What I learned about writing – Unlock Your Potential

Unlock Your Potential: The Power of Joining a Writer’s Group

Writing is often a solitary pursuit. Hunched over a keyboard, staring at a blank page, or lost in the quiet hum of creativity—these moments define the life of a writer. But what if there was a way to transform isolation into inspiration? Enter writers’ clubs, workshops, or writing groups: vibrant communities that offer more than just feedback. They become the bedrock of growth, connection, and resilience for writers at any stage of their journey. Let’s explore the transformative benefits of joining such a group.


1. Constructive Feedback and a Fresh Perspective

One of the most immediate benefits of joining a writing group is the constructive feedback you receive. While self-editing is essential, external perspectives can unveil blind spots. For example, a fellow writer might notice an inconsistency in a character’s motivation or suggest a pacing adjustment you hadn’t considered. Workshops often foster a culture of honesty and kindness, helping you refine your work with specific, actionable insights.

Moreover, reading others’ work exposes you to diverse styles, genres, and techniques. This cross-pollination of ideas can spark creativity and broaden your own writing toolkit.


2. Motivation, Accountability, and Discipline

The writing process can be inconsistent. Deadlines slip, self-doubt creeps in, and distractions abound. A writer’s group provides structure and accountability. Regular meetings, shared writing goals (like word counts or drafting timelines), and peer encouragement create a rhythm that keeps you on track.

Imagine committing to write 500 words a week, knowing your group will check in on your progress. Suddenly, the task feels personal and collaborative. The shared energy of a room (or virtual space) filled with fellow writers can reignite your passion on even the toughest days.


3. Learning and Skill Development

Writing groups often double as learning hubs. Many workshops include writing exercises, mini-lessons on grammar or storytelling techniques, or guest speakers who share industry tips. For instance, a member might lead a session on dialogue writing, or the facilitator could guide a critique focused on character development.

Even informal exchanges—discussing a favourite novel or dissecting a challenging scene—can deepen your understanding of the craft. The more you engage, the sharper your skills become.


4. Networking and Collaboration Opportunities

Connections matter. By joining a writing group, you become part of a network of like-minded individuals. These relationships can lead to collaborations—co-authoring a story, editing each other’s manuscripts, or even finding a publishing agent through introductions.

Additionally, many groups host or share information about contests, publications, or local literary events. For emerging writers, these opportunities can be invaluable for visibility and growth.


5. Emotional Support and Validation

Writing is an emotionally charged endeavour. Rejection letters, “fix-it” feedback, and the pressure to publish can wear you down. A writer’s group offers emotional support, a safe space to vent, celebrate small wins, and process setbacks.

Feeling part of a community combats the isolation many writers face. Sharing your struggles with others who “get it” fosters resilience and reminds you that your voice matters.


6. Access to Resources and Creative Stimulation

Many groups curate resources: writing prompts, book recommendations, or even shared tools like grammar checkers. Some offer access to exclusive workshops or masterclasses. Online groups, in particular, can connect you to global experts and trends in the literary world.

The collaborative brainstorming sessions are gold, too. A tired plot idea revived by a group member’s unexpected twist, or a new genre explored through peer encouragement—these moments keep creativity alive.


7. Building Confidence and Overcoming Self-Doubt

Imposter syndrome is common among writers. Hearing peers praise your work or admit they struggle with similar doubts can be incredibly validating. Over time, the supportive environment of a writing group helps you trust your voice and embrace your unique style.

Additionally, sharing your writing aloud in a group setting helps build confidence in your work—and your ability to receive feedback without defensiveness.


Find Your Tribe: Where to Start

Still unsure? Begin by searching for local writing groups through libraries, community centres, or platforms like Meetup and Eventbrite. If in-person isn’t possible, online writing communities (e.g., Reddit’s r/writing, Scribophile) offer equally rich interactions. For the bold, consider starting your own group!


Final Thoughts

A writer’s group isn’t just a place to “get feedback.” It’s a village of collaborators, cheerleaders, and mentors who help you grow both personally and professionally. By joining such a community, you invest in your craft—and your confidence. So, take the leap. Share your work, lean on others, and watch your writing thrive in ways you never imagined.

What’s your favourite benefit of a writing group? Share your experiences in the comments below!

Ready to connect? Explore local or online writing groups today and unlock the power of collective creativity. 

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 208

Day 208 – Writing is like riding a fine steed

…

The Bit and Reins of Writing: How to Ride Your Creativity Without Falling in the Ditch

“Writing is like riding a fine steed: Even if it has a noble air, you must control it with the bit and reins. Don’t let it go off the tracks, gallop to its heart’s content, and fall into a ditch somewhere.” — Yan Zhitui

We’ve all been there. You sit down to write, and inspiration strikes like lightning. Your imagination rears up, proud and powerful. Words flow effortlessly, ideas cascade onto the page, and for a moment, you feel like a literary god.

And then, disaster strikes.

You look up an hour later, blinking in confusion. You started writing a blog post about time management, but somehow you are deep into a tangent about the history of hourglasses, debating the philosophy of time, and questioning your life choices. Your magnificent steed has bolted off the path, leaped over the guardrails, and dropped you headfirst into a muddy ditch.

Writing is a wild, beautiful, and exhilarating beast. But as sixth-century scholar Yan Zhitui so brilliantly observed, raw talent and unbridled passion aren’t enough. Without the bit and reins of discipline, structure, and editing, even the noblest piece of writing will crash.

Here is how to master the art of the equestrian writer—how to give your creativity enough room to run, while keeping it safely on the path.


1. Why the “Fine Steed” Needs Freedom First

Before we talk about control, we have to acknowledge the horse. Yan Zhitui calls it a fine steed with a noble air.

In writing terms, this is your raw inspiration, your voice, and your creative flow. If you immediately slap a heavy saddle on a horse and beat it into submission, it won’t move. Likewise, if you stifle your writing with too many rules, outlines, and self-censorship before you even begin, you kill the magic.

  • The Draft Phase is the Gallop: When you first sit down to write, let the horse run. Turn off your inner critic. Allow yourself to explore unexpected avenues, type out messy paragraphs, and chase the thrill of discovery.
  • Embrace the Chaos (Temporarily): Great writing often requires a messy first draft. Don’t worry about grammar, formatting, or word count while the adrenaline is pumping. Just let the steed move.

2. Recognising the Ditch: When Freedom Becomes Chaos

The danger of the blank page is no longer just writer’s block; often, it’s writer’s avalanche. We get lost in our own verbosity.

How do you know your creative steed has gone off the tracks and is heading for a ditch? Watch out for these warning signs:

  • The Rabbit Hole: You are three paragraphs deep into a sub-point that has almost nothing to do with your main headline.
  • The Bloated Sentence: You’ve used four adjectives where one strong noun would do, simply because it felt poetic in the moment.
  • The Lost Point: You reach the end of a section and realise you’ve completely forgotten what question you were trying to answer.

If left unchecked, unbridled creativity doesn’t lead to a masterpiece; it leads to reader fatigue and writer burnout.

3. Forging the Bit and Reins: Tools for Control

This is where the real craft of writing begins. Taming the steed doesn’t mean breaking its spirit; it means directing its immense power toward a specific destination.

Here is how you apply the bit and reins to your writing process:

A. The Outline (The Pre-Ride Check)

Before you let the horse run wild, map out where you are going. An outline doesn’t have to be rigid—think of it as the trail map. Knowing your destination (your core thesis) and your major waypoints (your sub-headings) ensures that even if your horse gallops wildly between points, it is still heading in the right direction.

