365 Days of writing, 2026 – 185/186

Days 185 and 186 – Writing exercise

…

Investigating death was a ‘thing” that some people took seriously, and others took as a challenge.

For them, it was about the numbers, the appearance of solving crimes, so the public could feel safe, to win that imaginary contest of who could solve the most crimes, and celebrate it on Friday night at the pub.

For others, like me, it was about justice.  It was about finding that person who committed the crime, not the most likely candidate buried under a trove of circumstantial evidence.

The pity of it was that our helicopter Detective Chief Superintendent was a numbers man, temporarily stopping in at our station on his way to bigger and better things.

He didn’t like to be thorough and methodical, and he definitely didn’t like me.  That’s why when he put his head out the door and saw that I was the only detective in the room, I could feel rather than see the sigh.

Or maybe that was because he should be down the pub with the rest of the team celebrating the extraordinary closure rate for this month.

“Burgess.”

I looked up.  “Sir.”

“Sending you a straightforward case.  The old man had apparently died in his sleep.  One of us to look in, dot the i’s.  I’ll send you the file.”

When the Chief Inspector says straightforward, there’s always an underlying suggestion not to make more out of it than there was.

The problem was that nothing in our line of work was straightforward.  Not if justice was to be served.

…

People die in their sleep all the time.  What’s unusual is that most of those who did were discovered in the morning, not at 5 pm.

I arrived at the house, one of twelve similar terrace houses, in a street of a hundred or so.  Most had been updated, and small manicured gardens.

Darkness had arrived on a cold, wet, wintry night where everyone would have preferred to be somewhere else, preferably warm.

The street seemed to be full of blue flashing lights and panda cars, but it was deceptive.  The house was cordoned off, and the crime scene crew were ready to go.

First responders had arrived at or near five, and checked the building, pulled the girl who discovered the body and the doctor she had called before she called the police.

Those were the people I would speak to first. 

The co-ordinator was at the door, an officer who had been doing the job for as long as I had been at the station, and was good at it.  He would have secured the scene and ensured that nothing had been touched since the first responder had arrived.

“Larry.”

He just finished the call and swivelled sideways.

“Detective Inspector Burgess.  If you’re here, your boss doesn’t think it’s open and shut.”

“The other detectives are busy, and I’m hoping it is.  Is it?”

“On appearances, yes, but we both know how it usually goes, winter, rain, freezing cold, and wanting to get out of it.”

“Privileges of rank, I’m afraid.  They’re off celebrating the crime numbers.”

Larry was as thrilled about it as I am.  “Hello, your assistant has arrived.”

I turned to look back the way I came.  It was not the Detective Sergeant I was expecting, but one of the Chief Superintendent’s ‘modern methods’ detectives, fast-tracking a new system.

It was the ‘achievement-based’ Superintendent’s way of keeping me on the straight and narrow.

“Buchanan.”

“Sir, Chief Super just gave me the highlights.  You’d think people would be more considerate.”

Yes, you would, but it was not something I would say within earshot of the girl who found him.  It was a typical Buchanan comment.

“I’m sure it wasn’t done to inconvenience you.”  I went back to Larry.  “What can you tell us?”

“The deceased is a man named Devlin McConnaughy, aged 75, living alone, and according to the doctor, was dead when the girl arrived.  The girl is Mr McConnaughy’s granddaughter.  She arrived about 5 pm, a routine stop by on her way out to meet her friends for dinner.  She had a key and visited three or four times a week.  When she found him and couldn’t rouse him, she called the doctor, then the police, when he said McConnaught was dead, about 5:15 pm.  The first responders got her about 5:29.   The teams have been notified and are standing by.”

“We can look at the scene?”

“Just about.  Just waiting on word that we won’t be trooping in like a herd of elephants.”

I’d heard about crime scenes being contaminated by people who were either not trained properly or didn’t care.  We still didn’t know if this was a crime scene.  The crime scene investigators’ preliminary run-through would determine that.  I’d seen a few getting dressed.  I’d be going in in one of those white suits myself.

Buchanan took that as a cue to get suits for us, and hopefully, there was a spot inside to put them on.  Outside was wet, and we didn’t need wet boots plodding through the house.”

“Your thoughts?  You’ve seen the body.”

“And the state of the house, but you’ll see what I mean soon enough.  It looks like he died in his sleep.  The girl had to move him slightly to check if he was still alive, but it looked to be a reasonable assumption based on appearances.  He’s very heavy, and she couldn’t move him far.  I’m hoping there’s nothing sinister otherwise; this is going to be a long night.”

A long night indeed.

….

We got the OK to go in, and the forensic teams followed us in.

This house was old, decrepit and overgrown.  The owner hadn’t bothered, or couldn’t maintain the place, and the outside gave an indication of the state of the inside.

A lifetime of hoarding.

It was difficult to get from the front door to the bedroom, trying not to knock over piles of books, boxes and newspapers.

The preliminary team had set a path to follow that would least impact on the scene.

Further into the house, at the end of the passage, was a kitchen and a rear exit.  On each side, there were rooms, a sitting room, bedrooms, a bathroom, and the old man’s room.

In the bedroom, equally piled up with books and boxes, there was a body on the bed and a paramedic standing to one side.

I looked at the body, scrunched up as though his last moments alive were very painful.  Death was never pretty. 

Larry nodded to the paramedics.

“Visually, there is no evidence of foul play.  There was a doctor in attendance when we arrived.  He advised us that the man was deceased, but did not have an explanation as to what killed him, other than it had been quick.  We sent him out after a short discussion about his actions on arrival.  The man’s granddaughter is with the doctor outside. She is the person who first discovered the body, called the doctor, then the emergency services.”

Larry looked at me.  “Any further questions?”

“No.  We’ll have to wait for the coroner and a post-mortem.”

“They should be here any moment.  It’s a busy night.”

“Good.  It’ll give me time to talk to the doctor and the granddaughter.”

I looked around the room, looking for obvious signs that someone else had been in the room, or that the killer, if there was one, had broken in to get to the man. 

It was beginning to look like a very big if.  The Superintendent might get his wish, that it was an open and shut case.

No obvious clues were lying around, and I was not seeing any obvious signs of murder, bruising, blunt force trauma or anything suspicious.  There were no bullet or knife wounds.

There was careless discarded pill sheets and a nasal spray on the bedside table, all of which forensics would sweep up and test.

Similarly, in the bathroom cabinet, there were more pills, about six different types, including one I knew to be heart medication.  He had high blood pressure.  A heart attack then might not be unexpected.  He also had other cold and influenza medications.  Perhaps he had recently been ill.  It was cold and miserable.

The coroner would have more to say on that.

I think I was disappointed.

There was just a contorted body with a lifeless expression and dead eyes.  It was rather creepy.

…

Dotting the i’s, Buchanan and I went outside and found the doctor and granddaughter waiting patiently. 

That was a first; most of the people detained by the first responders were very vocal about having to wait around, and in this weather, these two should have been more annoyed.

I know I would be.

Coming out the front door, I looked around at the few neighbours who had gathered to see what was happening.  The uniformed officers would have got statements from all of them.

