needed.Prevent blind spots.

Result: A first draft in 30–45 days, with most major plot holes already flagged.

Phase 4 – Revision (4–8 weeks)

Revision PassFocus
Pass 1 – Macro: Compare draft to scene cards, ensure every card is represented appropriately.Structural fidelity.
Pass 2 – Character Depth: Cross‑check each character’s “Motivation Card” against their actions.Emotional authenticity.
Pass 3 – Detail Polish: Use “Setting” and “Clue” cards to enrich prose, add sensory layer.Texture and atmosphere.
Pass 4 – Line‑Edit: Grammar, style, pacing.Clean copy.

The beauty of this system is that the heavy lifting (detail tracking) is already done; revisions become a matter of refinement, not reconstruction.


6. When Speed Can Backfire (And How to Avoid It)

PitfallSymptomsFix
“Speed‑first, plan‑later”Frequently hitting dead‑ends, large plot holes, endless rewrites.Insert at least a 10‑page outline before the first draft.
“All‑out sprint, no rest”Burnout, loss of enthusiasm, sloppy prose.Build in micro‑breaks (e.g., 10‑minute walk after each 2‑hour block).
“Details after the fact”Inconsistencies in character back‑story, world logic errors.Use cards or a spreadsheet to log every new fact as you write.
“Relying on memory”Forgetting early clues, contradictory timelines.Keep a master timeline (Google Sheet, Excel) updated daily.

7. Bottom Line: Speed Is a Tool, Not a Philosophy

  • If you have a plan, a fast first draft can be a productive sprint that leaves you plenty of time for deep revision.
  • If you lack a plan, speed often leads to a quick mess that takes longer to clean up than a slower, more deliberate approach.
  • Gardner’s 3 × 5‑card system proves that you can have both: a rapid output engine powered by meticulous, externalised detail tracking.

In short: Write fast when you’ve wired the details into a system you trust. Write slowly when you’re still figuring out what the story even is. The sweet spot lies somewhere in the middle—structured speed backed by disciplined organisation.


8. Quick‑Start Checklist (Print‑Friendly)

  •  Capture every narrative idea on a card (physical or digital).
  •  Tag each card (Character, Plot, Setting, Clue).
  •  Arrange cards into a three‑act scene sequence.
  •  Set a daily word‑count goal (1,000–2,000 words).
  •  Write the first draft without editing – use the cards as a roadmap.
  •  Mark cards that need extra detail during the draft.
  •  Revise using the four‑pass method (macro → character → detail → line).

Print this list, stick it on your desk, and let it guide you from “I have a story” to “I have a polished novel—fast.”


Further Reading

  • Earl Stanley Gardner – The Case of the Counterfeit Coin (intro to his planning method).
  • Steven King – On Writing (chapter on “The Importance of a Plan”).
  • K.M. Weiland – Structuring Your Novel (Snowflake Method).
  • James Clear – Atomic Habits (building daily writing habits).

Ready to sprint your next novel while keeping the details tight? Grab a stack of 3 × 5 cards, map out your world, and let the words flow. Speed and depth are not mutually exclusive—they’re just waiting for the right system to meet.

Happy writing!


If you found this post helpful, share it on social media, subscribe for more writing strategy articles, or leave a comment below with your own fast‑write success stories.

A to Z – April – 2026 – K

K is for Katerina

Sunday lunch could be the best of times or the worst of times.  Any family gathering at my parents’ house was a trial, one that eventually drove me away.

I had stopped turning up at the family residence for the weekly gatherings simply because the ritual cross-examination of why I was not like my brothers and sisters, married with three point two children, got too exhausting.

It meant that I rarely, if ever, got to see my nieces and nephews or my brothers, sisters, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, and well-meaning but over-the-top parents.

Moving to the other side of the country had a lot to do with it.  The rest of my family had stayed put, making their lives in the one place they all professed they could never leave.

Only one other sibling had attempted an escape, my younger sister Eileen, but two months after she left, she came home.  I knew something bad had happened, but she never said anything and never left again, except for the odd trip to the state capital for work.

But like all good things that came to an end, it was approaching that time when I would have to go back, if only once, because it was time.

I might have returned home earlier had it not been for an entirely unforeseen event.

I never had any intention of looking for, or becoming involved with, any other person, not to the extent that it would require explanation of my rather odd, to me anyway, circumstances.

Yes, I harboured the same hopes and dreams of meeting ‘the one’ as everyone else had, but the idea of subjecting them to the rigours of the family third degree was the single limiting factor.  I could not say I was an orphan, but then I didn’t think it would be a selling point that I was the second youngest of fourteen children, with twelve of the thirteen others married, with a collective thirty-six nephews and nieces.

What was probably the worst aspect, this group turned up every Sunday for lunch, all sixty-four of them, unless a major calamity prevented their attendance.  As you can see, with odds of sixty-four to one, the Spanish Inquisition would have been a kindergarten outing by comparison.

But to say I missed them may have been the case, but that they missed me more was becoming very hard to ignore or put off.

Perhaps they had missed making my life hell, because over the past three years, there had been many phone calls and messages and one visit by my eldest brother, the self-elected spokesman, he said, the peacemaker, who had come to take me home.

It was the last time we spoke. Civilly, anyway.

That was a year ago.

Things had changed during that year, though I was not sure whether for the better.  I had met someone, yes, a woman named Catherine, Katerina if I wanted to call her by her Russian name, which I didn’t, one who was perhaps as skittish as I was at the whole dating and sharing your life thing.