B. The Discipline of Cutting (The Reins)

Stephen King famously advises writers to “kill your darlings.” This is the ultimate pull on the reins. That clever sentence you spent twenty minutes crafting? The one that sounds amazing, but adds nothing to the argument? Pull back. Yank the reins. Cut it. A disciplined writer knows that what is left out of a piece is often just as important as what is left in.

C. The Editing Phase (Riding the Trail Again)

Never let your first draft be your final draft. The first draft is the wild ride; the editing phase is where you groom the horse, fix its footing, and polish its coat. Read through your work with a critical eye. Ask yourself:

  • Does every paragraph serve the main idea?
  • Are there any linguistic ditches (confusing metaphors, run-on sentences) I need to steer clear of?
  • Is the pacing smooth, or does it jerk the reader around?

Conclusion: Master the Ride

Writing is a lifelong balancing act. Lean too far toward absolute control, and your writing becomes stiff, academic, and lifeless. Lean too far toward unbridled freedom, and you’ll end up lost in a swamp of your own making, leaving your readers behind.

Be a master equestrian of your own thoughts. Let your imagination provide the fire, the speed, and the nobility. But always keep your hands firm on the reins, guiding your ideas down the path of clarity, purpose, and impact.

After all, it’s much better to cross the finish line in style than to win a fast race straight into a ditch.


What about you? Do you tend to let your writing run wild, or do you keep a tight grip on the reins? Let us know in the comments below!

…

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 208

Day 208 – Writing is like riding a fine steed

…

The Bit and Reins of Writing: How to Ride Your Creativity Without Falling in the Ditch

“Writing is like riding a fine steed: Even if it has a noble air, you must control it with the bit and reins. Don’t let it go off the tracks, gallop to its heart’s content, and fall into a ditch somewhere.” — Yan Zhitui

We’ve all been there. You sit down to write, and inspiration strikes like lightning. Your imagination rears up, proud and powerful. Words flow effortlessly, ideas cascade onto the page, and for a moment, you feel like a literary god.

And then, disaster strikes.

You look up an hour later, blinking in confusion. You started writing a blog post about time management, but somehow you are deep into a tangent about the history of hourglasses, debating the philosophy of time, and questioning your life choices. Your magnificent steed has bolted off the path, leaped over the guardrails, and dropped you headfirst into a muddy ditch.

Writing is a wild, beautiful, and exhilarating beast. But as sixth-century scholar Yan Zhitui so brilliantly observed, raw talent and unbridled passion aren’t enough. Without the bit and reins of discipline, structure, and editing, even the noblest piece of writing will crash.

Here is how to master the art of the equestrian writer—how to give your creativity enough room to run, while keeping it safely on the path.


1. Why the “Fine Steed” Needs Freedom First

Before we talk about control, we have to acknowledge the horse. Yan Zhitui calls it a fine steed with a noble air.

In writing terms, this is your raw inspiration, your voice, and your creative flow. If you immediately slap a heavy saddle on a horse and beat it into submission, it won’t move. Likewise, if you stifle your writing with too many rules, outlines, and self-censorship before you even begin, you kill the magic.

  • The Draft Phase is the Gallop: When you first sit down to write, let the horse run. Turn off your inner critic. Allow yourself to explore unexpected avenues, type out messy paragraphs, and chase the thrill of discovery.
  • Embrace the Chaos (Temporarily): Great writing often requires a messy first draft. Don’t worry about grammar, formatting, or word count while the adrenaline is pumping. Just let the steed move.

2. Recognising the Ditch: When Freedom Becomes Chaos

The danger of the blank page is no longer just writer’s block; often, it’s writer’s avalanche. We get lost in our own verbosity.

How do you know your creative steed has gone off the tracks and is heading for a ditch? Watch out for these warning signs:

  • The Rabbit Hole: You are three paragraphs deep into a sub-point that has almost nothing to do with your main headline.
  • The Bloated Sentence: You’ve used four adjectives where one strong noun would do, simply because it felt poetic in the moment.
  • The Lost Point: You reach the end of a section and realise you’ve completely forgotten what question you were trying to answer.

If left unchecked, unbridled creativity doesn’t lead to a masterpiece; it leads to reader fatigue and writer burnout.

3. Forging the Bit and Reins: Tools for Control

This is where the real craft of writing begins. Taming the steed doesn’t mean breaking its spirit; it means directing its immense power toward a specific destination.

Here is how you apply the bit and reins to your writing process:

A. The Outline (The Pre-Ride Check)

Before you let the horse run wild, map out where you are going. An outline doesn’t have to be rigid—think of it as the trail map. Knowing your destination (your core thesis) and your major waypoints (your sub-headings) ensures that even if your horse gallops wildly between points, it is still heading in the right direction.

B. The Discipline of Cutting (The Reins)

Stephen King famously advises writers to “kill your darlings.” This is the ultimate pull on the reins. That clever sentence you spent twenty minutes crafting? The one that sounds amazing, but adds nothing to the argument? Pull back. Yank the reins. Cut it. A disciplined writer knows that what is left out of a piece is often just as important as what is left in.

C. The Editing Phase (Riding the Trail Again)

Never let your first draft be your final draft. The first draft is the wild ride; the editing phase is where you groom the horse, fix its footing, and polish its coat. Read through your work with a critical eye. Ask yourself:

  • Does every paragraph serve the main idea?
  • Are there any linguistic ditches (confusing metaphors, run-on sentences) I need to steer clear of?
  • Is the pacing smooth, or does it jerk the reader around?

Conclusion: Master the Ride

Writing is a lifelong balancing act. Lean too far toward absolute control, and your writing becomes stiff, academic, and lifeless. Lean too far toward unbridled freedom, and you’ll end up lost in a swamp of your own making, leaving your readers behind.

Be a master equestrian of your own thoughts. Let your imagination provide the fire, the speed, and the nobility. But always keep your hands firm on the reins, guiding your ideas down the path of clarity, purpose, and impact.

After all, it’s much better to cross the finish line in style than to win a fast race straight into a ditch.


What about you? Do you tend to let your writing run wild, or do you keep a tight grip on the reins? Let us know in the comments below!

…

What I learned about writing – Don’t Be Obsessed, Be Obsessedly Curious

Don’t Be Obsessed, Be Obsessedly Curious: The Balanced Art of Writing a Compelling Play

Playwriting is a thrilling dance between creativity and discipline. It’s a craft that demands passion, yet many aspiring playwrights believe they must be obsessively consumed by their work to succeed. But here’s the truth: you don’t need to be obsessive to write a great play. Instead, what you need is curiosity, patience, and a toolkit of strategies to bring your vision to life. Let’s explore why obsession isn’t the answer—and how to write a play that lingers in the hearts of audiences long after the curtain falls.


The Myth of the “Obsessed Artist”

Pop culture loves the image of the tormented artist locked in a studio for months, surviving on coffee and sheer willpower. But this myth is a red herring. While dedication is key, obsession—borderline compulsion, neglecting self-care, or losing balance—can lead to burnout, poor writing, and even health issues.

Consider this: Great plays are born from sustainable creativity, not self-destruction. Playwrights like Lynn Nottage and David Mamet thrived by setting boundaries, sleeping, and nourishing their minds with diverse experiences. The goal isn’t to “die for your art” but to live for it in a way that fuels your creativity without stealing your joy.