Sometimes it is said that the killer would hang around after the murder as a bystander waiting for the police.  My assessment of everyone in the small groups was that none of them fitted the profile.

At the moment, it was a motiveless murder.  The only two with a possible opportunity were the granddaughter and the doctor.  An old man, living alone?  What did he have that others might covet?

The house.  Even in its current state in this neighbourhood, it had to be worth a lot.  Was there anything in the house?  If there was a will lying around, the forensic teams would find it.

But there was the granddaughter and the doctor. 

They were standing just up from the door, sheltering under a small verandah roof.  In that spot, there was protection from the elements, except the cold.

The rain had turned into a steady drizzle.

I shivered.  The ghost of the old man is finally leaving?

The two were expecting me.  I sent Buchanan off with the doctor.  I stayed with the girl.  The granddaughter was about 20ish and more conservative than a lot of 20-year-olds I’d seen, especially the daughters of my sister.

She had been crying, so it was safe to assume she had cared about the old man.

I introduced myself, “Detective Inspector Burgess.  You are?”

“Christine Davies, the man’s granddaughter.  I was looking in on my grandfather as I do most Fridays, and found him like that.  Dead.  It’s horrible.”

More tears flowed, and her grief was genuine.

It was horrible and for most a frightening experience.  I could imagine how she felt, and even having seen more than my share of dead people, it doesn’t make you immune to the horror of it.

“I’m sorry for your loss.  Just a couple of questions.  You have a key to the door?”

“Yes.  I come on average three times a week, sometimes more, to check on him.  No one else does, nor does it seem they care.  He was recently in the hospital for a few days, had his appendix removed.”

“The last time?”

“Two days ago.  He called and asked if I could drop in.  He said he misplaced a card and asked me to look for it.”

“A card?”

“Those cards the bank gives you to use rather than go to the branch.  He asked me to set up his internet banking account. He didn’t like the idea of a card replacing his money or the idea that he didn’t have to go to the bank, but I convinced him that the world was moving on and he had to catch up.  He reckoned it was the first step in them stealing your money.”

Or someone else, like a craft granddaughter. Ostensibly, she had access to his accounts if she set them up.  We had the computer and phone and would find out.

“Did you find the card?”

“No.  He got me to go back to the bank and sort them out.  He was feeling a little tired.  He didn’t look well, and I said I’d get the doctor to call.”

She gave me the details so I could check.

“Did you call the doctor?”

“Yes, but he was busy and couldn’t get here until today.  I called him first to make sure he was not still alive because I tried what they do on TV, you know, the pulse in the neck thing, but I got nothing.  He came quickly and confirmed he was dead.  That’s when I called the emergency services.”

“Did you check to see if anyone else had been there, or was there any sign of a break-in?”

“Everything looked the same, though, as you’ve no doubt seen, the place is a bit of a mess, but I’ve been trying to clean it up a bit.  I just went in the usual way, the front door, called out that it was me, and when he didn’t answer, went down the passage to his room.”

“Did anyone else have a key?”

“Just about everyone, I mean, his children.  There are five, including my mother.  Once my grandmother died, they all lost interest in visiting.  Or should I say when they realised there was no money in her will for any of them?  Not that there was much anyway.  He’s not rich.”

“He owns this house?”

“It’s a dump.  It can’t be worth that much.  I tried to convince him that he would be better off in an old folks home with other people and be cared for, but he said it would be like being in jail.”

“Did he tell you you might benefit from a will?”

She made a face when she realised the implications of that seemingly innocent question.

“Or did I coerce him into leaving me this place, and then kill him for it?  I mean, seriously.  I was the only one who cared what happened to him. You think I wanted it for the so-called pot of gold at the end of the rainbow?  I told him to leave whatever he had for cancer research.  A couple of years back, he was diagnosed with cancer, but they got it in time, and he has been free of it, although I feared it might have come back.  He said he was fine, but you can’t tell.”

I didn’t know much about it.  She seemed honest, but then, in my experience, some people have that knack of coming across exactly the opposite of what they are.  Perhaps the cancer had come back and killed him.

She gave her details on how to contact her for any follow-up questions and then let her go.

By that time, Buchanan had finished with the doctor and confirmed the recent cancer diagnosis, the coroner had arrived and could not shed any more light on the body until after the post-mortem, and I  left, leaving Buchanan to clean up.

At that point, it was the proverbial open and shut case.

…

The call from the Chief Superintendent was not unexpected because Buchanan would have reported to him the moment I left the scene.

He asked, and I told him that it seemed like a death by natural causes, because no one at the scene had made a different determination.

That would only come after a post-mortem and blood work. That would be available the next day.  He did question whether either was necessary in such circumstances, and I said we were dotting the i’s just as had requested.

It did not earn me any brownie points.

The fact that the granddaughter said that any of his family members might have killed him for his money was a very familiar story.  Sex and money were the two most popular reasons for killing someone, and neither seemed likely.

Unless the will and he’d been secreting millions away somewhere.  The granddaughter did think he had, but she would not be the first person, seemingly innocent, to lie to me

At the moment, it was sitting on the benefit of the doubt.  That might change in the next day or so.

Until then, rest was not going to come easily.  Something was nagging at the back of my neck.  A detail I should know and couldn’t remember. Perhaps I was making more of it than I should.

I went back to the office and did an internet dive into all things Devlin McConnaughy, and found very little.  It could wait until the next day.

….

Buchanan was in before I was, which to me was unusual.  I could smell the hand of the Superintendent’s in this new work ethic.

The other detectives followed me in slowly, some of them worse for wear.  None bothered to ask me why I hadn’t turned up; I had ceased talking to most of them over the last six months.

The feeling of hatred was mutual.

My desk had an analysis of Devlin’s phone and computer.  The sum total of nothing except a portal to the bank, and internet searches for holidays.

Given the nature of the holidays, it seemed they were more likely made by the granddaughter. 

We agreed to disagree

The interviews were typed up and put in a file sitting on mt desk.  Still no autopsy report or of the blood work, so we were still waiting for results.

…

Real policing was not a nine-to-five job, and there was no such thing as weekends.  Truth be told, you really couldn’t have a life, not in the early years of a detective’s career.

I had devoted early on that it wouldn’t be fair to subject someone else to the sacrifices that had to be made.  It was why my older comrades found it difficult to get a decent work-life balance, and the divorce rate was much higher than for any other occupation.

Or at least it seemed that way to me.

But, given my choices, it was not unusual to find me in at the office or volunteering on workdays when others wished to be at home with their families.

This day was no exception.

There was a report on the laptop? The phone, the neighbourhood interviews and I had the notes to write up the one I had conducted.

There was no post-mortem yet, which would arrive soon. 

Was I expecting anything?

There was very little evidence collected at the house.  They had found a copy of the will, and I was going to check with the solicitor.  It left a substantial amount to the granddaughter and reasonable amounts to the children.  A clause said that if any of them contested it, it would be held over until it was adjudicated by the courts.

The value of the house as an inheritance was a viable motive.  If it were a suspicious death. 

