Perhaps a question we should be asking is whether there are still any laws that cover libel or slander. I often mistake one for the other, whether oral or written.
Shouldn’t someone wheel out the legal cart during elections, and put the brakes on some of the stuff being said about candidates?
And after it’s said, the media takes great joy in repeating the remarks, in as large a typeface as they can, perhaps proclaiming the Editor’s bias towards one party or the other.
I’m guessing that journalism standards have dropped to such a low point that even I could qualify to write for a news outlet, and that’s saying something.
My problem, I suspect, is that I have integrity, so I’d be the last person they’d hire.
Equally, I’m guessing, it’s these libellous and slanderous statements that make the best headlines, and, as they say in the circulation department, the trashier it is, the more papers they sell, or whatever it is that brings in revenue.
They’ll tell you that people don’t want the truth. The truth is too depressing, so they tend not to look under the covers and journalists are more interested in writing about whatever is contentious. The Police are a likely target for one side. Protesters (sorry, so-called communist agitators) is a target for the other.
Whatever happened to ‘no one will get left behind’?
It seemed to me to be a very good slogan at the time of the 2016 election. I bet a lot of people thought, hey, it’s about time we all got on the train, not just some of us.
What happened? Did the train leave, and we all failed to get to the station on time?
But you know what’s worst of all – it’s only going to get worse.
70 odd days to go and we are no doubt going to find out every horrible detail about all of the candidates that are up for election.
It’s not about the good they might do, or the policies the country’s crying out for, or the fact they might be decent, honest, family people. Forget that, that doesn’t sell papers, it’s the dirty laundry we want to hear about, about them, their family, anyone who can be trashed in a public forum without any filter.
Is it possible not to cast a vote, simply because you hate the lot of them?
Is there a middle line, an independent, someone who has no axe to grind, someone who doesn’t spew hate with every word they utter?
Or would it perhaps a better idea is to vote for ‘none of the above’, even if you have to write that on the ballot yourself and tick that box.
‘None of the above”…
Now, where have I heard that before?