5 Strategies to Write a Compelling Play (Without Going Crazy)

1. Start with a Core Question, Not a Plot

Every great play is driven by an emotional or philosophical “what if?” Ask yourself:

  • What story haunts me?
  • What truth am I desperate to explore?
    Your answer might be as simple as, “What if a single mother lost her job and had to choose between her kids and a dream?” That question becomes the heartbeat of your play. Build your plot and characters to answer it—or, better yet, to challenge it.

2. Craft Nuanced Characters, Not Stereotypes

Audiences don’t want perfect heroes or villains. They want characters who feel human: flawed, vulnerable, and complicated.

  • Give each character a hidden motive. (Example: A grieving father might lash out, but his rage masks guilt.)
  • Avoid monologues that “explain” everything—let their actions and subtext do the work.

3. Fuel the Fire with Conflict and Stakes

Conflict isn’t just a punchy line—it’s the engine of drama. Ask:

  • What do my characters want?
  • What’s stopping them?
  • What do they stand to lose?

Think of Glengarry Glen Ross by David Mamet: The fight for a car sales job isn’t just about money—it’s about dignity. Raise the stakes by making the cost of failure personal.

4. Dialogue That Bites: Less Is More

Play dialogue should echo real speech—but with purpose.

  • Trim the filler: Delete “ums” and “you know.”
  • Subtext is your friend: Let characters say one thing but mean another. (This is how Shakespeare’s Ophelia truly speaks.)
  • Conflict in soundbites: Short, sharp lines pack more punch than long speeches.

Need help? Try the “Rewrite as a Screenplay” method: If your lines would feel at home on a Zoom call, they’re not dramatic enough.

5. Edit Ruthlessly and Collaborate Relentlessly

First drafts are drafts for a reason. Let them simmer, then revise with a surgeon’s precision.

  • Cut scenes that don’t serve the core question.
  • Work with others: Read your play aloud to beta readers, actors, or writers’ groups. Fresh ears catch what you miss.

Remember: Even August Wilson revised his plays 20+ times. Perfection isn’t a starting point—it’s a destination.


The Secret Sauce: Curiosity Over Compulsion

The key to writing a compelling play isn’t marathon sessions fueled by espresso but consistency and exploration. Take walks, read poetry, or attend stranger’s conversations. Inspiration isn’t just about being a “crazy artist”—it’s about living with open eyes and ears.

And when you feel stuck? Pace yourself. A daily 30-minute writing habit can build a masterpiece faster than a week-long caffeine-fueled sprint followed by burnout.


Final Thought: Write to Be Free, Not Trapped

A play is a mirror held up to life. It doesn’t have to be born of obsessive frenzy—just honest curiosity. The stage is for stories that matter, not for self-imposed suffering. So write from your deepest joys, fears, and questions. And remember: Your best work will come when you’re energised to tell it—not exhausted by the process.

Now go. Let the world see what makes you uniquely human. The audience is waiting. 🎭


365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 206/207

Days 206 and 207 – From a Broken Keyboard to a Global Conspiracy

…

From a Broken Keyboard to a Global Conspiracy: How to Flesh Out Your Thriller’s Plot

Every great thriller starts with a relatable spark. Yours begins with a brilliant, highly grounded premise: an ordinary, overworked everyman is stuck in a dreary office at 1:00 AM, dealing with cheap corporate equipment. Out of sheer frustration with a broken keyboard—and management’s refusal to replace it—he mashes a strange key combination.

Suddenly, he triggers something he was never meant to find.

As the quiet hum of the night office is broken by footsteps he assumes belong to security, his life shifts from mundane corporate misery to a high-stakes nightmare. If you want to turn this fantastic premise into a gripping, fast-paced narrative featuring a faceless organisation, unreliable allies, and a race to expose the truth, you need a solid narrative roadmap.

Here is a comprehensive guide on how to flesh out your storyline from the first keystroke to the final, high-risk broadcast.


Act I: The Catalyst (The 1 a.m. Discovery)

To make the conspiracy hit hard, the beginning must establish the protagonist’s mundane reality. Show, don’t just tell, how soul-crushing his job is.

  • The Setup: Establish the late hour. The office is a graveyard of half-eaten takeout and flickering fluorescent lights. He’s dealing with a mechanical artifact—a keyboard where the Spacebar sticks and the Enter key requires a hammer blow.
  • The Accident: In a fit of sleep-deprived rage, he slams a specific, unnatural sequence of keys (perhaps an old legacy shortcut bypassed by IT decades ago). Instead of an error screen, a terminal window opens, bypassing corporate firewalls entirely.
  • The Intruder: He finds data he shouldn’t—off-the-books ledgers, surveillance logs, or algorithmic predictions of human behaviour. Suddenly, he hears footsteps. He hides beneath his cubicle, expecting a night-shift security guard with a flashlight. Instead, he watches expensive, scuff-free Italian leather shoes walk past his desk. These people aren’t security; they are clean-up crew operatives or corporate fixers, and they know someone accessed the terminal.

Act II: Expanding the Circle (The Impossible Situation)

An ordinary man on the run can be thrilling, but adding a partner-in-crime elevates the tension through interpersonal dynamics and shared jeopardy.

  • The Unlikely Accomplice: Introduce a colleague. Maybe it’s the cynical night-shift data analyst who stayed late, or an ambitious junior compliance officer who is equally sick of the system. They accidentally get dragged into the mess when the protagonist tries to escape or confide in someone.
  • The Impossible Situation: Now, they aren’t just hiding; they are chained to a ticking clock. The faceless organisation locks down the building’s digital and physical infrastructure. Keycards stop working, elevators freeze, and the digital trail proves they accessed the files. They are trapped in a concrete-and-glass labyrinth where the hunters control every door.
  • Anatomy of the Faceless Organisation: Give this shadow entity weight. They shouldn’t be cartoon villains; they should feel like an omnipresent corporate leviathan. They mask their malice behind HR jargon, automated compliance threats, and terrifying efficiency. To them, the protagonists aren’t enemies—they are simply data anomalies that need to be deleted.

Act III: The Mirage of Allies (Trust No One)

As the walls close in, our protagonists need help—or so they think. This is where you subvert reader expectations.

  • The “Saviours”: Introduce characters who claim they want to help. Perhaps it’s a sympathetic middle-manager from a different department who “knows how the system works,” or an external cybersecurity consultant who mysteriously arrives to offer an escape route.
  • The Betrayal: Build the trust, drop breadcrumbs of doubt, and then pull the rug out. Maybe the “friendly manager” slips up by referencing a detail only the killers would know, or the cybersecurity expert leads them right into a trap.
  • The Psychological Toll: This realisation breaks the protagonists’ morale. They realise that within the ecosystem of this massive corporation, anyone could be compromised, monitored, or bought off. They are completely on their own.

Act IV: The Climax and Resolution (To the Right People)

Surviving the night is only half the battle. If they simply walk out the front door, the organisation will silence them legally, financially, or permanently. They have to go on the offensive.

  • The Arsenal: What did they discover on that broken keyboard? It’s not just dirty secrets; it’s verifiable digital leverage—encryption keys, financial transfers, or blueprints of a wider conspiracy.
  • Choosing the Target: Who are “the right people”?
    • Option A (The Media): A disgraced investigative journalist desperate for a comeback, or an independent whistleblower platform. The risk? Traditional media outlets can be bought, pressured, or legally gagged before the story drops.
    • Option B (A Shadow Group): An underground collective of hacktivists or a rival corporate faction who operates in the gray areas of the law. The risk? These allies might have a dark agenda of their own, forcing our heroes to make a deal with the devil.
  • The Final Transmission: Build to a cinematic climax where the protagonists must breach a secure location (or survive one final onslaught) long enough to hit “Send” or broadcast the files live.

