Day 78 – Writers are outlaws
…
“I Became a Writer Because Writers Were Outlaws.”
Why the Rebel‑Heart Still Drives Literature – and Why It Matters Today
“I became a writer because writers were outlaws.” – Paul Theroux
When Paul Theroux drops this line in an interview, it feels like a secret handshake among anyone who has ever felt more at home in the margins than in the mainstream. It’s a declaration of allegiance to a lineage of “outlaw” writers—people who have deliberately stepped outside the accepted rules of language, politics, and morality to expose hidden truths, provoke discomfort, and, above all, keep the imagination untamed.
In this post, we’ll unpack what Theroux meant, trace the outlaw tradition from ancient epics to the digital age, and ask: Why does the rebel spirit of the writer still matter in a world that seems both more censored and more free than ever before?
1. The Outlaw Archetype: From Homer to the Underground Press
| Era | “Outlaw” Writer | What Made Them a Rebel |
|---|---|---|
| Ancient Greece | Homer (if we accept the legendary status) | Oral poets who travelled, challenging the city‑state’s rigid mythic canon. |
| Renaissance | Giordano Brunelleschi’s “Il Principe” (although a political treatise, it was a seditious “how‑to” for power) | Directly confronted the Church’s monopoly on moral authority. |
| 19th c. | Charles Dickens (early serials) | Exposed the underbelly of industrial London while keeping a popular voice. |
| Early 20th c. | James Joyce – Ulysses | Banned in the U.S. for “obscenity,” he turned narrative form itself into a crime. |
| Mid‑20c. | Jack Kerouac – On the Road | Celebrated a nomadic, drug‑tinged lifestyle that “damaged” the post‑war American ideal. |
| Late‑c. | Mikhail Bulgakov – The Master & Margarita | Wrote magical realism under Stalin’s watchful eye; the manuscript survived only because he hid it. |
| 1990s‑2000s | William S. Burroughs – Naked Lunch | Banned, confiscated, and deemed “pornographic”; he embraced the “read‑it‑if‑you‑dare” culture. |
| Digital Age | Anonymous/Online Activist Writers (e.g., WikiLeaks, whistle‑blowers) | Disseminate classified information, turning the act of publishing into a legal risk. |
The pattern is clear: outlaw writers are those who refuse to let the powers that be dictate what stories can be told, how they can be told, or who is allowed to hear them. They often operate at the intersection of art and activism, using narrative as a weapon.
2. Why Did Theroux Call Writers Outlaws?
Theroux’s own career is a perfect case study:
- Travel as Subversion – He turned the travel memoir into a critique of colonialism, capitalism, and tourism. The Great Railway Bazaar (1975) does not simply catalogue stations; it reveals the hidden economies of displacement and the veneer of “exotic” hospitality.
- Political Confrontation – In The Old Patagonian Express and later works, Theroux went into places under authoritarian regimes (Chile under Pinochet, Soviet‑occupied Afghanistan) and wrote about what the local press dared not say.
- Narrative Style – He stripped away the sentimental travelogue, opting for a dry, observational prose that makes the reader feel the unease of being a foreigner. That “detached” voice is a form of rebellion against the romanticised wanderer myth.
When Theroux says, “I became a writer because writers were outlaws,” he’s acknowledging that the act of choosing the writer’s path is itself an act of rebellion—a deliberate sidestepping of conventional careers, societal expectations, and, often, personal safety.
3. The Mechanics of Literary Outlawry
What actually makes a writer an outlaw? It isn’t merely the content, but the method and the consequence.
| Element | How It Turns a Writer Into an Outlaw |
|---|---|
| Form‑Breaking | Experimental structures (stream‑of‑consciousness, non‑linear narratives) that disregard “commercial” readability. |
| Forbidden Topics | Sex, drug use, political dissent, religion—subjects censored by governments or cultural gatekeepers. |
| Subversive Language | Slang, profanity, or invented dialects that erode the hegemony of “standard” language. |
| Risk of Reprisal | Arrest, exile, bans, or even death. The stakes give the work a visceral urgency. |
| Community Building | Underground presses, samizdat, zines, and now encrypted digital platforms that bypass mainstream distribution. |
These mechanisms overlap. James Joyce’s Ulysses combined form‑breaking (the famous “stream of consciousness”) with taboo topics (sexuality, bodily functions). The novel’s ban in the United States turned it into a literal criminal case (the 1933 United States v. One Book Called Ulysses trial). The legal battle itself amplified the book’s status as a cultural outlaw.
