365 Days of writing, 2026 – 54

Day 54 – Anger and confusion as inspiration

When Anger & Confusion Become Creative Fuel

How the messier emotions in our lives can spark our most powerful ideas


“The best art comes from a place of discomfort.” – Anonymous

We’re taught to chase calm, to “think clearly” before we write, paint, design, or launch a new project. Yet some of the most unforgettable works—whether a novel that reshaped a generation, a song that still makes us shiver, or a startup that turned an industry upside‑down—were born from moments of angry frustration or gut‑wrenching confusion.

If you’ve ever felt a surge of irritation while stuck in traffic, or a bewildering swirl of thoughts after a heated argument, you already have a well‑spring of raw material waiting to be transformed. The trick isn’t to suppress those feelings, but to channel them.

Below, we’ll explore why anger and confusion are surprisingly fertile creative soil, look at real‑world examples, and walk through practical steps you can use right now to turn those messy emotions into compelling content, products, or art.


1. Why the “Negative” Emotions Matter

EmotionWhat It Does to Your BrainHow It Helps Creativity
AngerTriggers the amygdala, spikes adrenaline, and heightens focus on perceived threats.Sharpens problem‑solving, fuels urgency, and pushes you to “break the rules” to resolve the tension.
ConfusionActivates the prefrontal cortex as you search for meaning and coherence.Forces you to ask why and how, encouraging divergent thinking and novel connections.
  • Energy Surge – Both anger and confusion release physiological energy (adrenaline, cortisol). When redirected, that energy can become the stamina needed for long writing sessions or intense brainstorming.
  • Narrative Drive – Stories thrive on conflict. Anger supplies a clear antagonist (the source of frustration), while confusion supplies the mystery that keeps the audience hooked.
  • Authenticity – Audiences can sense when a piece is born from genuine feeling. Raw, unfiltered emotion builds trust and resonance.

2. Legends Who Turned Rage & Uncertainty Into Masterpieces

CreatorEmotionResulting WorkWhy It Worked
Vincent Van GoghDeep melancholy & inner turmoil (bordering on confusion)Starry NightThe turbulent sky mirrors his mental state, turning personal chaos into universal beauty.
Kanye WestPublic outrage & indignation after award show snubs“Yeezus” (2013)Aggressive beats and confrontational lyrics harnessed his anger, producing one of his most daring albums.
Malala YousafzaiFear and outrage at oppressionI Am Malala (memoir)The anger at injustice fueled a powerful narrative that inspired global activism.
James DysonFrustration with underperforming vacuum cleanersDyson Cyclone technologyAnger at the status quo drove relentless prototyping, resulting in a market‑disrupting product.

These stories underscore a simple truth: the more personal the friction, the more universal the impact—when you translate your private storm into public art, you give others permission to feel seen.


3. From Internal Turmoil to Tangible Output – A Step‑by‑Step Workflow

TL;DR: Capture, Clarify, Convert, Polish.

Step 1 – Capture the Spark

  • Immediate journal: Keep a small notebook or note‑app on hand. As soon as you feel a flash of anger or a wave of confusion, jot down:
    • What triggered it? (e.g., “Stuck in endless Zoom meetings.”)
    • Physical sensations (e.g., “Heart pounding, jaw clenched.”)
    • One‑sentence “headline” that captures the feeling (“Enough is enough: the meeting apocalypse”).
  • Voice memo: If you’re on the go, record a 30‑second rant. Hearing your own tone later can reveal nuances you missed in writing.

Step 2 – Clarify the Core Question

  • Anger often hides a demand (“I want this to change”).
  • Confusion hides a gap (“I don’t understand why this happened”).
  • Translate each entry into a concrete question:
    • “How can remote work be more humane?”
    • “Why do we default to endless meetings, and what alternatives exist?”

Step 3 – Brainstorm Solutions/Angles

  • Set a timer (10–15 minutes) and list all possible responses—no judgment.
  • Use “yes, and…” improvisation technique to build on each idea.
  • Highlight any that feel contrarian or provocative; anger loves a good rebellion.

Step 4 – Create a First Draft

  • Structure: Problem (the anger/confusion) → Exploration (your research/brainstorm) → Resolution (your insight or call‑to‑action).
  • Write in a voice that mirrors the original emotion: short, punchy sentences for anger; meandering, question‑filled prose for confusion.

Step 5 – Cool‑Down & Polish

  • Take a short break (5–10 minutes) to let the adrenaline subside.
  • Revise for clarity: Replace raw outbursts with purposeful language while preserving intensity.
  • Add humanising details (an anecdote, a metaphor) to help readers connect.

4. Practical Tips for Different Creative Mediums

MediumHarnessing AngerHarnessing Confusion
Writing (blog, fiction, copy)Use strong verbs (“shatter”, “explode”) and short paragraphs to replicate urgency.Embrace open‑ended questions and fragmented sentences that mimic mental looping.
Visual Art / DesignBold, contrasting colors (red, black) and jagged lines convey tension.Layered textures, ambiguous shapes, or “visual riddles” invite viewers to decode the piece.
Music / AudioAggressive tempos, distorted instruments, lyrical repetitions (“I’m done, I’m done”).Dissonant chords, irregular time signatures, spoken‑word interludes that ask “what’s next?”
Product DevelopmentIdentify the pain point that fuels the anger; prototype a solution that eliminates that pain.Map out the confusion journey (user flow gaps) and redesign for clarity, turning uncertainty into elegance.
MarketingCampaigns that call out a common frustration (“Stop waiting for support”) often go viral.Story‑driven ads that pose a mystery (“What happens when…?”) encourage engagement and shares.

5. Avoiding the Pitfalls

RiskWarning SignMitigation
BurnoutYou keep feeding on anger without rest.Schedule “emotion detox” days (no work, just leisure).
Over‑NegativityThe final piece sounds purely bitter, alienating the audience.Balance with hope or solution; end on a constructive note.
Unclear MessagingConfusion remains unresolved for the reader.Ensure the conclusion clearly answers the core question you posed.
Echo ChamberYou only share with people who agree with your rage.Seek diverse feedback; a calm third‑party can spot blind spots.

6. A Mini‑Exercise to Try Right Now

  1. Pick a recent moment of anger or confusion (e.g., the last time a software glitch ruined your workflow).
  2. Write a 150‑word micro‑story that starts with a vivid line of that feeling.
    • Angry example: “The screen froze, and my deadline sprint turned into a marathon of curses.”
    • Confused example: “Why does the ‘Save’ button disappear right when I need it most?”
  3. Identify the underlying demand or question.
  4. Add a single, unexpected twist that resolves the tension in a fresh way.
  5. Read it aloud—does the emotion still feel punchy? If not, sharpen the language.

Do this daily for a week and watch how quickly raw moments become polished ideas.


7. Closing Thoughts: Embrace the Storm

Creativity isn’t a serene garden; it’s a storm‑tossed sea where the fiercest winds generate the biggest waves. Anger and confusion are not obstacles to be sidestepped; they are compasses pointing toward the stories, solutions, and art that matter most.

When you feel that heat rising or your thoughts spiralling, ask yourself:

  • What is this feeling demanding of me?
  • What truth lies hidden beneath the confusion?

Then, grab your notebook, your sketchpad, or your laptop, and turn that turbulence into triumph.


Ready to test the theory? Share a snippet of your angry‑or‑confused‑inspired work in the comments below. Let’s turn the collective noise into a chorus of brilliant ideas. 🚀

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 53/53

Days 52 and 53 – Writing exercise

You wake up in a room, a note on the mirror, a whole new identity, and a card with my new name on it.

I went to bed Thursday night after a few drinks at the Fox and Hounds with a half dozen or so lads who were having a Stag night for James Aloysius Corbey, the groom-to-be on Saturday.

That’s the first thing I remembered when I woke up the next morning, slightly hungover and vague.  About where I was, and who I was.

Because I woke up in a place I didn’t sleep.  The walls of the room were wallpapered, not painted; the roof was ornate plasterwork, not plain; and the main light was a chandelier, not a round plastic light found at IKEA.

As for the curtains, well, by that time I was beginning to think something was terribly wrong, like the Stag party boys had moved me to another hotel as a practical joke.

A quick glance sideways almost gave me a sign of relief, they had not planted a dead body, or worse, one of the three girls that turned up halfway into the session and ‘performed’ for the Stag.

I hoped his wife would never be found out.  Perhaps that was why they chose to be at least 50 miles away from his town. 

A sheet of paper on the bedside table told me I was in Morden, wherever that was.  Scrawled hurriedly was a note, “pack up your old life and put it in the suitcase, you are no longer that person”.

I shrugged.

It was a condition of joining the service that you left your old life behind.  It wouldn’t be that hard; my old life wasn’t a life; I had just been going through the motions. 

I hadn’t quite considered the ramifications of the change, but now that it was a reality, it wasn’t that hard. 

Out of curiosity, I looked out the window.  It overlooked the lane outside the hotel.  It looked almost like an anonymous suburban house.