Tips for Writing This Thriller

  1. Use Sensory Details: Lean into the claustrophobia of the office at night—the hum of the vending machine, the blinking red light of a security camera, the cold sweat of panic.
  2. Pacing is Everything: Alternate quiet, suspenseful moments of hiding with frantic, breathless bursts of action.
  3. Keep the Stakes Grounded: Remind the reader why these two ordinary people care. They aren’t secret agents; they just want to survive, clear their names, and expose a system that treats human lives as collateral damage.

By grounding your story in the universal frustration of a broken office tool and scaling it up into a high-stakes corporate conspiracy, you’ll hook readers from page one and keep them guessing until the very final keystroke.

…

365 Days of Writing, 2026 – 206/207

Days 206 and 207 – From a Broken Keyboard to a Global Conspiracy

…

From a Broken Keyboard to a Global Conspiracy: How to Flesh Out Your Thriller’s Plot

Every great thriller starts with a relatable spark. Yours begins with a brilliant, highly grounded premise: an ordinary, overworked everyman is stuck in a dreary office at 1:00 AM, dealing with cheap corporate equipment. Out of sheer frustration with a broken keyboard—and management’s refusal to replace it—he mashes a strange key combination.

Suddenly, he triggers something he was never meant to find.

As the quiet hum of the night office is broken by footsteps he assumes belong to security, his life shifts from mundane corporate misery to a high-stakes nightmare. If you want to turn this fantastic premise into a gripping, fast-paced narrative featuring a faceless organisation, unreliable allies, and a race to expose the truth, you need a solid narrative roadmap.

Here is a comprehensive guide on how to flesh out your storyline from the first keystroke to the final, high-risk broadcast.


Act I: The Catalyst (The 1 a.m. Discovery)

To make the conspiracy hit hard, the beginning must establish the protagonist’s mundane reality. Show, don’t just tell, how soul-crushing his job is.

  • The Setup: Establish the late hour. The office is a graveyard of half-eaten takeout and flickering fluorescent lights. He’s dealing with a mechanical artifact—a keyboard where the Spacebar sticks and the Enter key requires a hammer blow.
  • The Accident: In a fit of sleep-deprived rage, he slams a specific, unnatural sequence of keys (perhaps an old legacy shortcut bypassed by IT decades ago). Instead of an error screen, a terminal window opens, bypassing corporate firewalls entirely.
  • The Intruder: He finds data he shouldn’t—off-the-books ledgers, surveillance logs, or algorithmic predictions of human behaviour. Suddenly, he hears footsteps. He hides beneath his cubicle, expecting a night-shift security guard with a flashlight. Instead, he watches expensive, scuff-free Italian leather shoes walk past his desk. These people aren’t security; they are clean-up crew operatives or corporate fixers, and they know someone accessed the terminal.

Act II: Expanding the Circle (The Impossible Situation)

An ordinary man on the run can be thrilling, but adding a partner-in-crime elevates the tension through interpersonal dynamics and shared jeopardy.

  • The Unlikely Accomplice: Introduce a colleague. Maybe it’s the cynical night-shift data analyst who stayed late, or an ambitious junior compliance officer who is equally sick of the system. They accidentally get dragged into the mess when the protagonist tries to escape or confide in someone.
  • The Impossible Situation: Now, they aren’t just hiding; they are chained to a ticking clock. The faceless organisation locks down the building’s digital and physical infrastructure. Keycards stop working, elevators freeze, and the digital trail proves they accessed the files. They are trapped in a concrete-and-glass labyrinth where the hunters control every door.
  • Anatomy of the Faceless Organisation: Give this shadow entity weight. They shouldn’t be cartoon villains; they should feel like an omnipresent corporate leviathan. They mask their malice behind HR jargon, automated compliance threats, and terrifying efficiency. To them, the protagonists aren’t enemies—they are simply data anomalies that need to be deleted.

Act III: The Mirage of Allies (Trust No One)

As the walls close in, our protagonists need help—or so they think. This is where you subvert reader expectations.

  • The “Saviours”: Introduce characters who claim they want to help. Perhaps it’s a sympathetic middle-manager from a different department who “knows how the system works,” or an external cybersecurity consultant who mysteriously arrives to offer an escape route.
  • The Betrayal: Build the trust, drop breadcrumbs of doubt, and then pull the rug out. Maybe the “friendly manager” slips up by referencing a detail only the killers would know, or the cybersecurity expert leads them right into a trap.
  • The Psychological Toll: This realisation breaks the protagonists’ morale. They realise that within the ecosystem of this massive corporation, anyone could be compromised, monitored, or bought off. They are completely on their own.

Act IV: The Climax and Resolution (To the Right People)

Surviving the night is only half the battle. If they simply walk out the front door, the organisation will silence them legally, financially, or permanently. They have to go on the offensive.

  • The Arsenal: What did they discover on that broken keyboard? It’s not just dirty secrets; it’s verifiable digital leverage—encryption keys, financial transfers, or blueprints of a wider conspiracy.
  • Choosing the Target: Who are “the right people”?
    • Option A (The Media): A disgraced investigative journalist desperate for a comeback, or an independent whistleblower platform. The risk? Traditional media outlets can be bought, pressured, or legally gagged before the story drops.
    • Option B (A Shadow Group): An underground collective of hacktivists or a rival corporate faction who operates in the gray areas of the law. The risk? These allies might have a dark agenda of their own, forcing our heroes to make a deal with the devil.
  • The Final Transmission: Build to a cinematic climax where the protagonists must breach a secure location (or survive one final onslaught) long enough to hit “Send” or broadcast the files live.

Tips for Writing This Thriller

  1. Use Sensory Details: Lean into the claustrophobia of the office at night—the hum of the vending machine, the blinking red light of a security camera, the cold sweat of panic.
  2. Pacing is Everything: Alternate quiet, suspenseful moments of hiding with frantic, breathless bursts of action.
  3. Keep the Stakes Grounded: Remind the reader why these two ordinary people care. They aren’t secret agents; they just want to survive, clear their names, and expose a system that treats human lives as collateral damage.

By grounding your story in the universal frustration of a broken office tool and scaling it up into a high-stakes corporate conspiracy, you’ll hook readers from page one and keep them guessing until the very final keystroke.

…

What I learned about writing – Authors to study from the past

Mastering the Craft: Must-Read Authors from the 1940s and Beyond to Elevate Your Writing

When it comes to mastering the art of writing—whether it’s crafting intricate plots, developing multidimensional characters, or diving into profound themes—there are countless literary giants whose works serve as masterclasses in storytelling. Starting from the 1940s and moving backwards in time, these authors offer timeless lessons in style, structure, and substance. Here’s a curated list of authors and their works that can transform your approach to writing.


1. William Golding (1954) – Lord of the Flies

Lesson: Human Nature and Allegory
Golding’s Lord of the Flies is a masterclass in allegorical storytelling and psychological depth. By placing a group of boys on a deserted island, he peels back the veneer of civilisation to reveal primal instincts. For writers, Golding teaches how to use a microcosmic setting to explore universal themes like power, fear, and morality. His sparse yet brutal prose shows how simplicity can amplify tension and symbolism.


2. Evelyn Waugh (1945) – Brideshead Revisited

Lesson: Structure and Societal Critique
Waugh’s semi-autobiographical novel combines lush prose with a fragmented, reflective narrative. Brideshead Revisited is a lesson in balancing character development with thematic depth. Writers can learn how to weave personal introspection with societal critique (e.g., the decline of British aristocracy) and how to structure a narrative around memory and emotional resonance.