Our first meeting was fascinating because her Russian accent was intoxicating, and I told her at the end of the night that she could read me War and Peace, and I would listen to it all night.  I think that I realised she used her Russian heritage to put off potential suitors.  I told her it wouldn’t work with me.

We both started out playing the orphan card, and as the dates piled up and the little pieces of our sad lives leaked out, it became apparent we both had suffered the small-town, large family, endless expectations things.  She had been expected to marry her high school sweetheart until she found out he was secretly cheating on her.

When she told her parents, and they confronted him, he denied it and made her look like she was just spiteful because she didn’t want to marry him.  The other girl could have him, and she left on the next bus out.  It was no surprise to learn the other girl hadn’t married him, nor had any other.

From there, with cards on the table, we just clicked.

But like all good things, it, too, should have ended because I was one of those people who never finished what they started.

A Saturday morning, not generally a workday and the day we set aside for everything that couldn’t get done on a weekday, came after an extended evening in the pub.

We rarely stayed beyond a drink or two, but others we knew, just back from a long holiday, dropped in on the off chance we would be there, and it turned into dinner and more drinks.

It never affected Katerina. I was guessing it was something to do with her Russian heritage and vodka, and the explanation I missed when I had to go to the bathroom. I was not so lucky.

She was up and about, and I heard the buzzer, usually someone trying to get in after they forgot to take their key, and I thought no more about it.

Five minutes passed, and then Katerina was standing in the doorway, her half-hostile, annoyed expression glaring at me. It was one of those expressions you could feel.

“Some silly girl at the door says she is your sister.”

“I don’t have a sister.”

“I say this, and she says, ‘Go tell that annoying bastard Eileen is here’.  So, annoying bastard, who is this Eileen?”

“One of the thirteen other siblings I try very hard not to admit I have.  They’re like debt collectors. You can never really escape them.”

I climbed out of bed and went out.  She stayed back at the door but was still visible from the front.

I opened the door, and there was Eileen, my youngest sister, the last born and the most spoiled.  Given the age differences between my other siblings and me, she was the only one I could relate to.

“What the hell, Robert?”

“What the hell, yourself?  Didn’t I make it clear to Prince Walter that I had disappeared through a portal to another dimension?”

It was an attempt at a joke that he couldn’t and wouldn’t understand.  He had no sense of humour at all.

“That dumb shit doesn’t work on me.  Are you going to leave me standing in the passage?”

“I’m thinking about it.”

“Oh, for fucks sake, Robert,” then brushed past inside.

Katerina was watching with a bemused expression.  Perhaps this was her family, too.

I could see Eileen giving her the traditional family female death stare.  “Who is she?”

“She is standing right here, and I can hear and see you.  A warning word, my other job is a bouncer at a nightclub, and you may, depending on what you say next, find out how I treat recalcitrant customers.”

That notion of not wanting to meet her in a dark alley was right.  Katarina was a gym freak.

It was amusing to see Eileen think before she spoke next.

Then, with a glance over my shoulder at Katarina, she said, “As I said at the door, I’m his sister, Eileen.  I’m surprised he didn’t mention me.”

Katerina looked her up and down.  “He mentioned all of you, but I think his description may have been a little harsh.  You only seem a little bit bitch from hell.  I am Katarina.  Bigger bitch from Siberia.”

I smiled.  She could be a fascinating companion, more so after a bottle of vodka, and especially when she related tales of being in the Russian army.  I could never tell if they were true and never dared to ask.

Eileen didn’t know what to do or say at that point. She was a hugger, and for the first time, I saw her hesitate.

Instead, she said, “Wow.  The others are going to shit their pants when they meet Katarina.”

“And you know that’s never going to happen.  That unappreciative, condescending collection of hypocrites doesn’t deserve anything from me and nothing from Katerina.”

She switched her death stare back to me.

“Dad’s dying.  Earlier in the week, the final diagnosis gave him four to six months, if he’s lucky.  We don’t believe he’s lucky.  He must go to the hospital next week, and I honestly believe he won’t be coming out, Robert.  We gave him a wish, the one thing he wanted most of all, no matter what it was, and we would grant it.  He wants to see you one more time before he dies.”

That was saying something. When I left, he told me I could die in purgatory, after hell froze over, before he wanted to see me again.

“You were there when I left?  He was the one who drove me away.  Along with everyone else, including mother, who, I might add, spent every last breath making you the spoilt brat you are.”

“You need to get over it and yourself.  I was not spoiled.  When I left, I made a fool of myself and was raped.  It was the worst experience of my life, and my mother nearly fought a losing battle when I tried to kill myself.  I thought I knew everything, but I knew nothing.  Perhaps I should have told you, and you wouldn’t have left.”

Well, if nothing else, it was typical of how my family handled trouble.  My brother could have explained everything when he came, but he chose not to.  He was the same man as my father, uncompromising and a hard task master.  I was sure that if my father, and in turn my eldest brother, could whip us for our sins, he would have.

I shook my head and looked at Katerina.  She went up to Eileen and hugged her. 

“It is a terrible thing, what men can do to women.  We go find this lowlife and teach lesson, no?”

“Too late.  God has a way of sorting out these problems. He was killed in a crash, chased by the cops while kidnapping an underage girl he had got pregnant.  Leopards and spots, my father says.”

That would be him.  A saying for everything, not a solution.

“There is no God, just karma.  But the story doesn’t change people, as you say, like leopards and spots.  Nor does death. They are still the same people as in life.  You need more compelling reasons.  I have the same family, which is why I left Russia.”