I went to the closet, and my clothes were hanging up, the suitcase was on the rack, and yesterday’s clothes were in a laundry bag.  I quickly attended to cleaning the room of any evidence I’d been there.

Then I went into the bathroom, and everything was laid out, like I would have.  The only thing out of place was a handwritten note tacked to the mirror.

Written in spidery but neat cursive script, the calligraphy of a woman rather than a man.  It was neat and just readable.

Jack,

That is your name now, Jack Williamson.  The rest of your details are in an envelope in the drawer beside the bed.  Memorise them and destroy the paperwork in the usual manner. 

Your mission is to find Eloise Margarethe Anderson.

Your new cell phone has an untraceable email with the details of her disappearance.  There is a backpack under the bed with everything you will need. 

You will be contacted in due course, but if you have information or require research assistance, there is a number to call.  It will not be answered; it is for text messages only. 

Good luck.

Unsigned, which was no surprise.

There was a slight aroma of a familiar scent, the sort a woman would use, and I tried to remember who she was.

Tried.  The weight of the previous evening still hung over my head.  Thinking wasn’t easy, so I went and stood under the cold water for a few minutes to wash the cobwebs away.

I should have expected this.

Having graduated, if it could be called that, from training, the sort that taught you skills that most people would never need, and watching a large percentage of the other candidates wash out one by one, I made it to the last ten.

We were told we would learn whether we succeeded or failed within the week, and that we should go home and wait.  That had been five weeks ago, and I was sure I had failed.

Apparently, I had not failed.

Or this was a final test.  A final final test.

It bothered me that I could be transported from one place to another and know absolutely nothing about it.  According to one of the instructors, if that happened, you were as good as dead. 

Had it happened in a real-life situation, I would be.

So, after half an hour, dressed and compus mentus, just the thought of what had happened scared me.  We had been told to be on our guard the whole time, and I had not.

I pulled out the backpack, retrieved the file, discovered Jack Williamson was not the greatest of characters, and that the missing girl was no one of consequence, just someone’s daughter who went to London for a friend’s party and was never seen again.  She was reported missing. The police kept the file open for a month but found nothing substantive. The evidence pointed to the fact that she had purposely left the party. They tracked her to Waterloo Station, where she was met by a young man, and they disappeared into the underground.

They did not get on a train, underground or overground, and did not leave the station, at least as far as CCTV could see.  Conclusion: she did not want to be found.  The meeting at Waterloo was planned, and the man was known to her.  There were photos of her and the man, both identified.  There was a copy of the police file, and it showed they’d gone the extra mile.

Why?

Something didn’t add up.

I guess that was why it had become my first, and quite possibly last, mission.

….

The hotel was a few minutes from Morden underground station and then to Waterloo.  I didn’t waste time thinking about the how or the why of getting there; I figured that it was their way of saying that whatever you had before was gone, this is how it’s going to be, a different place, a different name, a different case.

There was no one at the hotel to ask, and even if there had been, I was sure any questions would be met with blank expressions and no information forthcoming.  It was probably a safe house.

Going out the front door, having seen up one from my room to the foyer, and after dropping the room key in the box provided for self-checkout, I saw an elderly couple going in as I went out.

“Good morning for a walk,” the lady said.

“Sounds like a good idea,”  I said, holding the door open for them, then heading off.

It was a short walk to the station, then a short wait for the Northern Line train.  I had enough time to read up on Waterloo Station, its entrances and exits, and some interesting station plans.

There was an interview with the girl’s father; her mother had left a few years earlier, abandoning them both for a work colleague.  The ex-wife did not paint the husband in a good light, subject to bouts of unemployment, heavy drinking, and domestic violence.  An interesting question, why leave a young girl in his care?

The neighbours didn’t see him much, not since his wife left, and said that he had changed.  The girl had been taken into child care, but he had managed to get her released into his custody on probation.  Nothing had happened until she disappeared.

If things were all right at home, why would she just up and leave?  He would not have let her go to the party if he didn’t trust her.

There was a document listing social media profiles found by the IT specialist assigned to the case, for the girl, her friends, particularly the one she went to the party with, and several email accounts for the father, mother and the two girls.

There was another, for the man she went to meet at Waterloo station.  The last message he received and the last message she sent told Jim which train she was on and the estimated arrival time.  After that, both phones went dead and hadn’t been reactivated.

I had photos of the two the last time they were picked up by CCTV, at the end of the Northern line arrival platform at Waterloo.

It was my starting point

Standing at the end of the platform, I looked up and saw the camera that had recorded their presence.  Behind me was the dark tunnel, and while they could have escaped that way, it was unlikely.  The CCTV would have been monitored, and they would not have got far.

I sat down at the very end, the last seat, and looked at the photograph.  Nothing special.  It was just one blurry shot taken from the continuous feed.

I sent a message to the email on the phone, “Can I see any CCTV footage relevant to the two at the end of the platform?” And waited.

In an idle moment, I loaded the Times crossword and started filling it in.

Five minutes, a reply, “Yes.”  There was an attachment, and I opened it.  Three minutes, walking to the end, talking, sitting, exactly where I was sitting, then getting up and retracing their steps, just as a train arrived and a lot of people got off.  That was where the CCTV lost track of them.

But…

Why were they sitting here?

Out of curiosity, I felt under the seat, expecting to find old chewing gum, but instead found two cell phones tucked under the metal fold, held in place by double-sided tape.

I made sure that anyone watching the current CCTV would not realise what I was doing.  I was going to assume they’d either thrown them on the tracks to be smashed or tossed them in a rubbish bin.

Not leave them to be retrieved. And if they did leave them, expecting to retrieve them, why hadn’t they come back?

They would be dead now, and I would have to recharge them.  It didn’t explain how they disappeared.

But on the way up to the main overland concourse, I checked all the CCTV locations against those labelled on the plan.  Three were missing, or at the very least, I couldn’t find them.

Three that would make it easy for them to leave without being noticed.  Having lost them at the station, they checked the CCTV footage outside it, but there were gaps.

I sent another email asking for CCTV coverage at any location for the exit near the three missing cameras.  This time it took 15 minutes. There was a reply, but no sign of them, and there was a black hold.

10 more minutes, I received another message and a file.  The file showed, a half hour later, what might have been the girl and man getting into a taxi.  Different clothes, hats hiding their faces, the man with a backpack.  Nothing conclusive, just a feeling.  There was a taxi registration and where it could be found.

I found a three-star hotel and checked in.  On the way from the station, I found a shop selling chargers for the two cell phones, and my first job was to charge them.

By the time the two phones were charged, I had the cab’s location and the driver’s number; the driver was an owner who went home at the end of his shift.  He would be there first thing in the morning, and so would I.

As Detective Inspector Strange, or so it said on the warrant card, with a rather interesting photo of my face.  Someone had assumed it might need one.

The phones were password-protected, but then entering the notebook computer solved that small problem.  I’d expected a treasure trove of data, and was immediately disappointed except…

On the man’s phone, photos showed the locations of the CCTV cameras that issued the alerts and a set of images charting a course around the dark spots.

Those photos were from a month ago, so was this disappearance planned? And planned meticulously.  There were no other messages, and the call histories on both phones had been erased except for her last call and one from his phone.

I sent it to my invisible assistant, and it came back with a surprise.  The number belonged to the cab driver who picked them up.  I went back to the CCTV footage and realised the taxi had been waiting for them to appear as they came out of the exit, not hailed by the man.

This was too easy.  How had the police failed to see what I was seeing?  Back to the police file, it seemed once they lost track of them in the station, they had only done a cursory check shortly after they disappeared, thinking they’d head straight for the exits.  They hadn’t.  They had found a place to change, away from prying eyes.

With a few hours to wait for the taxi driver to come off shift, I put my head down to get some rest.

I was woken several hours later by the vibration of the cell phone warning me of an incoming message.

It showed the taxi’s track from the time it picked up the two, including the stops it made afterwards.  It was an address in Guildford, Surrey, about 40 miles away.

A car had been ordered and would be out front of the hotel in an hour. I was to proceed with caution in establishing whether the two were in the house and to report back.

Once again, while washing the cobwebs away, I had to think that this was too easy, that there was something I was missing. The police would have gone through the same processes I had.

I took my time getting there, then parked some distance from the house. It was exposed, and they would see me coming, especially if someone was watching from the upstairs windows. If I had to make an assessment, it would be ideal. More importantly, in an emergency, they could get away quickly without being seen from the front of the house.

It wasn’t a random selection. A lot of thought had gone into this disappearance.

So, given the circumstances, I decided to drive to the front of the house and walk straight to the front door, with purpose, giving the impression I had a purpose to be there.

When I got out of the car, a curtain moved in a window from the house over the road, and I thought I saw movement in the upstairs window. No hesitation, I headed towards the front door, waited for a few seconds while I pretended to check my phone, then knocked, not forcefully, but loud enough for them to hear.

Nothing. No movement, no sounds behind the door.