3. Graham Greene (1940s–1950s) – The Power and the Glory (1940), The Quiet American (1955)

Lesson: Moral Ambiguity and Pacing
Greene’s novels, set against politically turbulent backdrops, explore moral ambiguity with razor-sharp precision. In The Power and the Glory, he uses a flawed priest to ask, “What makes a man good?” Writers can study Greene’s lean, taut prose, his ability to build tension through understatement, and how to embed philosophical questions into action-driven plots.


4. John Steinbeck (1939–1952) – The Grapes of Wrath, East of Eden

Lesson: Social Justice and Emotional Resonance
Steinbeck’s unflinching portrayal of the human condition, from the Joad family’s plight in The Grapes of Wrath to the complex family dynamics in East of Eden, teaches the power of empathy in storytelling. His ability to balance epic scope with intimate moments is a guide to creating narratives that are both socially relevant and emotionally gripping.


5. F. Scott Fitzgerald (1925) – The Great Gatsby

Lesson: Symbolism and Narrative Voice
Though published in the 1920s, Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby remains a touchstone for writers. Nick Carraway’s reflective narration and Gatsby’s glittering, tragic world showcase how symbolism (e.g., the green light, the Valley of Ashes) can anchor themes of aspiration and decay. His lyrical prose reminds us that language itself can be a character in the story.


6. Ernest Hemingway (1940s–1950s) – Across the River and into the Trees (1950)

Lesson: The Iceberg Theory
Hemingway’s famous “theory of omission” (hide the deeper meaning beneath the surface) is best learned by studying his sparse, understated prose. His 1950s works, while less celebrated, demonstrate how much can be said with minimal words. A lesson in restraint: show, don’t tell.


7. George Orwell (1949) – 1984

Lesson: Dystopian Storytelling and Warning Narratives
Orwell’s 1984 endures as a chilling exploration of authoritarianism and language manipulation. For writers, it’s a blueprint for constructing cautionary tales: how to create a world that feels grounded in reality, yet pushes the boundaries of imagination to provoke thought.


8. Virginia Woolf (1920s–1930s) – To the Lighthouse, Mrs. Dalloway

Lesson: Stream of Consciousness and Subjective Time
Woolf’s modernist experiments with time and perspective teach writers how to capture the inner lives of characters. Her fluid narratives, like the fragmented days of Mrs. Dalloway, show how to blur the lines between external action and internal emotion.


9. Truman Capote (1960) – In Cold Blood

Lesson: Narrative Non-Fiction
Though published in the 1960s, Capote’s blend of journalism and novelistic technique in In Cold Blood redefined true crime. It’s a masterclass in pacing, interview-driven storytelling, and how to humanise even the most heinous characters.


10. Harper Lee (1960) – To Kill a Mockingbird

Lesson: Moral Courage in Character Development
Lee’s iconic novel, published in the early 1960s, is a case study in using a child’s perspective to critique systemic racism. Atticus Finch’s quiet moral authority and Scout’s growth illustrate how to embed ethical dilemmas into character arcs without sermonizing.


Conclusion: The Timeless Classroom of Literature

From Golding’s haunting allegories to Hemingway’s clipped prose, these authors offer a rich tapestry of techniques to inspire modern writers. Whether you’re drawn to the moral complexity of Greene, the symbolic depth of Fitzgerald, or the socio-political acuity of Orwell, reading backward from the 1940s is a journey into the heart of what makes storytelling enduring. So, dive in—your next story’s secret might be hidden in the pages of their masterpieces.


Final Tip: As you explore these works, don’t just read—annotate, imitate, and experiment. The best writing lessons come when you let these authors’ voices influence your own unique style. Happy writing!

365 Days of writing, 2026 – Beyond the second novel

The ultimate blueprint

…

The Ultimate Blueprint: Simple Guidelines for Planning and Writing a Series of Novels

Stepping into the world of novel series writing is both exhilarating and terrifying. Whether you are dreaming of an epic fantasy saga like Harry Potter, a sprawling space opera, or a gripping multi-book mystery series, the sheer scale of the project can easily overwhelm even the most disciplined writers.

How do you keep your plot straight across three, five, or ten books? How do you keep readers hooked from the final page of Book 1 without resorting to cheap tricks?

As a copywriter and content strategist, I look at book series through the dual lens of creative storytelling and audience retention. Just like a successful content marketing funnel, a great book series needs structural integrity, consistent branding (or tone), and a compelling journey that keeps the “consumer” coming back for more.

Here are some simple, actionable guidelines to help you plan and write a successful series of novels from conception to publication.


1. Define the Scope: Trilogy, Open-Ended, or Arc-Based?

Before you write a single word of Chapter 1, you need to know the architectural style of your series. Not all series are created equal. Broadly speaking, they fall into three categories:

  • The Finite Trilogy/Saga: Think The Lord of the Rings or The Hunger Games. There is one overarching plot, a clear beginning, middle, and end, and the series concludes when the main conflict is resolved.
  • The Episodic/Open-Ended Series: Think classic detective fiction like Sherlock Holmes or Lee Child’s Jack Reacher. The protagonist remains the same, but each book features a standalone mystery or adventure.
  • The Arc-Based Series: Think most modern urban fantasy or television shows. There is a “case of the week” or book-specific conflict, but a massive, overarching plot unfolds slowly in the background over multiple books.

Pro Tip: If this is your first series, start with a trilogy or a tight arc-based series. Open-ended series can easily suffer from “plot fatigue,” while trilogies force you to respect pacing and finality.

2. Establish the Core Promise (And Honour It)

Every genre has unwritten rules and reader expectations. If you are writing a romance series, the reader expects a happily-ever-after (HEA) or at least a happy-for-now (HFN). If you are writing a thriller, they expect high stakes and resolution.

When planning a series, define your Core Promise:

  • What emotional or psychological journey are you taking the reader on?
  • What makes this world and these characters unique?

Deliver a satisfying conclusion to each individual book while advancing the larger narrative promise across the series. If a reader finishes Book 1 and feels like nothing happened because it was “just setup” for Book 2, you’ve broken the contract of trust.

3. Map the Macro and the Micro (Outlining)

You can sometimes “pantser” (write by the seat of your pants) a standalone novel, but doing so for a series is a recipe for massive continuity errors, plot holes, and writer’s block.

You need a two-tier outlining strategy:

  • The Macro Outline (The Series Arc): Map out the major beats of the entire series before you start. Where does the protagonist start in Book 1? What is the midpoint of the entire series (usually in Book 2 of a trilogy)? How does it end in the final book? Knowing your destination prevents you from writing yourself into a corner.
  • The Micro Outline (The Individual Book): Once the macro arc is set, zoom in and outline the specific book you are currently writing. Ensure it has its own distinct three-act structure, rising action, climax, and resolution.

4. Design Characters with Built-In Runway

Your protagonist needs room to grow. If your main character starts Book 1 as an all-knowing, all-powerful master of their universe, where do they go by Book 3? Nowhere.

  • Give them flaws: Flaws create internal conflict, which is just as important as external conflict.
  • Plan the character arc: Map out how the character’s worldview will shift from book to book.
  • Don’t neglect the supporting cast: Introduce recurring side characters who can carry subplots, offer contrasting viewpoints, or act as foils for your protagonist.

5. Build a Living, Breathing Bible (Continuity Tracking)

Nothing pulls a reader out of a story faster than a character having blue eyes in Book 1 and brown eyes in Book 3, or a magical rule changing on a whim.