Eileen glared at me.  “Who is this woman?”

Katerina put her angry face on again. “When you live my life, you can dare ask.  You have delivered a message.”  She went to the door and opened it.  “We will discuss; let you know.”

“Robert?”

“Where are you staying?”

“The hotel up the road, not far from here.”

“Good.  I’ll call you.  I assume your cell number hasn’t changed?”

Her annoyance changed to surprise. I was not sure what she was expecting, but it certainly wasn’t the open door.

“Is that it?”

“Like the rest, your expectation is that I would just fall into line. You could have called me.”

“You wouldn’t answer.”

“Perhaps, perhaps not.   But I will call you.”

“We can talk now.”

“No.  You can’t just turn up on my doorstep and expect me to drop everything.  I now have a life, one I like, free of all that obligation and expectation.  I don’t have to meet anyone’s standards other than my own and of Katarina, as it should be.”

“He’ll be very disappointed if you don’t.  Everyone will be.”

“And there’s the emotional blackmail.  Go now before I simply refuse, and you will have wasted your time and money.”

She looked at me with anger and just a little of what my brother had in his eyes the last time I saw him.  Hatred.

“I don’t understand why you hate us so much.”

“You should be asking them, not me.”

A final shake of the head, and she left.  It was not what I wanted, but it was the right thing to do.  Something I had learned while away from home was that decisions were not mine alone when there were others involved, something my father never practised.  It had always been his way or no way.

I leaned against the door and sighed.

“You think her story is true?  She is quite manipulative, as you said.”

“Maybe.  My father taught them well, her especially.”

“What do you want to do?”

“Go back to bed and pretend it didn’t happen.”

“Shopping or bed, I know which I prefer, but it doesn’t resolve the problem.”

“Then I make a call to a friend who will know what’s really going on.  Then bed, then we talk, then we take her to dinner and send her back with the good or bad news.  It’s up to you, too.”

“It is, after all, your family.”

“And yours for better or worse, if or when we decide to make this permanent.”

“Does that mean we have to go to Siberia to see mine? It is not something I would ask of you.”

“I’d love to see Siberia.”

She laughed.  “You are funny, boy Robert.  No one loves to go to Siberia, especially Siberians.  Make the call, and then I will make you forget Siberia exists.”

©  Charles Heath  2025-2026

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 86

Day 86 – Writing fast or slow

Speed vs. Patience in Novel Writing: Why “Fast” Doesn’t Have to Mean “Shallow”

  • Writing fast can be a strength when it’s backed by a solid plan, disciplined habits, and a system for keeping track of details.
  • Rushing without preparation usually ends in thin characters, plot holes, and endless rewrites.
  • Earl Stanley Gardner’s 3 × 5‑card system shows how a writer can sprint the first draft while still maintaining “detail‑level” control.

In the world of fiction, the “fast‑track” versus “slow‑burn” debate is as old as the first typewriter. Some of the most beloved classics were laboured over for years; others erupted onto the scene in a burst of creative momentum. So, is finishing a novel quickly a badge of honour or a recipe for mediocrity? Let’s unpack the myth, look at the data, and see what a master of the craft—Earl Stanley Gardner—can teach us about marrying speed with substance.


1. The Myth of the “Quick‑Write” Novel

Common Pro‑Speed BeliefReality Check
“If I write fast, the story stays fresh.”Freshness can be preserved if you capture the core idea quickly, but the nuance (voice, subtext, world‑building) still requires time.
“The first draft should be a sprint.”A sprint works when you have a map; otherwise you risk getting lost and having to backtrack.
“Fast writers are more productive, period.”Productivity = output ÷ time. A fast first draft can be productive, but quality revisions are the true productivity multiplier.

The romantic image of the author hunched over a typewriter, words spilling out like a torrent, is compelling. Yet the industry’s “publish‑or‑perish” pressure has turned speed into a badge of professionalism—sometimes at the cost of depth.

Why the Fear of “Too‑Slow” Persists

  1. Market pressure – Publishers want marketable manuscripts, and a lengthy gestation can look risky.
  2. Personal doubt – Writers equate time spent with laziness, ignoring the fact that thoughtful revision is work, not procrastination.
  3. Social media – Flash‑fiction challenges and “write‑a‑novel‑in‑30‑days” hashtags glorify speed.

But speed alone is not a metric of quality. It’s the process behind that speed that makes the difference.


2. The Counter‑Argument: “Take Your Time, Get the Detail Right”

Many celebrated authors have taken years—sometimes decades—to perfect a single novel:

AuthorTime to First DraftNotable Detail
Marcel Proust13 years ( À la recherche du temps perdu )Intricate memory structures, sensory detail
J.K. Rowling5 years ( Harry Potter series)World‑building, magical system rules
Haruki Murakami4–6 years per novelAtmosphere, recurring motifs

These writers demonstrate that deliberate, layered craftsmanship often requires a slower pace. Yet notice the pattern: they didn’t just sit and think; they produced drafts, rewrote, and refined—a disciplined cadence, not a languid drift.

What “Taking Your Time” Looks Like in Practice

  • Daily word‑count goals (e.g., 500–1,000 words) that respect a realistic schedule.
  • Research blocks are scheduled before or during the draft, not after.
  • Iterative outline revisions as the story evolves.
  • Scheduled “detail‑days” where you focus solely on specific aspects: dialogue, setting, character back‑story.

In other words, time is a resource—you can spend it wisely or waste it. The key is structure.