Don’t knock again too soon and sound impatient. I waited, then knocked again. The same tempo. Not in a hurry.

This time, there were sounds from behind the door, then, with a flourish, it opened.

“Hello, Jack. Come on in.”

I tried not to look surprised. How did these people know I would be turning up on their doorstep? Unless…

The girl and the man were sitting in two chairs opposite someone I instantly recognised.

One of my instructors. The one who had supervised my final test. The one who gave no inkling as to what he was thinking, or believed in giving feedback.

“You’ll be pleased to know that eight out of ten candidates fail this test. It proved to us that you can find people who don’t want to be found. The thing is, we were not sure if the measures we put in place to protect these people were sufficient, and they are not.

But, more to the point, we now want you to find Eloise’s mother, Margarethe. The files will be sent to your phone imminently. In the meantime, a hotel has been booked for you at Heathrow, and you are booked on a flight to Vienna. ” He stood. “Well done. Now, off you go. Progress reports as per protocol.”

I got to sit down for all of five minutes.

Vienna! Wiener Schnitzel and Apfelstrudel. If there was time.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 53/53

Days 52 and 53 – Writing exercise

You wake up in a room, a note on the mirror, a whole new identity, and a card with my new name on it.

I went to bed Thursday night after a few drinks at the Fox and Hounds with a half dozen or so lads who were having a Stag night for James Aloysius Corbey, the groom-to-be on Saturday.

That’s the first thing I remembered when I woke up the next morning, slightly hungover and vague.  About where I was, and who I was.

Because I woke up in a place I didn’t sleep.  The walls of the room were wallpapered, not painted; the roof was ornate plasterwork, not plain; and the main light was a chandelier, not a round plastic light found at IKEA.

As for the curtains, well, by that time I was beginning to think something was terribly wrong, like the Stag party boys had moved me to another hotel as a practical joke.

A quick glance sideways almost gave me a sign of relief, they had not planted a dead body, or worse, one of the three girls that turned up halfway into the session and ‘performed’ for the Stag.

I hoped his wife would never be found out.  Perhaps that was why they chose to be at least 50 miles away from his town. 

A sheet of paper on the bedside table told me I was in Morden, wherever that was.  Scrawled hurriedly was a note, “pack up your old life and put it in the suitcase, you are no longer that person”.

I shrugged.

It was a condition of joining the service that you left your old life behind.  It wouldn’t be that hard; my old life wasn’t a life; I had just been going through the motions. 

I hadn’t quite considered the ramifications of the change, but now that it was a reality, it wasn’t that hard. 

Out of curiosity, I looked out the window.  It overlooked the lane outside the hotel.  It looked almost like an anonymous suburban house.

I went to the closet, and my clothes were hanging up, the suitcase was on the rack, and yesterday’s clothes were in a laundry bag.  I quickly attended to cleaning the room of any evidence I’d been there.

Then I went into the bathroom, and everything was laid out, like I would have.  The only thing out of place was a handwritten note tacked to the mirror.

Written in spidery but neat cursive script, the calligraphy of a woman rather than a man.  It was neat and just readable.

Jack,

That is your name now, Jack Williamson.  The rest of your details are in an envelope in the drawer beside the bed.  Memorise them and destroy the paperwork in the usual manner. 

Your mission is to find Eloise Margarethe Anderson.

Your new cell phone has an untraceable email with the details of her disappearance.  There is a backpack under the bed with everything you will need. 

You will be contacted in due course, but if you have information or require research assistance, there is a number to call.  It will not be answered; it is for text messages only. 

Good luck.

Unsigned, which was no surprise.

There was a slight aroma of a familiar scent, the sort a woman would use, and I tried to remember who she was.

Tried.  The weight of the previous evening still hung over my head.  Thinking wasn’t easy, so I went and stood under the cold water for a few minutes to wash the cobwebs away.

I should have expected this.

Having graduated, if it could be called that, from training, the sort that taught you skills that most people would never need, and watching a large percentage of the other candidates wash out one by one, I made it to the last ten.

We were told we would learn whether we succeeded or failed within the week, and that we should go home and wait.  That had been five weeks ago, and I was sure I had failed.

Apparently, I had not failed.

Or this was a final test.  A final final test.

It bothered me that I could be transported from one place to another and know absolutely nothing about it.  According to one of the instructors, if that happened, you were as good as dead. 

Had it happened in a real-life situation, I would be.

So, after half an hour, dressed and compus mentus, just the thought of what had happened scared me.  We had been told to be on our guard the whole time, and I had not.

I pulled out the backpack, retrieved the file, discovered Jack Williamson was not the greatest of characters, and that the missing girl was no one of consequence, just someone’s daughter who went to London for a friend’s party and was never seen again.  She was reported missing. The police kept the file open for a month but found nothing substantive. The evidence pointed to the fact that she had purposely left the party. They tracked her to Waterloo Station, where she was met by a young man, and they disappeared into the underground.

They did not get on a train, underground or overground, and did not leave the station, at least as far as CCTV could see.  Conclusion: she did not want to be found.  The meeting at Waterloo was planned, and the man was known to her.  There were photos of her and the man, both identified.  There was a copy of the police file, and it showed they’d gone the extra mile.

Why?

Something didn’t add up.

I guess that was why it had become my first, and quite possibly last, mission.

….

The hotel was a few minutes from Morden underground station and then to Waterloo.  I didn’t waste time thinking about the how or the why of getting there; I figured that it was their way of saying that whatever you had before was gone, this is how it’s going to be, a different place, a different name, a different case.

There was no one at the hotel to ask, and even if there had been, I was sure any questions would be met with blank expressions and no information forthcoming.  It was probably a safe house.

Going out the front door, having seen up one from my room to the foyer, and after dropping the room key in the box provided for self-checkout, I saw an elderly couple going in as I went out.

“Good morning for a walk,” the lady said.

“Sounds like a good idea,”  I said, holding the door open for them, then heading off.

It was a short walk to the station, then a short wait for the Northern Line train.  I had enough time to read up on Waterloo Station, its entrances and exits, and some interesting station plans.

There was an interview with the girl’s father; her mother had left a few years earlier, abandoning them both for a work colleague.  The ex-wife did not paint the husband in a good light, subject to bouts of unemployment, heavy drinking, and domestic violence.  An interesting question, why leave a young girl in his care?

The neighbours didn’t see him much, not since his wife left, and said that he had changed.  The girl had been taken into child care, but he had managed to get her released into his custody on probation.  Nothing had happened until she disappeared.

If things were all right at home, why would she just up and leave?  He would not have let her go to the party if he didn’t trust her.

There was a document listing social media profiles found by the IT specialist assigned to the case, for the girl, her friends, particularly the one she went to the party with, and several email accounts for the father, mother and the two girls.

There was another, for the man she went to meet at Waterloo station.  The last message he received and the last message she sent told Jim which train she was on and the estimated arrival time.  After that, both phones went dead and hadn’t been reactivated.

I had photos of the two the last time they were picked up by CCTV, at the end of the Northern line arrival platform at Waterloo.

It was my starting point

Standing at the end of the platform, I looked up and saw the camera that had recorded their presence.  Behind me was the dark tunnel, and while they could have escaped that way, it was unlikely.  The CCTV would have been monitored, and they would not have got far.

I sat down at the very end, the last seat, and looked at the photograph.  Nothing special.  It was just one blurry shot taken from the continuous feed.

I sent a message to the email on the phone, “Can I see any CCTV footage relevant to the two at the end of the platform?” And waited.

In an idle moment, I loaded the Times crossword and started filling it in.

Five minutes, a reply, “Yes.”  There was an attachment, and I opened it.  Three minutes, walking to the end, talking, sitting, exactly where I was sitting, then getting up and retracing their steps, just as a train arrived and a lot of people got off.  That was where the CCTV lost track of them.

But…

Why were they sitting here?

Out of curiosity, I felt under the seat, expecting to find old chewing gum, but instead found two cell phones tucked under the metal fold, held in place by double-sided tape.

I made sure that anyone watching the current CCTV would not realise what I was doing.  I was going to assume they’d either thrown them on the tracks to be smashed or tossed them in a rubbish bin.

Not leave them to be retrieved. And if they did leave them, expecting to retrieve them, why hadn’t they come back?

They would be dead now, and I would have to recharge them.  It didn’t explain how they disappeared.

But on the way up to the main overland concourse, I checked all the CCTV locations against those labelled on the plan.  Three were missing, or at the very least, I couldn’t find them.

Three that would make it easy for them to leave without being noticed.  Having lost them at the station, they checked the CCTV footage outside it, but there were gaps.

I sent another email asking for CCTV coverage at any location for the exit near the three missing cameras.  This time it took 15 minutes. There was a reply, but no sign of them, and there was a black hold.

10 more minutes, I received another message and a file.  The file showed, a half hour later, what might have been the girl and man getting into a taxi.  Different clothes, hats hiding their faces, the man with a backpack.  Nothing conclusive, just a feeling.  There was a taxi registration and where it could be found.