Create a Series Bible—a digital document (using tools like Notion, Scrivener, or even a simple Google Doc) where you track:

  • Character Profiles: Names, physical descriptions, quirks, key relationships, and character arcs.
  • World-Building Rules: Geography, history, magic systems, technology, or societal rules.
  • The Timeline: A chronological master-list of when events happen in your universe.

Update this bible religiously as you write. Future-you will thank present-you.

6. Balance Cliffhangers and Resolution

One of the trickiest parts of writing a series is figuring out how to end each individual book.

  • Avoid the “Abrupt Stop”: Do not simply cut the story off mid-sentence on page 300 and call it a cliffhanger. That frustrates readers.
  • Resolve the Main Conflict of the Book: The immediate threat of this specific novel must be dealt with. The villain of Book 1 should be defeated (or the immediate mystery solved).
  • Introduce the Next Catalyst: Once the dust settles, introduce a new revelation, a twist, or a threat that points directly toward Book 2. The reader should feel a sense of closure plus a massive spike of curiosity about what happens next.

7. Consider Your Release Strategy (For Indie and Hybrid Authors)

If you are self-publishing or working with independent presses, your release strategy matters immensely for series success.

Unlike traditional publishing, where books often come out years apart, modern readers consume content rapidly.

  • Write ahead: Ideally, write the first two or three books (or even the whole series) before publishing the first one.
  • Rapid release: Launching books close together (e.g., 1–3 months apart) allows you to capture algorithmic momentum, keep advertising profitable, and hook readers who hate waiting for sequels.

Final Thoughts: Consistency is King

Writing a series of novels is a marathon, not a sprint. The secret ingredient isn’t raw talent—it’s consistency. By setting clear structural goals, keeping meticulous notes in your series bible, and respecting the pacing of both individual books and the overarching narrative, you’ll build a cohesive, immersive world that readers won’t want to leave.

Now, open up that blank document, map out your macro-arc, and start writing the first chapter of your multi-book masterpiece!


Are you planning a book series right now? What genre are you tackling, and what’s your biggest challenge? Let’s chat in the comments below!

…

365 Days of writing, 2026 – Beyond the second novel

The ultimate blueprint

…

The Ultimate Blueprint: Simple Guidelines for Planning and Writing a Series of Novels

Stepping into the world of novel series writing is both exhilarating and terrifying. Whether you are dreaming of an epic fantasy saga like Harry Potter, a sprawling space opera, or a gripping multi-book mystery series, the sheer scale of the project can easily overwhelm even the most disciplined writers.

How do you keep your plot straight across three, five, or ten books? How do you keep readers hooked from the final page of Book 1 without resorting to cheap tricks?

As a copywriter and content strategist, I look at book series through the dual lens of creative storytelling and audience retention. Just like a successful content marketing funnel, a great book series needs structural integrity, consistent branding (or tone), and a compelling journey that keeps the “consumer” coming back for more.

Here are some simple, actionable guidelines to help you plan and write a successful series of novels from conception to publication.


1. Define the Scope: Trilogy, Open-Ended, or Arc-Based?

Before you write a single word of Chapter 1, you need to know the architectural style of your series. Not all series are created equal. Broadly speaking, they fall into three categories:

  • The Finite Trilogy/Saga: Think The Lord of the Rings or The Hunger Games. There is one overarching plot, a clear beginning, middle, and end, and the series concludes when the main conflict is resolved.
  • The Episodic/Open-Ended Series: Think classic detective fiction like Sherlock Holmes or Lee Child’s Jack Reacher. The protagonist remains the same, but each book features a standalone mystery or adventure.
  • The Arc-Based Series: Think most modern urban fantasy or television shows. There is a “case of the week” or book-specific conflict, but a massive, overarching plot unfolds slowly in the background over multiple books.

Pro Tip: If this is your first series, start with a trilogy or a tight arc-based series. Open-ended series can easily suffer from “plot fatigue,” while trilogies force you to respect pacing and finality.

2. Establish the Core Promise (And Honour It)

Every genre has unwritten rules and reader expectations. If you are writing a romance series, the reader expects a happily-ever-after (HEA) or at least a happy-for-now (HFN). If you are writing a thriller, they expect high stakes and resolution.

When planning a series, define your Core Promise:

  • What emotional or psychological journey are you taking the reader on?
  • What makes this world and these characters unique?

Deliver a satisfying conclusion to each individual book while advancing the larger narrative promise across the series. If a reader finishes Book 1 and feels like nothing happened because it was “just setup” for Book 2, you’ve broken the contract of trust.

3. Map the Macro and the Micro (Outlining)

You can sometimes “pantser” (write by the seat of your pants) a standalone novel, but doing so for a series is a recipe for massive continuity errors, plot holes, and writer’s block.

You need a two-tier outlining strategy:

  • The Macro Outline (The Series Arc): Map out the major beats of the entire series before you start. Where does the protagonist start in Book 1? What is the midpoint of the entire series (usually in Book 2 of a trilogy)? How does it end in the final book? Knowing your destination prevents you from writing yourself into a corner.
  • The Micro Outline (The Individual Book): Once the macro arc is set, zoom in and outline the specific book you are currently writing. Ensure it has its own distinct three-act structure, rising action, climax, and resolution.

4. Design Characters with Built-In Runway

Your protagonist needs room to grow. If your main character starts Book 1 as an all-knowing, all-powerful master of their universe, where do they go by Book 3? Nowhere.

  • Give them flaws: Flaws create internal conflict, which is just as important as external conflict.
  • Plan the character arc: Map out how the character’s worldview will shift from book to book.
  • Don’t neglect the supporting cast: Introduce recurring side characters who can carry subplots, offer contrasting viewpoints, or act as foils for your protagonist.

5. Build a Living, Breathing Bible (Continuity Tracking)

Nothing pulls a reader out of a story faster than a character having blue eyes in Book 1 and brown eyes in Book 3, or a magical rule changing on a whim.

Create a Series Bible—a digital document (using tools like Notion, Scrivener, or even a simple Google Doc) where you track:

  • Character Profiles: Names, physical descriptions, quirks, key relationships, and character arcs.
  • World-Building Rules: Geography, history, magic systems, technology, or societal rules.
  • The Timeline: A chronological master-list of when events happen in your universe.

Update this bible religiously as you write. Future-you will thank present-you.

6. Balance Cliffhangers and Resolution

One of the trickiest parts of writing a series is figuring out how to end each individual book.

  • Avoid the “Abrupt Stop”: Do not simply cut the story off mid-sentence on page 300 and call it a cliffhanger. That frustrates readers.
  • Resolve the Main Conflict of the Book: The immediate threat of this specific novel must be dealt with. The villain of Book 1 should be defeated (or the immediate mystery solved).
  • Introduce the Next Catalyst: Once the dust settles, introduce a new revelation, a twist, or a threat that points directly toward Book 2. The reader should feel a sense of closure plus a massive spike of curiosity about what happens next.

7. Consider Your Release Strategy (For Indie and Hybrid Authors)

If you are self-publishing or working with independent presses, your release strategy matters immensely for series success.

Unlike traditional publishing, where books often come out years apart, modern readers consume content rapidly.

  • Write ahead: Ideally, write the first two or three books (or even the whole series) before publishing the first one.
  • Rapid release: Launching books close together (e.g., 1–3 months apart) allows you to capture algorithmic momentum, keep advertising profitable, and hook readers who hate waiting for sequels.