3. Planning: The Bridge Between Speed and Substance

Speed without a plan is like driving a sports car without a road map: you’ll get somewhere, but likely not where you intended. A robust plan lets you:

  • Locate narrative landmarks (major plot twists, climax, resolution).
  • Flag high‑stakes details (character motivations, world rules) for later refinement.
  • Allocate “sprint” vs. “sprint‑pause” phases, ensuring stamina.

Types of Planning Systems

SystemCore IdeaIdeal For
Full‑blown outline (e.g., Snowflake Method)Start with a single sentence, expand to chapters.Writers who love a macro view before micro work.
Scene‑by‑scene index cardsCards for each scene, shuffled as needed.Visual thinkers, flexible plots.
Mind‑mapNon‑linear, branching ideas.Complex worlds, multiple POVs.
3 × 5‑card system (Earl Stanley Gardner)Details captured on index cards, organized into “files.”Plot‑driven writers, mystery/suspense authors.

All of these share a common thread: externalise the story. When you move ideas off the page (or screen) you free mental bandwidth for creative flow.


4. Case Study: Earl Stanley Gardner and the 3 × 5‑Card System

Who Was Earl Stanley Gardner?

  • Creator of the Perry Mason series (1933–1973) – over 80 novels, many adapted for TV.
  • Prodigious output: Averaged a novel every two months, some weeks.
  • Master of plot precision: Known for intricate puzzles that never left loose ends.

The Card System Explained

StepWhat You DoWhy It Helps
1. Capture every ideaWrite each plot point, character trait, clue, or setting on a 3 × 5 index card.Prevents “aha!” moments from evaporating.
2. Categorize into “files.”Group cards into logical bins: CharactersMotivesCluesRed HerringsScenes.Gives you a searchable “database” of story elements.
3. Sequence the narrativeLay out the scene cards in order, shuffle, test alternate orders.Enables rapid restructuring without rewriting.
4. Draft from the cardsUse the sequence as a road map for a fast, first‑draft sprint.Keeps you moving forward; you already have the details.
5. Review & tightenAfter the draft, return to the cards to spot missing connections or over‑complicated twists.Guarantees that the detail‑level (the “fair‑play” of mystery) stays intact.

Why It Works

  • External Memory: The cards become a “second brain,” freeing the author to write rather than juggle facts.
  • Modular Flexibility: If a scene feels flat, you pull a different card, replace it, and keep writing.
  • Speed with Safety Net: Gardener could sprint the first draft because the “detail police” lived on his card table.

Takeaways for Any Writer

  1. Adopt a capture tool – physical index cards, a digital Kanban board (Trello, Notion), or even a simple spreadsheet.
  2. Commit to a “card‑first” mindset – no idea is too small to be carded.
  3. Use the cards as a reversible outline – rearrange, add, delete, then write.

5. Practical Blueprint: Write a Novel Fast Without Losing Depth

Below is a step‑by‑step workflow that blends Gardner’s method with modern tools.

Phase 1 – Ideation (1–2 weeks)

ActionToolOutput
Brain‑dump plot seedsScrivener, Google Docs, or a stack of 3 × 5 cards20–30 raw ideas
Turn each seed into a cardPhysical cards or Trello card“Idea Cards”
Assign tags (Character, Setting, Twist)Card color/labelOrganized library

Phase 2 – Structure (2–3 weeks)

ActionToolOutput
Draft a one‑sentence loglineNotepadCore hook
Expand to a paragraph synopsisWord processorStory arc
Break synopsis into scene cardsTrello board columns (Act I, II, III)30–50 scene cards
Verify each scene supports one major plot goal and one character arc beatChecklistCohesive structure

Phase 3 – Sprint Draft (4–6 weeks)

Daily RoutineGoal
Morning (30 min): Review the next 2‑3 scene cards, add any missing details.Keep the mental map fresh.
Writing block (2 hr): Write the scenes in order without editing.Capture raw narrative.
Afternoon (15 min): Update card status (Done, Needs Revision).Track progress.
Evening (10 min): Quick “detail‑audit” – do any clues or character motives feel incomplete? Add new cards if needed.Prevent blind spots.

Result: A first draft in 30–45 days, with most major plot holes already flagged.

Phase 4 – Revision (4–8 weeks)

Revision PassFocus
Pass 1 – Macro: Compare draft to scene cards, ensure every card is represented appropriately.Structural fidelity.
Pass 2 – Character Depth: Cross‑check each character’s “Motivation Card” against their actions.Emotional authenticity.
Pass 3 – Detail Polish: Use “Setting” and “Clue” cards to enrich prose, add sensory layer.Texture and atmosphere.
Pass 4 – Line‑Edit: Grammar, style, pacing.Clean copy.

The beauty of this system is that the heavy lifting (detail tracking) is already done; revisions become a matter of refinement, not reconstruction.


6. When Speed Can Backfire (And How to Avoid It)

PitfallSymptomsFix
“Speed‑first, plan‑later”Frequently hitting dead‑ends, large plot holes, endless rewrites.Insert at least a 10‑page outline before the first draft.
“All‑out sprint, no rest”Burnout, loss of enthusiasm, sloppy prose.Build in micro‑breaks (e.g., 10‑minute walk after each 2‑hour block).
“Details after the fact”Inconsistencies in character back‑story, world logic errors.Use cards or a spreadsheet to log every new fact as you write.
“Relying on memory”Forgetting early clues, contradictory timelines.Keep a master timeline (Google Sheet, Excel) updated daily.