I found a three-star hotel and checked in.  On the way from the station, I found a shop selling chargers for the two cell phones, and my first job was to charge them.

By the time the two phones were charged, I had the cab’s location and the driver’s number; the driver was an owner who went home at the end of his shift.  He would be there first thing in the morning, and so would I.

As Detective Inspector Strange, or so it said on the warrant card, with a rather interesting photo of my face.  Someone had assumed it might need one.

The phones were password-protected, but then entering the notebook computer solved that small problem.  I’d expected a treasure trove of data, and was immediately disappointed except…

On the man’s phone, photos showed the locations of the CCTV cameras that issued the alerts and a set of images charting a course around the dark spots.

Those photos were from a month ago, so was this disappearance planned? And planned meticulously.  There were no other messages, and the call histories on both phones had been erased except for her last call and one from his phone.

I sent it to my invisible assistant, and it came back with a surprise.  The number belonged to the cab driver who picked them up.  I went back to the CCTV footage and realised the taxi had been waiting for them to appear as they came out of the exit, not hailed by the man.

This was too easy.  How had the police failed to see what I was seeing?  Back to the police file, it seemed once they lost track of them in the station, they had only done a cursory check shortly after they disappeared, thinking they’d head straight for the exits.  They hadn’t.  They had found a place to change, away from prying eyes.

With a few hours to wait for the taxi driver to come off shift, I put my head down to get some rest.

I was woken several hours later by the vibration of the cell phone warning me of an incoming message.

It showed the taxi’s track from the time it picked up the two, including the stops it made afterwards.  It was an address in Guildford, Surrey, about 40 miles away.

A car had been ordered and would be out front of the hotel in an hour. I was to proceed with caution in establishing whether the two were in the house and to report back.

Once again, while washing the cobwebs away, I had to think that this was too easy, that there was something I was missing. The police would have gone through the same processes I had.

I took my time getting there, then parked some distance from the house. It was exposed, and they would see me coming, especially if someone was watching from the upstairs windows. If I had to make an assessment, it would be ideal. More importantly, in an emergency, they could get away quickly without being seen from the front of the house.

It wasn’t a random selection. A lot of thought had gone into this disappearance.

So, given the circumstances, I decided to drive to the front of the house and walk straight to the front door, with purpose, giving the impression I had a purpose to be there.

When I got out of the car, a curtain moved in a window from the house over the road, and I thought I saw movement in the upstairs window. No hesitation, I headed towards the front door, waited for a few seconds while I pretended to check my phone, then knocked, not forcefully, but loud enough for them to hear.

Nothing. No movement, no sounds behind the door.

Don’t knock again too soon and sound impatient. I waited, then knocked again. The same tempo. Not in a hurry.

This time, there were sounds from behind the door, then, with a flourish, it opened.

“Hello, Jack. Come on in.”

I tried not to look surprised. How did these people know I would be turning up on their doorstep? Unless…

The girl and the man were sitting in two chairs opposite someone I instantly recognised.

One of my instructors. The one who had supervised my final test. The one who gave no inkling as to what he was thinking, or believed in giving feedback.

“You’ll be pleased to know that eight out of ten candidates fail this test. It proved to us that you can find people who don’t want to be found. The thing is, we were not sure if the measures we put in place to protect these people were sufficient, and they are not.

But, more to the point, we now want you to find Eloise’s mother, Margarethe. The files will be sent to your phone imminently. In the meantime, a hotel has been booked for you at Heathrow, and you are booked on a flight to Vienna. ” He stood. “Well done. Now, off you go. Progress reports as per protocol.”

I got to sit down for all of five minutes.

Vienna! Wiener Schnitzel and Apfelstrudel. If there was time.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – My second story 8

More about my second novel

Today we are in Bratislava, Slovakia.

John has found Zoe after playing a little cat and mouse in the streets near the hotel. Back at the hotel, they just get back to the room when a member of Worthington’s hit team arrives and comes off second best.

Of course, the rest are stationed at the obvious exits, and it takes some effort to get away.

Even that escape is fraught with danger, but with all the cunning she can muster, Zoe makes sure they get back to Vienna.

With Worthington’s hit team hot on their trail, a diversion at the main railway station helps aid their departure.

By now, two things are certain:

Worthington is behind the latest attempted hit, and they are both in the firing line, and

John had to decide whether or not he wanted a life always looking over his shoulder.

No prizes for guessing his choice!

We’re still in Bratislava with Zoe, making a few repairs, having been injured in the getaway from the hotel, where bullets were flying around indiscriminately.

In a nondescript hotel near a railway station, the favourite accommodation for assassins, maybe, there’s enough time for John to get the message that Zoe is not happy with him bringing along a hit squad.

And, they’re on the news, that is to say, they know who it is that’s on the news; the blurry figures are too indistinct for anyone else to identify them. It was disconcerting to be called criminals fleeing the scene of a crime.

Back in London, Sebastian is about to have a set-to with Worthington, who has decided that Sebastian is too close and might compromise his black op, so he’s sending him to Paris.

Here, we learn that Sebastian has both Isobel and Rupert locked in the basement cells, awaiting interrogation, and that Worthington orders him to send them home.

Of course, Sebastian is not going to do anything of the sort.

He knows they know where John is, and by implication, where Zoe is, and wants to know.

In the first edit, I suspect I will have to mention Sebastian ‘arresting’ Rupert and Isobel just to keep continuity, and no unfathomable surprises later on.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – My second story 8

More about my second novel

Today we are in Bratislava, Slovakia.

John has found Zoe after playing a little cat and mouse in the streets near the hotel. Back at the hotel, they just get back to the room when a member of Worthington’s hit team arrives and comes off second best.

Of course, the rest are stationed at the obvious exits, and it takes some effort to get away.

Even that escape is fraught with danger, but with all the cunning she can muster, Zoe makes sure they get back to Vienna.

With Worthington’s hit team hot on their trail, a diversion at the main railway station helps aid their departure.

By now, two things are certain:

Worthington is behind the latest attempted hit, and they are both in the firing line, and

John had to decide whether or not he wanted a life always looking over his shoulder.

No prizes for guessing his choice!

We’re still in Bratislava with Zoe, making a few repairs, having been injured in the getaway from the hotel, where bullets were flying around indiscriminately.

In a nondescript hotel near a railway station, the favourite accommodation for assassins, maybe, there’s enough time for John to get the message that Zoe is not happy with him bringing along a hit squad.

And, they’re on the news, that is to say, they know who it is that’s on the news; the blurry figures are too indistinct for anyone else to identify them. It was disconcerting to be called criminals fleeing the scene of a crime.

Back in London, Sebastian is about to have a set-to with Worthington, who has decided that Sebastian is too close and might compromise his black op, so he’s sending him to Paris.

Here, we learn that Sebastian has both Isobel and Rupert locked in the basement cells, awaiting interrogation, and that Worthington orders him to send them home.

Of course, Sebastian is not going to do anything of the sort.

He knows they know where John is, and by implication, where Zoe is, and wants to know.

In the first edit, I suspect I will have to mention Sebastian ‘arresting’ Rupert and Isobel just to keep continuity, and no unfathomable surprises later on.

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 51

Day 51 – The Power of Silence

The Power of Silence: Why Saying Less Can Make Your Interviews—and Your Writing—Far More Compelling

“Silence is a source of great strength.” — Lao Tzu

In a world that rewards constant chatter, it’s easy to forget that the most memorable moments often happen when nobody is speaking. Whether you’re sitting across from a subject in a face‑to‑face interview or watching a scene unfold on the page, strategic silence can turn good material into something unforgettable.

In this post, we’ll explore:

  1. Why silence works – the psychological and narrative reasons it matters.
  2. Interview tactics – how to harness pauses, breathing space, and non‑verbal cues.
  3. Writing tricks – letting characters speak for themselves and using “silence” in prose.
  4. Common pitfalls – what to avoid when you try to be “quiet”.

Grab a notebook (or a blank document) and let the quiet speak to you.


1. The Science Behind the Pause

What Happens When You’re SilentWhy It Helps Your Audience
The brain fills in gaps – humans love pattern‑completion.Listeners/readers become active participants, constructing meaning in the spaces you leave.
Emotional intensity rises – a pause creates tension.The audience anticipates what comes next, sharpening focus on the upcoming reveal.
Trust is built – you’re not trying to steer the conversation.Interviewees feel heard, while readers sense authentic, unmanipulated dialogue.
Memory retention improves – novelty stands out.Unusual moments (a lingering silence) stick in the mind longer than a flood of words.

In short, silence is not “nothing”; it’s a catalyst that amplifies whatever follows it.


2. Interview Techniques: Let the Interviewee Own the Story

a. The “Goldilocks” Pause

  • What it is: A deliberate, 2‑5‑second silence right after a question or a key statement.
  • Why it works: It gives the interviewee mental space to think, often coaxing deeper, less rehearsed answers.
  • How to practice:
    1. Ask a question.
    2. Resist the urge to fill the void with “uh‑uh” or “so…”.
    3. Count silently (1‑2‑3…) and then listen.