Final Thoughts: Consistency is King

Writing a series of novels is a marathon, not a sprint. The secret ingredient isn’t raw talent—it’s consistency. By setting clear structural goals, keeping meticulous notes in your series bible, and respecting the pacing of both individual books and the overarching narrative, you’ll build a cohesive, immersive world that readers won’t want to leave.

Now, open up that blank document, map out your macro-arc, and start writing the first chapter of your multi-book masterpiece!


Are you planning a book series right now? What genre are you tackling, and what’s your biggest challenge? Let’s chat in the comments below!

…

An excerpt from “Mistaken Identity” – a work in progress

The odds of any one of us having a doppelganger are quite high. Whether or not you got to meet them or be confronted by them was significantly lower. Except, of course, unless you are a celebrity.

It was a phenomenon remarkable only for the fact that, at times, certain high-profile people, notorious or not, had doubles if only to put off enemies or the general public. Sometimes we see people in the street who look like someone we knew and make the mistake of approaching them like a long-lost friend, only to discover an embarrassed individual desperately trying to get away from what they perceive as a stalker, or worse.

And then sometimes it is a picture that looms up on a TV screen, an almost exact likeness of you. At first, you are fascinated, and then, according to the circumstances and narrative that is attached to that picture, either flattered or horrified.

For me, one turned to the other when I saw an almost likeness of me flash up on the screen when I turned the TV on in my room. What looked to be my photo, with only minor differences, was in the corner of the screen, the newsreader speaking in rapid Italian, so fast I could only translate every second or third word.

But the one word I did recognise was murder. The photo of the man on the screen was the subject of an extensive manhunt. The crime, the murder of a woman in the very same hotel I was staying, and it was being played out live several floors above me. The gist of the story, the woman had been seen with and staying with the man who was my double, and, less than an hour ago, the body had been discovered by a chambermaid.

The killer, the announcer said, was believed to be still in the hotel because the woman had died shortly before she had been discovered.

I watched, at first fascinated by what I was seeing. I guess I should have been horrified, but at that moment it didn’t register that I might be mistaken for that man.

Not until another five minutes had passed, and I was watching the police in full riot gear, with a camera crew following behind, coming up a passage towards a room. Live action of the arrest of the suspected killer, the breathless commentator said.

Then, suddenly, there was a pounding on the door. On the TV screen, plain to see, was the number of my room. I looked through the peephole and saw an army of police officers. It didn’t take much to realise what had happened. The hotel staff identified me as the man in the photograph on the TV and called the police.

Horrified wasn’t what I was feeling right then.

It was fear.

My last memory was the door crashing open, the wood splintering, and men rushing into the room, screaming at me, waving guns, and when I put my hands up to defend myself, I heard a gunshot.

And in one very confused and probably near-death experience, I thought I saw my mother and thought what was she doing in Rome?

…

I was the archetypal nobody.

I lived in a small flat, I drove a nondescript car, had an average job in a low-profile travel agency, was single, and currently not involved in a relationship, had no children, and, according to my workmates, no life.

They were wrong. I was one of those people who preferred their own company; I had a cat, and travelled whenever I could. And I did have a ‘thing’ for Rosalie, one of the reasons why I stayed at the travel agency. I didn’t expect anything to come of it, but one could always hope.

I was both pleased and excited to be going to the conference. It was my first, and the glimpse I had seen of it had whetted my appetite for more information about the nuances of my profession.

Some would say that a travel agent wasn’t much of a job, but to me, it was every bit as demanding as being an accountant or a lawyer. You were providing a customer with a service, and arguably, more people needed a travel agent than a lawyer. At least that was what I told myself as I watched more and more people start using the internet, and our relevance slowly dissipating.

This conference was about countering that trend.

The trip over had been uneventful. I was met at the airport and taken to the hotel where the conference was being held with several other delegates who had arrived on the same plane. I had mingled with several other delegates at the pre-conference get-together, including one whose name was Maryanne.

She was an unusual young woman, not the sort that I usually met, because she was the one who was usually surrounded by all the boys, the life of the party. In normal circumstances, I would not have introduced myself to her, but she had approached me. Why did I think that may have been significant? All of this ran through my mind, culminating in the last event on the highlight reel, the door bursting open, men rushing into my room, and then one of the policemen opened fire.

I replayed that last scene again, trying to see the face of my assailant, but it was just a sea of men in battle dress, bulletproof vests and helmets, accompanied by screaming and yelling, some of which I identified as “Get on the floor”.

Then came the shot.

Why ask me to get on the floor if all they were going to do was shoot me? I was putting my hands up at the time, in surrender, not reaching for a weapon.

Then I saw the face again, hovering in the background like a ghost. My mother. Only the hair was different, and her clothes, and then the image was going, perhaps a figment of my imagination brought on by pain-killing drugs. I tried to imagine the scene again, but this time it played out without the image of my mother.

I opened my eyes and took stock of my surroundings. What I felt in that exact moment couldn’t be described. I should most likely be dead, the result of a gunshot wound. I guess I should be thankful the shooter hadn’t aimed at anything vital, but that was the only item on the plus side.

I was in a hospital room with a policeman by the door. He was reading a newspaper and sitting uncomfortably on a small chair. He gave me a quick glance when he heard me move slightly, but didn’t acknowledge me with either a nod or a greeting, just went back to the paper.

If I still had a police guard, then I would still be considered a suspect. What was interesting was that I was not handcuffed to the bed. Perhaps that only happened in TV shows. Or maybe they knew I couldn’t run because my injuries were too serious. Or the guard would shoot me long before my feet hit the floor. I knew the police well enough now to know they would shoot first and ask questions later.

On the physical side, I had a large bandage over the top left corner of my chest, extending over my shoulder. A little poking and prodding determined the bullet had hit somewhere between the top of my rib cage and my shoulder. Nothing vital there, but my arm might be somewhat useless for a while, depending on what the bullet hit on the way in or through.

It didn’t feel like there were any broken or damaged bones.

That was the good news.

On the other side of the ledger, my mental state, there was only one word that could describe it. Terrified. I was looking at a murder charge and jail time, a lot of it. Murder usually had a long time in jail attached to it.

Whatever had happened, I didn’t do it. I know I didn’t do it, but I had to try to explain this to people who had already made up their minds. I searched my mind for evidence. It was there, but in the confused state brought on by the medication, all I could think about was jail, and the sort of company I was going to have.

I think death would have been preferable.

…

Half an hour later, maybe longer, I was drifting in and out of consciousness. A nurse, or what I thought was a nurse, came into the room. The guard stood, checked her ID card, and then stood by the door.

She came over and stood beside the bed. “How are you?” she asked, first in Italian, and when I pretended I didn’t understand, she asked the same question in accented English.

“Alive, I guess,” I said. “No one has come and told me what my condition is yet. You are my first visitor. Can you tell me?”

“Of course. You are very lucky to be alive. You will be fine and make a full recovery. The doctors here are excellent at their work.”

“What happens now?”

“I check you, and then you have another visitor. He is from the British Embassy, I think. But he will have to wait until I have finished my examination.”

I realised then she was a doctor, not a nurse.

…

My second visitor was a man, dressed in a suit, the sort of which I associated with the British Civil Service.  He was not very old, which told me he was probably a recent graduate on his first posting, the junior officer who drew the short straw.

The guard checked his ID but again did not leave the room, sitting back down and going back to his newspaper.

My visitor introduced himself as Alex Jordan from the British Embassy in Rome, and he had been asked by the Ambassador to sort out what he labelled a tricky mess.