7. Bottom Line: Speed Is a Tool, Not a Philosophy

  • If you have a plan, a fast first draft can be a productive sprint that leaves you plenty of time for deep revision.
  • If you lack a plan, speed often leads to a quick mess that takes longer to clean up than a slower, more deliberate approach.
  • Gardner’s 3 × 5‑card system proves that you can have both: a rapid output engine powered by meticulous, externalised detail tracking.

In short: Write fast when you’ve wired the details into a system you trust. Write slowly when you’re still figuring out what the story even is. The sweet spot lies somewhere in the middle—structured speed backed by disciplined organisation.


8. Quick‑Start Checklist (Print‑Friendly)

  •  Capture every narrative idea on a card (physical or digital).
  •  Tag each card (Character, Plot, Setting, Clue).
  •  Arrange cards into a three‑act scene sequence.
  •  Set a daily word‑count goal (1,000–2,000 words).
  •  Write the first draft without editing – use the cards as a roadmap.
  •  Mark cards that need extra detail during the draft.
  •  Revise using the four‑pass method (macro → character → detail → line).

Print this list, stick it on your desk, and let it guide you from “I have a story” to “I have a polished novel—fast.”


Further Reading

  • Earl Stanley Gardner – The Case of the Counterfeit Coin (intro to his planning method).
  • Steven King – On Writing (chapter on “The Importance of a Plan”).
  • K.M. Weiland – Structuring Your Novel (Snowflake Method).
  • James Clear – Atomic Habits (building daily writing habits).

Ready to sprint your next novel while keeping the details tight? Grab a stack of 3 × 5 cards, map out your world, and let the words flow. Speed and depth are not mutually exclusive—they’re just waiting for the right system to meet.

Happy writing!


If you found this post helpful, share it on social media, subscribe for more writing strategy articles, or leave a comment below with your own fast‑write success stories.

“The Things we do for Love”, the story behind the story

This story has been ongoing since I was seventeen, and just to let you know, I’m 72 this year.

Yes, it’s taken a long time to get it done.

Why, you might ask.

Well, I never gave it much interest because I started writing it after a small incident when I was 17, and working as a book packer for a book distributor in Melbourne

At the end of my first year, at Christmas, the employer had a Christmas party, and that year, it was at a venue in St Kilda.

I wasn’t going to go because at that age, I was an ordinary boy who was very introverted and basically scared of his own shadow and terrified by girls.

Back then, I would cross the street to avoid them

Also, other members of the staff in the shipping department were rough and ready types who were not backwards in telling me what happened, and being naive, perhaps they knew I’d be either shocked or intrigued.

I was both adamant I wasn’t coming and then got roped in on a dare.

Damn!

So, back then, in the early 70s, people looked the other way when it came to drinking, and of course, Dutch courage always takes away the concerns, especially when normally you wouldn’t do half the stuff you wouldn’t in a million years

I made it to the end, not as drunk and stupid as I thought I might be, and St Kilda being a salacious place if you knew where to look, my new friends decided to give me a surprise.

It didn’t take long to realise these men were ‘men about town’ as they kept saying, and we went on an odyssey.  Yes, those backstreet brothels where one could, I was told, have anything they could imagine.

Let me tell you, large quantities of alcohol and imagination were a very bad mix.

So, the odyssey in ‘The things we do’ was based on that, and then the encounter with Diana. Well, let’s just say I learned a great deal about girls that night.

Firstly, not all girls are nasty and spiteful, which seemed to be the case whenever I met one. There was a way to approach, greet, talk to, and behave.

It was also true that I could have had anything I wanted, but I decided what was in my imagination could stay there.  She was amused that all I wanted was to talk, but it was my money, and I could spend it how I liked.

And like any 17-year-old naive fool, I fell in love with her and had all these foolish notions.  Months later, I went back, but she had moved on, to where no one was saying or knew.

Needless to say, I was heartbroken and had to get over that first loss, which, like any 17-year-old, was like the end of the world.

But it was the best hour I’d ever spent in my life and would remain so until I met the woman I have been married to for the last 48 years.

As Henry, he was in part based on a rebel, the son of rich parents who despised them and their wealth, and he used to regale anyone who would listen about how they had messed up his life

If only I’d come from such a background!

And yes, I was only a run away from climbing up the stairs to get on board a ship, acting as a purser.

I worked for a shipping company and they gave their junior staff members an opportunity to spend a year at sea working as a purser on a cargo ship that sailed between Melbourne, Sydney and Hobart in Australia.

One of the other junior staff members’ turn came, and I would visit him on board when he would tell me stories about life on board, the officers, the crew, and other events. These stories, which sounded incredible to someone so impressionable, were a delight to hear.

Alas, by that time, I had tired of office work and moved on to be a tradesman at the place where my father worked.

It proved to be the right move, as that is where I met my wife.  Diana had been right; love would find me when I least expected it.

lovecoverfinal1

NaNoWriMo – April – 2026 – Day 13

Now, over the cat and his wake-up tactics, food issues, and then walking off with a snooty expression, it might not be, but I’m going with that, it’s time to get to work.

But before that, I’m going to take the time to go over the plan, and taking into account the few sidebars that I made a few notes on to come back to, I realise there was a little loss of continuity.

Unfortunately, I’m going to have to rechart the plan in Excel, so later, when the same thing happens, I can quickly move the ’tiles’ around, and this takes a few hours.

Chester drops by to give me a surly look and wanders off.

Now having sorted the ’tiles’ into order, and added side notes, I’m ready to start again.