Example – Instead of “What made you decide to start the company?” followed immediately by “And how did you fund it?”, try:
“What made you decide to start the company?” (pause) “Take your time.” (pause again) …and you’ll hear the story unfold organically.

b. Mirror the Body Language

  • Technique: Nod, maintain an open posture, and let the interviewee see you’re engaged without speaking.
  • Result: Non‑verbal affirmation often encourages the interviewee to keep talking, turning a silence into a “safe‑space” signal.

c. Avoid “Filler” Questions

  • Bad habit: “Do you like that?” or “Is that right?” after every answer.
  • Better approach: Let the previous answer breathe. If you need clarification, phrase it as a reflection: “So you’re saying…?” – then pause.

d. The “Quiet Re‑Ask”

When you need deeper detail, repeat the last few words of the interviewee’s answer, then stay silent.

Interviewee: “We had to scrap the original design.”
You: “Scrap the original design…?” (silence)
Result: The interviewee often fills in the missing “why” or “how”.


3. Writing Tricks: Let Your Characters Speak for Themselves

a. Show, Don’t Tell—Through Silence

  • Scene: A mother and her teenage son sit across a kitchen table after a heated argument.
  • Traditional “telling”: “She was angry, and he felt guilty.”
  • Silence‑driven “showing”:The spoon clinked against the porcelain, a rhythm that grew louder as the minutes stretched. She stared at the steam rising from her tea; he stared at the chipped edge of his mug. No one said a word.

The absence of dialogue forces the reader to infer the tension.

b. Use “Silent Beats” Between Dialogue

  • Why: They act like punctuation, letting readers absorb what was just said.
  • How: Insert a line break or a brief description of a character’s reaction.

“I’m leaving,” she whispered.

The rain thumped against the window, louder than any goodbye.

The beat gives weight to the line, turning a simple statement into a moment of finality.

c. Let Characters “Fill In Their Own Gaps”

If you give a character an ambiguous line, resist the temptation to explain it for them. Trust the reader’s imagination.

“You remember what happened that night?”

He nodded, eyes flicking to the empty doorway.

Notice we never tell the reader what he remembers. The silence invites speculation, creating deeper engagement.

d. Narrative “Silence” — The Unspoken Backstory

Sometimes the silence isn’t a pause in dialogue but a gap in the narrative. Let background details emerge gradually, through hints rather than exposition.

  • Technique: Drop a prop, a habit, or a scar and let the audience wonder.
  • Result: The story feels lived‑in, like a real person who has a past you’re only glimpsing.

4. Pitfalls to Avoid

PitfallWhy It Undermines SilenceQuick Fix
Filling gaps with narrationOver‑explaining robs the reader of agency.Use concise, vivid images instead of exposition.
Awkward, overly long pausesCan feel uncomfortable, breaking immersion.Keep silent beats purposeful—2–5 seconds in interviews, a line break or two in prose.
Assuming silence = boredomSome people mistake quiet for lack of content.Prepare with strong questions or scene stakes; silence will then feel intentional.
Using silence to avoid the tough questionLeads to shallow interviews/writing.Embrace uncomfortable topics; let the pause draw them out.

5. A Mini‑Exercise to Practice “Silence”

  1. Interview: Conduct a 5‑minute conversation with a friend about a memorable childhood event. After each question, count to five silently before responding. Record the exchange. Notice how the answers become richer.
  2. Write: Draft a scene (150–200 words) in which two characters meet after years apart. Include at least three silent beats—one before dialogue, one in the middle, one after. Compare the emotional impact to a version where the conversation is nonstop.

6. Takeaway: Silence Is Your Secret Superpower

  • In interviews, silence is a listening tool that invites deeper, unfiltered storytelling.
  • In writing, silence is a structural device that lets characters own their voice and readers fill in the emotional blanks.

When you deliberately step back—whether from a microphone or a keyboard—you create space for authenticity to breathe. And in that breath lies the resonance that makes an interview memorable and a story unforgettable.

Next time you feel the urge to fill the void, pause. Let the silence do the heavy lifting.


Ready to try it? Share your silent‑beat experiment in the comments below. I’d love to hear how a simple pause transformed your interview or manuscript!

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 51

Day 51 – The Power of Silence

The Power of Silence: Why Saying Less Can Make Your Interviews—and Your Writing—Far More Compelling

“Silence is a source of great strength.” — Lao Tzu

In a world that rewards constant chatter, it’s easy to forget that the most memorable moments often happen when nobody is speaking. Whether you’re sitting across from a subject in a face‑to‑face interview or watching a scene unfold on the page, strategic silence can turn good material into something unforgettable.

In this post, we’ll explore:

  1. Why silence works – the psychological and narrative reasons it matters.
  2. Interview tactics – how to harness pauses, breathing space, and non‑verbal cues.
  3. Writing tricks – letting characters speak for themselves and using “silence” in prose.
  4. Common pitfalls – what to avoid when you try to be “quiet”.

Grab a notebook (or a blank document) and let the quiet speak to you.


1. The Science Behind the Pause

What Happens When You’re SilentWhy It Helps Your Audience
The brain fills in gaps – humans love pattern‑completion.Listeners/readers become active participants, constructing meaning in the spaces you leave.
Emotional intensity rises – a pause creates tension.The audience anticipates what comes next, sharpening focus on the upcoming reveal.
Trust is built – you’re not trying to steer the conversation.Interviewees feel heard, while readers sense authentic, unmanipulated dialogue.
Memory retention improves – novelty stands out.Unusual moments (a lingering silence) stick in the mind longer than a flood of words.

In short, silence is not “nothing”; it’s a catalyst that amplifies whatever follows it.


2. Interview Techniques: Let the Interviewee Own the Story

a. The “Goldilocks” Pause

  • What it is: A deliberate, 2‑5‑second silence right after a question or a key statement.
  • Why it works: It gives the interviewee mental space to think, often coaxing deeper, less rehearsed answers.
  • How to practice:
    1. Ask a question.
    2. Resist the urge to fill the void with “uh‑uh” or “so…”.
    3. Count silently (1‑2‑3…) and then listen.

Example – Instead of “What made you decide to start the company?” followed immediately by “And how did you fund it?”, try:
“What made you decide to start the company?” (pause) “Take your time.” (pause again) …and you’ll hear the story unfold organically.

b. Mirror the Body Language

  • Technique: Nod, maintain an open posture, and let the interviewee see you’re engaged without speaking.
  • Result: Non‑verbal affirmation often encourages the interviewee to keep talking, turning a silence into a “safe‑space” signal.

c. Avoid “Filler” Questions

  • Bad habit: “Do you like that?” or “Is that right?” after every answer.
  • Better approach: Let the previous answer breathe. If you need clarification, phrase it as a reflection: “So you’re saying…?” – then pause.

d. The “Quiet Re‑Ask”

When you need deeper detail, repeat the last few words of the interviewee’s answer, then stay silent.

Interviewee: “We had to scrap the original design.”
You: “Scrap the original design…?” (silence)
Result: The interviewee often fills in the missing “why” or “how”.


3. Writing Tricks: Let Your Characters Speak for Themselves

a. Show, Don’t Tell—Through Silence

  • Scene: A mother and her teenage son sit across a kitchen table after a heated argument.
  • Traditional “telling”: “She was angry, and he felt guilty.”
  • Silence‑driven “showing”:The spoon clinked against the porcelain, a rhythm that grew louder as the minutes stretched. She stared at the steam rising from her tea; he stared at the chipped edge of his mug. No one said a word.

The absence of dialogue forces the reader to infer the tension.

b. Use “Silent Beats” Between Dialogue

  • Why: They act like punctuation, letting readers absorb what was just said.
  • How: Insert a line break or a brief description of a character’s reaction.

“I’m leaving,” she whispered.

The rain thumped against the window, louder than any goodbye.

The beat gives weight to the line, turning a simple statement into a moment of finality.

c. Let Characters “Fill In Their Own Gaps”

If you give a character an ambiguous line, resist the temptation to explain it for them. Trust the reader’s imagination.

“You remember what happened that night?”

He nodded, eyes flicking to the empty doorway.

Notice we never tell the reader what he remembers. The silence invites speculation, creating deeper engagement.

d. Narrative “Silence” — The Unspoken Backstory

Sometimes the silence isn’t a pause in dialogue but a gap in the narrative. Let background details emerge gradually, through hints rather than exposition.

  • Technique: Drop a prop, a habit, or a scar and let the audience wonder.
  • Result: The story feels lived‑in, like a real person who has a past you’re only glimpsing.

4. Pitfalls to Avoid

PitfallWhy It Undermines SilenceQuick Fix
Filling gaps with narrationOver‑explaining robs the reader of agency.Use concise, vivid images instead of exposition.
Awkward, overly long pausesCan feel uncomfortable, breaking immersion.Keep silent beats purposeful—2–5 seconds in interviews, a line break or two in prose.
Assuming silence = boredomSome people mistake quiet for lack of content.Prepare with strong questions or scene stakes; silence will then feel intentional.
Using silence to avoid the tough questionLeads to shallow interviews/writing.Embrace uncomfortable topics; let the pause draw them out.