For starters, it was good to see that someone cared about what happened to me.  But, equally, I knew the mantra, get into trouble overseas, and there is not much we can do to help you.  So, after that lengthy introduction, I had to wonder why he was here.

I said, “They think I am an international criminal by the name of Jacob Westerbury, whose picture looks just like me, and apparently, for them, it is an open and shut case.”  I could still hear the fragments of the yelling as the police burst through the door, at the same time telling me to get on the floor with my hands over my head.

“It’s not.  They know they’ve got the wrong man, which is why I’m here.  There is the issue of what had been described as excessive force, and the fact that you were shot had made it an all-around embarrassment for them.”

“Then why are you here?  Shouldn’t they be here apologising?”

“That is why you have another visitor.  I only took precedence because I insisted on speaking with you first.  I have come, basically, to ask you for a favour.  This situation has afforded us an opportunity.  We would like you to sign the official document, which basically indemnifies them against any legal proceedings.”

Curious.  What sort of opportunity was he talking about?  Was this a matter that could get difficult and I could be charged by the Italian Government, even if I wasn’t guilty, or was it one of those hush-hush type deals, you do this for us, we’ll help you out with that?  “What sort of opportunity?”

“We want to get our hands on Jacob Westerbury as much as they do.  They’ve made a mistake, and we’d like to use that to get custody of him if or when he is arrested in this country.  I’m sure you would also like this man brought into custody as soon as possible, so you will stop being confused with him.  I can only imagine what it was like to be arrested in the manner you were.  And I would not blame you if you wanted to get some compensation for what they’ve done.  But.  There are bigger issues in play here, and you would be doing this for your country.”

I wondered what would happen if I didn’t agree to his proposal.  I had to ask, “What if I don’t?”

His expression didn’t change.  “I’m sure you are a sensible man, Mr Pargeter, who is more than willing to help his country whenever he can.  They have agreed to take care of all your hospital expenses, refund the cost of the Conference, and travel.  I’m sure I could also get them to pay for a few days at Capri or Sorrento, if you like, before you go home.  What do you say?”

There was only one thing I could say.  Wasn’t it treason if you went against your country’s wishes?

“I’m not an unreasonable man, Alex.  Go do your deal, and I’ll sign the papers.”

“Good man.”

…

After Alex left, the doctor came back to announce the arrival of a woman, who had announced herself as the publicity officer from the Italian police. When she came into the room, she was not dressed in a uniform.

The doctor left after giving a brief report to the civilian at the door. I understood the gist of it: “The patient has recovered excellently, and the wounds are healing as expected. There is no cause for concern.”

That was a relief.

While the doctor was speaking to the civilian, I speculated on who she might be. She was young, not more than thirty, conservatively dressed, so an official of some kind, but not necessarily with the police. Did they have prosecutors? I was unfamiliar with the Italian legal system.

She had long, wavy black hair and the sort of sultry looks of an Italian movie star, and her presence made me more curious than fearful, though I couldn’t say why.

The woman then spoke to the guard, and he reluctantly got up and left the room, closing the door behind him. She checked the door and then came back towards me, standing at the end of the bed. Now alone, she said, “A few questions before we begin.” Her English was only slightly accented. “Your name is Jack Pargeter?”

I nodded. “Yes.”

“You are in Rome to attend the Travel Agents Conference at the Hilton Hotel?”

“Yes.”

“You attended a preconference introduction on the evening of the 25th, after arriving from London at approximately 4:25 pm.”

“About that time, yes. I know it was about five when the bus came to collect me, and several others, to take us to the hotel.”

She smiled. It was then that I noticed she was reading from a small notepad.

“It was ten past five to be precise. The driver had been held up in traffic. We have several witnesses who saw you on the plane, on the bus, at the hotel, and with the aid of closed-circuit TV, we have established you are not the criminal Jacob Westerbury.”

She put her notebook back in her bag and then said, “My name is Vicenza Andretti, and I am with the prosecutor’s office. I am here to formally apologise for the situation that can only be described as a case of mistaken identity. I assure you, it is not the habit of our police officers to shoot people unless they have a very strong reason for doing so. I understand that in the confusion of the arrest, one of our officers accidentally discharged his weapon. We are undergoing a very thorough investigation into the circumstances of this event.”

I was not sure why, but between the time I had spoken to the embassy official and now, something about letting them off so easily was bugging me. I could see why they had sent her. It would be difficult to be angry or annoyed with her.

But I was annoyed.

“Do you often send a whole squad of trigger-happy riot police to arrest a single man?” It came out harsher than I intended.

“My men believed they were dealing with a dangerous criminal.”

“Do I look like a dangerous criminal?” And then I realised if it was mistaken identity, the answer would be yes.

She saw the look on my face and said quietly, “I think you know the answer to that question, Mr Pargeter.”

“Well, it was overkill.”

“As I said, we are very sorry for the circumstances you now find yourself in. You must understand that we honestly believed we were dealing with an armed and dangerous murderer, and we were acting within our mandate. My department will cover your medical expenses and any other amounts for the inconvenience this has caused you. I believe you were attending a conference at your hotel. I am very sorry, but given the medical circumstances you have, you will have to remain here for a few more days.”

“I guess, then, I should thank you for not killing me.”

Her expression told me that was not the best thing I could have said in the circumstances.

“I mean, I should thank you for the hospital and the care. But a question or two of my own. May I?”

She nodded.

“Did you catch this Jacob Westerbury character?”

“No. In the confusion created by your arrest, he escaped. Once we realised we had made a mistake and reviewed the closed-circuit TV, we tracked him leaving by a rear exit.”

“Are you sure it was one of your men who shot me?”

I watched as her expression changed to one of surprise.

“You don’t think it was one of my men?”

“Oddly enough, no. But don’t ask me why.”

“It is very interesting that you should say that, because in our initial investigation, it appeared none of our officers’ weapons had been discharged. A forensic investigation into the bullet tells us it was one that is used in our weapons, but…”

I could see their dilemma.

“Have you any enemies that would want to shoot you, Mr Pargeter?”

That was absurd because I had no enemies, at least none that I knew of, much less anyone who would want me dead.

“Not that I’m aware of.”

“Then it is strange, and will perhaps remain a mystery. I will let you know if anything more is revealed in our investigation.”

She took an envelope out of her briefcase and opened it, pulling out several sheets of paper.

I knew what it was. A verbal apology was one thing, but a signed waiver would cover them legally. They had sent a pretty girl to charm me. Perhaps using anyone else would not have worked. There was potential for a huge litigation payout here, and someone more ruthless would jump at the chance of making a few million out of the Italian Government.

“We need a signature on this document,” she said.

“Absolving you of any wrongdoing?”

“I have apologised. We will take whatever measures are required for your comfort after this event. We are accepting responsibility for our actions and are being reasonable.”

They were. I took the pen from her and signed the documents.

“You couldn’t add dinner with you on that list of benefits?” No harm in asking.

“I am unfortunately unavailable.”

I smiled. “It wasn’t a request for a date, just dinner. You can tell me about Rome, as only a resident can. Please.”

She looked me up and down, searching for the ulterior motive. When she couldn’t find one, she said, “We shall see once the hospital discharges you in a few days.”

“Then I’ll pencil you in?”

She looked at me quizzically. “What is this pencil me in?”

“It’s an English colloquialism. It means maybe. As when you write something in pencil, it is easy to erase it.”

A momentary frown, then recognition and a smile. “I shall remember that. Thank you for your time and cooperation, Mr Pargeter. Good morning.”

…

© Charles Heath 2015-2021