4. Outlaw Writers in the Digital Era: New Frontiers, Same Spirit
You might think the internet has democratized publishing, erasing the “outlaw” label. Yet digital platforms have spawned a fresh breed of literary rebels:
- Encrypted Journals – Writers in authoritarian states now post on Tor sites, using code words and self‑censorship to dodge surveillance.
- Crowd‑Funded Zines – Platforms like Kickstarter let dissident poets launch limited‑run anthologies without a publisher’s gatekeeping.
- AI‑Generated Satire – Projects that manipulate deep‑fake text to satirise political figures—legal grey areas that test the limits of free speech.
- Social‑Media Manifestos – Threads that blur the line between short‑form poetry and protest; a 280‑character haiku can trigger a wave of real‑world action.
The outlaw’s toolbox has simply been upgraded. The risk—whether state censorship, doxxing, or platform bans—remains the same, but the reach is now global. A single tweet can ignite a movement in three continents the same way a pamphlet did in 1917.
5. Why We Still Need Literary Outlaws
- Guardians of the Uncomfortable Truth
History remembers the outlaw for exposing what the majority prefers to ignore. From The Gulag Archipelago (Solzhenitsyn) to the modern whistle‑blower blogs, these works force societies to confront systemic violence. - Catalysts for Language Evolution
When writers defy linguistic norms, they expand the expressive capacity of language itself. Think of how Ulysses introduced new verb forms that later entered everyday English. - Counter‑Power to Market Homogenization
The publishing industry, driven by profit, often pushes formulaic best‑sellers. Outlaw writers serve as antidotes, reminding us that art can be messy, ambiguous, and even unprofitable. - Inspiration for Civic Engagement
A reader who discovers that a novelist risked imprisonment for a paragraph about police brutality is more likely to question authority and perhaps join a protest.
6. The Moral Ambiguity of “Outlaw” Status
Being an outlaw is not automatically virtuous. Some writers have used the rebel label to glorify violence, propagate hate, or romanticise criminality (e.g., extremist propaganda disguised as “literature”). The modern reader must therefore ask:
Who decides which outlaw narrative serves the public good?
The answer, paradoxically, often comes from collective critical discourse—reviews, academic analysis, and, increasingly, community moderation on digital platforms. The outlaw’s power lies not just in the act of publishing, but in the dialogue that follows.
7. How to Channel Your Inner Literary Outlaw
If Theroux’s quote resonates, you might be wondering how to embrace the outlaw spirit without getting locked up (unless you’re a spy novelist—then, go ahead). Here are practical steps:
- Read Widely, Then Dig Deeper – Study classic outlaw writers. Note the techniques they used to circumvent censorship.
- Experiment with Form – Try a story told entirely through footnotes, or a poem that uses only emojis.
- Choose a Taboo Topic – Write about something you suspect your family or workplace avoids discussing.
- Publish Outside the Box – Submit to literary journals that focus on experimental or political work, or use a self‑publishing platform with a Creative Commons license.
- Build a Community – Join or start a writing circle that values risk‑taking. Online forums like r/experimentalwriting can be a good incubator.
- Accept Consequences – Be prepared for criticism, rejection, or even legal pushback. The outlaw’s path is rarely comfortable.
8. Closing Thoughts: The Outlaw as a Mirror
Paul Theroux’s simple confession—“I became a writer because writers were outlaws”—does more than romanticise rebellion. It positions the writer as a mirror that reflects society’s cracks, a torch that lights hidden corridors, and a weapon that can dismantle oppressive narratives.
In a time when algorithms decide what we read, when governments label “fake news” as a crime, and when the very act of questioning can trigger deplatforming, the outlaw writer becomes even more essential. Not every writer will go to jail, but every writer can choose a moment to step outside the comfortable script, to ask the question that “outlaws” have always asked:
“What if we told a different story?”
If that question makes you a little uneasy, you might just be on the right track. And that, dear reader, is the true legacy of the literary outlaw.
—
If you enjoyed this exploration, let me know in the comments which outlaw writer has most inspired you, and feel free to share your own “outlaw” experiment. The rebellion, after all, thrives on conversation.
Thrills, Spills, and just a dash of Romance 