5. A Mini‑Exercise to Practice “Silence”

  1. Interview: Conduct a 5‑minute conversation with a friend about a memorable childhood event. After each question, count to five silently before responding. Record the exchange. Notice how the answers become richer.
  2. Write: Draft a scene (150–200 words) in which two characters meet after years apart. Include at least three silent beats—one before dialogue, one in the middle, one after. Compare the emotional impact to a version where the conversation is nonstop.

6. Takeaway: Silence Is Your Secret Superpower

  • In interviews, silence is a listening tool that invites deeper, unfiltered storytelling.
  • In writing, silence is a structural device that lets characters own their voice and readers fill in the emotional blanks.

When you deliberately step back—whether from a microphone or a keyboard—you create space for authenticity to breathe. And in that breath lies the resonance that makes an interview memorable and a story unforgettable.

Next time you feel the urge to fill the void, pause. Let the silence do the heavy lifting.


Ready to try it? Share your silent‑beat experiment in the comments below. I’d love to hear how a simple pause transformed your interview or manuscript!

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 50

Day 50 – Bad poetry

When “Feeling” Becomes a Pitfall: Unpacking the Paradox of Bad Poetry

“All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling – to be natural is obvious, to be obvious is inartistic.”

It’s a line that sounds like a warning scrawled on the back of a notebook in a cramped dorm room, yet it manages to capture a timeless tension every poet — amateur or seasoned — wrestles with. How can something as sincere as genuine feeling produce poetry that feels flat, trite, or outright “bad”? Why does the very act of being “natural” sometimes devolve into being “obvious,” and why does that matter?

In this post, we’ll:

  1. Parse the quote – what does it really say?
  2. Explore why raw feeling can become a liability.
  3. Distinguish “natural” from “obvious.”
  4. Look at real‑world examples of both the curse and the cure.
  5. Offer practical steps for turning heartfelt material into artful poetry.

Grab a cup of tea, settle in, and let’s unpack the paradox that haunts any writer who’s ever tried to put a beating heart on a page.


1. The Quote in Plain English

All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling – to be natural is obvious, to be obvious is inartistic.

Break it down:

PhraseWhat it means (in everyday terms)
All bad poetry springs from genuine feelingMany poems that feel “bad” begin with a sincere emotional impulse. The poet isn’t faking; they truly care.
To be natural is obviousWhen a poet writes “naturally,” the language often lands exactly where you’d expect it—no surprise, no tension.
To be obvious is inartisticPoetry that states the obvious, that tells you exactly what you think you already know, fails to engage the reader’s imagination.

At its core, the statement warns against confusing emotional honesty with artistic success. A poem can be heartfelt and terrible if it leans on the feeling alone and never transforms it.


2. Why “Genuine Feeling” Can Produce Bad Poetry

a. Emotion is a Raw Material, Not a Finished Product

Feelings are like unrefined ore: rich, but still needing smelting. When a poet simply pours the ore onto the page, the result is heavy, unshaped, and often unpalatable.

Example: “I’m sad because my dog died. I miss him so much. I cry every night.”
That’s a statement of feeling, not a poem about feeling.

b. The Comfort Zone of the “I-Statement”

Writing “I feel ___” is a reflex. It’s comfortable because it bypasses the challenge of showing rather than telling. The poet leans on the reader’s empathy, assuming the raw confession will do the heavy lifting. Often, it doesn’t.

c. Cliché is the Natural Offspring of Unexamined Feeling

When we rely on our first, most immediate emotional response, we tend to reach for the language we already hear in the world around us. “Heartbreak” becomes “a broken heart,” “sadness” becomes “tears,” “love” becomes “a fire.” The result: a poem that sounds like the collective chorus of every greeting‑card writer that came before.


3. Natural vs. Obvious – How the Two Diverge

NaturalObvious
Feels inevitable – the word choice fits the image like a glove.Feels predictable – the reader sees the punchline before the line lands.
Leaves room for inference – the poem hints, implies, and trusts the reader to fill gaps.Leaves no gaps – the poem tells you everything, removing the reader’s agency.
Often uses fresh metaphor or unexpected syntax to convey a familiar feeling.Relies on familiar metaphor (e.g., “heart is a rose”) and straightforward diction.
Creates tension – the reader must stay awake to parse what the poem doesn’t say.Creates ease – the reader can skim without thinking.

In short: naturalness is the feeling of inevitability; obviousness is the feeling of inevitability without any surprise. Good poetry walks the line between the two, making the inevitable feel new.


4. Case Studies: When Feeling Wins, When It Loses

4.1 The “Bad” Example: A Straight‑forward Lament

My mother’s hand was warm,
Now she’s gone, my world is cold.
I miss her like the desert misses rain.

What went wrong?

  • Genuine feeling: The poet truly misses their mother.
  • Obvious language: “Warm,” “cold,” “desert misses rain” are all textbook opposites.
  • No transformation: The poem says, “I miss my mother,” without inventing a new way to show that loss.

4.2 The “Good” Example: Transformative Imagery

She left a kitchen with an empty kettle,
steam still curling in the hallway’s sigh—
a ghost of mornings that never boiled.

What works?

  • Genuine feeling: The poet feels the absence.
  • Natural but non‑obvious: The kettle, steam, and hallway become a metaphor for lingering presence.
  • Transformation: The everyday object becomes a vessel for grief, inviting the reader to taste the silence.

4.3 Why the Difference Matters

The good poem doesn’t tell you directly “I miss her.” It shows—through a half‑filled kettle and lingering steam—that the house (and the poet) is waiting for a ritual that will never happen again. The reader must assemble the emotional puzzle, which creates a deeper, more resonant experience.


5. Turning Genuine Feeling into Artful Poetry

If you’ve ever stared at a notebook full of raw emotions and wondered, “How do I make this poetry?” here are concrete strategies to move from feeling → natural → obvious into feeling → crafted → surprising.

1️⃣ Start with the Emotion, Then Step Back

  1. Write a journal entry (no rhyme, no meter, just the raw feeling).
  2. Read it aloud. Highlight any words or phrases that feel over‑used or too literal.
  3. Identify the core image: What concrete thing does this feeling actually look like, smell like, sound like?

2️⃣ Find a “Metaphorical Lens”

Instead of describing the feeling directly, ask:

  • What object carries a similar weight?
  • Which environment mirrors the internal climate?
  • What action could stand in for the emotional state?

Example: “Grief” becomes “a tide that refuses to recede.”

3️⃣ Play with Form to Force Freshness

  • Enjambment can keep the reader guessing.
  • Unexpected line breaks can shift emphasis.
  • A formal constraint (sonnet, villanelle, ghazal) demands you find fresh ways to fulfil a given structure, preventing the temptation to fall back on clichés.

4️⃣ Use “Defamiliarisation”

Coined by Russian formalist Viktor Shklovsky: make the familiar strange.
Instead of “cold night,” try “the sky’s iron‑clad sigh.”

This technique pushes the poem away from obviousness and back toward natural intrigue.

5️⃣ Invite the Reader to Participate

Leave a gap in the narrative. End a stanza on a half‑finished image, or pose a subtle question. The reader’s mind will work to fill that space, turning raw feeling into a collaborative experience.

6️⃣ Edit Ruthlessly for the “Obvious”

During revision, ask:

  • “Is this line the only way to express this idea?”
  • “What cliché does this echo? Can I replace it with a specific detail?”
  • “Does this line show the feeling, or just tell it?”

If the answer leans toward “tell,” rewrite.


6. The Bigger Picture: Art, Authenticity, and Audience

The quote we started with hints at a deeper philosophical conundrum: If poetry is meant to be an artistic rendering of truth, why does authenticity sometimes feel like a handicap?

  • The audience’s role – Readers come to poetry seeking not just to be understood but to be re‑imagined. A poem that merely mirrors their own feeling offers no new perspective.
  • The artist’s responsibility – The poet must translate—not transcribe—emotion. Translation entails choice, compression, and often, paradox.
  • Historical precedent – Think of Walt Whitman’s “I celebrate myself…” He starts with a personal confession, but he immediately expands that self into a universal, almost mythic, voice. The feeling is genuine, but it becomes a vehicle for something larger.

When poets manage this alchemy, the result is not only beautiful; it is transformative.


7. Quick Takeaways (For the Busy Writer)

ProblemWhy it HappensFix
“I’m sad, so I write sad words.”Overreliance on literal feeling.Find a concrete image that acts as a stand‑in for sadness.
“Everything feels obvious.”Using familiar metaphors without thinking.List clichés, then replace each with a specific, surprising detail.
“My poem feels flat.”Too much telling, not enough showing.Rewrite every line as a scene rather than a statement.
“I can’t get past the first draft.”Fear that editing will kill the feeling.Separate the process: first, pour out the feeling; second, sculpt it.