Of course, then there’s a problem. I’m writing away, and instead of sticking to the plan, I’m going off on a tangent. That’s the way the story is leading me, pantser style, but it’s only one possibility, so I put that writing aside and go back to the plan.

Done.

Not happy, but it’s written.

NaNoWriMo – April – 2026 – Day 12

It was a day like no other.

Oops, been watching Romancing the Stone again, and that catchy line caught my attention. Perhaps I can use it somewhere, one day.

But…

The project is proceeding on course, adhering more to the outline than less, and it’s looking good.

I know just in saying that the ship is about to founder on a reef, so I’ll brace myself.

Today’s quota of words is done early, so I can sit down soon and do the crossword over a cup of coffee while waiting for dinner to cook in the oven.

Perhaps we might have a New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc with dinner. What I’ve noticed with these is that they are not all the same; some actually taste terrible, and some are quite exquisite. I suspect it might be where they grow the grapes, even if it is in the same region.

And, later, I’ll take another look at the sidebar I decided to add and flesh it out a little more. In view of what is happening, it is rather fortuitous that it came out of left field because it will serve as a reminder that being home doesn’t mean they’re safe.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 85

Day 85 – Writing to please yourself

Writing for Yourself vs. Writing for an Audience

Why trying to please a “target reader” can lead you straight into a creative dead‑end—and how embracing your own voice can actually broaden your reach.


1. The Age‑Old Dilemma

Every writer, from the novice journal keeper to the seasoned novelist, has heard the mantra: “Know your audience.” In marketing circles, it’s a golden rule, in academic circles, it’s a prerequisite for a good paper, and in creative writing workshops, it’s often presented as a safety net: “If you write for someone who actually wants to read your work, you’ll have a better chance of success.”

But there’s a darker side to that advice. When the phrase “target audience” becomes a prescriptive checklist, it can morph into a self‑imposed prison. You start asking:

* Should I tone down my humour because “my readers don’t get sarcasm”?*
* Do I need to avoid political opinions because “my audience is 50‑something retirees”?*
* Must I keep my protagonist’s journey “relatable” in a way that feels forced?*

The result? A story that sounds less like you and more like a diluted version of what you think they want. In the worst cases, the writing turns bland, generic, and ultimately forgettable.


2. The Myth of the “Perfect Reader”

The idea that a single, monolithic reader exists—someone who will love everything you write—is a comforting illusion. In reality:

Reader TypeTypical ExpectationReality
The “Ideal Fan”Loves every plot twist, character, and stylistic quirk.No one loves everything; even the biggest fans have pet peeves.
The “Critical Scholar”Demands flawless structure and deep subtext.Even experts can disagree on what qualifies as “deep.”
The “Casual Browser”Wants light, easy‑to‑digest content.They might actually crave something thought‑provoking if presented well.
The “Niche Enthusiast”Wants high‑level technical detail.Over‑explaining can alienate newcomers; under‑explaining can feel lazy.

Because each individual brings a unique mix of experience, mood, and personal bias to the page, any attempt to write for a single archetype is fundamentally speculative. You can only guess what will click, and even the most data‑driven predictions can’t account for the serendipitous spark that makes a reader fall in love with a line.


3. Writing for You: The Unexpected Advantage

When you write primarily for yourself, a few things happen that actually help reach a broader audience:

What Happens When You Write for YourselfWhy It Helps the Reader
Authentic Voice EmergesReaders pick up on sincerity. A genuine tone feels trustworthy and invites empathy.
Risk‑Taking Becomes NaturalYou’re more willing to experiment with structure, language, or theme—creating fresh experiences for the reader.
Consistency Beats ConformityA clear personal style becomes a brand. Readers know what to expect (and love it), even if the genre shifts.
Passion Fuels PersistenceWriting is hard. When the work matters to you, you’re more likely to edit, rewrite, and polish.

Think of it as a two‑way street: the more you love what you write, the more chance there is that someone else will love it too. Authenticity is magnetic; calculated pandering is often invisible.


4. Real‑World Examples

AuthorWhat They DidResult
Haruki MurakamiWrote stories about jazz bars, cats, and surreal parallel worlds because those obsessions fascinated him.Global cult following; readers across continents adore his “oddly specific” voice.
David MitchellMixed historical fiction with speculative sci‑fi purely because he loved the “what‑if” of time travel.Critical acclaim and a wildly diverse readership attracted to his genre‑bending narratives.
Samantha “Sam” Cole (fictional indie blogger)Abandoned a “listicle for millennials” plan, wrote a personal essay on grief because it had to be said.The post went viral, resonating with readers of all ages who recognized its raw honesty.

These writers didn’t start with a spreadsheet of demographics; they started with curiosity, annoyance, awe, or pure love for a subject. The audience grew organically around that core.