I had copies of his bank accounts, three, one a working account, one a savings account and one an investment account.  There was not enough in any of them to warrant killing the man for his money.

The house was owned by him, and we would have to talk to a real estate agent to get an approximate value.

I looked in my email and found a preliminary toxicology report with nothing unusual.  So, no drug overdosing, self-inflicted or otherwise.  Suicide was always on the list, and had to be ticked off.

An hour later, the post mortem came in, and it confirmed that Devlin had a heart attack and had been on painkiller medication for what looked to be a recent accident that scarred his leg.

It had nothing to do with his death.

The phone rang. 

Burgess.  “The body last night.  Verdict?”

There was only one verdict he wanted to hear.

“Nothing points to murder.  Heart attack and died.”

“Good.  Wrap it up.”

“Yes, sir.”

End of the discussion.  I put all the papers back in the file and left it in my in tray.  It could wait until Monday morning.  I would interview the solicitor, meet the granddaughter’s parents, and talk to the granddaughter again.

There was something not right.  Something about this case resonated with something I had read about, a few years ago, on the tail end of the COVID pandemic.

I was going for a walk in the park to clear my head.  I had a lot of searching and reading to do.

…

The trouble with quick clearance rates is that sometimes justice is not served.  The Devlin McCannaughy case was one.

But over the next few days, listening to all of the members of that family argue and squabble over the spoils, and furious that the granddaughter got nearly everything, the accusations were just that, accusations.

The lawyer knew all about the will and the reasons behind it.  So apparently did all those in line time inherit.  There was no motive for any of them other than the main beneficiary.

The trouble was, I could find no evidence to support my theory, and solid evidence was required before there would be any prosecution.

Did I think the granddaughter was guilty of murdering her grandfather for the money?  She didn’t steal from him, not like the children did; it was her mother who had stolen her father’s card and taken money out of the account.

We could prosecute her for theft, but the amount was almost irrelevant and not worth the court’s time.

How did the granddaughter do it?

By the nasal spray.  I had read about a case, one I had used in a paper I wrote about the perfect murder.  The thing is, she would need medical knowledge of what toxin to use and not leave a trace.  I had ordered another tox screen, but we didn’t know what we were looking for.

Motive and opportunity, but not the means.  Even though it was only her prints on the nasal spray beside the bed, one taken from the bathroom cabinet, there was a simple explanation, one given freely when I interviewed her.

She collected and gave him his medication. Yes, he had high blood pressure, and yes, he had minor heart problems, but nothing that would kill him.

When I gave the report to the Chief Superintendent, he just laughed and told me I was not working for MI5 and I should keep my conspiracy theories to myself.

Of course I did, but fate eventually intervened.  The Chief Superintendent was found dead in a sleazy motel, dead because of a heart attack.

Everyone drew the same conclusion.

…

©  Charles Heath  2026

365 Days of writing, 2026 – My Second Story 27

More about my second novel

It sounds like it’s a start on the blurb…

…

Like any book that is the second in a series, there is that inevitable question – What am I going to write about now?

You’re fighting off the, everyone had at least one book in them, and sitting down staring at that blank page because maybe your character has found the woman of his dreams, and there’s no need to chase anymore.

Who said Zoe had any interest in settling down?

She has missed getting out there and doing a job she is good at.

But rather than have her hunting people down, I thought it would be better if she were the one being hunted.

The thing is, she had managed to make more than one enemy over the years. And given the bounty, it brings old foes and fellow assassins out of the woodwork and into her path.

And a few people she had left behind, intentionally or otherwise.

But, the least expected, armed with a pair of dogged private detectives, is her newest friend, and want-to-be boyfriend.

She should have realised that he was not going to go away like he was supposed to.

But, here’s the thing…

People on both sides are looking for her, each with very different reasons, but all have the same intention…

Revenge.

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – My Second Story 27

More about my second novel

It sounds like it’s a start on the blurb…

…

Like any book that is the second in a series, there is that inevitable question – What am I going to write about now?

You’re fighting off the, everyone had at least one book in them, and sitting down staring at that blank page because maybe your character has found the woman of his dreams, and there’s no need to chase anymore.

Who said Zoe had any interest in settling down?

She has missed getting out there and doing a job she is good at.

But rather than have her hunting people down, I thought it would be better if she were the one being hunted.

The thing is, she had managed to make more than one enemy over the years. And given the bounty, it brings old foes and fellow assassins out of the woodwork and into her path.

And a few people she had left behind, intentionally or otherwise.

But, the least expected, armed with a pair of dogged private detectives, is her newest friend, and want-to-be boyfriend.

She should have realised that he was not going to go away like he was supposed to.

But, here’s the thing…

People on both sides are looking for her, each with very different reasons, but all have the same intention…

Revenge.

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 184

Day 184 – Show, don’t tell

…

The Art of the Landscape: What Thomas Hardy Taught Ursula K. Le Guin About “Showing, Not Telling”

Every writer has heard the golden rule: “Show, don’t tell.”

It is the advice that launches a thousand creative writing workshops, yet it remains one of the most misunderstood concepts in literature. Does it mean you can never state an emotion? Does it mean your prose must be purely cinematic?

To find the true essence of this rule, we can look to a master of the craft, Ursula K. Le Guin. In her legendary essays on writing, Le Guin often pointed to a specific, masterful example of environmental storytelling: the opening chapter of Thomas Hardy’s The Return of the Native.

Here is how Hardy uses the landscape of Egdon Heath to redefine what it meant to “show” an entire world before a single character ever speaks.


The Trap of “Telling”

When beginners are told to “show,” they often interpret it as a directive to describe every micro-movement—“She clenched her fist, her knuckles turning white, showing her anger.”

While this is “showing,” it is literal and often clunky. True “showing” is about atmosphere, mood, and implication. It is about placing the reader in a space where they can feel the truth of the situation without being lectured by the author.

The Lesson from Egdon Heath

In the first chapter of The Return of the Native, Thomas Hardy does something radical. He doesn’t introduce a hero, a villain, or a dialogue-driven incident. Instead, he introduces the heath itself.

As Ursula K. Le Guin noted in her workshops, Hardy treats Egdon Heath not as a backdrop, but as a living, breathing participant in the story. He writes:

“The place became full of a watchful intentness now; for when other things sank brooding to sleep the heath appeared slowly to awake and listen.”

Hardy is doing something extraordinary here. He is “showing” the reader the tone of the entire novel before the plot begins. He doesn’t tell us, “The setting is oppressive, ancient, and indifferent to human suffering.” Instead, he describes the heath as a creature that “awaits” and “listens.”

Why Le Guin Admired This Approach

Le Guin championed this passage because it teaches writers that environment is character.

By spending pages describing the soil, the colours of the heath, the shadows, and the way the light dies over the horizon, Hardy creates a sense of foreboding. He shows the reader that the human lives within this book will be small, fragile, and ultimately at the mercy of this vast, prehistoric landscape.

If Hardy had simply told us, “The story takes place in a lonely, haunting part of England where people struggle against nature,” the reader would have accepted it as a fact. But by showing it—by making the heath look, act, and “feel”—the reader experiences that loneliness in their own bones.