8. Final Thought: The Art of “In‑Between”

Good poetry lives in the in‑between: between heart and head, feeling and craft, naturalness and surprise. Genuine feeling is the spark; technique, metaphor, and form are the fuel that keep the fire from sputtering out in a puff of obviousness.

So the next time you sit down to write, remember:

Feel first. Then, step away. Then, rebuild.

Let your emotions guide you, but give them a new shape before they become “obviously” bad. In doing so, you honour both the authenticity of your voice and the artistry that makes poetry timeless.


Your turn: Grab a piece of genuine feeling you’ve been holding onto—maybe a recent disappointment, a quiet joy, a stubborn love. Write a short stanza that shows that feeling through an unexpected image. Share it in the comments; let’s see how many of us can turn raw feeling into something delightfully natural—but never obvious.

Happy writing! 🌿✍️

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 50

Day 50 – Bad poetry

When “Feeling” Becomes a Pitfall: Unpacking the Paradox of Bad Poetry

“All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling – to be natural is obvious, to be obvious is inartistic.”

It’s a line that sounds like a warning scrawled on the back of a notebook in a cramped dorm room, yet it manages to capture a timeless tension every poet — amateur or seasoned — wrestles with. How can something as sincere as genuine feeling produce poetry that feels flat, trite, or outright “bad”? Why does the very act of being “natural” sometimes devolve into being “obvious,” and why does that matter?

In this post, we’ll:

  1. Parse the quote – what does it really say?
  2. Explore why raw feeling can become a liability.
  3. Distinguish “natural” from “obvious.”
  4. Look at real‑world examples of both the curse and the cure.
  5. Offer practical steps for turning heartfelt material into artful poetry.

Grab a cup of tea, settle in, and let’s unpack the paradox that haunts any writer who’s ever tried to put a beating heart on a page.


1. The Quote in Plain English

All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling – to be natural is obvious, to be obvious is inartistic.

Break it down:

PhraseWhat it means (in everyday terms)
All bad poetry springs from genuine feelingMany poems that feel “bad” begin with a sincere emotional impulse. The poet isn’t faking; they truly care.
To be natural is obviousWhen a poet writes “naturally,” the language often lands exactly where you’d expect it—no surprise, no tension.
To be obvious is inartisticPoetry that states the obvious, that tells you exactly what you think you already know, fails to engage the reader’s imagination.

At its core, the statement warns against confusing emotional honesty with artistic success. A poem can be heartfelt and terrible if it leans on the feeling alone and never transforms it.


2. Why “Genuine Feeling” Can Produce Bad Poetry

a. Emotion is a Raw Material, Not a Finished Product

Feelings are like unrefined ore: rich, but still needing smelting. When a poet simply pours the ore onto the page, the result is heavy, unshaped, and often unpalatable.

Example: “I’m sad because my dog died. I miss him so much. I cry every night.”
That’s a statement of feeling, not a poem about feeling.

b. The Comfort Zone of the “I-Statement”

Writing “I feel ___” is a reflex. It’s comfortable because it bypasses the challenge of showing rather than telling. The poet leans on the reader’s empathy, assuming the raw confession will do the heavy lifting. Often, it doesn’t.

c. Cliché is the Natural Offspring of Unexamined Feeling

When we rely on our first, most immediate emotional response, we tend to reach for the language we already hear in the world around us. “Heartbreak” becomes “a broken heart,” “sadness” becomes “tears,” “love” becomes “a fire.” The result: a poem that sounds like the collective chorus of every greeting‑card writer that came before.


3. Natural vs. Obvious – How the Two Diverge

NaturalObvious
Feels inevitable – the word choice fits the image like a glove.Feels predictable – the reader sees the punchline before the line lands.
Leaves room for inference – the poem hints, implies, and trusts the reader to fill gaps.Leaves no gaps – the poem tells you everything, removing the reader’s agency.
Often uses fresh metaphor or unexpected syntax to convey a familiar feeling.Relies on familiar metaphor (e.g., “heart is a rose”) and straightforward diction.
Creates tension – the reader must stay awake to parse what the poem doesn’t say.Creates ease – the reader can skim without thinking.

In short: naturalness is the feeling of inevitability; obviousness is the feeling of inevitability without any surprise. Good poetry walks the line between the two, making the inevitable feel new.


4. Case Studies: When Feeling Wins, When It Loses

4.1 The “Bad” Example: A Straight‑forward Lament

My mother’s hand was warm,
Now she’s gone, my world is cold.
I miss her like the desert misses rain.

What went wrong?

  • Genuine feeling: The poet truly misses their mother.
  • Obvious language: “Warm,” “cold,” “desert misses rain” are all textbook opposites.
  • No transformation: The poem says, “I miss my mother,” without inventing a new way to show that loss.

4.2 The “Good” Example: Transformative Imagery

She left a kitchen with an empty kettle,
steam still curling in the hallway’s sigh—
a ghost of mornings that never boiled.

What works?

  • Genuine feeling: The poet feels the absence.
  • Natural but non‑obvious: The kettle, steam, and hallway become a metaphor for lingering presence.
  • Transformation: The everyday object becomes a vessel for grief, inviting the reader to taste the silence.

4.3 Why the Difference Matters

The good poem doesn’t tell you directly “I miss her.” It shows—through a half‑filled kettle and lingering steam—that the house (and the poet) is waiting for a ritual that will never happen again. The reader must assemble the emotional puzzle, which creates a deeper, more resonant experience.


5. Turning Genuine Feeling into Artful Poetry

If you’ve ever stared at a notebook full of raw emotions and wondered, “How do I make this poetry?” here are concrete strategies to move from feeling → natural → obvious into feeling → crafted → surprising.

1️⃣ Start with the Emotion, Then Step Back

  1. Write a journal entry (no rhyme, no meter, just the raw feeling).
  2. Read it aloud. Highlight any words or phrases that feel over‑used or too literal.
  3. Identify the core image: What concrete thing does this feeling actually look like, smell like, sound like?

2️⃣ Find a “Metaphorical Lens”

Instead of describing the feeling directly, ask:

  • What object carries a similar weight?
  • Which environment mirrors the internal climate?
  • What action could stand in for the emotional state?

Example: “Grief” becomes “a tide that refuses to recede.”

3️⃣ Play with Form to Force Freshness

  • Enjambment can keep the reader guessing.
  • Unexpected line breaks can shift emphasis.
  • A formal constraint (sonnet, villanelle, ghazal) demands you find fresh ways to fulfil a given structure, preventing the temptation to fall back on clichés.

4️⃣ Use “Defamiliarisation”

Coined by Russian formalist Viktor Shklovsky: make the familiar strange.
Instead of “cold night,” try “the sky’s iron‑clad sigh.”

This technique pushes the poem away from obviousness and back toward natural intrigue.

5️⃣ Invite the Reader to Participate

Leave a gap in the narrative. End a stanza on a half‑finished image, or pose a subtle question. The reader’s mind will work to fill that space, turning raw feeling into a collaborative experience.

6️⃣ Edit Ruthlessly for the “Obvious”

During revision, ask:

  • “Is this line the only way to express this idea?”
  • “What cliché does this echo? Can I replace it with a specific detail?”
  • “Does this line show the feeling, or just tell it?”

If the answer leans toward “tell,” rewrite.


6. The Bigger Picture: Art, Authenticity, and Audience

The quote we started with hints at a deeper philosophical conundrum: If poetry is meant to be an artistic rendering of truth, why does authenticity sometimes feel like a handicap?

  • The audience’s role – Readers come to poetry seeking not just to be understood but to be re‑imagined. A poem that merely mirrors their own feeling offers no new perspective.
  • The artist’s responsibility – The poet must translate—not transcribe—emotion. Translation entails choice, compression, and often, paradox.
  • Historical precedent – Think of Walt Whitman’s “I celebrate myself…” He starts with a personal confession, but he immediately expands that self into a universal, almost mythic, voice. The feeling is genuine, but it becomes a vehicle for something larger.

When poets manage this alchemy, the result is not only beautiful; it is transformative.


7. Quick Takeaways (For the Busy Writer)

ProblemWhy it HappensFix
“I’m sad, so I write sad words.”Overreliance on literal feeling.Find a concrete image that acts as a stand‑in for sadness.
“Everything feels obvious.”Using familiar metaphors without thinking.List clichés, then replace each with a specific, surprising detail.
“My poem feels flat.”Too much telling, not enough showing.Rewrite every line as a scene rather than a statement.
“I can’t get past the first draft.”Fear that editing will kill the feeling.Separate the process: first, pour out the feeling; second, sculpt it.

8. Final Thought: The Art of “In‑Between”

Good poetry lives in the in‑between: between heart and head, feeling and craft, naturalness and surprise. Genuine feeling is the spark; technique, metaphor, and form are the fuel that keep the fire from sputtering out in a puff of obviousness.

So the next time you sit down to write, remember:

Feel first. Then, step away. Then, rebuild.