5. Practical Strategies: How to Prioritise Your Voice Without Ignoring Readers

You don’t have to swing the pendulum completely to “write only for yourself.” Here’s a balanced workflow that preserves authenticity while still being considerate of readers:

  1. Start in the “Me‑Zone”
    • Freewrite for 15–20 minutes with the intention only of getting your own thoughts down. No audience in mind.
    • Ask yourself: What excites me? What irritates me? What can’t I stop thinking about?
  2. Step Back & Identify the Core
    • Highlight the central emotion or hook that made you write in the first place. This is the seed that will interest readers.
  3. Empathy Check
    • Switch hats: If a reader stumbled on this piece tomorrow, what would they need to understand the core quickly?
    • Tip: Write a one‑sentence pitch for a complete stranger. If you can convey the essence, you’re likely on the right track.
  4. Selective Polishing
    • Remove self‑censorship that dilutes your voice (e.g., “Maybe I shouldn’t use that slang”).
    • Add clarity where needed (explain a term, give context) without compromising tone.
  5. Feedback Loop
    • Share with a small, trusted group who value honesty over flattery. Ask: “Did my voice feel genuine? Was anything confusing?”
    • Use their notes to tighten the piece, not to rewrite it in their image.
  6. Release & Observe
    • Publish. Watch the comments, metrics, and, most importantly, your own emotional response.
    • If you feel proud, that pride will translate into future work that continues to attract kindred readers.

6. “What If” Scenarios: When Audience‑First Fails

ScenarioWhat Went WrongLesson Learned
A romance novelist writes only “safe” love‑stories to please the “mainstream market.”Stories lack tension; readers feel the plot is predictable and disengage.Authentic conflict—whether internal or external—drives investment.
A tech blogger avoids jargon to appeal to “non‑techies.”Content becomes vague; both novices and experts feel the article is unhelpful.Clarity doesn’t require “dumbing down”; it requires thoughtful explanation.
A poet tries to mimic the style of a bestselling poet to capture their fanbase.The work feels derivative; critics call it “imitative.”Originality beats mimicry; readers can spot a copycat from a mile away.

These cautionary tales reinforce the central truth: no amount of market research can substitute for genuine curiosity and personal investment. When you start building your work on the sand of “what I think they want,” you risk losing the solid foundation of your own voice.


7. The Sweet Spot: “Write for Yourself and Invite Others In”

Think of writing as hosting a party you love. You decorate the space, choose the playlist, and cook the food because you enjoy it. Then, you open the door and welcome guests. If the vibe feels authentic, the guests will stay, chat, and maybe even bring friends. If the party feels forced, no one will linger.

In practice, that means:

  • Let your passion be the headline. Your enthusiasm is contagious.
  • Use empathy as the entryway. A brief moment of “what would a reader need?” can help bridge the gap without muting your voice.
  • Accept that you’ll never please everyone. The goal isn’t universal approval; it’s a connection with those who resonate.

8. Takeaway Checklist

✅I’m writing because…
1I’m fascinated, angry, or moved by the subject.
2I have a unique angle that I can’t find elsewhere.
3I’m excited to experiment with form or language.
4I’m willing to edit for clarity, not for conformity.
5I’m open to feedback that enhances my voice, not replaces it.

If you can answer “yes” to at least three of these, you’re likely steering toward a piece that speaks both to you and, organically, to readers.


9. Final Thought

“Write for yourself, but don’t forget the world is listening.”

That paradox captures the sweet spot most writers chase: authenticity as your compass, empathy as your map. When you let your inner compass guide you, you’ll find that the world—sometimes unexpectedly—shows up at the destination you never planned.

So the next time you sit down at the keyboard, ask yourself: What would I write if no one were watching? Then, once the words flow, give them a quick glance to make sure the door is open enough for someone else to step inside.

Write boldly, edit kindly, and watch as the right readers find you—because they’ll be looking for the voice you could only have written.


Happy writing, and may your pages always feel like home.


If this post resonated with you, feel free to share your own experiences in the comments. How have you balanced personal passion with audience awareness?

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 85

Day 85 – Writing to please yourself

Writing for Yourself vs. Writing for an Audience

Why trying to please a “target reader” can lead you straight into a creative dead‑end—and how embracing your own voice can actually broaden your reach.


1. The Age‑Old Dilemma

Every writer, from the novice journal keeper to the seasoned novelist, has heard the mantra: “Know your audience.” In marketing circles, it’s a golden rule, in academic circles, it’s a prerequisite for a good paper, and in creative writing workshops, it’s often presented as a safety net: “If you write for someone who actually wants to read your work, you’ll have a better chance of success.”

But there’s a darker side to that advice. When the phrase “target audience” becomes a prescriptive checklist, it can morph into a self‑imposed prison. You start asking:

* Should I tone down my humour because “my readers don’t get sarcasm”?*
* Do I need to avoid political opinions because “my audience is 50‑something retirees”?*
* Must I keep my protagonist’s journey “relatable” in a way that feels forced?*

The result? A story that sounds less like you and more like a diluted version of what you think they want. In the worst cases, the writing turns bland, generic, and ultimately forgettable.


2. The Myth of the “Perfect Reader”

The idea that a single, monolithic reader exists—someone who will love everything you write—is a comforting illusion. In reality:

Reader TypeTypical ExpectationReality
The “Ideal Fan”Loves every plot twist, character, and stylistic quirk.No one loves everything; even the biggest fans have pet peeves.
The “Critical Scholar”Demands flawless structure and deep subtext.Even experts can disagree on what qualifies as “deep.”
The “Casual Browser”Wants light, easy‑to‑digest content.They might actually crave something thought‑provoking if presented well.
The “Niche Enthusiast”Wants high‑level technical detail.Over‑explaining can alienate newcomers; under‑explaining can feel lazy.

Because each individual brings a unique mix of experience, mood, and personal bias to the page, any attempt to write for a single archetype is fundamentally speculative. You can only guess what will click, and even the most data‑driven predictions can’t account for the serendipitous spark that makes a reader fall in love with a line.