Three Ways to Apply the “Hardy-Le Guin” Method

If you want to move beyond the surface-level interpretation of “show, don’t tell,” try these three strategies:

1. Use the Setting to Establish Stakes

Don’t just have your characters walk through a room. Have the room reflect the state of the story. If a marriage is failing, show the dust on the mantle or the way the light doesn’t quite reach the chairs. Make your setting a reflection of your underlying themes.

2. Let the Landscape “Listen”

Hardy gave the heath a sense of “watchful intentness.” What is your setting doing? Is the city you are writing in hostile? Does the forest feel like it’s holding its breath? Giving your setting semi-sentient traits can anchor your reader in the mood of the piece instantly.

3. Trust the Reader’s Intelligence

Hardy didn’t need to summarise the history of Egdon Heath. He trusted the reader to pick up the vibe of the place through the sensory language he used. When you write, pull back on the adjectives and lean into the gestures of your environment.

The Takeaway

“Show, don’t tell” isn’t about avoiding exposition; it’s about making your exposition experiential.

As Ursula K. Le Guin taught, the best writers don’t just dump information on the reader. They build a world so tactile and evocative that the “meaning” of the story is felt long before it is understood. Take a page from Hardy: ignore the plot for a moment, look at the world you’ve built, and ask yourself—is my setting just a stage, or is it alive?

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 184

Day 184 – Show, don’t tell

…

The Art of the Landscape: What Thomas Hardy Taught Ursula K. Le Guin About “Showing, Not Telling”

Every writer has heard the golden rule: “Show, don’t tell.”

It is the advice that launches a thousand creative writing workshops, yet it remains one of the most misunderstood concepts in literature. Does it mean you can never state an emotion? Does it mean your prose must be purely cinematic?

To find the true essence of this rule, we can look to a master of the craft, Ursula K. Le Guin. In her legendary essays on writing, Le Guin often pointed to a specific, masterful example of environmental storytelling: the opening chapter of Thomas Hardy’s The Return of the Native.

Here is how Hardy uses the landscape of Egdon Heath to redefine what it meant to “show” an entire world before a single character ever speaks.


The Trap of “Telling”

When beginners are told to “show,” they often interpret it as a directive to describe every micro-movement—“She clenched her fist, her knuckles turning white, showing her anger.”

While this is “showing,” it is literal and often clunky. True “showing” is about atmosphere, mood, and implication. It is about placing the reader in a space where they can feel the truth of the situation without being lectured by the author.

The Lesson from Egdon Heath

In the first chapter of The Return of the Native, Thomas Hardy does something radical. He doesn’t introduce a hero, a villain, or a dialogue-driven incident. Instead, he introduces the heath itself.

As Ursula K. Le Guin noted in her workshops, Hardy treats Egdon Heath not as a backdrop, but as a living, breathing participant in the story. He writes:

“The place became full of a watchful intentness now; for when other things sank brooding to sleep the heath appeared slowly to awake and listen.”

Hardy is doing something extraordinary here. He is “showing” the reader the tone of the entire novel before the plot begins. He doesn’t tell us, “The setting is oppressive, ancient, and indifferent to human suffering.” Instead, he describes the heath as a creature that “awaits” and “listens.”

Why Le Guin Admired This Approach

Le Guin championed this passage because it teaches writers that environment is character.

By spending pages describing the soil, the colours of the heath, the shadows, and the way the light dies over the horizon, Hardy creates a sense of foreboding. He shows the reader that the human lives within this book will be small, fragile, and ultimately at the mercy of this vast, prehistoric landscape.

If Hardy had simply told us, “The story takes place in a lonely, haunting part of England where people struggle against nature,” the reader would have accepted it as a fact. But by showing it—by making the heath look, act, and “feel”—the reader experiences that loneliness in their own bones.

Three Ways to Apply the “Hardy-Le Guin” Method

If you want to move beyond the surface-level interpretation of “show, don’t tell,” try these three strategies:

1. Use the Setting to Establish Stakes

Don’t just have your characters walk through a room. Have the room reflect the state of the story. If a marriage is failing, show the dust on the mantle or the way the light doesn’t quite reach the chairs. Make your setting a reflection of your underlying themes.

2. Let the Landscape “Listen”

Hardy gave the heath a sense of “watchful intentness.” What is your setting doing? Is the city you are writing in hostile? Does the forest feel like it’s holding its breath? Giving your setting semi-sentient traits can anchor your reader in the mood of the piece instantly.

3. Trust the Reader’s Intelligence

Hardy didn’t need to summarise the history of Egdon Heath. He trusted the reader to pick up the vibe of the place through the sensory language he used. When you write, pull back on the adjectives and lean into the gestures of your environment.

The Takeaway

“Show, don’t tell” isn’t about avoiding exposition; it’s about making your exposition experiential.

As Ursula K. Le Guin taught, the best writers don’t just dump information on the reader. They build a world so tactile and evocative that the “meaning” of the story is felt long before it is understood. Take a page from Hardy: ignore the plot for a moment, look at the world you’ve built, and ask yourself—is my setting just a stage, or is it alive?

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 183

Day 183 – Words of Wisdom

…

The Symbiotic Cycle: Why Writing and Living Are Inseparable

“I shall live badly if I do not write, and I shall write badly if I do not live.” — Françoise Sagan

When the French novelist Françoise Sagan uttered these words, she wasn’t just talking about the craft of writing; she was defining the heartbeat of the creative process. For many, writing is a profession, a hobby, or a necessary outlet. But for the serious practitioner, writing is a metabolism. It is the process of converting life into art and art back into fuel for life.

But what does this delicate, circular balance actually mean for those of us who struggle to find time for both? Let’s break down the symbiotic relationship between lived experience and the written word.


Part I: “I shall live badly if I do not write”

For the dedicated writer, writing is not an extracurricular activity. It is a psychological hygiene practice. When we don’t write, the internal static—the observations, the frustrations, the fleeting moments of beauty—begins to clog our internal machinery.

  • Writing as Processing: Life is chaotic. We encounter grief, joy, and existential absurdity in rapid succession. Writing turns the abstract feelings of our day-to-day existence into something tangible. Without this outlet, we often “live badly” because we are carrying the weight of unexamined experiences.
  • The Clarity of Thought: Joan Didion famously said, “I write entirely to find out what I’m thinking, what I’m looking at, what I see and what it means.” When you fail to write, you lose your internal compass. Writing forces you to articulate your values, which in turn helps you live with greater intention.

Part II: “I shall write badly if I do not live”

The flip side of Sagan’s coin is equally dangerous. If you retreat into a hermetically sealed room to write, believing that “inspiration” will strike you in isolation, your work will eventually suffer. This is the “Ivory Tower” trap.

  • The Well Must Be Refilled: You cannot pour from an empty cup. If your life is devoid of risk, conversation, sunlight, failure, and connection, your writing will begin to taste like stale water. Great writing requires the raw material of reality—the sensory details of a subway ride, the awkwardness of a first date, or the frustration of a broken-down car.
  • Empathy Requires Experience: Fiction and non-fiction alike rely on the writer’s ability to understand the human condition. If you don’t engage with the world, your characters become flat and your philosophy becomes theoretical. To write with depth, you must allow yourself to be hurt, surprised, and changed by the world outside your desk.