Let your emotions guide you, but give them a new shape before they become “obviously” bad. In doing so, you honour both the authenticity of your voice and the artistry that makes poetry timeless.


Your turn: Grab a piece of genuine feeling you’ve been holding onto—maybe a recent disappointment, a quiet joy, a stubborn love. Write a short stanza that shows that feeling through an unexpected image. Share it in the comments; let’s see how many of us can turn raw feeling into something delightfully natural—but never obvious.

Happy writing! 🌿✍️

365 Days of writing, 2026 – 49

Day 49 – Writing in unlikely places

Does Where You Are Determine What and How Much You Write?


Introduction: The Unseen Hand of Place

You sit down at your desk, coffee steaming, notebook open, and… nothing happens. The cursor blinks like a taunting lighthouse. You hear the house settle, the dishwasher start, a notification ping from a social‑media app you don’t need to check. The very space you’ve cultivated for creativity feels more like a trap than a sanctuary.

Flip the scene. You’re on a cramped airport bench, a train rattles past, or you’re lying on an exam table, waiting for the surgeon’s lights to turn on. The world around you is noisy, uncomfortable, and utterly unpredictable—yet suddenly the words flow.

Is it the environment that makes us write—or the lack of it?

In this post, I’ll explore how location shapes both what we write and how much we manage to produce, why the “bad” places often become the most fertile, and what practical tricks you can use to turn any setting—home, office, or waiting room—into a writing ally.


1. The Myth of the “Ideal” Writing Space

1.1 The Comfort‑Trap

When we think of the “perfect” writing nook, we picture a quiet corner, a comfy chair, ambient lighting, maybe a plant or two. The problem? Comfort breeds complacency.

  • Distractions multiply – The very things you set up to keep you cozy—TV, music playlists, the fridge within arm’s reach—are also the easiest pathways to procrastination.
  • Decision fatigue – Choosing the right pen, the perfect mug, the exact temperature of the room consumes cognitive bandwidth that could otherwise go toward drafting sentences.

1.2 The “Creative Crisis” of Home

Home is a paradox. It’s where you choose to be, yet it’s also where the countless responsibilities, family members, and chores compete for your attention. Even with a meticulously organised desk, the mental clutter of “Did I leave the stove on?” or “I need to reply to that email” can block the flow of ideas.

Research note: A 2019 study published in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts found that participants reported higher creative output in “moderately distracting” environments (e.g., a coffee shop) compared to completely quiet or extremely noisy settings. A touch of ambient stimulus appears to “prime” the brain for associative thinking.


2. The Unexpected Power of “Bad” Places

2.1 Waiting as a Creative Engine

I first noticed the phenomenon while waiting for a 2‑hour pre‑surgery appointment. The fluorescent lights hummed, the nurse called my name in a monotone, and the sterile smell hung heavy. Instead of scrolling through my phone, I pulled out a notebook and let the anxiety of the impending operation funnel into a short story about a surgeon who could hear the thoughts of his patients.

Why did it work?

  • Time becomes owned – In a waiting room you have no real agenda; the minutes are yours by default. The brain, desperate to escape monotony, seeks a task.
  • Heightened emotional state – Stress, anticipation, or even boredom raise cortisol levels, which can sharpen focus temporarily—much like the “fight or flight” effect that hones attention on a single objective.
  • Physical constraints force mental clarity – Limited space, fixed seating, and the inability to move freely eliminate the temptation to “just get up and do something else.”

2.2 Other “Uncomfortable” Hotspots

LocationWhat Usually Pops UpWhy It Helps
Public transport (bus/train)Observational snippets, dialogue, micro‑fictionConstant flow of strangers gives instant character material.
Coffee shop (moderate buzz)Blog outlines, brainstorming listsAmbient chatter creates a low‑level “white noise” that blocks internal monologue distractions.
Gym locker room (post‑workout)Reflective essays, personal narrativesEndorphin surge + sweat = mental clarity + emotional honesty.
Long line at the DMVPoetry, haikus, rapid‑fire ideasLimited time forces concise thinking; the line’s rhythm can act like a metronome.

3. How Place Influences What You Write

  1. Sensory Input → Subject Matter
    • Smell of rain → Nostalgic memories, melancholic tone.
    • Industrial clang → Gritty, fast‑paced action scenes.
  2. Emotional Atmosphere → Tone
    • Calm home → Analytical essays, research‑heavy pieces.
    • High‑stress environment → Raw, confessional voice.
  3. Physical Constraints → Form
    • Tight space → Short forms (poems, flash fiction).
    • Ample time (e.g., a weekend retreat) → Long‑form novels or deep‑dive investigative pieces.

Understanding this relationship allows you to leverage a location rather than fight it. If you know you’ll be in a noisy airport, plan to write a list of story beats rather than a full draft. If you’re in a quiet home office, schedule deep‑work sessions for complex research.


4. Strategies to Turn Any Environment Into a Writing Ally

4.1 The “Mini‑Commitment” Method

  • What it is: Instead of promising yourself an hour of writing, commit to five focused minutes.
  • Why it works: Short bursts reduce the psychological barrier and are easier to fit into any setting—whether you’re on a train or standing in line.

Implementation tip: Keep a small notebook or a note‑taking app on your phone. When you spot a waiting period, open it and set a timer for 5 minutes. Write whatever comes to mind—no editing, just capture.

4.2 “Portable Writing Kit”

ItemReason
Moleskine or pocket notebookNo batteries, instant start.
Pen with comfortable gripReduces friction, encourages flow.
Noise‑cancelling earbuds or a “focus playlist”Helps mute external chatter without isolating you completely.
Offline writing app (e.g., iA Writer, Ulysses)No internet needed, lightning‑fast launch.
A small “prompt card”Pre‑written prompts or story seeds you can pull out on the spot.

Having these items in your bag means you can start right away when the perfect (or imperfect) moment appears.

4.3 “Environmental Anchors”

Assign a type of writing to a specific place.

  • Coffee shop → Brainstorming & outlining
  • Bedroom → Personal journaling
  • Commute (standing) → Sentence‑level micro‑writing

When you walk into that space, your brain already knows the mode you’ll adopt, reducing decision fatigue.

4.4 “Time‑Boxed Distraction Buffer”

If you’re at home and the distractions are relentless, schedule a distraction buffer: a 10‑minute period where you intentionally check emails, make a snack, or scroll social media before you sit down to write. Once the buffer ends, you’ve already satisfied the urge to wander, making it easier to stay focused on the task.

4.5 “The ‘Waiting‑Room Narrative’ Exercise”

  1. Observe: Look around—people, sounds, smells. Jot down three concrete details.
  2. Imagine: Assign each detail a character, a conflict, or a memory.
  3. Write: In 10 minutes, craft a short scene that weaves those three elements together.

This exercise turns idle observation into a storytelling engine and can be repeated wherever you wait.


5. Real‑World Example: From Surgery Waiting Room to Published Short Story

Two hours before my knee‑replacement surgery, I was hunched on a plastic chair, the fluorescent lights buzzing above. My mind raced with “what‑ifs,” and the sterile scent of antiseptic filled the air.

I pulled out an empty notebook and wrote:

“The surgeon walked in, a quiet man with hands that trembled like the leaves outside the window…”

That snippet grew into a 2,500‑word short story titled “The Quiet Hands”, which later won a local flash‑fiction contest. The waiting room’s pressure gave the narrative urgency; the physical constraints forced me into concise, vivid prose; the ambient sounds became the rhythm of my sentences.

Takeaway: You don’t need a quiet home office to create award‑winning work—you just need to recognize the creative potential of every circumstance.


6. Final Thoughts: Embrace the Unpredictable

The answer to the headline question isn’t a simple “yes” or “no.” The place you’re in does influence what you write and how much you produce, but not in a deterministic way. It acts as a catalyst, a set of constraints, and a source of sensory fuel.

  • If you love the quiet of home, schedule deep‑work blocks and protect them fiercely.
  • If you thrive on the hustle of public spaces, use them for brainstorming, outlines, or short‑form writing.
  • If you’re stuck in a waiting room, treat that time as a gift—a forced pause that can sharpen focus and spark authenticity.

The ultimate skill isn’t to “find the perfect spot,” but to adapt—to read the environment, to decide what kind of writing it invites, and to have a toolbox ready for any scenario. When you can turn a sterile surgery waiting room into a launchpad for your best story, you’ve mastered that art.


Action Checklist

  • ☐ Pack a portable writing kit (notebook, pen, earbuds).
  • ☐ Create environment anchors (e.g., coffee shop = outline).
  • ☐ Set a daily mini‑commitment timer (5‑minute bursts).
  • ☐ Practice the Waiting‑Room Narrative exercise once this week.
  • ☐ Schedule a distraction buffer before your next home‑writing session.

Give yourself permission to write wherever you are. You may be surprised at the quality and quantity that emerges when you stop hunting for the “perfect” space and start harvesting the creativity that’s already hiding in the moments you thought were just downtime. Happy writing!