3. Writing for You: The Unexpected Advantage

When you write primarily for yourself, a few things happen that actually help reach a broader audience:

What Happens When You Write for YourselfWhy It Helps the Reader
Authentic Voice EmergesReaders pick up on sincerity. A genuine tone feels trustworthy and invites empathy.
Risk‑Taking Becomes NaturalYou’re more willing to experiment with structure, language, or theme—creating fresh experiences for the reader.
Consistency Beats ConformityA clear personal style becomes a brand. Readers know what to expect (and love it), even if the genre shifts.
Passion Fuels PersistenceWriting is hard. When the work matters to you, you’re more likely to edit, rewrite, and polish.

Think of it as a two‑way street: the more you love what you write, the more chance there is that someone else will love it too. Authenticity is magnetic; calculated pandering is often invisible.


4. Real‑World Examples

AuthorWhat They DidResult
Haruki MurakamiWrote stories about jazz bars, cats, and surreal parallel worlds because those obsessions fascinated him.Global cult following; readers across continents adore his “oddly specific” voice.
David MitchellMixed historical fiction with speculative sci‑fi purely because he loved the “what‑if” of time travel.Critical acclaim and a wildly diverse readership attracted to his genre‑bending narratives.
Samantha “Sam” Cole (fictional indie blogger)Abandoned a “listicle for millennials” plan, wrote a personal essay on grief because it had to be said.The post went viral, resonating with readers of all ages who recognized its raw honesty.

These writers didn’t start with a spreadsheet of demographics; they started with curiosity, annoyance, awe, or pure love for a subject. The audience grew organically around that core.


5. Practical Strategies: How to Prioritise Your Voice Without Ignoring Readers

You don’t have to swing the pendulum completely to “write only for yourself.” Here’s a balanced workflow that preserves authenticity while still being considerate of readers:

  1. Start in the “Me‑Zone”
    • Freewrite for 15–20 minutes with the intention only of getting your own thoughts down. No audience in mind.
    • Ask yourself: What excites me? What irritates me? What can’t I stop thinking about?
  2. Step Back & Identify the Core
    • Highlight the central emotion or hook that made you write in the first place. This is the seed that will interest readers.
  3. Empathy Check
    • Switch hats: If a reader stumbled on this piece tomorrow, what would they need to understand the core quickly?
    • Tip: Write a one‑sentence pitch for a complete stranger. If you can convey the essence, you’re likely on the right track.
  4. Selective Polishing
    • Remove self‑censorship that dilutes your voice (e.g., “Maybe I shouldn’t use that slang”).
    • Add clarity where needed (explain a term, give context) without compromising tone.
  5. Feedback Loop
    • Share with a small, trusted group who value honesty over flattery. Ask: “Did my voice feel genuine? Was anything confusing?”
    • Use their notes to tighten the piece, not to rewrite it in their image.
  6. Release & Observe
    • Publish. Watch the comments, metrics, and, most importantly, your own emotional response.
    • If you feel proud, that pride will translate into future work that continues to attract kindred readers.

6. “What If” Scenarios: When Audience‑First Fails

ScenarioWhat Went WrongLesson Learned
A romance novelist writes only “safe” love‑stories to please the “mainstream market.”Stories lack tension; readers feel the plot is predictable and disengage.Authentic conflict—whether internal or external—drives investment.
A tech blogger avoids jargon to appeal to “non‑techies.”Content becomes vague; both novices and experts feel the article is unhelpful.Clarity doesn’t require “dumbing down”; it requires thoughtful explanation.
A poet tries to mimic the style of a bestselling poet to capture their fanbase.The work feels derivative; critics call it “imitative.”Originality beats mimicry; readers can spot a copycat from a mile away.

These cautionary tales reinforce the central truth: no amount of market research can substitute for genuine curiosity and personal investment. When you start building your work on the sand of “what I think they want,” you risk losing the solid foundation of your own voice.


7. The Sweet Spot: “Write for Yourself and Invite Others In”

Think of writing as hosting a party you love. You decorate the space, choose the playlist, and cook the food because you enjoy it. Then, you open the door and welcome guests. If the vibe feels authentic, the guests will stay, chat, and maybe even bring friends. If the party feels forced, no one will linger.

In practice, that means:

  • Let your passion be the headline. Your enthusiasm is contagious.
  • Use empathy as the entryway. A brief moment of “what would a reader need?” can help bridge the gap without muting your voice.
  • Accept that you’ll never please everyone. The goal isn’t universal approval; it’s a connection with those who resonate.

8. Takeaway Checklist

✅I’m writing because…
1I’m fascinated, angry, or moved by the subject.
2I have a unique angle that I can’t find elsewhere.
3I’m excited to experiment with form or language.
4I’m willing to edit for clarity, not for conformity.
5I’m open to feedback that enhances my voice, not replaces it.

If you can answer “yes” to at least three of these, you’re likely steering toward a piece that speaks both to you and, organically, to readers.


9. Final Thought

“Write for yourself, but don’t forget the world is listening.”

That paradox captures the sweet spot most writers chase: authenticity as your compass, empathy as your map. When you let your inner compass guide you, you’ll find that the world—sometimes unexpectedly—shows up at the destination you never planned.

So the next time you sit down at the keyboard, ask yourself: What would I write if no one were watching? Then, once the words flow, give them a quick glance to make sure the door is open enough for someone else to step inside.

Write boldly, edit kindly, and watch as the right readers find you—because they’ll be looking for the voice you could only have written.


Happy writing, and may your pages always feel like home.


If this post resonated with you, feel free to share your own experiences in the comments. How have you balanced personal passion with audience awareness?