Part III: Finding the Equilibrium

How do we balance the need for the solitude of the page with the need for the chaos of the street?

  1. Immerse to Write: Give yourself periods of “active intake.” Read, travel, listen to podcasts, or volunteer. Make your life “messy” enough to give you something to analyse.
  2. Withdraw to Create: Set non-negotiable windows of time where the world is locked out. Use this time to distil what you’ve gathered.
  3. The Feedback Loop: Treat your life as research. When you are living, look for the “story”—what is the core emotion of this interaction? When you are writing, look for the “truth”—does this sentence reflect the way I truly feel, or is it just a cliché?

The Final Word

Françoise Sagan understood that a writer who stops living becomes a technician, and a person who stops writing becomes a passive observer of their own life.

To live well, you must synthesise your experience into meaning. To write well, you must be brave enough to step out into the world and get your boots dirty. So, go out and live a life worth writing about—then come home and put it on the page.


Are you struggling to balance your creative output with your daily life? Share your thoughts on how you keep your “well” full in the comments below.

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 183

Day 183 – Words of Wisdom

…

The Symbiotic Cycle: Why Writing and Living Are Inseparable

“I shall live badly if I do not write, and I shall write badly if I do not live.” — Françoise Sagan

When the French novelist Françoise Sagan uttered these words, she wasn’t just talking about the craft of writing; she was defining the heartbeat of the creative process. For many, writing is a profession, a hobby, or a necessary outlet. But for the serious practitioner, writing is a metabolism. It is the process of converting life into art and art back into fuel for life.

But what does this delicate, circular balance actually mean for those of us who struggle to find time for both? Let’s break down the symbiotic relationship between lived experience and the written word.


Part I: “I shall live badly if I do not write”

For the dedicated writer, writing is not an extracurricular activity. It is a psychological hygiene practice. When we don’t write, the internal static—the observations, the frustrations, the fleeting moments of beauty—begins to clog our internal machinery.

  • Writing as Processing: Life is chaotic. We encounter grief, joy, and existential absurdity in rapid succession. Writing turns the abstract feelings of our day-to-day existence into something tangible. Without this outlet, we often “live badly” because we are carrying the weight of unexamined experiences.
  • The Clarity of Thought: Joan Didion famously said, “I write entirely to find out what I’m thinking, what I’m looking at, what I see and what it means.” When you fail to write, you lose your internal compass. Writing forces you to articulate your values, which in turn helps you live with greater intention.

Part II: “I shall write badly if I do not live”

The flip side of Sagan’s coin is equally dangerous. If you retreat into a hermetically sealed room to write, believing that “inspiration” will strike you in isolation, your work will eventually suffer. This is the “Ivory Tower” trap.

  • The Well Must Be Refilled: You cannot pour from an empty cup. If your life is devoid of risk, conversation, sunlight, failure, and connection, your writing will begin to taste like stale water. Great writing requires the raw material of reality—the sensory details of a subway ride, the awkwardness of a first date, or the frustration of a broken-down car.
  • Empathy Requires Experience: Fiction and non-fiction alike rely on the writer’s ability to understand the human condition. If you don’t engage with the world, your characters become flat and your philosophy becomes theoretical. To write with depth, you must allow yourself to be hurt, surprised, and changed by the world outside your desk.

Part III: Finding the Equilibrium

How do we balance the need for the solitude of the page with the need for the chaos of the street?

  1. Immerse to Write: Give yourself periods of “active intake.” Read, travel, listen to podcasts, or volunteer. Make your life “messy” enough to give you something to analyse.
  2. Withdraw to Create: Set non-negotiable windows of time where the world is locked out. Use this time to distil what you’ve gathered.
  3. The Feedback Loop: Treat your life as research. When you are living, look for the “story”—what is the core emotion of this interaction? When you are writing, look for the “truth”—does this sentence reflect the way I truly feel, or is it just a cliché?

The Final Word

Françoise Sagan understood that a writer who stops living becomes a technician, and a person who stops writing becomes a passive observer of their own life.

To live well, you must synthesise your experience into meaning. To write well, you must be brave enough to step out into the world and get your boots dirty. So, go out and live a life worth writing about—then come home and put it on the page.


Are you struggling to balance your creative output with your daily life? Share your thoughts on how you keep your “well” full in the comments below.

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 182

Day 182 – How do writers cope with requests

…

The Burden of “Unpaid Favours”: How Writers Can Protect Their Time and Sanity

If you are a writer, you have undoubtedly felt the sting of “The Ask.”

It starts with a ping in your inbox or a DM on social media: “I love your work! Would you mind just taking a quick look at my manuscript?” or “Could you write a quick blurb?” or “Can I pick your brain for an hour over coffee about how to break into the industry?”

The legendary literary critic Edmund Wilson famously lamented these demands, referring to them as “unpaid favours.” For the recipient, these requests represent a genuine dilemma: you want to be generous and supportive of your community, but your time is your professional capital. If you said “yes” to everyone, you would never write another word of your own.

So, how do you manage the flood of requests without burning bridges—or burning out? Here is a guide to navigating the delicate art of saying “no.”


1. The “Gatekeeper” Strategy: Use a FAQ Page

Prevention is the best medicine. If you have a professional website, create a dedicated “Contact” or “FAQ” page. Clearly outline your current capacity.

Pro-tip: Add a section titled “Mentorship and Inquiries.” State politely but firmly: “Due to my current writing schedule, I am unable to accept requests for manuscript reviews, informational interviews, or unpaid consulting.”

When someone sends a request, you don’t have to draft a long explanation. You can simply link to your policy. It removes the personal nature of the refusal.

2. Master the “Template of Kindness”

You don’t need to be rude to be firm. A “template of kindness” allows you to send a polite refusal in under 30 seconds.

Try this script:

“Hi [Name], thanks so much for reaching out and for your kind words about my work. I’m currently deep in a deadline and have had to step back from all outside projects and consultations to protect my writing time. I’m afraid I can’t help with this request, but I wish you the very best of luck with your [manuscript/project]!”

By keeping it brief, you prevent the “back-and-forth” that often results when you leave the door slightly ajar.

3. Redirect, Don’t Reject

Sometimes, the person asking genuinely needs help but doesn’t know where to turn. Instead of providing the labour yourself, provide a roadmap.

If someone asks for advice on how to get published, direct them to three reliable resources: a specific book on craft, a reputable industry organisation (like Poets & Writers or AWP), or a craft-focused newsletter.

Why this works: You are still being helpful, but you are shifting the burden from your labour to your curation.

4. Set “Consultation Hours”

If you truly want to give back but are overwhelmed, carve out a small, manageable block of time. Perhaps you offer one 30-minute coffee chat per quarter, or you answer one email question a month.

When that slot is full, it’s full. You can then honestly tell people: “My mentorship slots for the year are currently filled, but please check back in January.”

5. Recognize the “Unpaid Favor” Trap

Many writers feel guilty saying no because they fear being labelled “unapproachable” or “stuck up.” It is important to reframe the request: When someone asks for your labour for free, they are asking you to prioritise their career over your own.

You are not obligated to provide free consulting, editing, or networking. Protecting your time is not an act of arrogance; it is an act of professional sustainability. If you don’t save your creative energy for your own work, your work will eventually stop existing—and then you won’t have anything to offer anyone.

The Bottom Line

Edmund Wilson was right: requests for “unpaid favours” are an occupational hazard for any successful writer. But you are the CEO of your own creative practice. You get to decide how your time is spent.

Be polite, be concise, and stay focused on your work. The best way to support the writing community is to keep writing, keep publishing, and keep showing the world that writing is a profession deserving of boundaries.

Are you a writer struggling with boundary-setting? Share how you handle “unpaid favours” in the comments below!


…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 182

Day 182 – How do writers cope with requests

…

The Burden of “Unpaid Favours”: How Writers Can Protect Their Time and Sanity

If you are a writer, you have undoubtedly felt the sting of “The Ask.”

It starts with a ping in your inbox or a DM on social media: “I love your work! Would you mind just taking a quick look at my manuscript?” or “Could you write a quick blurb?” or “Can I pick your brain for an hour over coffee about how to break into the industry?”

The legendary literary critic Edmund Wilson famously lamented these demands, referring to them as “unpaid favours.” For the recipient, these requests represent a genuine dilemma: you want to be generous and supportive of your community, but your time is your professional capital. If you said “yes” to everyone, you would never write another word of your own.

So, how do you manage the flood of requests without burning bridges—or burning out? Here is a guide to navigating the delicate art of saying “no.”


1. The “Gatekeeper” Strategy: Use a FAQ Page

Prevention is the best medicine. If you have a professional website, create a dedicated “Contact” or “FAQ” page. Clearly outline your current capacity.

Pro-tip: Add a section titled “Mentorship and Inquiries.” State politely but firmly: “Due to my current writing schedule, I am unable to accept requests for manuscript reviews, informational interviews, or unpaid consulting.”

When someone sends a request, you don’t have to draft a long explanation. You can simply link to your policy. It removes the personal nature of the refusal.

2. Master the “Template of Kindness”

You don’t need to be rude to be firm. A “template of kindness” allows you to send a polite refusal in under 30 seconds.

Try this script:

“Hi [Name], thanks so much for reaching out and for your kind words about my work. I’m currently deep in a deadline and have had to step back from all outside projects and consultations to protect my writing time. I’m afraid I can’t help with this request, but I wish you the very best of luck with your [manuscript/project]!”

By keeping it brief, you prevent the “back-and-forth” that often results when you leave the door slightly ajar.

3. Redirect, Don’t Reject

Sometimes, the person asking genuinely needs help but doesn’t know where to turn. Instead of providing the labour yourself, provide a roadmap.

If someone asks for advice on how to get published, direct them to three reliable resources: a specific book on craft, a reputable industry organisation (like Poets & Writers or AWP), or a craft-focused newsletter.

Why this works: You are still being helpful, but you are shifting the burden from your labour to your curation.

4. Set “Consultation Hours”

If you truly want to give back but are overwhelmed, carve out a small, manageable block of time. Perhaps you offer one 30-minute coffee chat per quarter, or you answer one email question a month.

When that slot is full, it’s full. You can then honestly tell people: “My mentorship slots for the year are currently filled, but please check back in January.”

5. Recognize the “Unpaid Favor” Trap

Many writers feel guilty saying no because they fear being labelled “unapproachable” or “stuck up.” It is important to reframe the request: When someone asks for your labour for free, they are asking you to prioritise their career over your own.

You are not obligated to provide free consulting, editing, or networking. Protecting your time is not an act of arrogance; it is an act of professional sustainability. If you don’t save your creative energy for your own work, your work will eventually stop existing—and then you won’t have anything to offer anyone.

The Bottom Line

Edmund Wilson was right: requests for “unpaid favours” are an occupational hazard for any successful writer. But you are the CEO of your own creative practice. You get to decide how your time is spent.

Be polite, be concise, and stay focused on your work. The best way to support the writing community is to keep writing, keep publishing, and keep showing the world that writing is a profession deserving of boundaries.

Are you a writer struggling with boundary-setting? Share how you handle “unpaid favours” in the comments below!


…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 181

Day 181 – Writing Exercise

How can you trust a person you know is telling you outright lies?

…

There’s nothing worse than being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I got there by trying to prove myself among a group of four colleagues who had been working together for years.

They clearly didn’t want a fifth wheel.

And they certainly didn’t like the idea of a forcibly retired field agent looking for a quiet berth to see out his service.

The section head in charge told me quite clearly that the department had made a mistake, that his research team did not need another member, and they certainly didn’t want an ex-field agent.

He was miffed because the department head had decided my knowledge and expertise were too valuable to toss on the scrapheap.

No one else in that group had seen field service or understood those who came from it.  To them, the information they provided was 100 per cent useful, when in my particular case, it was not.

In that first meeting when I arrived, and listened to the broad outline of what the team provided, I could have categorically proved that information, sometimes poorly researched, had caused actual deaths of top-line agents, and taking into account my last personal experience, it had led to me unwillingly landing on their doorstep.

Such was the arrogance, I wanted to personally throttle two of them, but I decided it was neither the time or the place.  It was a matter of head down, minding my own business, and only consulting with the others when necessary.

And then only with extreme reluctance.

Which led to the seminal moment.  There was a cafe not far from the office, one I discovered the day I first arrived, where I needed a strong coffee before walking through the door.

The waitress, Angelique, according to her nametag, was bright and cheerful, the exact opposite of what I was feeling.  It was hard not to feel her enthusiasm, and it had lightened my mood.

So much so, I preferred to spend my morning and afternoon breaks in the cafe rather than be ignored in the cafeteria.

Sometimes the others, singly or in pairs, never the whole four at once, would come in.  I deliberately sat where I could not be seen very clearly and observed them.  Those conversations when they sat close enough were priceless.

Angelique brought my coffee and her surprise cake. I always let her decide which cake. Then two of my colleagues came in.  They did not look happy.

Nor did they see me, but then they would have to be deliberately looking for me.  They sat two tables across on the other side of a dividing hedge.

Angelique went over to them and took their order.  Two cappuccinos.  Perhaps the automatic coffee machine in the cafeteria had broken down.

“I’m telling you, Sandra, Roger thinks he’s a spy.”

“Roger jumps at shadows.  Don’t you think it’s time to cut him loose?  He’s never going to leave his wife.  She controls the money.”

“He says it’s complicated.”

“All married men say that.  As for Stevens, he was a spy, could still be a spy, but the reality is, good spies don’t get sent to our corner of the universe unless they failed badly.”

“You don’t think he’s been sent to see why some of the briefings were not quite up to the mark.  I mean that Paris mission…”

My last job.  Not up to the mark?  It provided out-of-date information, a critical schedule change that was missed.

“Roger approved it.  He said he checked it.”

“How, Eva?  He was with you?”

“I’m not to blame here.  That’s up to him to juggle things.  He would have postponed, like he has before, when things get tight.”

“You need to dump him before he takes you down with him, or worse, sets you up to take the fall.”

“He wouldn’t.”

Sandra just shook her head and said nothing.  The coffee arrived.

“Anyway,” Sandra said, “it might well be a moot point.  Roger has a plan to get rid of him.  It worked with the others, and this guy looks about ready to quit anyway.”

“You think so.  I wouldn’t underestimate what he’s capable of if he were an agent.  I’d like to know just how many people he’s killed.”

“You’re just morbid.”

“No.  Practical.  Mark my words.  There’s more to him than meets the eye.”

…

I was a spy, for want of a better word.  It was made very clear when the department head came to visit me before discharge from the hospital that I would not likely be sent back into the field

It was when he pitched the research job.

By then, I needed something, anything to take my mind off the nightmare.

I went to see him a few weeks later, at his request.  It was the second time I’d been in his office, all dark wood and leather furniture.  The polished almost made my eyes water. 

The cigar smoke did.

“That position I was talking about, it has taken on a new aspect.  The ops manager has completed his review of your mission and found that the briefing reference material was lacking.”

“Wrong.”

“By and large, it was right, except for several crucial details.  The question he raises is whether or not it was deliberate.”

“A traitor?”

“An incompetent fool, more likely.  But that’s for you to determine.  We’re sending you there.  I know the chap who runs it.  He’s going to fight this and make your life hell.”

“So another MacCallister then.”

That was a story.  The man I had to impress to get into the service.  The man who failed 80 per cent of his charges in the first week.  He and I were chalk and cheese.

“Worse.  MacCallister knows when he’s met a worthy opponent.  Roger Ballins doesn’t.  He’s broken every new person we’ve sent.”

I shrugged.  “He hasn’t had the Berkeley twins find his breaking point then.”

The Berkeley twins were the department’s interrogation team.  We all went through what was called the ‘break test’.  It was near the end of the training, and the cause of a lot of the remaining candidates failing.

“Not yet.  Let’s hope it does not come to that.”

…

So, Roger had a plan.  It bothered me that the two of them had no concept of what secrecy was, or had a modicum of training in how to maintain a certain level of anonymity, given the job they were doing.

It raised the question of whether they frequently discussed their research out of the office.  I doubted anyone was aware of how bad security was at the section.

Especially when it involved another employee, in this case, me.

If their plan involved overloading me with work, it wasn’t working.  Roger had been subtly dumping new requests in my in-tray every morning, and then asking the same afternoon what the status was on them.

The daily meetings each morning saw the others clearing requests while I was not.  Roger hadn’t said anything yet, but that might be the next phase of the plan.

My first day, he’d started with the spiel that it was a tight-knit crew who had been working well together for years, and there was no need for another.

For that reason, I just didn’t get to work with any of the others, and any requests I made of them were either ignored or I was given the excuse that they were too busy.

That then led to them spreading niggling half-truths woven into far larger tales of my aloofness, inability to work in a team, confrontational attitude, and lack of interpersonal skills.

Sadly, half of that was true.  I didn’t want to work with them, and even less so now after overhearing them.  I wished I hadn’t.

I stewed over their comments on the short walk back to the office, and it was no surprise to find Roger waiting for me when I returned.

“Where have you been?”  It wasn’t asked in the politest of tones.

I quickly glanced at the others who had their heads down.

“Out for a head-clearing walk.  It’s marvellous what the London Transport diesel fumes can do for the mind.”

I couldn’t tell him I was up the road having a coffee break.

“You might think….” 

It was as far as he got.  The department head chose that exact moment to walk through the door.  An unannounced visit.

The four others suddenly looked more alert and on their guard.

He looked at me.  “Stevens, you are here.  I was told operations sent you to apply your field experience to improving the relevance of the briefing papers.”  He swung around and looked at Roger.  “I’m sure you’ve been using Stevens as an expert resource to assist the team?”

“I … well.. I was not aware that was the intention.”

He shook his head, then turned back to me.  “Just what has he been using you for?”

“Research, which is what I assumed I was here for.”

“God no.  Operations assured me they would pass on my request that every briefing now has to pass through you to ensure that it’s relevant and correct from the field agents’ perspective.”

He turned back to Roger, who was almost cowering.  “Operations sent me the memo, and your name was on the distribution list.  Go and find it and take the time to find an excuse why you haven’t implemented a direct order.  I’ll be in the cafeteria.  Stevens, you’re with me.”

A last look before I followed him out, it looked like the gang of five just got a very swift kick where it hurt.

Good.

….

“Roger was a washout from the training program about ten years ago, sold operations on the idea that a person who understood the field agents’ perspective would add value to the research process.  Trouble is, he was never in the field.”

“Maybe it was more about resenting the fact he was washed out.”

Coffee in the cafeteria had a very distinctive taste, and one I could see wasn’t appreciated.  I wondered if that meant he would do something about it.

“Maybe he’s just an incompetent fool.  What have you found out?”

“Eva did the Paris report, sent it to Roger.  Thing is, they are having an affair, and if I overheard the conversation correctly, he was too busy spending time with her to check the report.”

“Are you listening at keyholes?”  He seemed surprised.

I was going to tell him that spies were notorious for listening at keyholes, but thought the better of it.

“There’s a Cafe not far up the road.  God knows how many others heard the same conversation.  They don’t seem to know much about security.”

The surprise changed to annoyance, but that was the moment Roger came in, saw us, and came over.

He waited until he was told to sit.

“I’m sorry, sir.  It was buried in a pile of requests.”

I didn’t believe him.  He would have seen it and filed it, hoping no one would ever notice.  Especially the department head.

“That’s the first strike, Roger.  What were your conclusions in the investigation I asked for on the Paris mission?  You’ve had three months.”

“We’ve been busy.”

“You told me categorically that you had sufficient staff to handle the workload.  That was obviously a lie.  I sent someone down to help, and you still seem to be overwhelmed.  That’s the second strike, Roger.”

There was no comeback for that, and it was interesting to see someone else squirm under the intensity of the department head.  Rumour had it he was once an excellent interrogator who didn’t need the usual tools of the trade.

“I … we .. “

“Go back to the office, Roger, before you register that fatal third strike.  I need a little time to consider what we need to do moving forward.  I have to say I’m extremely disappointed.  Go.”

I doubted Roger liked the idea of being dismissed, and it was going to make my position less tenable, being present at his dressing down.

“They might all resign,” I said.

“That wouldn’t be the worst outcome.  There are at least a dozen other candidates that could instantly fill their shoes.”

“I think the problem is not with the staff, it’s the person in charge.”

“Then you can take over and restore some discipline.  Problem solved.”

“Temporarily.”  I had no wish to be running a section full of resentful people.

“Fix this for me, and we’ll talk about where you go next.”  He took another sip of his coffee and made a face.  “This is terrible.  We’ll have to do something about this, too.”

…

We went back to the office, and the department head sent Roger off on stress leave, then announced my promotion to acting section head.

No one said a word, but the expressions said more than words could.  Each of them blamed me for his removal, and especially Eva.

After the department head left, I called a meeting.  I seriously believed they would simply ignore me, but then they shuffled into the room and sat in their usual chairs.

I looked at each one of them and could feel the resentment.

I looked at Eva.  “Just so you know, I was sent on that Paris mission.  I was lucky, I lived.  Just.  Three others died, and believe me when I tell you, being there and watching them die because someone didn’t do their job properly, well, you are very fortunate I didn’t throttle you the first day I got here.”

“It was not my fault.”  Petulant.

“What do you call fucking your section leader when he should be critiquing your work?”

“How…”

It was said to shock her, and it had the effect I was looking for.  She was arrogant, but arrogance only lasts until the reason for it is broken.  As long as Roger was there, she felt bulletproof.

Now I just had to dispel the notion I had overheard them earlier.  She was clever nonetheless, and I was not going to underestimate her.

“The department carries out periodical checks on staff who are in positions where discretion is paramount.  A foreign agent could quite easily use your illicit affair as leverage.  You do understand what leverage is, don’t you?  The internal report on your report actually suggested that you had been compromised and forced to provide flawed information.”

It was the last nail in the coffin that held her invincibility.  I don’t think any of them had been told of the importance of their work.

There was still a little iron in her tone, but the facade was cracking.  “I would never do that.” 

“You wouldn’t have a choice.  The fact that you left yourself open to the possibility is bad enough.  The real problem is that your mind wasn’t on the job at hand.  The fact that Roger let it happen is even worse.”

She didn’t ask the bigger question: why didn’t she get the sack, which is generally the first option in situations like this?  Instead, she went with, “What’s going to happen to him?”

“You should be more worried about yourself,” Sandra said.  “I told you the bastard would drag you down with him.”

Her friend was right.

“You are very lucky not to have followed him out the door.  Instead, your first job will be to write a report on the complete process beyond the reference paper you wrote for the Paris Mission.  I want all the sources annotated.  You need to tell the truth, and it’s the only chance you will get to keep your job. Am I understood?”

I saw Sandra squeeze her hand.  A tear escaped from watery eyes.  The defiance was gone, replaced by recognition that she was in a very bad place.

“Understood.”

“As for the rest of you, next week you will be attending security briefings.  From now on, not one word of what you do, where you work, or who you work for is to be repeated outside this office.  In a month, we will be changing offices.  I assume you’ve told just anyone who would listen all about this place.  Now you have to tell them that the unit was disbanded and you’ve been reassigned.  Security will also be a lot tighter, and breaches of it will be dealt with summarily.  Anyone who does not want to stay under the new conditions can give notice by the end of the week.”

The four were visibly shellshocked.

“Any questions?”

Sandra looked at me with what I would call an unfathomable expression.  I’d seen it once before, from a person I misjudged.

“How many people have you killed?”

For some reason, I had been expecting it.

“I’d like to say none, but when you are in a life-or-death moment, you are taught to make an instant decision based on the imminent threat to your life.  The simple answer is only when I absolutely had to.  It doesn’t pay to have too many ghosts of your enemies haunting your dreams.”

Question time over, I sent them back to work.

…

There’s an old saying, “A leopard cannot change its spots”, and unfortunately, Eva was a prime example.

I had hoped that she understood her situation, certainly she did what I had requested and wrote a report that told me that the section was lacking certain specific resources that a simple check would have uncovered.

It means that the section, when it is relocated, would have a resources manager whose sole job will be to keep everything up to date.

Aside from that, it wasn’t hard to see that she had not broken off the relationship with Roger and was in fact, reporting back to him what was happening.

Roger probably believed that he was coming back at the end of his stress leave, a question I asked the department head.  A reply came back to tell me he had been reassigned.

So, he was lying to Eva, but that wasn’t really the issue.  She was violating what was now a golden rule.  No telling anyone the nature of our work or the existence of the office.

Which, unfortunately, led to a request to come to my office when she arrived.  We had just started at the new building, where security was very tight.

She knocked on the door, a half hour after the appointed time.  Some of that arrogance had returned, probably fed to her by Roger telling her that I had no real authority.

I did admonish her for lateness.  I could overlook a lot of minor indiscretions so long as the work ethic was there.

Operations had received an anonymous letter about certain aspects of the section that apparently were not within the department’s guidelines.

It was supposed to be a reflection on my ineptitude in running what a functioning section was, and had now become a disparate and dysfunctional group without proper leadership.

A list of infractions followed.

As soon as she sat down, I handed her the document.

“Quite a damning expose, don’t you think?”

She glanced at the document and tossed the file back on the desk.  “I wouldn’t know, it’s the first time I’ve seen it.”

“But it doesn’t relate to certain events in this office.”

“It appears so.”

“And you had nothing to do with it?”

“No.”

“And you have broken off all relations with Roger?”

A very subtle change in expression.  A seasoned interrogator would pick up on it.

“Yes.”

“When was the last time you spoke to him?”

“The day he left the office.”

“You do realise that when you signed your new employment contract recently, you agreed that the department can, at any time, instigate standard personnel checks to determine your security status.”

The eyes changed, just for a second.  People needed time to process a question and then work on a suitable and believable response.

“That may also include a lie detector test.”

“Are you deliberately handing me grounds for a harassment case?”

I shrugged, opened the top drawer, pulled out a folder and pushed it across the desk.

“You tell me.”

First reaction, she did not want to reach for it.  From the moment she uttered that previous statement until I pulled out the file, she had been smug.

She had also been lying to my face.

I was willing to accept the four of them at face value and treated them all equally and equitably.  I hadn’t expected to get that particular letter, but I knew Roger well enough to know he would retaliate in some way, and that he might reach out to Eva.

“Sandra was right, Eva.  Roger didn’t care that much about you, so he was willing to take you down with him.  I have to say I misjudged you.  I’m usually a better judge of character.”

“What’s in the file?”

“Photographs and a transcript of your conversation.”

“How many people know?”

“The Department head, head of operations and me.  We were expecting it.  You had to know that we would be monitoring you.”

Smug expression gone, but there was still defiance.  She sighed.  “What happens now?”

“You find another job.  You’ve proved that you can’t be trusted, so it cannot be for any government organisation.  Unfortunately, when the authorities came to arrest Roger, he decided not to come in quietly.  There was an exchange of shots, and he didn’t survive.  He left behind a confession that also explains your actions, and that this latest development was your idea for revenge.”

“And now he’s dead, and the lies earlier you will not believe anything I say.”  She shook her head. “Am I free to go?”

“As far as I’m concerned, you are.”

“But…”

“When you leave here, you will be met by a woman.  I suggest you make the time to hear what she has to say.  It may be the only way you will get to see light at the end of a very dark tunnel “

She stood.  “You’re scaring me, now.”

“Good, because that same woman told me that fear was going to be my only friend when the chips were down.  It’s why I’m still here, and still breathing.  Take some advice.  Listen to her.

…

©  Charles Heath  2026